A retirement crisis could be coming. Here's how to prepare
spk_0
Most of the time that gap, that retirement gap is not the individual's fault. Life happened, our institutions should have anticipated life happened, um, we shouldn't expect everybody to be superhuman. We should have super institutions, not superhuman beings.
0:20
spk_1
Working longer is often described as the best way to secure your retirement, especially if you haven't saved enough. And here to talk with me about that and all things related to retirement is Teresa Ghilarducci. She's a professor at the New School and she's also the author of numerous books, most recently, Work, retire, Repeat. Teresa, welcome.
0:40
spk_0
Uh, hi, hi Bob. Good to see you.
0:42
spk_1
Uh, good to see you as well. Um, so let's start right with the hard questions, I guess. Um, you've argued that the working longer consensus is not a solution, but an insidious problem. So maybe you could elaborate on why this consensus has eroded both the quantity and quality of people's years, older people's years, diminishing their time before death and often leading to increased illness.
1:05
spk_0
Oh yeah, the working along with consensus was, is really a convenient um untruth. The consensus was that, well, if people haven't saved for the last 40 years, you know, when we told them to, at least they haven't out.And we don't have to do anything about it, you know, it's just the problem is on the individual and since everyone is living longer, then people can clearly live and work longer, and since jobs are getting easier, um, then people, all people can work longer. Well, those two things, everyone's living longer and everyone has easier jobs are false and therefore.This idea that we could all just work longer to make up for retirement savings gaps, you know, is false. Um, some people are living longer, um, I see it in my data sets that people who have stable lives, good jobs, um, stable jobs, in escalating salaries, they often have access to good health care.And they live, they're living longer. That's like people with professional degrees and above. Men have gotten, especially white men have gotten big longevity gains. They um are taking their statins and they stopped smoking. So we have a bigBig average increase pulled up by these white men doing good things, but they've also been lucky because they've had actually the work careers that lead to longer lives and maybe even a choice to live longer. The rest of us, the rest of us are um faced with like flatline longevity. White women's longevity has not um increased, mainly cause they're working more, you know, working actually isn't that good for you and um.Now I looked all over the globe for research on this one question. What kinds of people are made healthier if they work into old age over and over again, and almost every week a new study was coming out, um, from the United States, from Denmark, from all over, all over the world, and the conclusion is it depends. If you're part of the elite.That you're the politician who makes retirement policies, you're a professor professor who professes about retirement policy, or if you're a financial advisor or a banker or politician who makes policies on retirement.Um, work might make you healthier and keep your mind alive. You can control the pace and the content of your work, but about 11% of populations have those kinds of jobs. They're in the Senate, they're in academia, you know, they're in the, the position of making influence. The rest of everybody, you know, 89% of people.Have jobs that if they continue them would actually hasten death by um causing more anxiety and cortisol because work and commutes can, especially if you aren't the boss, can create higher levels of cortisol, and when you get older, those higher levels actually hurt your heart worse.Women in service related jobs who are um working past 60 are especially vulnerable to having their jobs create more illness, more morbidity, and um a shorter lifespan.
4:27
spk_1
Yeah, so Tracy just as a follow up it sort of creates a dilemma, right? Work longer, die sooner, but if I don't work longer, I won't have the financial security to enjoy whatever years I have left.
4:38
spk_0
Well, there you go. Um, there was a New Yorker cartoon that had two people discussing a couple discussing their retirement accounts. You're smiling, so I, I think you saw the cartoon says, and one of the members of the couple says, ah, I got it, we'll take an early death and a late retirement, so.And that actually unfortunately is the rational thing to do, um, oddly, you know, the rational way to think. The problem is, Bob, it's even worse than that. Most people don't have a choice about whether or not they'll be employed in old age. When you drill down on the people who are retired, you know, just take a, go into a room full of retired people and just ask a simple question. Did you retire when you wanted to?You know, did you retire at the age you wanted to, and most of them will say, no, uh, I retired a lot earlier than I thought I, I had to, and there's all sorts of reasons you can make them up health, wealth, layoff, their skills got it, um, you know, were um obsolete because the world of technology, you know, moved past them and there's age discrimination. So most of us don't even have a choice to work longer, even if we don't have enough money to live on in our old age.
