Brazil, Trump up the ante in row over Bolsonaro coup trial
Leftist Brazilian counterpart Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva threatened to reciprocate.
Trump has strongly criticized the prosecution of right-wing ally Bolsonaro, who is on trial for allegedly plotting to cling on to power after losing 2022 elections to Lula.
Brasilia on Wednesday summoned Washington's top envoy to the country to explain an embassy statement describing Bolsonaro as a victim of "political persecution" -- echoing Trump's claims of a "witch hunt" against the 70-year-old Brazilian firebrand.
Trump then announced he would slap a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian imports starting August 1, citing "Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections" and warning of escalation if the country retaliates.
In a letter addressed to Lula, Trump criticized the treatment of Bolsonaro as an "international disgrace" and said the trial "should not be taking place."
He added Washington would launch an investigation into Brazil's trade practices.
While Trump has been issuing letters to trading partners -- focusing on those his country runs a deficit with -- Brazil had until now not been among those threatened with higher duties come August 1.
The South American powerhouse is the second-largest exporter of steel to the United States after Canada, shipping four million tons of the metal in 2024.
The new 50 percent tariff was independent of sector-specific levies, with the US recently doubling duties on steel and aluminum imports to 50 percent.
Lula wrote on X that "any unilateral tariff increases will be addressed in light of the Brazilian Law of Economic Reciprocity."
Trade between the two countries reached $41.7 billion between January and June, with $20 billion for exports from Brazil and $21.7 billion for US products, according to Brazilian government data.
'LEAVE BOLSONARO ALONE'
On Monday, Trump angered Lula by urging Brazilian authorities to "LEAVE BOLSONARO ALONE," in a post on social media.
"They have done nothing but come after him, day after day, night after night, month after month, year after year!" the US president wrote.
Lula, who narrowly beat Bolsonaro in a divisive election in 2022, hit back at Trump's "interference," insisting that "no one is above the law."
Bolsonaro denies he was involved in an attempt to wrest power back from Lula as part of an alleged coup plot that prosecutors say failed only for a lack of military backing.
After the plot fizzled, rioting supporters known as "Bolsonaristas" raided government buildings in 2023 as they urged the military to oust Lula. Bolsonaro was abroad at the time.
The case against Bolsonaro carries echoes of Trump's prosecution over the January 6, 2021 attacks by his supporters on the US Capitol to try and reverse his election loss.
Trump pleaded not guilty, and the case was abandoned when he was reelected president.
The cases have drawn the Trump and Bolsonaro families together, with the Brazilian ex-leader's sons lobbying for US sanctions against one of the Supreme Court judges sitting on the ex-president's trial.
In his post Monday, Trump suggested Bolsonaro was the favorite in presidential elections next year, despite him being banned from running for spreading disinformation about Brazil's voting system.
Bolsonaro thanked Trump for his defense of "peace, justice and liberty" in a social media post.
On Wednesday, the US embassy in Brasilia issued a statement to "reinforce" Trump's support for the embattled former army captain, who risks a 40-year prison sentence.
"Jair Bolsonaro and his family have been strong partners of the United States," read the note.
"The political persecution against him, his family, and his followers is shameful and disrespects Brazil's democratic traditions."
Members of the BRICS grouping, meeting in Brazil under host Lula this week, criticized Trump's imposition of import tariffs and his bombing of Iran.
This drew the US president's ire and a threat of 10 percent additional tariffs on each BRICS-aligned country.
