Biblical tales in the Puranas
The Bhavishya Purana imagines an India (Bharat-varsha) from the Himalayas to the sea, with the Indus or Sindhu-desha forming the main barrier between Arya-desha, land of civilised folk, and Mleccha-desha, land of barbarians. In Bharat-varsha, the four varnas do their duty. Sanskrit is spoken by the twice-born elites and Prakrit by the Shudras, or service-providers. Dravida-desha is to the south of the Vindhyas; there varnas tend to mix. In other local lore, Dravida-desha is the land without Kshatriyas, which Rishi Agastya and Rishi Parashurama organise and cultivate using the local Shudras.
Like all Puranas, this text speaks of creation followed by the four yugas. The first yuga, Satya, was ruled by Ikshavaku kings. The second, Dvapara, was ruled by solar kings ending with Ram of Ayodhya. Treta yuga was ruled by lunar kings ending with the infamous Mahabharata war. But there is a slight twist. Yayati's children are founders not just of the Pandavas, Kauravas and Yadavas, but also of the Mlecchas, who are essentially those who turn away from Vedic rites, and take refuge in Maru-desha (probably the Thar desert).
We are told of Satanika, the 23rd generation descendent of the Pandavas. His great grandson Kshemaka is killed by the Mlecchas. Kshemaka's son Pradyota performs a great Mleccha yagna where hundreds of barbarians are slaughtered. Kshemaka's son Vedavat died childless and that is when Kali Yuga actually begins.
An Indian Adam and Eve
Mleccha-Kali prays to Vishnu for the revival of the Mlecchas, and so from the god's clay are born Adama and Hayvavati. In Persian, Eve is called Hawa. Adama's name is linked to the restraint (dama) of his senses and devotion to Vishnu. They live 'east of Pradana' — a name that seems like a combination of Paradise and Eden.
East of Eden is a common Christian metaphor for transgressors, like Adam's son Cain who kills his brother Abel. Adam goes to the Udumbara (fig) tree in search of his wife, where the serpent of Kaliyuga offers fruit on a plate made of leaves. Here, Hayavavati, like a 'good' Indian wife, feeds the husband first, even though eating this fruit is forbidden. Since the rules are broken, the two are cast out. Their children are the Mlecchas.
Then comes the story of Nyuha (Noah), who is advised by Vishnu to build a boat (of exact Biblical specifications) in seven days to survive a flood, which will mark the onset of Kaliyuga. Besides his relatives, Nyuha rescues 80,000 munis (silent sages) and all living creatures. The sages venerate Vishnu's maya, as well as numerous Tantrik goddesses, before the rains stop and the ship lands between two Himalayan peaks, Arac and Sisira.
Unable to speak proper Sanskrit, Nyuha communicates in reverse (right-to-left, like Semitic script) and renames his sons Sima, Sama and Bhava as Sima (Shem), Hama (Ham) and Yakuta (Japhteh). Saraswati curses them that their language will be low, but their numbers will be high, and they will populate much of the Earth.
Of Jesus and Muhammad
Musa or Moses' teaching inspires the Mlecchas. But he is countered by Rishi Kashyapa who travels to Egypt and spreads the Vedic doctrine. He brings back a few Mlecchas who transform, under Rishi Kanva's guidance, into Shudras and Vaishyas. Their descendents populate parts of Haryana (Prithu-desha), Rajasthan (Rajaputra-puram) and Magadha. Significantly, in 800 AD, Multan was known as Kashyapapura, and it was here that Devala-smriti, a dharma-shastra, was written by local Brahmins to purify those said to be contaminated by contact with Arabs.
In the Dark Age, the Vedic order was re-established first by Vikramaditya, then by Shalivahana and finally by Bhoja, the king who ruled Malwa in 1000 AD. Vikramaditya encounters Jesus (Isamasiha) while Shalivahana and his poet, Kalidasa, encounter Muhammad (Mahamada).
All this reveals a jumbled public memory in the 1800s of an earlier period when India had first contact with foreigners, between 300 BC and 500 AD. Their arrival marked the end of the old Vedic Age that forced Brahmins of Yamuna-Ganga doab to reimagine Hinduism through Puranic lore, and migrate to new lands in search of new patrons.