5:52
spk_1
Yeah. So Theresa, in our podcast, we try to do two things. We, we like to say that we want this to be someone's first and last stop in their search for retirement now, but we also want to give people actual advice. So given all that you just said is what should someone do who's in thatsituation?
6:07
spk_0
Yeah, so I, um, so an individual faced right now, you know, you're coming into your 50s, you know, early 60s.Um, maybe you're in the mid-60s, um, you have to really do some hygiene. You have to look at your own finances and you have to be realistic about how much you need. Um, and then I say assess your budget. I look at my spending every month, you know, it's not, I don't do it every day, but I look at it every month. It it takes now about 20 to 20 minutes to half an hour.And um and then I have to add 20% because I don't always count what I spend, you know, I, I, you know, I like to lowball it's sort of like my calorie counts, you know, I really do 20% more than I say I do. Well, I probably spend 10 to 20% more than I do, and then you have to estimate your future retirement income and um subtract 20% from that because people underestimate.The kind of um raises they're going to get, the kind of uh pension income they're going to get, they forget that stock markets go up and down. So you add 20% to your spending, you decrease your retirement income by 20%, and then you look at the gap, right? And you look at that gap and you have and you should look at it without shame.Without that inner critic saying, oh, I should have done this, I should have done that, because most of the time that gap, that retirement gap is not the individual's fault. Life happened, our institutions should have anticipated life happened. Um, we shouldn't expect everybody to be superhuman. We should have super institutions, not superhuman beings. Um, so look at that gap without shame.Try to work longer if you can, if there's that gap, try to decrease your, you know, your income. Everyone knows the, the things to do. You could even be mindful about how much you need.Talk to a fee only adviser to get rational advice. You've been a really good advocate of staying away from conflicted advisors, so you could help people and really hammer that down. A fee only advisor you could visit AARP's website which has really good retirement calculator, good advice about home equity um loans, um so good job options if you're older and you want to avoid age discrimination.And also a lot of agencies can help older people get access to programs to income that they might not already know about. 30% of elders who are eligible for um food stamps don't apply. 40% of people who are eligible for SSI supplementary um.Um, income don't apply, home assistance, energy assistance, all those programs are underutilized, so you have to make sure that you um can get all those. And the other thing is, is that you are, this is a collective problem, so it needs collective action to solve it. You are also the um holder of a very valuable resource which is your vote.And you need, um, and politicians know that older Americans vote, and they try to bamboozle them by saying, I'm helping the older American, be very careful not to be distracted with a token tax deduction here or there, as we saw in the last tax bill that just passed.Um, and know that Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid are your most important financial assets. The government is your most important financial partner um in your old age, and vote to take care of that.
9:46
spk_1
Yeah. So you've talked about this tale of two retirements, the wealthy and the less wealthy, uh, and you just mentioned Social Security and the trustee's report just came out and we're looking at a 23% cut come 2033 if Congress doesn't act. What, what's your take on that and what to do because of it, or did it happen?
10:06
spk_0
You know, uh, we have been in this business for a long time, you and me, Bob, and we always thought Congress would act by now. We really told people, we reassured people, don't worry, they'll never be across the board cut in benefits of 23%, and that means people who get 100% of their income from 20 from Social Security will get.A 23% cut and people who only get 10% of their income will get a 23% cut. Guess who hurts is hurt the most, the people who depend upon Social Security. So we only have actually optimistically 2033. When you feed in this last tax bill, that um that insolvency comes sooner, indirectly because of the way the taxes are are done.Um, but it means actually Congress not doing anything is actually a hostile act.Towards Social Security, you know, you got to a point now that when you hear a politician or a president says, no, no, I'm not going to touch Social Security, that means they are actually planning on that cut because Social Security will cut itself, you know, based on it is. So not doing anything will really hurt, you know, the bottom 60% of people because they depend on Social Security the most.Um, and it will mean more poverty among elders. Even if you're middle class now, your risk of going into poverty or near poverty will go up by quite a bit because you don't have a backstop to Social Security. We could be going into a recession at that point or the economy will continue this very slow growth with tariffs, you know, with no investments, with a big deficit.So your ability to get extra work may also be um be trimmed out. There won't be a way out of that low standard of living if Congress doesn't act now.
