Wolverhampton New Cross hospital launches relatives' room appeal
"This improvement will enhance the experience at a difficult time. The space would provide a calm and peaceful space for loved ones to take a break from the busy ward environment."The fundraising appeal has been launched by the hospital's specialist palliative care team, which provides support to patients facing life-limited illness, as well as those in their final days of life."End-of-life care needs to be centred around dignity and compassion, and this room is a much-needed addition to the hospital but we need to raise funds to cover the cost of building work and the homely touches needed to make it a comfortable space," added Dr Jennens.The trust's charity, Your RWTC, has appealed to businesses in the area for financial help, and said it would look to organise fundraising events as well.
Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Low-income and minority ethnic people in England most at risk from dangerously hot homes
Lower-income householders, minority ethnic people and those with young children are more likely to live in homes at risk from dangerous overheating, research has found. The UK has baked in multiple heatwaves this summer, with many people sweltering in dangerously hot homes that were not designed to withstand extreme temperatures. June was the hottest on record and in general this summer England was an average of 1.58C above average temperatures. Hot homes are dangerous for health; cardiovascular and respiratory issues, sleep disturbance, mental health problems and heat exhaustion all correlate with high temperatures in the home. Health risks spike when temperatures inside are above 25C, and there is a link between overheating homes and the risk of death, particularly for elderly people. An analysis of housing stock by the Resolution Foundation has found nearly half (48%) of the poorest fifth of English households have homes liable to get too hot – three times as many as among the richest fifth (17%). Owning your own home reduces the risk of overheating; two-thirds of socially renting households face the highest risk of their homes getting too hot compared with 55% of private rented homes and 17% of those that are owner occupied. Additionally, six in 10 of those with young children, and almost half of minority ethnic households also face the highest risk of their homes getting too hot. Overall, the research found a fifth of homes in England overheat in current summer temperatures, while one-third (32%) have attributes that put them at high risk of overheating in the future. Small flats, small homes and those that are overcrowded are all at risk of getting too hot, as are those in areas such as London that suffer from an urban heat island effect. More than half (53%) of homes in London are at risk of overheating, compared with 31% of those outside the capital. Experts have called for the government to update its upcoming future homes standard to include provisions for overheating homes. The regulations are due to be published this autumn, to come into force from 2027, but the focus has been mainly on how to keep draughty homes warm in winter, rather than to keep them cool in summer. 'The way we are building new housing is not adequate to the climate change we are already seeing, never mind the even hotter weather that's coming,' said Simon McWhirter, the chief executive of the UK Green Building Council. Zachary Leather, an economist at the Resolution Foundation, said: 'With the sweltering temperatures parts of the UK have seen recently set to become more common, we face a greater risk of overheating at home. But this risk is not spread equally – lower-income families, social renters, those with children and ethnic-minority households are more likely to live in homes at risk of overheating.' The thinktank used data from a government study that placed hundreds of sensors in people's homes to determine which types of houses were most at risk of overheating. The figures were then combined with the latest data on who lives in these homes – small flats, small homes and overcrowded properties – to identify those at the highest risk of overheating as the UK's temperature rises. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion It also analysed the dangers people face at work from extreme heat. One in four UK workers work in occupations where they are at risk of heat stress. There is an inequality aspect to this, too; those in the top third income bracket have a lower than average risk. Older workers are more likely to face heat stress at work; 31% of those in jobs liable to cause heat stress are aged over 50. The research also found that office workers in more deprived areas were less likely to have air conditioning in their workplaces. The researchers suggested 'learning from countries that have long had higher temperatures, including legal rights for maximum workplace temperatures, and better adapted buildings'. Measures that can keep homes cooler in summer include good ventilation to create through airflow that cools rooms, with well-designed windows and external shutters, and reflective paint on roofs or outside surfaces. Street trees are a simple and cost effective way to keep homes cool, the UK Green Building Council has said. It advocates a 3:30:300 approach: you should be able to see three trees from your dwelling; you should have 30% tree canopy cover within your neighbourhood; and you should be no more than 300 metres from a biodiverse green space or park. A government spokesperson said: 'We know the importance of keeping homes cool in hot weather. That's why building regulations require new homes to be built to reduce the risk of overheating and through the future homes standard consultation we are exploring how to further improve protections. This is alongside considering the use of air-air heat pumps to keep existing homes cool under the boiler upgrade scheme.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Ambulance services hit with bills totalling £27.5million to transport increasing numbers of obese patients
