Ex-Biden official says former prez should've ‘bowed out' after ‘Afghanistan debacle'
Monday was the one-year anniversary of then-President Biden dropping out of the 2024 presidential election, relinquishing the nomination to then-Vice President Kamala Harris. His son, Hunter Biden, also made headlines recently by offering views ranging from blasting Democratic Party elites to suggesting his father was on Ambien during the debate.
'I know exactly what happened in that debate,' Hunter said on the 'Channel 5' podcast this past weekend. 'He flew around the world, basically, the mileage that he could have flown around the world, three times.
'He's 81 years old. He's tired as s—. They give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage. And he looks like he's a deer in the headlights. And it feeds into every f—ing story that anybody wants to tell.'
An NBC news panel discussed both the interview and the Democratic Party's efforts to analyze what went wrong in the election.
4 U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks on Afghanistan during a speech in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., August 31, 2021.
REUTERS
'A lot of things can be true here,' Coley, who is now an NBC News contributor, said. 'So he was 81 years old, and he did take two trips back and forth from Europe. I give him that. That's not why he lost the race, though.'
'You can have the best message in the world, you can have the best policy agenda in the world, but at the end of the day, if you don't have a trusted messenger, somebody that voters think can go the distance, somebody who has stamina, then you're gonna lose,' he continued. 'And that's what happened on the presidential level in 2024.'
4 Flag-draped transfer cases of U.S. military service members who were killed by an August 26 suicide bombing at Kabul's Hamid Karzai International Airport line the inside of a C-17 Globemaster II prior to a dignified transfer at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, U.S., August 29, 2021.
VIA REUTERS
4 Coley argued that Biden could not recover after the 'Afghanistan debacle.'
NBC
4 Former U.S. President Joe Biden at the presidential debate in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., June 27, 2024.
REUTERS
He then argued that Biden's fate was sealed long before, and should have taken the hint to leave the race.
'I think what Hunter Biden didn't say is that people started losing confidence in Joe Biden – whom I love, who I worked for in his administration – right after the Afghanistan debacle,' he said. 'Do you remember that? It was August of 2022, like his polling never recovered after Afghanistan.'
While the midterms that year gave Biden's team a degree of confidence, he said, the Afghanistan debacle was nonetheless 'the moment he really should have bowed out, and we should have had a robust primary process.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
4 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Math Fail Sparks Massive Online Trolling
President Donald Trump is getting heat on social media for making a claim on Tuesday about cutting drug prices that's essentially mathematically impossible. Trump began promisingly enough with a complaint shared by Democrats and Republicans alike: the high cost of medication, and how much more Americans pay for some medications than patients in other countries. He promised to reduce those costs ― but to a very unlikely degree. 'We're gonna get the drug prices down. Not 30% or 40%, which would be great. Not 50% or 60%. No, we're gonna get them down 1,000%, 600%, 500%, 1,500%,' Trump said at a Republican dinner. 'Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable.' Critics quickly pointed out the reason those numbers are not thought to be achievable: reducing the price by 100% would make the drugs free. Reducing it by '1,000%, 600%, 500%, 1,500%,' as Trump said, would make the cost negative dollars ― with the drug company essentially paying people to take the medication. Trump: This is somebody nobody else can do. I can get the drug prices down… 1000% 600% 500% 1500%. Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable. — Acyn (@Acyn) July 23, 2025 @acyn/ C-SPAN / Via Twitter: @Acyn Several users asked Grok, the AI chatbot on X, if Trump's numbers made sense. Grok called Trump's claim ' mathematically impossible,' ' hyperbolic and not literal ' and ' total bullshit.' But Trump insisted he could use 'a certain talent that I have' to convince pharmaceutical companies that they have no choice but to reduce their prices. Trump also mentioned an executive order he signed in May to invoke 'most-favored nation' status in drug costs, which he says would ensure that drug companies can't charge Americans any more than what they charge patients in other nations. However, the details of that plan remain hazy, and at least one pharmaceutical CEO said discussions with the White House are ongoing and expected to take time. Trump on Tuesday insisted that his order will lead to those price cuts. 'We will have reduced drug prices by 1,000%, by 1,100, 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 700, 600,' he said. 'Not 30 or 40 or 50%, but numbers the likes of which you've never even dreamed of before.' Trump's critics offered some free math lessons: As someone who graduated from first grade, this is not how numbers work. — Hemant Mehta (@hemantmehta) July 23, 2025 @hemantmehta/ C-SPAN Thank goodness this guy isn't negotiating the percentages we pay in tariffs. — Justin Wolfers (@JustinWolfers) July 23, 2025 @justinwolfers / C-SPAN Quite a trick if he can do it. Are we going into negative numbers where big Pharma pays me to take their drugs? — Dj Omega Mvp (@DjOmegaMVP) July 23, 2025 @DJOmegaMVP/ C-SPAN Hard to imagine this guy was found liable of fraud for making up numbers — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) July 23, 2025 @meidastouch/ C-SPAN So the drug companies are going to pay us to take their drugs? Dumbest President EVER. — SickoftheCrap (@SickoftheC) July 23, 2025 @SickoftheC The economics department at Wharton must be incredibly proud of this man's fundamental understanding of basic math. — Franklin Leonard (@franklinleonard) July 23, 2025 @franklinleonard/ C-SPAN Cant wait fill my next zpack at cvs and leave with a stack of their money — Ronnie (@Gem_Mint_Cards_) July 23, 2025 @gem_mint_cards_/ C-SPAN I feel like a requirement of being president should be understanding basic math. — Jared Ryan Sears (@JaredRyanSears) July 23, 2025 @JaredRyanSears So medicines would be free and pharmaceutical companies would pay us? — Bru🔮 💉🗣 (@brwninh4) July 23, 2025 @brwninh4 Getting paid to take drugs sounds awesome where do I sign up — TCL (@TitleTalkTCL) July 23, 2025 @titletalkTCL / C-SPAN Universal Prescription Income. Your move, Yang — Roger Sollenberger (@SollenbergerRC) July 23, 2025 @SollenbergerRC/ C-SPAN What kind of math is this? — Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) July 23, 2025 @WuTangKids/ C-SPAN And people wonder how this idiot bankrupted casinos. — Jo (@JoJoFromJerz) July 23, 2025 @JoJoFromJerz/ C-SPAN Negative drug prices are on the way ! 🤣🇺🇸 — Christopher Schultz (@nalyticsatwork) July 23, 2025 @nalyticsatwork/ C-SPAN This is the fucking genius. — Fred Wellman (@FPWellman) July 23, 2025 @FPWellman/ C-SPAN — Dave Itzkoff (@ditzkoff) July 23, 2025 @DaveItzkoff/ C-SPAN @realDonaldTrump is out here pitching drug deals like it's Shark Tank for Cartels: 'I'm offering insulin for negative $300 and a lifetime supply of bleach injections… but only if you call in the next 15 minutes.' This QVC for crackheads. — Frank C (@FrankC164) July 23, 2025 @FrankC164/ C-SPAN
Los Angeles Times
4 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Tech companies want to move fast. Trump's ‘AI Action Plan' aims to remove ‘red tape'
The Trump administration on Wednesday laid out a plan that aims to make it easier for companies to quickly develop and deploy artificial intelligence technology. The initiative shows how Silicon Valley tech executives who backed Trump during the election are shaping federal policy that will impact their businesses as they compete globally to dominate the AI race. 'Artificial intelligence is a revolutionary technology with the potential to transform the global economy and alter the balance of power in the world,' said David Sacks, the White House's AI and crypto advisor, in a statement. 