12:08
spk_1
Yeah.Uh, Theresa, we have to take a short break, but when we come back, I want to talk about, we have so much to talk about the gray New Deal, government retirement accounts, and perhaps the failure of defined contribution plans. So don't go away.Welcome back to Decoding Retirement. I'm speaking with Teresa Ghilarducci. She's a professor at the New School and author of numerous books, including, uh, Work Retire, Repeat. You know, Theresa, I have a friend who has a blog called Work Retire, Die. I like your title better. A little more hopeful.Yeah, all right, so I, I promised that we were going to talk about, uh, the Gray New Deal, which is uh a term that I think is unique to you. I think you coined it, so tell us what it is and what people need to know about it.
12:52
spk_0
Yeah, so, um, the New Deal, you remember as Roosevelt, and it was a New Deal for workers and, and people didn't have jobs. Um, this is a New Deal for a very big part of the population. We are richer, we have older people, and it's going to be a a permanent quarter of our of our population, you know, people who are pushed out of work, you know, or want to, um, want a retirement period. So we need a new deal for that population.Um, it is absolutely a failure to say, well, those people should just have saved, they should have saved, or those people can just work. Those are, I said in my book, those are just unrealistic kind of fantasies and hope. That's not a plan. Um, so what the great New Deal is is to not say that everybody has to retire. If older people want to work, we absolutely should not have age discrimination. Go work, but those jobs should be better.Um, those jobs get better when people unionize, when there's more regulations on safety, when there is more accommodation for workers' ability to do the job, all those kind of work protections have to be strengthened in order to make the physical requirements of jobs that older people have or the jobs, the requirements that.Computers um make people have or the surveillance that comes from from computers are really tempered and controlled and make those jobs meaningful and and resourceful if an older person wants to have it. Many people can't work longer, don't want to work longer, deserve a retirement, so retirement should be made decent. Um, we need to shore up Social Security. We're past.The point of cutting Social Security. We're past the point of raising the retirement age, which is just a cut in Social Security. We only have one agenda for Social Security, and that's to increase revenue and probably benefits and across the board $200 increase in Social Security would not be untoward. It should, it's.Um, probably actually, it's required now to lower our property rates from a world standard of 23%. So we have to increase Social Security and we need a guaranteed retirement account plan. Half of workers now, Bob, and I'm going to repeat this, do not have access to a retirement plan at work.That means half the people don't. Whenever I'm on a broadcast, everybody who interviews me has a retirement plan, but most of the people listening, half of the people listening, if you have a population listening to you that represents America, won't have a retirement plan, and people move in and out of employers that provide a retirement plan.So we need to make sure that people are covered 100% when they work. We are covered 100% with Social Security. Wherever you go, that FICA tax follows you. If you're a gig worker, you pay Social Security. If you're a contingent worker, you pay Social Security, temporary worker, you pay Social Security. Small employer, middle employer, big employer, you pay Social Security.Well, we should have everybody, when they pay into Social Security, pay into their own savings account, and that is called a guaranteed retirement account, and it's in Congress now as a proposal and it's supported by Republicans and Democrats and it's supported by Republicans and Democrats in the House and Republicans and Democrats in the Senate. There has never been such a bold reform of retirement securities, you know, since the 70s. Um andNow that we've done the tax breaks for wealthy people, we now have to turn to retirement security for the best of us.
16:34
spk_1
Yeah, so my understanding of the GARA is that it would be over and above Social Security. It would be voluntary, uh, perhaps what upwards of 3% of your salary going into an account that's in your name and invested how you want it to be invested.
16:48
spk_0
Yeah, let me, let me talk about um the barista, you know, down the street, um, and she isn't 23, you know, she's 40, and she's had these kind of service, um, jobs, you know, for 1520 years, um, she would automatically be in the guaranteed retirement account or we call it the private sector thrift savings plan account.Um, the rift savings plan for everybody who's on a federal worker is the federal workers' retirement plan. It's a great plan. It's kind of a hybrid between a defined benefit and defined contribution plan, um, and federal workers are automatically put into this, you know, retirement account, and the um federal government matches.When because the government matches the low income workers, workers like with that barista down the street is in it because she knows she puts in a $1 and she gets $1.50 from the government, from the employer. Well, our plan would anybody who makes below median wage would be automatically put into a plan at just 1% of their.Salary, and the government would match it 3 times, 3% of their salary.
