logo
Rayner pledges ‘change and reform' as she formally responds to Grenfell report

Rayner pledges ‘change and reform' as she formally responds to Grenfell report

Yahoo26-02-2025
The Government has pledged 'tough action' on the construction industry and stronger rights for residents as it formally accepted recommendations made by the Grenfell Tower Inquiry final report.
A group representing some of the bereaved welcomed the commitments but warned it will be paying 'close attention' to how they progress.
The Government said it is accepting in full 49 of the 58 recommendations made by Sir Martin Moore-Bick when he published his long-awaited report in September.
The report concluded the fatal 2017 fire in west London had been the 'culmination of decades of failure' across government and the building industry.
The Government said the remaining nine recommendations are being accepted 'in principle', with some requiring 'further consideration' through consultations.
This includes a key recommendation for a single regulator for the construction industry, which the report said had become 'too complex and fragmented'.
On Wednesday, the Government said while it is committed to establishing a single regulator, it does not believe it would be 'appropriate' for that organisation to undertake testing and certification of construction products, or issue certificates of compliance.
Arguing this would 'create a new conflict of interest within the regulator', the Government said it will instead work to strengthen oversight of existing bodies through reforms to the construction products regime.
It has launched a consultation, running until May, on regulatory reform in the sector to 'improve public safety, rebuild public trust and ensure the Grenfell Tower tragedy cannot be repeated'.
The timeline for wider change is set out in phases, with a suggestion some reforms are unlikely to be delivered before 2028 – 11 years on from the fire which claimed the lives of 72 people.
In its update, the Government said it is 'committed to delivering meaningful change as quickly as possible' but that 'given the scale of further change needed, including legislative, we intend to deliver these further reforms using a three-phased approach over the course of this Parliament'.
Seven organisations criticised in last year's report are also being investigated for possible bans on public contracts, using powers under the Procurement Act 2023.
The Cabinet Office is launching investigations to establish whether professional misconduct has taken place and vowed decisions on debarment will be made 'at pace'.
In a lengthy document detailing its wider response, the Government also said it is 'committed to exploring further reforms to deliver systemic change to how residents' voices are heard and reliably acted upon'.
The inquiry report noted how the relationship between Grenfell Tower landlords and residents in the years before the fire was 'increasingly characterised by distrust, dislike, personal antagonism and anger'.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, who is also Housing Secretary, said: 'We are acting on all of the inquiry's findings, and today set out our full response, detailing the tough action we are taking to drive change and reform the system to ensure no community will ever have to face a tragedy like Grenfell ever again.
'That means greater accountability, stronger regulation, and putting residents at the heart of decision-making.
'We must deliver the fundamental change required. We owe that to the Grenfell community, to the country, and to the memory of those who lost their lives.'
Grenfell Next of Kin, a group representing some of the bereaved, said it will be 'paying close attention to these words and intentions' from Government, as it repeated criticism of the 'grave mistakes, failures, corruption' it said had led to the deaths.
The group: 'We can never forget our beloved kin and we can never forgive the negligence and corruption that led to their deaths.
'The injustice is so great and the measures being put in place now with new laws and reforms are welcomed, but should have been basic requirements for a developed country such as ours.
'Nevertheless let's move forward in the right direction.'
On the day the final report was published, Sir Keir Starmer apologised 'on behalf of the British state to each and every one' of the people affected by the disaster.
Speaking in Parliament at the time as some bereaved watched from the Commons gallery, he said the 'country failed to discharge its most fundamental duty, to protect you and your loved ones, the people that we are here to serve'.
Earlier this month, the Government announced the tower, the remains of which have stood in place in west London since the fire almost eight years ago, will be 'carefully' demolished in a process likely to take two years.
Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry into the fire, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Should the state pension age be increased to 70? Have your say
Should the state pension age be increased to 70? Have your say

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Should the state pension age be increased to 70? Have your say

