Gauteng's measles outbreak prompts urgent call for vaccination
Image: Supplied
The provincial Department of Health has intensified its public health efforts in response to a surge in measles cases across Gauteng. A public health expert from the University of the Western Cape (UWC) has also urged a further scale-up of measles vaccinations to help curb the ongoing outbreak.
Prof Talitha Crowley, the Academic Division Head at the School of Nursing, said that vaccination coverage in the province, reportedly under 75%, is well below the threshold to prevent outbreaks.
"To prevent any measles outbreak, we actually need less than 5% who are not vaccinated in a community. In other words, 95% vaccination coverage."
In Gauteng, a total of 181 laboratory-confirmed measles cases have been reported from 1 January to 13 June 2025, with many of these cases emanating from Johannesburg, Tshwane and Ekurhuleni districts.
She continued, 'In Gauteng, districts with high numbers of zero-dose children - those who have received no immunisations - may experience a surge in cases.'
UWC Associate Professor Talitha Crowley
Image: UWC
According to a vaccine hesitancy webinar conducted by the Department of Health in 2024, in some areas up to 22% of children were unvaccinated Prof Crowley noted.
'Encouragingly, the Cape Metropole increased its under-5 immunisation coverage to 90% by early 2025, thanks to targeted campaigns. Children are routinely vaccinated against measles at six and 12 months as part of South Africa's Expanded Programme on Immunisation. Catch-up doses are available for those who missed their vaccinations, with no upper age limit.'
Despite being vaccine-preventable, measles continues to pose a serious health threat, particularly to young children and vulnerable communities. She warned that measles is not just a childhood illness - it's a highly contagious viral disease that can lead to severe complications and even death. It spreads through respiratory droplets when an infected person coughs or sneezes. The virus can linger in the air or on surfaces for up to two hours, making it alarmingly easy to contract. Symptoms typically appear seven to 14 days after exposure, beginning with fever, cough, runny nose, and red, watery eyes. A few days later, a distinctive red rash emerges, starting on the face and spreading across the body.
'By the time the rash appears, the person is already in the most contagious phase. Complications from measles can be devastating. The virus damages the lining of the skin, gut, lungs, eyes, and sometimes the liver and brain, while also weakening the immune system,' explained Prof Crowley.
'This can lead to diarrhoea, pneumonia, blindness, encephalitis, and even death. Children under two, those who are malnourished, and immunosuppressed individuals are especially at risk.'
As for prevention, vaccination remains the most effective defence, said Crowley, 'One dose of the measles vaccine offers about 93% protection, and two doses increase this to around 97%.
While rare, vaccinated individuals can still contract measles, but symptoms are usually mild and less likely to spread.'
In cases where someone is exposed to measles, individuals should confirm their immunity status - the body's ability to resist disease either naturally or through vaccination. Post-exposure vaccination within three days can help prevent infection.
Prof Crowley advised: 'If symptoms appear, seek medical attention immediately and inform your healthcare provider. Measles is a notifiable condition in South Africa. With vigilant immunisation efforts and public awareness, measles can be controlled and lives can be saved.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
5 days ago
- IOL News
South Africa's breastfeeding crisis: key reasons behind the decline and solutions for our babies
Breastfeeding isn't just about nutrition. As the Department of Health explains, it protects babies against infections, reduces the risk of obesity and type 1 diabetes, and even shields mothers from certain cancers and chronic diseases. Image: Serdi Nam /pexels There's something quietly powerful about breastfeeding. It's nature's golden elixir, a living substance scientists still can't replicate. Yet, as World Breastfeeding Week (WBW) reminds us each August, South Africa finds itself on the back foot, and babies could pay the highest price. While global exclusive breastfeeding rates have seen modest growth, South Africa's numbers have moved in the wrong direction. The country's exclusive breastfeeding rate dropped from 32% in 2016 to just 22% in 2024, according to the Department of Health. It's a worrying trend, especially when you consider the World Health Assembly's goal of at least 50% by 2025 and 70% by 2030. And unless real change happens beyond slogans and billboards, experts say we won't get there. Breastfeeding isn't just about nutrition. As the Department of Health explains, it protects babies against infections, reduces the risk of obesity and type 1 diabetes, and even shields mothers from certain cancers and chronic diseases. 