Most fascinating is how the stories of the Bible were retold. Information about them could have come to Brahmin storytellers via Christian sailors or even Persian and Arab traders. We get a glimpse of this in the Mughal paintings depicting Biblical themes.
Devdutt Pattanaik is author of 50 books on mythology, art and culture.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Sudershan Reddy's candidature strengthens our collective resolve to safeguard democracy, says Stalin
Chief Minister M.K. Stalin congratulated retired Supreme Court judge B. Sudershan Reddy on being named INDIA bloc's Vice-Presidential candidate. 'I wholeheartedly congratulate Thiru B. Sudershan Reddy on being chosen as the vice-presidential candidate of the Opposition,' he said. Mr. Reddy was a jurist of integrity and independence, and a champion of civil liberties and social justice, and upheld constitutional values throughout his career, Mr. Stalin said. 'At a time when our institutions are under strain, his candidature strengthens our collective resolve to safeguard democracy and protect the spirit of the Constitution,' he added. Contending that all the independent institutions meant to safeguard democracy had been turned into the 'subsidiary bodies of the ruling party', and that the Constitution was in danger, he said, 'In such a situation, the responsibility before us is to support only the one who believes in India's fundamental ideals of secularism, federalism, social justice, and unity in diversity.' Mr. Stalin alleged that the BJP-led government at the Centre was 'continuously inflicting injustice on Tamil Nadu' — refusing to accept the State's rightful demands such as exemption from NEET, recognition of Keeladi's antiquity, fairness in fund devolution, and release of educational funds. 'Through Governors, it has been running a parallel government and blocking the functioning of State governments, while engaging in efforts to weaken institutions of higher education.' The DMK was consistently and vociferously raising its voice in Parliament against the unconstitutional denial of the State rights, the centralisation of power, the rising tide of hate propaganda, and the relentless imposition of Hindi and Sanskrit — 'all of which dig a grave for the Constitution and attempt to bury it', Mr. Stalin said. The DMK president said 'secular-spirited people of Tamil Nadu' had, in successive elections, overwhelmingly voted for the MPs and MLAs of the DMK-led alliance to defend the rights of the State and safeguard the Constitution. 'This decision stands as both a reaffirmation of the people's faith and a mark of respect for their mandate and sentiment.' 'As someone who can create space for constructive debates in Parliament, conduct the House by giving the rightful place to the voice of the Opposition, and as a democrat who has faith in the Constitution and in the principles of federalism, pluralism, social justice, and linguistic rights — Mr. Sudershan Reddy stands. As the opposite of anti-federalism, authoritarianism, and the trend of spreading hatred — Mr. Sudershan Reddy stands,' he said.
The Wire
a day ago
- The Wire
The Increasing Use of Hindu Mythological References in the Armed Forces Under the BJP Govt
All three services have aided the government in crafting a martial identity focused less on professional neutrality and more on cultural assertion. In turn, this only eroded the inherent secularity associated with the Indian military. New Delhi: Since coming to power in 2014, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led Union government has increasingly infused Hindu mythology not just into public life, but also into the military sphere, shaping naming of operations, ceremonial practices, and institutional symbolism to reflect a culturally and politically charged vision of national identity. Assorted military operations, along with numerous defence platforms, doctrines, and programmes, were now routinely named after figures, concepts, and events from the epics and Puranas, curiously linking contemporary security and military power to India's ancient cultural heritage. A politically framed transition The objective, it appears, is to cast the armed forces as an extension of the valour and divinity celebrated in Hindu mythology, emphasising strength, precision, and the swift destruction of adversaries. This transformation is politically framed as part of a broader nationalist effort to 'decolonise' the military, discarding colonial-era associations, tenets, designations, practices, and traditions in favour of culturally resonant symbols that embody a vision of a pure Viksit or developed India. Thus, names such as Sudarshan Chakra (Vishnu's celestial discus), Rudra (the Destroyer), Mahadev (the Great God), and Bhairav (the Ferocious), among many others, have been steadily introduced into the military in recent years for their psychological impact and cultural resonance, with the deliberate and pointed aim of reshaping the military's fundamental