Lula insisted BRICS members were sovereign and did not want an 'emperor.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Pentagon official at center of weapons pause on Ukraine wants US to focus on China
WASHINGTON : Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's top policy official, wants to refocus the U.S. military on countering China. That has put him at the center of the Trump administration's abrupt moves on providing weapons to Ukraine. It was Colby, a 45-year-old grandson of a former Central Intelligence Agency director, who wrote a memo to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in early June outlining how Ukraine's requests for U.S. weapons could further stretch already depleted Pentagon stockpiles. The memo didn't have a recommendation and was described by a defense official as a tool for assessing how arms deliveries would affect U.S. stockpiles. But some officials in the administration and in Congress say it figured in the Pentagon's decision to suspend some arms shipments to Kyiv, a move President Trump later reversed. The incident exemplifies Colby's push to make good on years of U.S. vows to boost its military position in the Western Pacific, his supporters say. But it also highlights the contrary pressures on an administration that, in its first months in office, has already launched major military operations against Iran and the Houthis in the Middle East while continuing military deliveries to Ukraine. Colby 'has been thinking very deeply about how the United States can best defend itself in an era of constrained resources," said Dan Caldwell, a former adviser to Hegseth. 'A lot of policymakers have refused to accept that reality." Colby has turned down interview requests about his views on helping Ukraine and in urging U.S. partners in Asia and Europe to step up their defense efforts. But in a social-media message Saturday, he said that he would continue to press allies to boost their military spending, even if some 'might not welcome frank discussions." Some of those frank discussions have included pressing Japan and Australia to make clear what military steps they are prepared to take in the event of a Chinese attack on Taiwan, according to a person familiar with the exchanges. Colby's efforts have surprised some officials in the region because the U.S.'s longstanding policy of 'strategic ambiguity" has avoided an explicit statement about what actions Washington might take if Chinese forces moved against Taiwan, and even Trump hasn't spelled out what he would do. Colby's discussions were earlier reported by the Financial Times. In arguing for doubling down on China, Colby is known as a 'prioritizer" who favors limiting U.S. obligations outside Asia to free up resources to counter Beijing. In so doing, he has differentiated himself from 'restrainers" who have urged that the U.S. pull back from overseas commitments, as well as traditional Republican hawks. Though presidents from both parties, starting with Barack Obama, have called for focusing U.S. national security strategy on China, putting the idea into practice has proven difficult, partly due to new threats that have emerged outside Asia and partly due to the Pentagon's longstanding commitments in Europe and the Middle East. Colby's calls to de-emphasize demands on U.S. forces other than in Asia have left him out of step with some Republicans. 'For many years, GOP 'prioritizers' have argued that the United States should not strike Iran or aid Ukraine because it must husband its resources for a possible war with China," said Matthew Kroenig of the Atlantic Council, who was a national security adviser to the 2012 Mitt Romney and 2016 Marco Rubio presidential campaigns. 'President Trump, in contrast, believes 'America First' requires continued U.S. involvement in multiple regions of the world." When Trump nominated Colby to serve as undersecretary of defense for policy in December, the fissures among Republicans over national security came to the fore. Colby received a hearty endorsement at his March confirmation hearing from Vice President JD Vance, who has long been a skeptical voice on providing billions of dollars in weapons to Ukraine and has called Colby a friend. Colby was grilled by Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.) about his past statement that it was feasible to contain a nuclear-armed Iran. Colby amended his stance in that confirmation hearing, saying that Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons and that he would provide the president with military options to stop it from doing so. Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the only Republican to vote against Colby's confirmation, lambasted him for promoting policies that could lead to 'geostrategic self-harm." Colby has deep family connections to the foreign policy establishment through his grandfather, former CIA Director William Colby. 'Bridge," as he is known in Washington, attended school in Japan, where his father worked for an investment bank, before graduating from Harvard University. At Yale Law School he was a housemate of Jon Finer, the former deputy national security adviser to President Joe Biden. Even then, Colby's contrarian foreign policy priorities were evident: He was a rare Republican who opposed the war in Iraq. Colby has written that the 2003 Iraq war and the lengthy U.S. occupation was a 'historic error" that squandered vast resources. He argued in a 2012 article against striking Iran's nuclear facilities, saying it would provide Tehran 'every incentive to reboot the program with greater vigor." As a deputy assistant secretary of defense during Trump's first term, he played a major role in the drafting of the 2018 national defense strategy, which urged a shift from a focus on counterterrorism that the Pentagon adopted after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to countering China and Russia. Colby's role wasn't without turbulence. Trump's defense secretary at the time, retired Marine Gen. Jim Mattis, was frustrated with Colby's emphasis on defending Taiwan, participants recall. 