'Breastfeeding is not just about reaching country and global targets, but also about supporting infant health and development, as well as maternal well-being,' said Dr Lynn Moeng-Mahlangu, chief director of Health Promotion, at the department panel in 2023. Yet despite these benefits, South African mothers are turning away from exclusive breastfeeding earlier than ever before. breastfeeding is not an isolated decision. It is influenced by the social and structural fabrics surrounding new mothers. Image: pexels Why are mothers stopping breastfeeding? According to Chantell Witten, health systems director at iLifa Labantwana, the reasons run deeper than 'lack of information'. Speaking to the "Daily Maverick", Witten said it's about lack of support at every level: from workplaces that don't give mothers time and space to express milk, to formula companies whose marketing quietly chips away at mothers' confidence. 'Given the lack of maternity protection and stable employment opportunities, South African mothers are not protected to enjoy a successful breastfeeding journey,' Witten explained. 'The insidious marketing of formula through health professionals undermines government efforts to promote, support and protect breastfeeding.' Formula marketing isn't a new challenge, but digital platforms have supercharged it. And for families struggling financially, formula can feel like a convenient solution, even if it isn't the healthiest one. Lactation issues Insufficient milk supply: Mothers may perceive that they are not producing enough milk to satisfy their baby. Painful nipples: Sore or cracked nipples can make breastfeeding uncomfortable and lead to early cessation. Infant refusal to breastfeed: Some infants may go through periods of refusing to breastfeed, known as "nursing strikes". Concerns about infant satisfaction: Mothers may worry that their baby is not getting enough milk or not being satisfied by breast milk alone. Need to take medication: Some medications are not compatible with breastfeeding, requiring mothers to stop or supplement with formula. Maternal illness: Mothers may need to stop breastfeeding due to their own health issues or postpartum depression. Social and support factors Unsupportive work policies: Lack of access to private lactation rooms or flexible work schedules can make it difficult to continue breastfeeding at work. Breastfeeding is a shared responsibility The Department of Health, supported by WHO, UNICEF, and organisations like the South African Breastmilk Reserve (SABR), emphasises that exclusive breastfeeding shouldn't rest only on mothers' shoulders. Fathers, grandparents, employers, communities, and even policymakers all play critical roles. Creating truly supportive environments means maternity leave that actually lasts, safe places to breastfeed in public, and workplaces that see breastfeeding not as a disruption, but as an investment in the next generation's health. The theme of World Breastfeeding Week 2025, 'Prioritise Breastfeeding: Create Sustainable Support Systems', isn't just a slogan. It's a call to build systems that protect mothers from pressure, shame, and misinformation. Malnutrition As breastfeeding rates fall, South Africa faces an alarming surge in childhood malnutrition. The Department of Health notes rising rates of stunting, wasting, and overweight in children under five. The irony? Breastfeeding could help prevent these outcomes. Globally, UNICEF reports that breastfed children have at least a sixfold greater chance of survival in the first months of life compared to non-breastfed infants. Yet, here at home, we still risk missing out on these life-saving benefits. Education campaigns alone aren't enough. Dr Moeng-Mahlangu has called for new strategies to encourage mothers to breastfeed exclusively for six months, and to continue up to at least 12 months. Breastfeeding saves lives, builds healthier children, and safeguards mothers. As we observe World Breastfeeding Week, it is vital that we engage with what should be seen as a public health crisis that matters to us all. Image: Anna Shvets /pexels This could mean everything from paid maternity leave to community-based peer support groups and better training for health workers to tackle formula marketing head-on. 'We need to move beyond awareness to real, structural change,' she emphasised. Breastfeeding isn't an individual choice made in a vacuum. It happens or doesn't because of the world we build around new mothers. South Africa's breastfeeding numbers aren't just statistics. They're a mirror reflecting how well or how poorly we support the earliest, most fragile months of life. Breastfeeding saves lives, builds healthier children, and protects mothers. And maybe, as World Breastfeeding Week reminds us, that's the real crisis we should all care about
Daily Maverick
01-08-2025
- Daily Maverick
Why are fewer women breastfeeding in SA despite its enormous benefits?