character. And in this ongoing endeavour, the armed forces were undergoing re-positioning – not as an apolitical institution – but as 'deliberate custodians' of the BJP's civilisational vision of ethnic nationalism. Rather than resisting, they eagerly embraced this shift, embedding mythological names into manuals, rituals, and briefings, and ensuring such symbolism became part of everyday military culture. A cross-section of service veterans, however, lamented that, by intertwining mythology with modern warfare, all three services had aided the government in crafting a martial identity focused less on professional neutrality and more on cultural assertion. In turn, this only eroded the inherent secularity associated with the Indian military. Alongside, instruction in ancient Indian texts like Kautilya's Arthashastra and Bhagavad Gita has been mandated by the government in military institutions, and in October 2023, the Indian Army (IA), with great fanfare, had launched Operation Udhhav (Evolution) to study ancient Sanskrit and Tamil texts from the 4th century BCE to the 8th century CE. The objective, according to Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, who inaugurated this Operation at the United Services Institute think-tank in New Delhi, was to 'rediscover' the country's rich heritage in 'statecraft, warcraft, diplomacy and grand strategy' and to operationally adapt it all in the Subcontinent's prevailing nuclear weapons environment. Other than the Arthashastra, Udbhav concentrates on the writings of the post-Mauryan Kamandaka (Nitisara) and those of the Tamil poet Thiruvalluvar (Tirukkural) to 'bridge historical concepts' with the contemporary, and to 'integrate age-old wisdom with modern military pedagogy, according to the Press Information Bureau at the time of launching Udbhav. Furthermore, in line with government instructions, the IA's Adjutant General's Branch is reportedly preparing sweeping proposals to discard colonial-era traditions centred on either reconsidering, or altogether eliminating long-established dress codes, pipe and drum bands, colour presentations, and investiture ceremonies. Service veterans strongly opposed prevailing trend of 'mythologising' Longstanding affiliations of blood and bonding between IA units and foreign regiments, forged during the two World Wars, were also likely to soon be dissolved in a move to sever ties with India's mlitary's past. It's an established truism that all militaries, past and current, rely on tradition, institutional memory, and established norms to maintain cohesion, discipline, and professional identity. But when naming practices and symbolic gestures are politicised or infused with cultural Hindutva ideology in the Indian military, they tend to reshape its traditions and ethos and alter its longstanding legacies of neutrality and impartiality. Meanwhile, several service veterans strongly opposed this prevailing trend of 'mythologising' in the military, arguing that adopting names from ancient epics simply amplified the BJP's cultural messaging and facilitated overt narrative construction to serve sectarian politics. While acknowledging that the intermixing of religion and politics was not new, applying it progressively to the armed forces over the past decade, they said, was unprecedented. They further contended that the BJP's deliberate strategy of recasting India's defence capabilities as the modern embodiment of divine power and heroic figures from the past was also 'deeply troubling', but few were willing to openly challenge it as they were fearful of 'consequences'. Another Indian Air Force (IAF) veteran observed that this symbiotic relationship between BJP politicians and soldiers benefited both sides. The former, he said, leveraged military operations to bolster their electoral campaigns, showcasing a strong approach to national security, while ambitious soldiers who supported or endorsed their narratives were invariably rewarded with promotions and career advancement and, in some cases, high-profile employment after retirement. Also Read: Rudra, Bhairav, Shaktibaan: Army's Mythology-Infused Brigades Revive an Old War Plan in New Garb Such mutual reinforcement blurred the boundary between professional military service and political utility, he added, requesting anonymity. But this was not always the case. A three-star Army veteran noted that, for several decades after Independence, operation naming was largely ad hoc and left to the discretion of local commanders. Many operations bore Anglicised, yet neutral names like Blue Star, Brasstacks, Rhino, Cactus, Checkmate, and Trident, amongst others. Nativised monikers were typically functional or drawn from nature, geography, and history – Meghdoot, Pawan, Vijay, Kabaddi, Safed Sagar, Bajrang and Hifazat, to name a few. 