'I think Bridge did a really good job in managing the strategy formulation process," said Frank Hoffman, a retired Marine colonel who was brought in by Mattis to help draft the strategy document. 'But in making Taiwan the hinge point of our military competition with China, he had a narrower focus than Secretary Mattis on what the strategy needed to do." Colby elaborated on his views in his 2021 book, 'The Strategy of Denial," in which he argued that the defense of Taiwan was vital because of its proximity to China, along with Japan and the Philippines, forming what Pentagon strategists refer to as the first island chain in the Western Pacific. His focus on China, he noted in the book, included arguing that Russia could be a 'potential collaborator" with the U.S. in an anti-Beijing coalition. And he warned against including Ukraine in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization because the country was 'highly exposed" to a Russia attack 'while offering no meaningful advantage to the alliance that is remotely comparable to the costs and risk that their defense would impose on it." But Colby's call for reprioritizing Pentagon strategy was tested after Russia invaded Ukraine the following year and turned to Beijing for help in expanding the Russian defense industry. Instead of dealing with China in isolation, Washington has faced the prospect of simultaneously deterring two geographically disparate adversaries that have been cooperating. Colby is playing a pivotal role in policy debate and the crafting of a new defense strategy that will set spending and force deployment goals for years to come. Some current and former officials who share Colby's goal of boosting American capabilities in the Pacific say he may be better at standing on principle than bringing allies along. Colby has irked Tokyo by urging that it commit to boosting military spending to 3.5% of its gross domestic product, they say. With policy disagreements over military spending and tariffs, Japan put off high-level talks with the U.S. that had been expected in July. A review Colby is conducting of a 2021 agreement—known as Aukus, under which Australia will get nuclear-powered attack submarines from the U.S. while contributing several billion dollars to the U.S. defense-industrial base—has concerned Australian officials. In an interview with Australian television last year, Colby said it would be 'crazy" for the U.S. to provide attack submarines to Australia unless the Pentagon can be assured it would have enough for itself, adding that the U.S. would be 'lucky" to get to the 2030s without a conflict with China. But it was the classified memo that preceded the pause in arms deliveries to Ukraine that especially spotlighted Colby's views. It tallied the numbers of weapons sought by Ukraine along with how many the U.S. has in its stocks for training and warfighting around the world. Trump later told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that he wasn't responsible for the pause in shipments that followed, which he has since lifted. Wess Mitchell, a former senior State Department official who once started a policy organization with Colby called the Marathon Initiative, said the Pentagon official's focus on making tough decisions to deter China is driven by concern that the U.S. is overstretched. 'Bridge has put his finger on the real problem and said 'Let's give priority to the main threat even if that means we have to accept trade-offs in the other regions,' " Mitchell said. 'People may disagree with his approach, but it is driven by a legitimate concern, which is we don't currently have the resources for a three-front war." Write to Michael R. Gordon at and Lara Seligman at
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
Mumbai man, 53, settled in US, asks Internet if he should return home
A 53-year-old man, originally from Mumbai and now settled in Texas, US, for over three decades, sparked debate online after he asked Reddit users if moving back home made sense at this stage in a now-viral post on Reddit, titled 'Mumbai Guy thinking of whether to come back from USA', the man said he had been raised in Bandra West but had spent the last 35 years in the US. advertisementNow, with ageing parents and a sense of disconnection from the city he once called home, he's unsure about what lies ahead. "Hi all, raised and schooled in Mumbai - Bandra W. 53, now and lived past 35 years in Texas. American wife, two kids aged 18 and 13. My brother and sister are also settled in the USA. My parents travel back and forth with their green cards, but they're getting old now," the post man shared that he had visited Mumbai recently after 13 years but only for two weeks. "Same old Mumbai but more congestion. Slightly better traffic in Bandra now thanks to the coastal road," he wrote. He revealed that his business had done well, netting close to $200,000 last year, and was considering returning to Mumbai once his younger child either graduated or got asked, 'Is it worth it to move completely or just buy a flat to visit for vacation? Parents are 80 and 75, and while I pray they live long, life happens. All my old friends and relatives have their own lives now. It's not the same Mumbai I left in 1990. Also, what would be the rental yield on a flat if I'm away for 2–3 years?'Take a look at his post here: Social media users didn't hold back. Several users, without even fully reading the post, were quick to advise against the move. "Don't do it. Mumbai is fine to visit, terrible to live in. I wouldn't trade Austin for Andheri," a user said, while another simply added, "Not reading your post. Just came to say no."One of the more thoughtful responses acknowledged the emotional pull behind the man's dilemma. "The comments here are tone-deaf. You're in your fifties, settled abroad, but dealing with elderly parents. That's not something most of these commenters understand yet. Consider temporarily moving to India. Let your family stay in the US. Be present for your parents in their final years—you'll never regret that.""Don't buy a flat. Get a flat on rent initially and test things out. Buy a flat once you've spent a year or so here. The liquidity in real estate is not good. The rental yield is also < 5 % usually. Also, since you're an NRI people may try to fleece you," one of the users said. advertisementWhile several users jumped to dismiss the idea, others urged the man to evaluate his options with empathy and practicality. Whether or not he chooses to return, his post resonated with those facing the complex reality of ageing parents, cultural disconnect, and perhaps a life stretched across continents.- Ends