Aggressive marketing campaigns by the formula milk industry, hunger and malnutrition and insecure employment are among the factors causing a decline in breastfeeding in the country. While global exclusive breastfeeding rates have seen a slight increase in recent years, South Africa is still lagging behind with a concerning decline in exclusive breastfeeding rates from 32% in 2016 to 22% in 2024. Civil society and the Department of Health say the current trend means the country is unlikely to achieve the World Health Assembly breastfeeding target of at least 50% by the end of 2025, and 70% in 2030 unless women receive support beyond education campaigns. The Department of Health in collaboration with various stakeholders hosted an event to mark the beginning of World Breastfeeding Week at Loftus Park Shopping centre in Pretoria on 1 August 2025. It aimed to intensify awareness about the long-term health benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for both the mother and child, as part of ongoing efforts to increase the rate of breastfeeding in the country. Multiple factors contribute to the decline in breastfeeding. Chantell Witten, the health systems director at iLifa Labantwana with expertise in breastfeeding and nutrition, told Daily Maverick that some of these factors were lack of support, income and formula marketing through health centres and professionals. 'Given the lack of maternity protection and stable employment opportunities, South African mothers are not protected to enjoy a successful breastfeeding journey. Furthermore, the insidious marketing of formula through health professionals undermines government efforts to promote, support and protect breastfeeding,' said Witten. World Breastfeeding Week is a global movement aimed at promoting breastfeeding and creating a conducive environment that supports mothers who breastfeed their babies, ultimately contributing to their wellbeing. Speaking to Daily Maverick, Edzani Mphaphuli, the Executive Director of Grow Great Campaign, said the first 1,000 days, from conception to a child's second birthday, were the most important for shaping lifelong health, learning and wellbeing. 'During this period, the brain develops rapidly, and the foundations for emotional, cognitive and physical growth are laid. If children are undernourished or neglected during this time, they risk becoming stunted. Stunting has irreversible effects on brain function, school performance and future productivity. Breastfeeding plays a central role in preventing stunting. It provides complete nutrition, supports immunity, and fosters emotional bonding. Supporting mothers to breastfeed is not just about nutrition, it is about brain development, emotional security, and human potential. Every child deserves the chance to grow great from the very beginning, and that means ensuring their mothers are nourished, supported and cared for too,' Mphaphuli said. Shared responsibility So this makes the decline concerning for the department, health and nutrition practitioners and civil society organisations in the space. The department says exclusive breastfeeding is a shared responsibility, 'extending beyond just the role of mothers, with families, communities, healthcare systems and employers having important roles to play. Breastfeeding is not just about reaching country and global targets, but also about supporting infant health and development, as well as maternal wellbeing.' Witten echoed this point, saying breastfeeding promotion and support programmes had multiple benefits, such as 'saving children's lives, better health outcomes, lower economic and environmental impact. It's good for mothers, children and the economic development of the country… Programmes to support mothers and their children are not prioritised, and (mothers should be) protected from profit-driven industries like the formula industry,' said Witten. Significant impact A mother's nutrition does not drastically affect the quality of breast milk, but it has a significant impact on her ability to continue breastfeeding. Mphaphuli said the campaign aimed to reduce child stunting and malnutrition through multiple programmes and interventions. She added that mothers' bodies prioritised the baby 'drawing nutrients from the mother's own reserves, often depleting her energy, muscle, and bone mass. Without proper food, mothers feel exhausted, anxious, and overwhelmed. Breastfeeding is physically demanding, and doing it while hungry can be debilitating,' says Mphaphuli. In a written response to Daily Maverick, Mphaphuli said that many mothers supported by Grow Great's Flourish programme and community health workers reported stopping breastfeeding due to hunger and stress. 'Hunger increases cortisol in the mother's body — this stress hormone transfers into breast milk, leaving babies fussy and colicky, which creates a cycle of emotional strain. This cycle makes breastfeeding even harder. What a mother eats while breastfeeding is determined not just by knowledge, but by what she can afford. Finances drive dietary choices. When money is tight, nutritious foods like fruit, vegetables, protein and dairy are often replaced with cheaper, calorie-dense but nutrient-poor alternatives. Financial support is therefore essential to help mothers eat well and breastfeed with confidence. Without it, the risk of burnout, poor mental health, and early breastfeeding cessation increases, contributing to poor growth and stunting in infants, especially in vulnerable households,' Mphaphuli said. The Grow Great Flourish programme is an intervention supporting breastfeeding and early child development in South Africa. It provides antenatal and postnatal support groups, led by trained local women who are mothers themselves. Mphaphuli said the programme demystified breastfeeding, covering topics like how milk was produced, how to latch, and how to manage common challenges. 'The safe, non-judgmental environment encourages mothers to ask questions and support each other. Beyond the sessions, WhatsApp groups keep the community connected, allowing mothers to share concerns and receive encouragement around the clock. Nearly all Flourish moms breastfeed, and 62% do so exclusively. This stands in stark contrast to the national average. Grow Great also trains community health workers to deliver in-home breastfeeding support. These workers reinforce critical messages and help mothers persevere. Together, these programmes are preventing stunting by ensuring that babies receive the best start in life, beginning with breast milk.' DM
Daily Maverick
31-07-2025
- Daily Maverick
Three decades in, is the Cuba-SA doctor training programme still worth the expense?
The Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro medical training programme has been controversial from the start. It's had high points, low points, and now many say it should have an end point. Almost 30 years since the Cuba-SA doctors' training programme was launched, it still divides opinion. This year only Gauteng and North West interviewed candidates for the bursary programme that sends students from South Africa to be trained in the island country. Critics say the dwindling interest shows the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro medical training programme has passed its sell-by date. But supporters remain committed to its ideals, and some beneficiaries of the programme still think of it as the opportunity of a lifetime. Between the differing views, what can be glimpsed is a chequered story of three decades of trying to transform South Africa's healthcare system. The programme has its origins in the ANC's political fraternity with Cuba and the laudable ideal of boosting doctors numbers in under-serviced rural areas. But it is also a tale of political inertia arguably blurring overtime into a blind spot as conditions changed. In the background is the stranglehold of corruption and maladministration in the health sector, shrinking provincial health budgets, the transformation of doctors' training, and changing curricula. One concern is that little is actually known about the programme's impact. There is a lack of clear data on the costs and the numbers of doctors produced. Shockingly, for such a long-running programme, no comprehensive evaluation reports have been published, as far as Spotlight has been able to establish. A comprehensive evaluation would weigh the benefits of the programme against its costs, compare it to other options for training medical doctors, and contextualise it within the current reality of very tight health budgets in provincial health departments — as it is, not all the doctors we are training are being employed. Given this context, it is not surprising that the national Department of Health recommended a scaling back of the programme a decade ago. While most provinces have taken this advice, the Gauteng and North West health departments have instead pushed ahead with the programme. Old histories and old allegiances The agreement that put in place the medical training programme was signed in 1996, with the first cohort of students leaving for Cuba a year later, in 1997. It was a mere two years into democracy and South Africa urgently needed to address the gaps in the provision of healthcare. Under apartheid, services prioritised a white minority mostly in urban settings and healthcare had a strong slant towards hospital or tertiary care. There was a shortage of doctors, and those with the least access to healthcare services were rural communities made up mostly of black South Africans. Medical schools mostly had curricula designed for the status quo, and there were few academic pathways for underprivileged students who had good marks at school but were not top achievers, leaving them overlooked for scholarships and bursaries. So the new government looked to Cuba. With its focus on primary healthcare, preventive medicine and community-based training, the Cuban approach to healthcare ticked many of the boxes for the South African government then led by Nelson Mandela. Since the communist revolution in Cuba in 1959, it has provided free healthcare to all its citizens. While there remains some scepticism over data collection and interpretation, the politicisation of medicine, and limited freedom to criticise the state, Cuba's healthcare system is also widely lauded. According to the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative, the country registers average life expectancy at 78 years (South Africa is at about 66), infant mortality dropped from 80 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1950 to just 5 deaths per 1,000 by 2013, and it has one of the world's highest doctor to patient ratios. In 2021, it was at 9.429 physicians per 1,000 people, according to World Bank Open Data. In the same year, South Africa tracked at 0.8 per 1,000. Since the 1960s, Cuba has established itself as a hub for training international fee-paying students and sending them back to their mostly lower-income countries as graduate doctors. One of its biggest universities, the Latin American School of Medicine, has graduated more than 30,000 students from 118 countries in the 21 years since it was established. Another tick was Cuba's staunch support for the ANC. SA History Online emphasises the depth of solidarity. It notes: 'Cuba was a state in alliance with provisional governments and independent states on the African continent. Cuba's military engagement in Angola kept the apartheid state in check, foiling its geopolitical strategies and forcing it to concede defeat at Cuito Cuanavale, and ultimately forcing both PW Botha and FW de Klerk to the negotiating table.' Costs and benefits The political and historical bonds sealed the doctors' training deal. But from the start, the bursary programme, funded by provincial budgets, came under fire. The estimated costs over nearly three decades are massive, but the details remain fuzzy. Spotlight's questions to the national health department were 'answered' in one paragraph by department spokesperson Foster Mohale. 