'To remain the leading economic and military power, the United States must win the AI race.' Sacks is a co-founder and partner at Craft Ventures, a venture capital firm in San Francisco. Tech companies have forged stronger ties with the Trump administration by donating money, showing up at high profile events such as his inauguration and showcasing their U.S. investments. Shortly after Trump took office, OpenAI, Oracle and Softbank announced that they planned to invest a total of $500 billion in AI infrastructure over the next four years. Billionaire Elon Musk, who runs Tesla and SpaceX, donated more than $280 million to the 2024 election and was tasked with slashing government spending. Apple, which has faced criticism from Trump for building its iPhones overseas, said it would invest $500 billion in the United States. The AI plan underscores how Trump is taking a different approach to AI regulation than his predecessor, former President Biden, who focused on AI's benefits but also potential risks such as fueling disinformation and displacing jobs. Trump had revoked Biden's executive order in January that placed guardrails around AI development. Tech companies started investing in artificial intelligence long before the rise of the popularity of OpenAI's ChatGPT, a chatbot that can generate text and images. But the emergence of more rivals has sparked a fierce competition among companies that are trying to release new AI tools that could reshape industries from healthcare to education. The rapid pace of technological development has raised concerns about whether the government is doing enough to regulate tech companies and safeguard the public from AI's potential dangers. Some fact-checkers have noted that AI chatbots can spew out incorrect information. Parents are worried chatbots their children use could pose a threat to their mental health. But regulation has a tough time keeping pace with how fast technology moves. The government also has to balance concerns that too many rules can hinder how quickly companies can release new AI-powered products. As major tech giants from Google and Meta face OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, they're also going head to head with rivals in other countries including Chinese AI company DeepSeek. The plan outlines removing 'bureaucratic red tape' and 'onerous federal regulation' that would make it tougher for companies to quickly build and develop AI technology. It also mentions revamping permits for data centers, infrastructure needed to power AI systems. Data centers house computing equipment such as servers used to process the trove of information needed to train and maintain AI systems. But the amount of water and electricity data centers consume concerns some environmentalists. Ahead of the plan's release, more than 80 civil rights, labor and environmental groups signed a 'people's AI action plan.' 'We can't let Big Tech and Big Oil lobbyists write the rules for AI and our economy at the expense of our freedom and equality, workers and families' well-being, even the air we breathe and the water we drink — all of which are affected by the unrestrained and unaccountable roll-out of AI,' the competing plan said. The White House's plan also tries to address one of the biggest concerns about the rapid deployment of AI: the potential that technology could replace humans in some jobs. The building of infrastructure to power AI systems, for example, will create high-paying jobs for Americans, the plan said. 'AI will improve the lives of Americans by complementing their work — not replacing it,' the plan said. It also said that AI systems must be free from bias. The plan recommends that the National Institute of Standards and Technology eliminate references to 'misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change' in its AI risk management framework. The plan emphasized the importance of national security. It mentioned that the U.S. should export its 'full AI technology stack' that includes hardware and software to its allies and partners but deny advanced AI to its foreign adversaries. Some tech executives on Wednesday quickly praised the AI plan. Box Chief Executive Aaron Levie said that the plan is 'quite strong.' 'It has a clear a mission to win the AI race and accelerate the development and use of AI by removing roadblocks or aiding adoption. Importantly, it focuses on the positive benefits of AI, which we're all seeing every day,' he wrote on X. Fred Humphries, Microsoft's corporate vice president of U.S. Government Affairs, also praised the plan. 'President Trump's plan will accelerate infrastructure readiness so AI can be built and used here, and help students and workers with skills needed to win in an AI-powered global economy,' he said on X.