The government has commissioned a review into the pensions system as it grapples with rising life expectancy and an ever-growing bill. Yahoo UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK readers. A review into the UK's pensions system could see the state pension age increased to 70. Dr Suzy Morrissey, who has been commissioned by work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall to carry out the review, said she would consider the merits and fairness of linking state pension age to life expectancy. With life expectancy projected to keep on rising, according to the Office for National Statistics, the number of pensioners is also expected to have increased by more than 50% by the 2070s. However, the working age population is only projected to have grown by over 10%, Kendall said in July, "making it even more imperative to help future pensioners put into a savings pot they can rely on in the future". Dr Morrisey will also look at the role of the state pension age in "managing the long-term sustainability" of the system, and examples from other countries. This is believed to include looking at Denmark, which recently raised the age of retirement to 70. Government spending on the state pension from 2025-26 is projected at £146bn, according to Department for Work and Pensions estimates – up 63% over the past 10 years and 183% over the past 20 years. With spending on the state pension forecast to increase to £169bn, accounting for inflation, by 2030, some have argued an increase of the retirement age is inevitable. While maintaining the triple lock, a mechanism that guarantees pension increases, modelling from 2022 shows that to keep public spending on state pensions below 6% of national income, the state pension age would have to rise by 69 by 2048–49 and 74 by 2068–69. The Institute for Fiscal Studies says that increases in the state pension age "are a coherent policy response to the fiscal challenges from rising longevity at older ages", and lead some people to remain in paid work for longer. However, the think tank also warns that those reaching retirement age renting in the private sector are at "heightened risk of poverty throughout their retirement" due to inadequate savings, and calls for means-tested benefits to help the hardest hit. Catherine Foot, director of the Standard Life Centre for the Future of Retirement, told the Telegraph that the group experiencing the fastest-growing rate of poverty among working-age adults is people aged 60-65. She said many of this cohort have "fallen out of work due to things like ill health, caring responsibilities or ageism in the labour market" and that any increases to the retirement age would have to be accompanied by policies that help people stay in back on Friday to read the results and analysis via the link below. Read more of Yahoo UK's Poll of the Week articles

Grand Forks lawmaker resigns to join North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services
Grand Forks lawmaker resigns to join North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Grand Forks lawmaker resigns to join North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services

State Rep. Emily O'Brien, R-Grand Forks, speaks to other lawmakers during a meeting of the Legislative Management Committee on the House Floor on Nov. 13, 2024. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor) Rep. Emily O'Brien, R-Grand Forks, is leaving her legislative seat to become second-in-command at the North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services. O'Brien starts her new job as deputy commissioner of the department Wednesday. According to a Tuesday announcement from the agency, she will serve as a liaison between Health and Human Services and the Legislature, and oversee a funding and performance tracking system. O'Brien's resignation from the Legislature takes effect Tuesday, according to a Monday letter she sent to Legislative Council and legislative leaders. 'This role will allow me to continue serving our state, but in a different capacity — one that complements the work we have done together in the Legislature to strengthen the health, well-being, and future of North Dakotans,' O'Brien wrote in the letter. O'Brien was first elected to represent District 42 in the North Dakota House in 2016, winning her bids for reelection in 2020 and 2024. She served on the Human Resources Division of the House Appropriations Committee, which works on the Department of Health and Human Services budget, during the 2023 and 2025 legislative sessions. O'Brien also chaired the Legislative Audit and Fiscal Review Committee over the 2023-2025 interim session, and served as its vice chair for the 2021-2023 and 2025-2027 interim sessions. During the 2023-2025 interim, she served on the Health Care and Health Services committees. 'We are thrilled to welcome Emily as our new deputy,' Pat Traynor, interim commissioner, said in the Tuesday announcement. 'She brings a proven track record of leadership, deep experience in public service, and a strong commitment to using data to guide decisions.' The North Dakota Constitution forbids members of the Legislature from holding a full-time appointed position at the state level. It'll be up to the District 42 Republican Party to fill O'Brien's seat, Legislative Council Director John Bjornson said in an email. Once the district leaders receive an official letter from Legislative Management notifying them of the vacancy, they will have three weeks to name a temporary replacement. That replacement will serve until the 2026 general election, during which voters will elect someone to serve the final two years of O'Brien's term, Bjornson said. Solve the daily Crossword

I was stranded on a cross-country train until a cleaner spotted me. Enough is enough
I was stranded on a cross-country train until a cleaner spotted me. Enough is enough

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I was stranded on a cross-country train until a cleaner spotted me. Enough is enough

