vivo unveils Y50/Y50m 5G - 6,000mAh battery, IP64, entry-level price
Both have a 6.74-inch 1600x720px IPS LCD with a 90Hz refresh rate, and a potent 6,000mAh battery with 44W charging. They run OriginOS 5, and are powered by the 6nm MediaTek Dimensity 6300 with four RAM options - 4GB (Y50), 6GB, 8GB, and 12GB. You either get 128GB or 256GB of expandable storage.
The Y50/Y50m is equipped with two cameras: a 13MP f/2.2 wide-angle lens on the back and a 5MP selfie shooter on the front.
Both phones measure 167.3mm tall, 77mm wide, and 8.2mm thick, and weigh in at 204 grams. They're dust tight and have some degree of water protection at IP64.
The Y50/Y50m come in Azure, Diamond Black, and Platinum and are now up for grabs from vivo's online store. The Y50 is CNY 1,199 (around €143, INR 14,500) for the 4/128GB model, CNY 1,499 (around €180, INR 18,000) for the 6/128GB one, CNY 1,999 (around €240, INR 24,000) for an 8/256GB config, and CNY 2,299 (around €275, INR 27,600) for the 12/256GB unit.
The Y50m has the same prices - CNY 1,499, CNY 1,999, CNY 2,299 - and just lacks the base 4/128GB choice.
Source
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Oppo Find X9 Pro's Dimensity 9500 SoC goes over an important threshold
The Oppo Find X9 Pro will use the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset, and today in China a new rumor claims that the SoC's CPU has gone past the 4 GHz threshold in testing, for the first time in MediaTek's history. Whether this will be the same for production units remains to be seen. For reference, note that the Dimensity 9400+, MediaTek's current top dog, has one core that can be clocked up to 3.73 GHz. The Find X9 Pro is said to come with a "1.5K" resolution flat screen with symmetrical bezels, with a glass or fiberglass back for the white version. Oppo Find X8 Pro It will boast a 200 MP periscope telephoto camera. This has been rumored before to use Samsung's upcoming ISOCELL HP5 sensor, a 1/1.56" type. Source (in Chinese) | Via
Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
If this is what foldables look like now, why should we care about Apple's?
Apple might finally be ready to enter the foldable phone game. According to the latest reports, the first foldable iPhone could launch in late 2026. That would make it seven full years behind Samsung's original Galaxy Fold from 2019, and nearly four years behind the wave of second-generation foldables that actually started getting that raises the obvious question: should we even care about Apple's foldable iPhone if it comes so late? It's hard to overstate how far Samsung has come since its early Fold prototypes. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 is not just thinner and lighter than any previous model — it's the thinnest and lightest book-style foldable you can buy today. At 8.9mm thickness when folded and just 215g, it's about as lean as the Honor Magic V5 and Vivo X Fold 5, with some slight nuances. More importantly, Samsung has finally fixed all the major hardware complaints. The new 6.5-inch cover screen with a 21:9 aspect ratio feels like that of a regular, non- foldable phone . The main 8-inch display is brighter, smoother, and supported by a titanium lattice that helps flatten out the crease. Oh yes, the crease — it's a near-invisible now, finally catching up to what Oppo and Huawei were already doing! Then there's the 200 MP main camera (borrowed from the Galaxy S25 Ultra), the refined One UI 8 software with tight Gemini integration, and the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip that makes this thing fly. The Fold 7 feels like the foldable Samsung always wanted to make (btw, the same can be said for the Z Flip 7). Trade-in $999 99 $2119 99 $1120 off (53%) Get the Galaxy Z Fold 7 with 512GB of storage at Samsung and enjoy a free storage upgrade worth $120. On top of that, you can save up to an extra $1,000 with eligible device trade-ins. Act fast and save while you can! Buy at Samsung Apple doesn't always wait — sometimes it creates entire product categories, like