'More than 4,000 [lower numbers are quoted by government in other instances] doctors have been produced through this medical programme since its inception. The programme is still relevant today and complements the local medical schools to produce more doctors. Qualified doctors have options of joining either public or private health sector,' he wrote. But discrepancies have shown up in the government's own figures. In November 2022, Haseena Ismail, the then DA member on the portfolio committee of health, raised concerns about the quality of government data. The Minister of Health at the time, Dr Joe Phaahla, said the preparatory year, including a stipend, cost $4,400 per student, and each of the following five years cost $7,400 per student. But a separate table from the health department listed higher figures — $8,400 for the preparatory year and up to $15,900 per student by the fifth year. Added to this, the department listed annual costs of $6,472 per student for food, accommodation, and medical insurance. There were also expenses for two return flights over six years, plus the cost of 18 months of tuition and accommodation for clinical training at a South African medical school. Phaahla said that as of November 2022, 3,369 students had been recruited into the programme, and 2,617 had graduated. However, he noted there was no information on what happened to these doctors or where they were employed. Each bursary student was required to work for the state for the same number of years for which they received funding. The programme also faced criticism over selection criteria for bursary candidates and for requiring two extra years of training compared with local medical programmes. Students spend one year learning Spanish, five years training in Cuba, and then return to South Africa for an additional 18 months of clinical training at a local medical school. Controversies have dogged the programme over the years. In 2013, the Afrikaans newspaper Beeld reported that by 2009, only half of the students enrolled in the programme during its first 12 years had completed their studies. In 2012, the government ramped up the numbers of students it sent abroad. In 2018, this backfired when about 700 fifth-year students returned home only to find they could not be accommodated at any of the then 10 medical schools in the country. It was at about this time that the national health department issued recommendations for the provinces to phase out the programme. Gauteng and North West Despite all of the above, the Gauteng Department of Health continues to fund students — about 20 last year and an expected 40 this year. Spotlight's questions on this to the Gauteng health department went unanswered. Compounding the administrative and planning blunders for returning students is the impact of deepening corruption and mismanagement in Gauteng's health department. It has been under routine Special Investigating Unit scrutiny as well as coming under fire for service delivery issues such as the ongoing backlog of cancer patients lingering on treatment waiting lists. In March, the South Gauteng Division of the High Court in Johannesburg ruled that the Gauteng health department had failed in its constitutional obligation to make oncology services available. In April, the department failed to pay its doctors their commuted overtime pay on time. These payments ensure there are doctors for 24-hour coverage at hospitals and make up as much as a third of doctors' take-home pay. The situation in the North West is also bleak. It's health facilities routinely face medicine stock-outs and understaffing. Its health department regularly struggles with accruals and paying suppliers on time. Given all these challenges, it is puzzling that these two provinces in particular are so committed to sending students to Cuba, at what we understand to be higher cost than for training doctors locally. 'Better investments' Professor Lionel Green-Thompson, now the dean of the faculty of health sciences at the University of Cape Town, was involved in managing returning students from the Cuba-SA programme between the mid-2000s and 2016. At the time, he was a medical educator and clinician at Wits University, where he oversaw the 18-month clinical training of more than 30 returning students. 'Some of these students were among the best doctors that I've trained, and I remain a stalwart supporter of the ideals of the programme. But at this point, there are better investments to be made, including directly funding university training programmes in South Africa,' he said. 'A programme that's rooted in our nostalgic connection with Cuba and its role in our change as a country is now out of step with many of the healthcare settings and realities we face in South Africa,' said Green-Thompson. He added that a proper evaluation of the programme needed to be conducted. There were also lessons to learn, he said, including a review of admissions programmes. How some students who entered a programme at 20% below the normally accepted marks and exited the programme as excellent doctors, offered clues on how great doctors could be made, he said. Green-Thompson also suggested that we needed to ask why specialisation had become a measure of success for many doctors in South Africa, often at the expense of family medicine. This, he said, took away from the impact doctors made at the community healthcare level as expert generalists. But changing the perspectives of healthcare professionals required early and sustained exposure to working in community healthcare settings, said Professor Richard Cooke, the head of the department of family medicine and primary care at Wits. Cooke is also the director of the Wits Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro Collaboration since 2018 and serves on the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro Ministerial Task Team. 