Rayner pledges ‘change and reform' as she formally responds to Grenfell report
The Government has pledged 'tough action' on the construction industry and stronger rights for residents as it formally accepted recommendations made by the Grenfell Tower Inquiry final report.
A group representing some of the bereaved welcomed the commitments but warned it will be paying 'close attention' to how they progress.
The Government said it is accepting in full 49 of the 58 recommendations made by Sir Martin Moore-Bick when he published his long-awaited report in September.
The report concluded the fatal 2017 fire in west London had been the 'culmination of decades of failure' across government and the building industry.
The Government said the remaining nine recommendations are being accepted 'in principle', with some requiring 'further consideration' through consultations.
This includes a key recommendation for a single regulator for the construction industry, which the report said had become 'too complex and fragmented'.
On Wednesday, the Government said while it is committed to establishing a single regulator, it does not believe it would be 'appropriate' for that organisation to undertake testing and certification of construction products, or issue certificates of compliance.
Arguing this would 'create a new conflict of interest within the regulator', the Government said it will instead work to strengthen oversight of existing bodies through reforms to the construction products regime.
It has launched a consultation, running until May, on regulatory reform in the sector to 'improve public safety, rebuild public trust and ensure the Grenfell Tower tragedy cannot be repeated'.
The timeline for wider change is set out in phases, with a suggestion some reforms are unlikely to be delivered before 2028 – 11 years on from the fire which claimed the lives of 72 people.
In its update, the Government said it is 'committed to delivering meaningful change as quickly as possible' but that 'given the scale of further change needed, including legislative, we intend to deliver these further reforms using a three-phased approach over the course of this Parliament'.
Seven organisations criticised in last year's report are also being investigated for possible bans on public contracts, using powers under the Procurement Act 2023.
The Cabinet Office is launching investigations to establish whether professional misconduct has taken place and vowed decisions on debarment will be made 'at pace'.
In a lengthy document detailing its wider response, the Government also said it is 'committed to exploring further reforms to deliver systemic change to how residents' voices are heard and reliably acted upon'.
The inquiry report noted how the relationship between Grenfell Tower landlords and residents in the years before the fire was 'increasingly characterised by distrust, dislike, personal antagonism and anger'.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, who is also Housing Secretary, said: 'We are acting on all of the inquiry's findings, and today set out our full response, detailing the tough action we are taking to drive change and reform the system to ensure no community will ever have to face a tragedy like Grenfell ever again.
'That means greater accountability, stronger regulation, and putting residents at the heart of decision-making.
'We must deliver the fundamental change required. We owe that to the Grenfell community, to the country, and to the memory of those who lost their lives.'
Grenfell Next of Kin, a group representing some of the bereaved, said it will be 'paying close attention to these words and intentions' from Government, as it repeated criticism of the 'grave mistakes, failures, corruption' it said had led to the deaths.
The group: 'We can never forget our beloved kin and we can never forgive the negligence and corruption that led to their deaths.
'The injustice is so great and the measures being put in place now with new laws and reforms are welcomed, but should have been basic requirements for a developed country such as ours.
'Nevertheless let's move forward in the right direction.'
On the day the final report was published, Sir Keir Starmer apologised 'on behalf of the British state to each and every one' of the people affected by the disaster.
Speaking in Parliament at the time as some bereaved watched from the Commons gallery, he said the 'country failed to discharge its most fundamental duty, to protect you and your loved ones, the people that we are here to serve'.
Earlier this month, the Government announced the tower, the remains of which have stood in place in west London since the fire almost eight years ago, will be 'carefully' demolished in a process likely to take two years.
Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry into the fire, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says
No decision will be taken on the winter fuel allowance until the Autumn budget – dispelling speculation that the government would make an announcement on it at next week's spending review. Sir Keir Starmer last month announced his intention to give more people access to winter fuel payments, just months after Labour decided to means test the previously universal payment. But weeks later, chaotic government messaging had left millions of pensioners with no idea what the changes will look like or when they will be announced. Asked about the changes, Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science, innovation and technology, told Sky News: 'These issues are going to be dealt with in the run up to the autumn where these decisions are going to be taken and announced. 'But this is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years.' Pressed on whether that means no details will be unveiled on winter fuel next week, the technology secretary said: 'I think what you're going to see is the overall spending constraints and allowances for each government department, and then each department is then going to start talking about how it's going to allocate those.' Last week, Rachel Reeves confirmed the expected U-turn on the controversial cuts would be in place for this winter, meaning that the government will be faced with a scramble to get the changes rolled out between the October budget and the winter months. While the chancellor had previously confirmed that they would not set out how the changes would be paid for until the autumn, there was a growing suggestion from the government that details on who the changes would affect could be set out at next week's spending review. The chancellor is expected to unveil a swathe of spending cuts on Wednesday as she attempts to walk the tightrope between delivering on the party's election promises and sticking within the bounds of her self-imposed fiscal rules. Mr Kyle's comments come days after pensions minister Torsten Bell confirmed there was no prospect of returning to a universal winter fuel payment for all, saying that '95 per cent of people agree that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.' Winter fuel payments are a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive the benefit. As a result, just 1.5 million pensioners received the payment in winter 2024-25 – a massive drop from the 10.8 million pensioners who received it the year before. The cuts were deeply unpopular because they were seen as being disproportionately damaging to vulnerable people, and were criticised for leaving thousands of poorer pensions who were on the borderline missing out on the payment. In November, it was revealed that the government's own figures indicated it would force 100,000 pensioners into poverty in 2026. The policy was partly blamed for Labour's poor performance at the local elections – which saw them lose two-thirds of the council seats they had in 2021– as well as the previously Labour-held Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary seat to Reform UK. The cuts – combined with the £5bn welfare cuts and the party's decision to keep the two child benefit cap in place – have sparked growing concern over the direction of the government among Labour MPs.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: Government needs the can-do mindset I experienced in the Army to push change through fast
Government moves too slowly. That's not just the fault of the current government or the last one – it's the system. Slowed down by bureaucracy. Paralysed by 'can't-do' figures. Obsessed with process over progress. I come from a background of delivery. In the Army, working in a 'human intelligence unit' – liaising with agents and special forces – we had to move from first gear to fifth in an instant. Lives depended on it. Getting ahead of the enemy, protecting our people and achieving results was the mission – not talking it to death. Confirming the location of a high-value target, whilst also ensuring they were alone and targetable, or identifying the precise site of an improvised explosive device factory, required creativity and a determined mindset – a willingness to take calculated risks to save lives and win. When I worked in counterterrorism at the Ministry of Defence, delivery wasn't optional. We built a culture of 'can-do'; creative, risk-aware and focused on action. It wasn't about perfection. It was about progress. Government could learn a lot from the mindset of the finest military in the world and the departments that work every day to protect the public from the threat of terrorism. An unstoppable political will must go hand in hand with a mindset of delivery. I think back to our counterterror planning meetings. The mission? To stop terrorists attacking our great country. No timewasters. Just serious professionals putting ideas on the table, pulling them apart, war-gaming every outcome, then locking in a plan and going all-out to deliver. That mindset – challenge, rigour and rapid execution – is what the system of government has desperately lacked for decades. Too often, it's delay by design. Endless consultations. Five-year strategies that take ten. Pet projects blocked by internal turf wars. Take the Lower Thames Crossing: more than £1.2 billion spent before a single spade in the ground – all because of drawn-out decision-making and red tape. Or the A9 dualling project in Scotland – promised by 2025, now pushed back to 2035. Ten years of drift. These delays are not acts of God. They are failures of will. The truth is, Whitehall needs reform. There are dedicated, brilliant people across the civil service – but too many are trapped in a system built to say 'no'. Risk aversion is often rewarded, not challenged. Delivery is too often deprioritised in favour of process, and meaningful reform is blocked by a sprawling web of arms-length bodies and quangos that diffuse responsibility and stifle urgency. We need a leaner, more focused state – one that empowers departments to move at pace and is held accountable for outcomes, not paperwork. That means streamlining quangos where appropriate, ending duplication, and changing the mindset within government itself. Ministers must be prepared to challenge officials – not to attack, but to sharpen decision-making and force clarity on delivery. Wes Streeting's approach to the NHS offers a blueprint. He's made clear that, as health secretary, he expects faster delivery, more accountability, and a culture that doesn't settle for 'this is just how things are done'. Abolishing NHS England shows a steely commitment to the change he expects. But reforming structures is only half the battle – changing the culture is the real prize. Government must operate with a sense of mission, not maintenance. The British public doesn't care whether a successful policy comes from Bevan or Thatcher. They care that it works. That it's delivered. We need to strip out the ideology and face complex problems with a solutions-based mindset. Let the evidence lead. Move fast. Be willing to make mistakes in the name of making progress. And above all, get things done. Because there's serious work to do.
CNN
5 hours ago
- CNN
GOP senator defends Trump sending National Guard into Los Angeles
Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin tells CNN's Dana Bash, "If the governor or the mayor of a city isn't willing to protect the citizens of his state or the city, then the president will."