Ambulance services have been hit with bills totalling £27.5million to transport increasing numbers of obese patients. Bosses have been forced to splash out on specialist ambulances and lifting equipment or pay private providers to carry people who are too large for standard vehicles. Health leaders last night urged the government to do more to tackle the nation's obesity crisis, while campaigners warned the NHS 'cannot cope' with the burden placed on it by individuals with 'grossly unhealthy lifestyles'. North West Ambulance Service has paid almost £15million in the past five years for ambulances to carry the overweight, Freedom of Information responses show. It hopes to cut its annual payment of £2.715million to private operators by buying eight new vehicles this year for £416,976. And London Ambulance Service is investing £1million for its own fleet, having paid contractors £1.6million a year for five years. South Central Ambulance Service - which covers Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and most of Hampshire - said it had spent £2.3million over the past five and a half years. East of England Ambulance Trust has got through more than £1.25million in two years. North East Ambulance Service said it has not spent any money on new transport for bariatric patients but all its ambulances 'include an extra wide tail lift with the lifting capacity of 500kg or 78 stone to allow bariatric patients to be transported'. John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Taxpayers will be horrified to see the burden placed on NHS budgets by some irresponsible patients. 'The health service simply cannot cope with the weight placed on it by those individuals with grossly unhealthy lifestyles. 'Ministers need to start seriously considering how to ensure that patients cough up when their own choices end up impacting taxpayers.' Rory Deighton, acute director at the NHS Confederation, which represents healthcare organisations, said: 'These examples of NHS spending on bariatric ambulances highlights the reality of the increasing costs of an ageing and increasingly unfit population. 'NHS leaders will be looking to the government to tackle some of the root causes of obesity as part of its wider mission to improve the health of the nation. Being bold and legislating on contentious issues like food policy will help deliver the Secretary of State's ambition to spend less on treatment by focusing more on prevention.' Recent Government research shows nearly two-thirds of UK adults are overweight or obese. Being overweight increases the risk of heart disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes and muscular-skeletal issues. Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents NHS trusts, said: 'The NHS is there for everyone who needs it. 'Providing care for the most obese patients require specialist skills, equipment and ambulances 'It is right for trusts to make that investment.' The average response time in June for ambulances dealing with the most urgent incidents, defined as calls from people with life-threatening illnesses or injuries, was seven minutes and 55 seconds. This is up slightly from seven minutes and 50 seconds in May and is above the target standard response time of seven minutes. Ambulances took an average of 29 minutes and 37 seconds last month to respond to emergency calls such as heart attacks, strokes and sepsis. This is up from 27 minutes and 48 seconds in May. The Government and NHS England have set a new target for this figure to average 30 minutes across 2025/26. Response times for urgent calls, such as late stages of labour, non-severe burns and diabetes, averaged one hour, 44 minutes and 56 seconds in June, up from one hour, 34 minutes and 51 seconds in May.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Public support for prostate cancer screening has grown following Daily Mail campaign, poll reveals
Public support for prostate cancer screening has grown following a Daily Mail campaign, a poll reveals. Some 91 per cent of Britons now believe the NHS should offer regular prostate checks for men, as it does for breast cancer in women. This is up from 86 per cent in April when OnePoll last conducted its survey on behalf of the charity Prostate Cancer Research. The latest findings found widespread problems around the current system, which relies on men to come forward and ask GPs for tests when they already have concerns. Responses from 2,000 adults show one in five has had a male family member or close friend die from the disease. Among those, more than three quarters believed earlier diagnosis could have saved the life of their loved one. And more than one quarter of those polled had no trust, or not much trust at all, in the current NHS system to detect prostate cancer at an early stage. Prostate cancer is the most diagnosed form of cancer in England, with 55,033 cases identified in 2023, the latest figures show. Catching it early improves the odds of successfully treating the disease, which kills around 10,200 men in England each year. The Daily Mail is campaigning for a national prostate cancer screening programme, initially targeted at high risk men. This includes those who are black or have a family history of the disease. Women aged between 50 and 70 are offered mammograms every three years. More than half of those polled said their opinion of their local MP would worsen if they opposed the introduction of screening. The survey found a strong desire among its respondents for the NHS to be more proactive about collecting and sharing information about medical history. Almost seven in ten (69 per cent) said in the event they were diagnosed with prostate cancer, they would want their male family members' NHS records to be automatically updated to reflect this. There was also considerable appetite for technological innovation, with 60 per cent supporting the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve diagnosis, for example, by reading MRI scans faster and more accurately. Health secretary Wes Streeting has declared his support for a national prostate cancer screening programme in a major boost for the Mail's campaign. The health secretary told MPs in April that he would like to see the NHS proactively offer men tests for the disease in a move that could prevent thousands of needless deaths. He said he is 'particularly sympathetic' to the argument that this should initially be targeted at high-risk men. The call for targeted screening has also been backed by former prime minister Rishi Sunak, former home secretary Sir James Cleverly and Calvin Bailey, a Labour MP and the chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on prostate cancer. David James, the director of patient projects and influencing at Prostate Cancer Research, said: 'These poll results send an unequivocal message to policymakers: the public overwhelmingly supports the introduction of a national screening programme. 'The current system is clearly failing to meet the public's expectations for early detection and proactive management of genetic risk. 'It's time for the NHS to prioritise a targeted screening programme that could save countless lives and alleviate the long-term burden on our healthcare system.' The charity's research suggests targeted screening, focused on black men, those with BRCA1/2 mutations and those with a family history of the disease, could mean an additional 775 early diagnoses per year for those aged between 45 and 69. The research also suggests these changes could spare almost 300 men a year from a stage 4 diagnosis, in which prostate cancer becomes incurable. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'This Government has been clear we would like to see screening in place, but the decision must be evidence-led.'