'I'm not in support of further students being sent to Cuba for the undergraduate programme, because these students are not being trained in our clinical settings,' he said, speaking in his Wits capacity. 'The Cuban system is far more primary healthcare based than South Africa's, but that doesn't necessarily translate into these students ending in primary healthcare,' said Cooke. And curricula at Wits were shifting, for instance, towards placing students at district hospitals for longer periods of time, rather than weeks-long rotations, he said. 'When students become part of the furniture at a hospital, they become better at facilitating, at critical thinking, problem solving, teamwork and collaboration,' Cooke said. But making this kind of transformation in local training took government funding and commitment. Students and doctors needed to be attracted to the programme and needed reasons to stay. But the money and resources to make this happen were simply not there — even as the Cuba training programme continued. Cooke added: 'There hasn't been definitive data on the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro programme. But even if the programme over 30 years has done well and met its targets, it's not been cost efficient. What's needed now is to leverage expertise and establish partnerships in different, more cost-effective ways like in research, health systems science and health science education.' Up to three times more expensive? Professor Shabir Madhi, the dean of the faculty of health sciences at Wits, said the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro programme costs an estimated three times more than it cost to train a student in South Africa. This, he said, should be enough reason for a beleaguered health department like Gauteng's to stop sending students to Cuba. He added: 'The government is aware that it simply can't absorb the number of medical graduates being produced.' Madhi says some trainee doctors were sitting at home while others trying to finish specialisations were being derailed. Broadly, he pinned the blame on the mismanagement of resources, including the department underspending R590-million on the National Tertiary Service Grant meant to subsidise specialised medical treatment at tertiary hospitals. Madhi said universities had worked hard to close the gaps identified by the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro programme 30 years ago, but now student doctors were being let down by the government not playing its part. 'Across the universities, there's been a complete overhaul of the curriculum to be focused on primary healthcare. Students are also getting community exposure as early as first-year training,' he said. He added that when it came to admissions, the majority of students entering medical schools across the country were now black South Africans, and additional changes had been made to the selection process. 'We used to have a race quota, but in further revisions we have introduced criteria that focus on the socioeconomic component, with 40% of the admissions coming from students in quintile 1, 2 and 3 schools [no-fee public schools],' he said. South Africa had 11 medical schools, with the most recent addition being North West University — specifically focused on rural health — and the University of Johannesburg in the pipeline to join the list. So the number of doctors being trained and graduating was increasing. Madhi estimated that the total number being trained was above 900 per year for Gauteng alone. The bottleneck of getting doctors into clinics and hospitals, he maintained, was not a shortage of doctors, but the government's inability to pay doctors' salaries or to create functioning, well-resourced workplace environments. 'You can't put a price on that' For Dr Sanele Madela, the ongoing challenges could not detract from the goal to get doctors into communities — including through the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro programme. Today, he is the health attaché at the Havana Mission for the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro training programme. Madela was also at one time a schoolboy with a dream of becoming a doctor. Growing up in Dundee in KwaZulu-Natal, he remembers almost never seeing a doctor in his community. 'Then when we did see a doctor, it was a white person or an Indian person and they never spoke our language — a nurse would have to translate,' said Madela, who was part of the 2002 Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro intake. The six years abroad, he said, exposed him to very different reasons for becoming a doctor. 'When people finish medical school, they say thank God it's over, but in Cuba people say thank God for the knowledge and information so they can give back to their country,' he said. When Madela got back to South Africa, his journey eventually led him to work in Dundee district hospital. It was the same hospital where his mother had worked as a cleaner. The Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro programme, Madela said, still played a vital role because of its objective to get more doctors into rural and township areas — 'and you can't put a price on that'. 'We are used to seeing the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro programme from the point of view of adding human resources, but it's also about the impact it makes for a community,' he said. It's the impact of a community finally getting their own doctor. His argument is that, thanks to the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro programme, he got to be that person for his community. DM