'This naming was not only secular but often carried a mischievous and droll streak of informality as in Ops Orchid, Shanti, Ginger, Samaritan and Leech,' recalled the veteran, speaking on condition of anonymity. Platform names too – INS Mysore, INS Ganga, INS Godavari, Chetak, Cheetah, Dhruv, Prithvi, Akash, Nag, Ajeya and Vijayanta – reflected linguistic, cultural, geographical, and historical themes without overtly religious or mythological references, underscoring the armed forces' conscious effort to maintain neutrality and institutional distance from political agendas. 'However, today's trend is different,' he stated, adding that 'All three services now compete to adopt religiously inflected nomenclature to please the government." This shift reflected a growing alignment between military naming and political-cultural messaging, where operation and platform names were no longer purely professional or strategic, but heavily influenced by the BJP's ideological and partisan considerations, he said. Furthermore, many officers, he added, either proposed names with Hindu mythological resonance themselves, or promptly endorsed suggestions from senior ministers, anticipating the BJP's preference for such allusions. Military action intersects with identity politics Globally, many militaries have adopted different naming conventions. The US, Britain, and other Western armed forces, for instance, tended to choose operation names systematically and institutionally, drawing from preapproved lists of neutral or evocative words. These names conscientiously avoided religious, cultural, or political sensitivities and were designed to ensure operational security, while subtly conveying operational intent. Since the 1970s, the US, for instance, has employed a semi-random system in which each command receives blocks of letters to generate two-word operation names, ensuring both neutrality and unpredictability. There is also an implicit rule that all names avoid overt aggression, commercial brands, or cultural insensitivity. For example, Operation Killer (1951, Korean War) and Infinite Justice (post-9/11 Afghanistan), both somewhat evocative, were replaced with Operation Ripper and Operation Enduring Freedom, respectively. The British Ministry of Defence favours understatement and anonymity, providing units also with randomly generated lists, from which one codeword is selected. Traditionally, Britain uses one-word names for operations, two-word names for exercises, but all neutral and discreet. French operations, for their part, are named after geographic or symbolic references, avoiding religiosity, while post-WWII German operations employed abstract, benign, or humanitarian names, reinforcing the military's role as an impartial instrument of state policy. Compared to these neutral models. India's increasing use of evocative, culturally charged operation names highlights a unique trajectory, where military action intersects with identity politics. Operations like Sindoor, for example, typified this trend, framing military action not as a strategic necessity but as a 21st-century enactment of a cultural legacy. Besides, operations like the 2016 'surgical strikes' and the 2019 Balakot air attack were woven into electoral campaigns, portraying the forces as instruments of nationalist messaging. Veterans cautioned that such lobbying gravely undermined the armed forces' secular and inclusive character and risked weakening of one of India's most trusted institutions. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
From The Hindu, August 19, 1975: Jatti suggests use of Nagari as common script
New Delhi, Aug. 18: The Vice-President, Mr. B.D. Jatti, to-day pleaded for the use of Nagari script as an effective instrument to bring about unity, understanding and integration between different regions. He said the use of Nagari script as the link between the South Indian languages of Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Malayalam, and between the southern and northern languages would prove of the utmost benefit both to the south and to the north. Inaugurating the Nagari Lipi Parishad here, Mr. Jatti said the South Indian languages were close to each other but were almost rigidly confined to their respective regions, because of difference in script. For a similar reason northerners were unable to understand Malayalam or Kannada even though 70 per cent of the words in these languages were in Sanskrit. Mr. Jatti said the Devnagari script was currently in use in the languages of Marathi and Hindi and with slight variations this script was being used in many other languages prevalent in the north. It was also used in the ancient languages of Sanskrit, Ardharmagadhi and Pali. 'It need hardly be said that the Nagari script is not needed to learn one's own language but to learn a language other than one's own. This is necessary if we are to be united and conscious of our common literary and philosophic heritage,' he observed. It had been widely recognised that Devnagari had advantages as a script which roman and other scripts did not possess. In it there was no ambiguity in utterance as there was no divergence between spelling and pronunciation.