it did with the iPad and AirPods. The iPhone, too, wasn't just 'another smartphone'; it redefined the category altogether. But when it comes to more experimental or evolving markets such as foldables, Apple tends to stay on the sidelines until the technology matures. While Samsung, Huawei, Oppo, and others have iterated for years, Apple has reportedly been perfecting its approach behind closed doors. The upcoming iPhone Fold is expected to feature a premium book-style design with a 5.5-inch cover screen, a 7.8-inch inner display, and a titanium and stainless steel hinge. But its standout feature could be the lack of a crease. Apple is said to be using a new hinge with liquid metal and a flexible internal plate to eliminate the fold entirely, potentially delivering the first truly seamless foldable display. This is something no current device, not even the excellent Fold 7 , has fully achieved. The problem is… Samsung and others have already solved most of the big used to be clunky, heavy, fragile, and awkward. But devices like the Galaxy Fold 7 , Oppo Find N5, and even the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold have smoothed over those pain points. The Fold 7 's hinge is sturdy. Its glass is tougher. Its software is polished and full of genuinely useful features like DeX mode, split-screen multitasking, and AI-powered editing tools. Even performance and thermals are solid — despite the ultra-thin form factor, the Snapdragon 8 Elite delivers excellent benchmark scores. There's not much left to 'fix.' Which puts Apple in a tough spot: the iPhone Fold needs to do more than just finally get released. It needs to offer something meaningfully different. To Apple's credit, there are still a few ways it could elevate the foldable experience. 1. A better ecosystem fit The iPhone Fold will likely run iOS with some iPadOS-style multitasking features layered in, like Split View, Slide Over, and Stage Manager. Combined with Apple Intelligence — given that it is actually useful by the time this phone comes out — that could lead to a uniquely fluid tablet-like experience. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a hardware masterpiece, but foldables still struggle with inconsistent app experiences. Many apps don't fully adapt to the larger screen, showing stretched layouts or awkward transitions between folded and unfolded states. Apple could fix that. With its tight control over iOS and deep experience across iPhone and iPad, Apple is uniquely positioned to deliver a more seamless, polished foldable experience. If every app works flawlessly across both displays from day one, the foldable iPhone could feel more refined than any Android foldable. 2. A clean software experience No ads, no duplicate app stores, and no third-party bloatware. Apple's tightly integrated software could offer a more polished, cohesive experience than what most foldables deliver today. 3. The "Apple factor" Apple's brand power can't be ignored. If the hardware and design are as premium as expected — titanium chassis, under-display selfie camera, side-mounted Touch ID — that alone might be enough to convince millions of iPhone users to give foldables a depends on how you see the future of foldables. Right now, book-style foldables remain niche — powerful and versatile, but still expensive enough to keep most people away. They offer a true phone-meets-tablet experience, and even though Samsung has a strong head start, Apple fans are still waiting for their foldable iPhone . Apple's window of opportunity hasn't closed yet. But with the Galaxy Z Fold 7 finally delivering the refined foldable experience many have been waiting for, it's definitely getting narrower. Apple can still win (even with a late entry) as long as the iPhone Fold is solid. But if it wants to convert new users and stand out, it'll need to deliver something genuinely fresh and useful. First-generation products often come with trade-offs, but given how long Apple has delayed its foldable, it doesn't have the luxury of a rough start.
Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Galaxy Watch 8 Classic's rotating bezel: A feature I can live without
Samsung brought back the "Classic" variant of its smartwatch this year. One of the hallmarks of the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, and a big marketing point, is the physical rotating bezel. Today I'm going to go against the grain and argue against this physical interface. This may be an unpopular opinion, but to be honest, I've seen quite a few people share this sentiment that the rotating bezel in Samsung's watches is an unnecessary, bulky, laggy, and even ugly contraption. But first, a few words on the history of the rotating bezel. Back to the year 2015! History of the rotating bezel The first iteration of the rotating bezel in the Gear S2 | Image by PhoneArena Samsung introduced it with the Galaxy Gear S2 in 2015. Back then, people were fascinated by the idea. My colleague Nick praised it in the Galaxy Gear S2 Review: "Speaking of the bezel, it is one of the Gear S2's stand-out features. By rotating it, one can navigate through the smartwatch's menus, scroll down emails, and interact with apps, having to touch the display only to confirm a selection. The solution is elegant, convenient, and superior to anything similar that we've seen on a smartwatch to date." The design made its way to the Galaxy Watch 3 and subsequently to the Galaxy Watch 4 Classic. But then Samsung decided to move to a two-year release cycle for the rotating bezel models, skipping it on the Galaxy Watch 5 series, only to bring it back a year later on the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic. The Galaxy Watch 7 series once again omitted the rotating bezel, and now we have it back on the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. What's going on? It turns out that most of the reasons match the ones I already mentioned in the beginning. Let's dive deeper. Design and aesthetics The true origin of the rotating bezel can be traced back to diving watches in the 1950s | Image by Omega One of the reasons Samsung has been taking away and bringing back the rotating bezel on a regular basis lies in the aesthetics department. I know design is subjective, but in 2022, when Samsung removed the rotating bezel from the Galaxy Watch 5 series, the industry was pushing for a minimal and stylish look. Samsung was competing with the Apple Watch 8 and allegedly saw the rotating bezel as old school, bulky, and outside the design language the company wanted to portray. Samsung didn't say this officially, but that's what the rumor mill was spitting out at the time. The sleek and stylish Galaxy Watch 7 | Image by PhoneArena I'm absolutely on board with this point of view. Smartwatches have been trying for years to mimic regular timepieces, mainly because we're so accustomed to the design through the ages. But given the true origin of the rotating bezel, I think it looks odd and out of place on a modern and stylish smartwatch. Hear me out. The origin of the rotating bezel can be traced back to diving watches back in the 1950s. It was a crucial safety feature to remind divers of the time they'd spent underwater. Nowadays many smartwatches go for that "diving watch" aesthetic, even though they're not specifically designed for diving. I personally find this annoying; instead of making smartwatches innovative and exciting, we're clinging to the past. But even as an interface piece, the rotating bezel is, in my opinion, not a very good idea. It's redundant as an interface You still need to tap on the display to navigate in and out of menus and apps | Image by PhoneArena The rotating bezel is mainly used to scroll through menus and text on the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. In order to select something or go back, you need to touch the display. Many people argue in favor of the rotating crown with the argument that it lets you navigate without touching the display—for example, with wet or dirty hands, underwater, etc. However, it's simply not the case—you can't even use the other physical buttons to avoid touching the screen—you can only return to the home screen. To me, it's a flawed design and a failed opportunity. Had Samsung allowed the physical buttons on the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic to be used to go forward and back one step, the rotating bezel would've made much more sense. And even then, doing a rotating motion to scroll up and down or left and right isn't the most intuitive way to do it. And speaking of alternatives… There's a better way to do it—the rotating crown Apple Watch's rotating crown is minimal and gives more design freedom As far as physical scrolling interfaces go, Apple did a great job with the rotating crown. Don't get me wrong, I still think that the Apple Watch is overpriced and flawed with its 18-hour battery life. The rotating crown, though, was a great invention, and no wonder so many companies have copied it. It requires less physical effort to turn (you can do it with a finger), your hand doesn't obscure the display while you're turning it, and the direction of the rotation mimics what's happening on the display—you turn it up or down, and the text or menu moves up or down. For me, the rotating crown is a better implementation of the same idea and also leaves much more design freedom. Other problems with the rotating bezel People are complaining about rotating bezel's durability and functionality on older Galaxy Watch models | Image by Reddit The rotating bezel is a big moving part. And as we all know, parts that move mechanically are prone to failure. It's also a point of entry for dirt and moisture, adding to the risk of failure I mentioned above. The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is still quite new, and it will take some time for such problems to manifest, but still, it's a potential issue. Conclusion Design and interface are two subjective parts of the smartwatch equation. I get that many people still love and swear by the rotating bezel, but it's just not for me. I see it as a gimmick and a tribute to our old ways of thinking. I would love to see new designs, new interface choices, and braver solutions when it comes to smartwatches. What do you think of the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic and the rotating bezel? Vote in our poll and share your thoughts in the comment section below.