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
From tech podcasts to policy: Trump's new AI plan leans heavily on Silicon Valley industry ideas
President Donald Trump has unveiled a sweeping new plan for America's 'global dominance' in artificial intelligence, proposing to cut back environmental regulations to speed up the construction of AI supercomputers while promoting the sale of U.S.-made AI technologies at home and abroad. The 'AI Action Plan' introduced Wednesday embraces many of the ideas voiced by tech industry lobbyists and the Silicon Valley investors who backed Trump's election campaign last year. The White House on Wednesday revealed the 'AI Action Plan' Trump ordered after returning to the White House in January. Trump gave his tech advisers six months to come up with new AI policies after revoking President Joe Biden's signature AI guardrails on his first day in office. The unveiling is co-hosted by the bipartisan Hill and Valley Forum and the 'All-In' podcast, a business and technology show hosted by four tech investors and entrepreneurs, which includes Trump's AI czar, David Sacks. The plan includes some familiar tech lobby pitches. That includes accelerating the sale of AI technology abroad and making it easier to construct the energy-hungry data center buildings that are needed to form and run AI products. It also includes some of the AI culture war preoccupations of the circle of venture capitalists who endorsed Trump last year. Trump's AI plan: global dominance, cutting regulations The plan prioritizes AI innovation and adoption, urging the removal of any 'red tape' that could be slowing down adoption across industries and government. But it also seeks to guide the industry's growth to address a longtime rallying point for the tech industry's loudest Trump backers: countering the liberal bias they see in AI chatbots such as ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. Trump's plan seeks to block the government from contracting with tech companies unless they 'ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias.' A Biden-era framework for evaluating the riskiest AI applications should also be stripped of any references to 'misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change,' the plan said. The plan also says the nation's leading AI models should protect free speech and be 'founded on American values,' though it doesn't define which values those should include. Sacks, a former PayPal executive and now Trump's top AI adviser, has been criticizing 'woke AI' for more than a year, fueled by Google's February 2024 rollout of an AI image generator that, when asked to show an American Founding Father, created pictures of Black, Asian and Native American men. Google quickly fixed its tool, but the 'Black George Washington' moment remained a parable for the problem of AI's perceived political bias, taken up by X owner Elon Musk, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, Vice President JD Vance and Republican lawmakers. Streamlining AI data center permits to speed up supercomputer construction The plan aims to speed up permitting and loosen environmental regulation to accelerate construction on new data centers and factories and the power sources to fuel them. It condemns 'radical climate dogma' and recommends lifting a number of environmental restrictions, including clean air and water laws. Trump has previously paired AI's need for huge amounts of electricity with his own push to tap into U.S. energy sources, including gas, coal and nuclear. Many tech giants are already well on their way toward building new data centers in the U.S. and around the world. OpenAI announced this week that it has switched on the first phase of a massive data center complex in Abilene, Texas, part of an Oracle-backed project known as Stargate that Trump promoted earlier this year. Amazon, Microsoft, Meta and xAI also have major projects underway. The tech industry has pushed for easier permitting rules to get its computing facilities connected to power, but the AI building boom has also contributed to spiking demand for fossil fuel production, which will contribute to global warming. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Tuesday called on the world's major tech firms to power data centers completely with renewables by 2030. 'A typical AI data center eats up as much electricity as 100,000 homes,' Guterres said. 'By 2030, data centers could consume as much electricity as all of Japan does today.' The plan includes a strategy to disincentivize states from aggressively regulating AI technology. It recommends that federal agencies 'consider a state's AI regulatory climate when making funding decisions and limit funding if the state's AI regulatory regimes may hinder the effectiveness of that funding or award.' Trump's Republican administration had supported a different proposal in Congress to block states from passing any AI laws for 10 years, but the Senate defeated it earlier this month. Who benefits from Trump's AI action plan? There are sharp debates on how to regulate AI, even among the influential venture capitalists who have been debating it on their favorite medium: the podcast. While some Trump backers, particularly Andreessen, have advocated an 'accelerationist' approach that aims to speed up AI advancement with minimal regulation, Sacks has described himself as taking a middle road of techno-realism. 'Technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop. If we don't do it, somebody else will,' Sacks said on the 'All-In' podcast. On Tuesday, more than 100 groups, including labor unions, parent groups, environmental justice organizations and privacy advocates, signed a resolution opposing Trump's embrace of industry-driven AI policy and calling for a 'People's AI Action Plan' that would 'deliver first and foremost for the American people.' Amba Kak, co-executive director of the AI Now Institute, which helped lead the effort, said the coalition expects Trump's plan to come 'straight from Big Tech's mouth.' 'Every time we say, 'What about our jobs, our air, water, our children?' they're going to say, 'But what about China?'' she said in a call with reporters Tuesday. She said Americans should reject the White House's argument that the industry is overregulated and fight to preserve 'baseline protections for the public' as AI technology advances.