18:02
spk_1
Yeah, as you're talking, the thrift savings plan allows you to invest in equities and fixed income, etc. and very low cost investment options, and I suspect that would be the case but GRA yeah.
18:13
spk_0
And you know what? Yeah, because the government has the muscle to negotiate for the best plans and the lowest fees.
18:21
spk_1
Yeah, I, I mean, on, on paper and in reality, it sounds like a great thing to do. What, what's the hold up? I, I, I'd love to see this happen because we're at 50% coverage.
18:31
spk_0
Well, the AARP supports it. Many unions support it, worker organizations support it, DoorDash supports it, Charles Schwab, Vanguard, Fidelity, they all support it. There's one little, there's a noisy group that does not support it, and they're the the lobbyists for the brokerage industry.Um, those folks that try to sell these very high fee non-fiduciary accounts, they would have to be retrained to do other work. You know, there would be less demand for these for-profit. Some of them are predatory, not all of them, but some, but they're all conflicted.Um, so there's only one small piece of the industry of the finance industry that are against it. Almost everybody is for it, even especially small employers. So I think it's just about focus and attention. It's really not about politics. The special interests are against it, butThere are bigger couple policy issues, and I think most of the people supporting have been able to ignore them.
19:34
spk_1
Yeah, you know, it's interesting, at least in the United Kingdom where they have the Nest program, I think it's been widely accepted and uh and widely praised as addressing the retirement crises that presumably was
19:44
spk_0
in. Most of the time, I don't invoke the nest program because most people don't really look outside for shores, for examples, but it's very much modeled after what our peer um countries do.Advanced market-based societies have a Social Security and a um a private savings plan, you know, a savings plan, and even the Netherlands, which always gets like A's and A pluses for their retirement plan, they have greedy capitalists in their country. They care about profits. They're just like us, but their people retire at a decent age before they're worn out, and theyThe 3% of poverty. The US with the same personalities of employers and capitalists and workers.Retire at 23% of poverty and uh and we have we work the most hours of anybody 1880 hours. None of our peers work that many years, so we're like worn out when we are working and we work the longest, you know, we work into our late 60s where our peers um retire in their early 60s. So we're rich and we just need better institutions.
21:03
spk_1
Um, so you've hinted at this already. We have about, I don't know, maybe 90 seconds left or so, Theresa, about this notion of creating a dignified retirement. Um, maybe just to talk, if you could briefly about that.
21:15
spk_0
Yeah, my research has led me away from kind of finances and and economics and cause you have to when you get into this psychology.And um and also workers' voices about what people want out of their life and the psychologists and the philosophers, and I realized that we are moving away from a vision we had around the 30s, 40s, and 50s, which is the rich and poor alike, the working class people should all deserve um some time to create a personal narrative of their life, not just be a worker bee and be a person.At the end of their lives, you know that that was 10 years, 20 years are the most precious because they're in short supply, you're going to die, and to be able to control your time during that period of time is very human and to deny a huge part of our population, that period of life is the ultimate inequality, and it's not moral, um, and so.Retirement security is more than in kind of a financial decision. It's really a decision about the kind of society we want to create for our people.
22:25
spk_1
Yeah.So I, I hope your great new deal comes to fruition. I hope the GRAs come to fruition, but I'm afraid we've run out of time for now, so we'll have to come, have you come back on. Thanks
22:35
spk_0
for your work, Bob. This is a really great program and it was very well prepared.
22:40
spk_1
Thank you. So that wraps up this episode of Decoding Retirement. We hope we provided you with some actionable advice to better plan for or live in retirement. And remember you can listen to and subscribe to Decoding Retirement on all your favorite streaming platforms.