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump intensifies trade war with threat of 30% tariffs on EU, Mexico
President Donald Trump on Saturday threatened to impose a 30 per cent tariff on imports from Mexico and the European Union starting on August 1, after weeks of negotiations with the major US trading partners failed to reach a comprehensive trade deal. In an escalation of the trade war that has angered US allies and rattled investors, Trump announced the latest tariffs in separate letters to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum that were posted on his Truth Social media site on Saturday. The EU and Mexico responded by calling the tariffs unfair and disruptive while pledging to continue to negotiate with the US for a broader trade deal before the deadline. The EU and Mexico are among the largest US trading partners. Trump sent similar letters to 23 other trading partners this week, including Canada, Japan and Brazil, setting blanket tariff rates ranging from 20 per cent up to 50 per cent, as well as a 50 per cent tariff on copper. Trump said the 30 per cent rate was "separate from all sectoral tariffs," which means 50 per cent levies on steel and aluminum imports and a 25 per cent tariff on auto imports would remain. The August 1 deadline gives the targeted countries time to negotiate agreements that could lower the threatened tariffs. The spate of letters shows Trump has returned to the aggressive trade posture that he took in early April when he announced a slew of reciprocal tariffs against trading partners that sent markets tumbling before the White House delayed implementation. 'Unfair treatment' But with the stock market recently hitting record highs and the US economy remaining resilient, Trump is showing no signs of slowing down his trade war. The US president promised to use the 90-day delay in April to strike dozens of new trade deals, but has only secured framework agreements with Britain, China and Vietnam. The EU has hoped to reach a comprehensive trade agreement with the US for the 27-country bloc. Trump's letter to the EU included a demand that Europe drop its own tariffs, an apparent condition of any future deal. "The European Union will allow complete, open Market Access to the United States, with no Tariff being charged to us, in an attempt to reduce the large Trade Deficit," he wrote. Von der Leyen said the 30 per cent tariffs "would disrupt essential transatlantic supply chains, to the detriment of businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic." She also said while the EU will continue to work towards a trade agreement, it "will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required." Mexico's economy ministry said Saturday it was informed the US would send a letter during a meeting on Friday with US officials. "We mentioned at the roundtable that it was unfair treatment and that we did not agree," the ministry's statement said. Rate for Mexico lower than Canada Mexico's proposed tariff level is lower than Canada's 35 per cent, with both letters citing fentanyl flows even though government data shows the amount of the drug seized at the Mexican border was significantly higher than the Canadian border. "Mexico has been helping me secure the border, BUT, what Mexico has done, is not enough. Mexico still has not stopped the Cartels who are trying to turn all of North America into a Narco-Trafficking Playground," Trump wrote. China is the main source of the chemicals used to make fentanyl. According to the US Customs and Border Patrol, only 0.2 per cent of all fentanyl seized in the US comes from across the Canadian border, while the vast majority originates from the southern border. Mexico sends more than 80 per cent of its total exported goods to the US and free trade with its northern neighbor drove Mexico to overtake China as the top US trading partner in 2023. The EU had initially hoped to strike a comprehensive trade agreement but more recently had scaled back its ambitions and shifted toward securing a broader framework deal similar to the one Britain brokered that leaves key details to be negotiated. The bloc is under conflicting pressures as powerhouse Germany urged a quick deal to safeguard its industry, while other EU members, such as France, have said EU negotiators should not cave into a one-sided deal on US terms. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel, said Trump's letter raised the risk of retaliatory moves by the EU similar to the flare-up between the US and China that rattled financial markets. "US and Chinese tariffs went up together and they came back down again. Not all the way down, but still down together," he said. Trump's cascade of tariff orders since returning to the White House has begun generating tens of billions of dollars a month in new revenue for the US government. US customs duties revenue topped $100 billion in the federal fiscal year through to June, according to US Treasury data on Friday. The tariffs have also strained diplomatic relationships with some of the closest US partners. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said last week that Japan needed to lessen its dependence on the US The fight over tariffs has also prompted Canada and some European allies to reexamine their security dependence on the U.S., with some looking to purchase non-US weapons systems.