Disability and commuter organisations are urging the government to get accessibility back on the map in its upcoming Railways Bill. A disabled man who was stranded on a train before he was eventually spotted by a cleaner is joining a call to get the government to make railways more accessible for disabled travellers. Doug Paulley, who lives in Wetherby, West Yorkshire, spoke to Yahoo News about how he has spent years dealing with transport nightmares as a disabled man, including being left stranded on trains with no staff around to assist him. The wheelchair user recalled times where he had resorted to pulling the emergency cord to alert staff that he was still on board and had been left without assistance on a train that had reached its final stop, "with nobody on the train, even to answer the emergency button to find me". Paulley, a highly respected disability campaigner, won a judicial review challenging the government's attempt to close train ticket offices across England in December 2023. He said he wanted to share how "highly stressful" getting a train as a disabled traveller can be in the UK to highlight the urgent need to make rail travel significantly more accessible for disabled people. He is joining 10 disability and commuter organisations urging the government to get accessibility back on the map in its upcoming Railways Bill, with "all of the previous government's pledges abandoned." Their demands include full staffing for trains, stations and ticket offices, the government to set a deadline for all stations to have step-free access, as well as 'turn up and go' travel — allowing disabled passengers to travel spontaneously on the rail network without needing to pre-book assistance in advance. The Bill, which was placed under consultation in February, aims to reform the railways, bringing them back into public ownership as well as make booking trains easier, and less costly. But plans to put accessibility as a statutory duty "at the heart" of the new Great British Railways (GBR) appear to have been dropped in the latest consultation documents. 'I was just stuck there' Paulley told Yahoo News about one journey on a CrossCountry Trains service earlier this year where he was stranded at Newcastle station, and almost ended up unwillingly travelling to the other side of the country before staff noticed he was on board and needed assistance to get off the train. Speaking about the experience, Paulley told Yahoo News: "It wasn't supposed to be my train, but my train was running really late and you know how it is, you just get on whatever's available. "The train got to Newcastle, everybody got off, the lights went off and nobody was there. "In the end, I tweeted CrossCountry and they tried to get somebody to see me, but the driver got on to take the service south again, setting back in the direction of Taunton. "The cleaner spotted me and eventually they managed to attract the attention of a member of staff on the platform who got me off the train. "It's scary thinking that nobody checked the train to check that it was properly empty before turning everything off and leaving. I was just stuck there." Unreliable — and unsafe Paulley is keen to emphasise that it's "not just the journey" that is a nightmare for disabled people. "It causes stress and distress on the run-up and afterwards as well, and work. A lot of stations aren't accessible to me in that they've got no step free access to some or all platforms. "They're inaccessible to other people because they don't have the staff that they need, particularly in driver-only operated areas where there's no guards. "I can't just turn up at a non-staff station because there'll be nobody to put the ramp down. With a lack of level boarding, I just can't get on or off it. The spontaneity is gone. "They might try and book me an accessible taxi to somewhere else, but that is very unreliable and lots of the time very unsafe. "Even when there are staff present, they can often forget." Blocked from easy and convenient travel Currently, only 13% of disabled people can use trains with confidence and ease, according to research carried out by advocacy group Transport for All. Emma Vogelmann, co-CEO of Transport for All, told Yahoo News: 'Our trains should give everyone the freedom to make everyday journeys - to work, to school, or just for fun. "But ongoing problems with our rail system are blocking disabled people from being able to travel easily – basic facilities like lifts, waiting rooms and display screens are broken, locked or missing. "In July 2024, Keir Starmer promised that accessibility would be at the heart of our new rail system, that's all that's needed to put things on the right track, so everyone – disabled or not - can travel easily on our trains.' Rensa Gaunt, a spokesperson for Inclusion London, a deaf and disabled people's organisation, told Yahoo News: "Reliable access to transport unlocks jobs, education and community. But the current railway system blocks us from easy and convenient travel, and makes us reliant on assistance that doesn't always turn up. In some cases, we are left stuck on trains, or are forced to cancel our journeys partway through. "We support the call to restore accessibility as an urgent priority, and to strategically plan with disabled people for a railway that we can all use reliably. "We need this and it needs to happen. Otherwise, disabled people continue to be excluded and have terrible experiences on the rail for the foreseeable future." A Department for Transport spokesperson said: "Accessibility is a core priority for Great British Railways (GBR) and we are committed to delivering a rail system which allows disabled people to travel easily, confidently and with dignity. 'We are considering all options to ensure accessibility is at the heart of GBR, such as creating a powerful new passenger watchdog to ensure services work for disabled passengers, and later this year we will publish a roadmap setting out our approach to delivering a more accessible railway.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store