22:54
spk_2
This content was not intended to be financial advice and should not be used as a substitute for professional financial services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Flexera Named a Leader in 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SaaS Management Platforms
Flexera recognized for its Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision ITASCA, Ill., Aug. 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Flexera, the global leader in technology spend and risk intelligence, today announced it has been positioned as a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for SaaS Management Platforms. We believe this recognition reflects Flexera's strong vision and SaaS strategy, its global presence and its robust thought leadership in the SaaS Management market. It is also the latest recognition from Gartner, as Flexera is the only vendor recognized in both the 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SaaS Management Platforms and the 2024 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Cloud Financial Management Tools. It's our view that this continued recognition highlights Flexera's advanced capabilities to help organizations control SaaS costs, manage shadow AI risks and reduce SaaS sprawl, while driving FinOps maturity through its integrated Flexera One platform. "In today's AI-first world, enterprises face unprecedented complexity in managing their technology ecosystems," said Jim Ryan, CEO of Flexera. "Flexera is uniquely positioned to help them close the visibility gap and act with precision. Our new SaaS Management offering is part of our broader Flexera One platform. This isn't just about SaaS management; it's about delivering actionable, high-fidelity intelligence across hybrid IT to power AI, mitigate risk, and reduce spend. Our leadership in this category is built on the unmatched scale, depth, and trust in our data — and to us, our position in the latest Gartner report demonstrates our commitment to driving innovation where it matters most." According to the Flexera 2025 State of Cloud Report, 35% of organizations report increased SaaS waste year-over-year—underscoring the urgent need for visibility, governance, and cost control. Flexera One SaaS Management solution addresses these challenges by offering: Comprehensive discovery engine: advanced discovery methods, such as Browser and Financial Discovery, Agent, API, Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), and Single-Sign On (SSO), ensure full visibility into all SaaS applications, including those unauthorized or hidden. Advanced SaaS optimization: Sophisticated insights that combine usage intelligence and financial data help identify underutilized licenses or features and implement automated governance and controls to manage and eliminate unused or redundant SaaS subscriptions. Integrated platform: Integration with IT asset management (ITAM) and FinOps processes within the Flexera One platform provides a unified view, supporting better decision-making and cost optimization across the entire IT ecosystem. 'As shadow AI and unsanctioned SaaS usage proliferate, organizations need visibility and control more than ever,' said Leigh Martin, senior director of product management at Flexera. 'Flexera One SaaS Management is the result of extensive innovation and strategic effort, designed to uncover hidden risks, eliminate waste and align SaaS investments with business priorities to meet evolving market demands. We believe our position as a Leader in this Gartner Magic Quadrant reflects our strong SaaS strategy and dynamic solution that meets market demands.' As ITAM, FinOps, and SaaS operations increasingly intersect, organizations need a holistic view across the entire environment. Flexera's SaaS Management capabilities, embedded within the Flexera One platform, provide the foundation for FinOps maturity and the visibility necessary to manage risk across the entire software estate. The evaluation of the 17 recognized vendors was based on criteria that analyzed each company's Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision. To talk to an expert about Flexera One SaaS Management, please visit: A complimentary copy of the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for SaaS Management Platforms report is available here. Follow Flexera on LinkedIn on X (formerly Twitter) on Instagram About Gartner Magic Quadrant Reports A Gartner Magic Quadrant is the culmination of research in a specific market, providing a wide-angle view of the relative positions of the market's competitors. A Magic Quadrant offers a graphical competitive positioning of four types of technology providers in markets where growth is high and provider differentiation is clear: Leaders, Challengers, Visionaries, and Niche Players. Gartner, Magic Quadrant for SaaS Management Platforms, By Tom Cipolla, Dan Wilson, Lina Al Dana, 30 July 2025 GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally, and MAGIC QUADRANT is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and are used herein with permission. All rights reserved. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, express or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. About Flexera Flexera helps organizations understand and maximize the value of their technology, saving billions of dollars in wasted spend. Powered by the Flexera Technology Intelligence Platform, our award-winning IT asset management, FinOps and SaaS management solutions provide comprehensive visibility and actionable insights on an organization's entire IT ecosystem. This intelligence enables IT, finance, procurement, FinOps and cloud teams to address skyrocketing costs, optimize spend, mitigate risk and identify opportunities to create positive business outcomes. More than 50,000 global organizations rely on Flexera and its Technopedia reference library, the largest repository of technology asset data. Learn more at For more information, contact: publicrelations@ in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Unusual Options Volume? Why Only BP Stock Passed the Quantitative Sniff Test
With the rising popularity of equities market trading following the COVID-19 pandemic, it was practically inevitable that interest would boom toward the options space. In many ways, options represent a market within a market. Since the underlying contracts exchange hands at a fraction of the rate of the actual security, the leverage can be tremendous. At the same time, unlike securities in the open market, options expire. So while there are incredible rewards to be had, the debit that you put can be completely nuked in a busted transaction. Even worse, in a credit-based position, tail risk — which is the phenomenon where you must make good on the risk you underwrote — can potentially beat your portfolio to a pulp. More News from Barchart Options Traders Expected Palantir Stock's Tamest Earnings Reaction in a Year. Did They Get It Right? PayPal Maintains its Huge FCF Guidance Despite a Q2 Drop - Is PYPL Stock Too Cheap? Option Volatility And Earnings Report For Aug 4 - 8 Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! Therefore, people turn to indicators like Barchart's Unusual Stock Options Volume screener to find potential opportunities. Fundamentally, it's a smart strategy because the options market tends to be the arena of the smart money. So, if you can decipher where the most intelligent traders are putting their funds, you can potentially gain an edge over everyone else. To be sure, interpreting unusual activity in the derivatives arena is both an art and a science. Here's the rub. Even if you were the world's best expert on the financial markets, you would know instinctively that there's no way all 500 stocks identified as 'unusual' represent compelling wagers. There has to be another mechanism to sort the wheat from the chaff. I believe that energy giant BP (BP) is the only enterprise from Monday's list that passed the sniff test. Let's quickly go over the stats since this is a story about unusual options activity and all. Yesterday, BP's total options volume hit 58,533 contracts, representing a lift of 215.73% over the trailing one-month average. Call volume stood at 47,156 contracts while put volume was 11,377 contracts, generating a put/call ratio of 0.24. Again, I'm not going to be overly excited but you should know that on Monday, options flow — which focuses exclusively on big block transactions likely placed by institutional investors — showed that net trade sentiment stood at more than $1.05 million above parity. This metric favors the bulls so the above ratio could be read intuitively. Okay, with the details out of the way, I'm going to get to the good stuff. BP Stock Flashes a Statistically Significant Signal One of the common traps that you'll find in the broader financial publication space is the concept that bullish options flow (or insert any other line of reasoning, such as a cheap earnings multiple) is automatically a 'good' opportunity. However, if the analyst making the assertion fails to define what 'good' means, the argument is likely to be a presuppositional fallacy. Essentially, merely stating that bullish options flow makes BP stock a 'good' opportunity smuggles the conclusion (that BP is favorably mispriced) into the premise (that there is an objective standard in the market for what 'good' means). If you really break down the argument, it's basically stating that BP stock is good because it has bullish options flow, implying that bullish flow is good because it means BP is good. This type of circular logic — also known as begging the question — runs up and down the financial publication industry. Go read the articles and find out for yourself. Heck, read my articles before my red pill moment, which occurred around April of this year. As far as I'm aware, the only objective truth in the equities sector is that, at the end of the day, the market is either a net buyer or a net seller. It's kinesis or stasis, one or the other. Yes, this may seem like an obvious point but with this framework, we can now much more easily observe recurring patterns and their forward probabilities. For example, in the past 10 weeks, the market voted to buy BP stock four times and sell six times. Despite distributive sessions outweighing accumulative, the overall trajectory of BP was upward. For brevity, we can label this sequence 4-6-U. Now, we all understand that the probability of upside under all conditinos is not a fixed percentage. Have you seen baseball or any team sports in general? Then you know that certain players (the great ones) rise to the occasion. I want to know when BP is in clutch mode and when it's not. To do this, I need to create a decision-tree logic across 10-week intervals (in this case, going back to January 2019): L10 Category Sample Size Up Probability Baseline Probability Median Return if Up 1-9-D 8 37.50% 44.77% 1.73% 2-8-D 24 41.67% 44.77% 4.65% 3-7-D 39 56.41% 44.77% 1.37% 3-7-U 4 50.00% 44.77% 7.70% 4-6-D 63 36.51% 44.77% 2.38% 4-6-U 29 62.07% 44.77% 1.79% 5-5-D 24 33.33% 44.77% 2.12% 5-5-U 54 48.15% 44.77% 2.86% 6-4-D 7 42.86% 44.77% 2.72% 6-4-U 50 44.00% 44.77% 2.11% 7-3-U 14 14.29% 44.77% 3.15% From the table above, the chance that a long position in BP stock will rise is only 44.77%, a negative bias. This is effectively our null hypothesis, the assumption of no mispricing. In contrast, our alternative hypothesis is that because the 4-6-U sequence is flashing, the upside probability for the following week is actually 62.07%. Therefore, an incentive exists to consider a debit-based options strategy. Assuming the positive pathway, the median return is 1.79%. If so, that would imply that BP stock may poke its head above the $33 level quickly. Putting the Math to Good Work Based on the market intelligence above, a sensible idea is to consider the 32/33 bull call spread expiring Sep. 19. This transaction involves buying the $32 call and simultaneously selling the $33 call, for a net debit paid of $54 (the most that can be lost in the trade). Should BP stock rise through the short strike price ($33) at expiration, the maximum profit is $46, a payout of over 85%. However, the most aggressive traders may consider the 32/34 bull spread also expiring on Sept. 19. This trade calls for a net debit of $86, which is pricier than the 32/33 spread. However, the max payout stands at roughly 133%, which is a very tempting proposition. The breakeven for this trade is $32.86, which as mentioned earlier is a realistic target. I mentioned in the title that BP stock passed the quantitative sniff test and that's not clickbait. Running a one-tailed binomial test on the 4-6-U sequence reveals a p-value of 0.0478. This means that there's a 4.78% chance that the implications of the sequence could materialize randomly as opposed to intentionally. Scientists will scoff at this ratio and state that it barely falls under the threshold of statistical significance of 5%. Yet in the context of an open, entropic system like the stock market, this is an awfully compelling signal. No, it doesn't guarantee a positive outcome. However, the usage of Markovian principles helps to rationalize your wagers rather than depending on empirically unanchored opinions and vibes. On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Car insurance options for low-mileage drivers
If you don't drive much, paying hundreds or more a month for car insurance can feel like a waste of money. You can't get rid of the insurance expense entirely, but you may have a way to trim your insurance costs. Requesting a low-mileage discount or switching to insurance designed for your limited driving habits could lower your premiums. This embedded content is not available in your region. Learn more: How car insurance works. The basics explained. Can you get low-mileage car insurance? Yes, you can get low-mileage car insurance. Several insurance companies have lower-cost programs for vehicle owners who log fewer hours behind the wheel. Each company sets its own rules regarding who qualifies as a low-mileage driver, how premiums are calculated, and the type of insurance offered. Types of insurance for low-mileage drivers There are three main types of car insurance programs for low-mileage drivers: Standard car insurance with a discount for low annual mileage. American Family Insurance, National General, Progressive, State Farm, Travelers, and others provide standard car insurance at cheaper rates for low-mileage drivers. Pay-per-mile insurance. Pay-per-mile car insurance has an adjustable premium based on how much you drive. Usually, you will pay a low base rate plus a per-mile rate. If your mileage is low, the sum of the two rate components can be cheaper than standard car insurance. Pay-per-mile insurance policies can provide the same coverage as standard insurance, but this may vary by provider. Allstate, Nationwide, and Mile Auto offer pay-per-mile insurance. Usage-based insurance (UBI), also called telematics insurance. UBI sets pricing based on your driving habits, including the number of miles you drive. If you don't drive a lot and drive safely, your rates with UBI coverage can be competitive. UBI providers monitor your driving behaviors and mileage with technology installed in your vehicle called telematics. Root and others offer UBI insurance. Learn more: How usage-based car insurance works How many miles a year is considered low mileage? Each auto insurance company sets thresholds for low-mileage discounts. Often, there are tiers. According to John Espenschied, agency principal at Insurance Brokers Group, insurance companies may characterize 7,500 annual miles driven as low mileage. But someone who drives 3,000 miles a year often gets a larger discount than another driver who drives 7,000 miles annually. You can also define low mileage as being less than the average miles driven. Average miles driven is estimated at roughly 11,000 to 14,000, depending on the source. Kelley Blue Book estimated the 2023 average mileage at 12,200 miles, based on total miles driven divided by the number of drivers. The Federal Highway Administration reported 11,106 average miles traveled by light-duty vehicles in 2023. How is mileage tracked? There are five ways an insurance company can track your mileage. Odometer photos. To maintain a low-mileage discount on standard insurance, you may need to submit photos of your car's odometer reading once a year or every quarter. Service records and claims. Auto dealers, oil change providers, and independent service shops may report work on your vehicle and odometer readings to national databases. Espenschied noted that insurance companies can access that data to determine how much you drive. Device installed in the car. Some insurance companies provide a device that plugs into your car's diagnostic port. The ports may be located under the steering wheel, near the center console, or under the dashboard. You can check your owner's manual to find the exact location. Connected car. Some modern vehicles have built-in technology that collects data on your driving and sends it to your insurance company. For example, some Toyotas made in 2018 or later can share driving data with Nationwide. Smartphone app. You may have the option to use a mobile app that automatically detects when you're driving and records mileage and other data. Who might want low-mileage insurance You may be a candidate for low-mileage insurance if: You work from home. You are retired. You have multiple cars. You live in a walkable city. You favor public transportation or bicycle riding over driving. In short, if you don't drive a car daily or take long trips, low-mileage insurance may be an option. Up Next Up Next How much does car insurance cost for low-mileage drivers? Espenschied estimated that driving less than 7,500 miles annually can lower insurance premiums by 5% to 15%, depending on the state and the insurer. Mileage example The table below shows how monthly insurance premiums can vary by annual mileage across different insurance companies. Quotes assume full coverage and a clean driving record. For this driver, Travelers and Progressive quoted lower rates for lower mileage, while Geico quoted the same rate for all mileages. Because many factors contribute to insurance pricing, your experience may be different. How to get a low mileage discount on your car insurance Know your mileage. You can estimate your annual mileage by checking your odometer weekly during three or four weeks of normal driving activity. Calculate your average weekly miles and multiply by 52 to approximate your annual miles driven. Ask your current provider. Contact your insurance company and ask if there is a low-mileage discount available. You may need to prove you don't drive much, with dated photos of your odometer. Ask your provider what information you'll need to provide and when the discount can take effect. Use a safe-driving app. Install a safe-driving app like Hum and use it to evaluate your driving habits. If the app gives you a good safety score, consider getting a quote for usage-based insurance. UBI is not advisable if you have risky driving habits, since it may cost more than standard insurance. Shop other providers. Your current insurance company may not have a low mileage discount, or the discount may not be competitive. To get the best rates, gather quotes from other companies. Look into standard coverage with discounts, pay-per-mile insurance, and — if you are a safe driver — usage-based insurance. Note that some online quoting tools may not request or consider your annual mileage. In that case, follow up with a broker or agent to ask about a mileage discount. Read more: How to get all the best car insurance discounts Low-mileage car insurance FAQs Is car insurance cheaper if you drive less? Car insurance may be cheaper if you drive less, depending on your car insurance company and where you live. Each insurance provider decides how important annual mileage is as a pricing factor in car insurance rates. Some treat it as a minor factor, and others weight it heavily. How much cheaper is low-mileage insurance? The potential savings for low-mileage driving can be 5% to 15%, according to Espenschied, of Insurance Brokers Group. Are hybrids good for low-mileage drivers? Hybrid cars deliver the biggest fuel efficiency gains in city driving conditions. On longer drives at steady speeds, hybrids rely more on fuel than electricity. Therefore, hybrids are suitable for low-mileage drivers who take short trips in urban areas but are less efficient for low-mileage drivers who only take occasional highway trips. What mileage is the cheapest for insurance? "There is not one cheapest mileage for insurance, but generally, the fewer miles you drive, the bigger the savings," said Espenschied. In other words, those who drive less than 3,000 miles per year can earn larger discounts than those driving 7,000 miles annually.
