One thing Aussies will learn to live with during Trump tariff turmoil
Figures released by Super Ratings shows the median superannuation funds eked out a small positive return of 0.4 per cent for the month of April.
The small gain came despite a wild month, with shares cratering following the US President's sweeping tariff policy, reaching a low on April 7, before rebounding sharply after April 9 when Mr Trump announced a 90 day pause on tariffs.
Super Ratings executive director Kirby Rappell warned Australians will need to learn to live with volatility over the next period.
'Members that panicked and switched options or withdrew funds may have missed out on this rebound and we continue to encourage a long-term mindset around superannuation,' Mr Rappell said.
According to Super Ratings the median growth option gained an estimated 0.4 per cent for the month, while the median capital stable option is estimated to have gained 0.6 per cent.
In April the Australian sharemarket outperformed its global peers, up 3.6 per cent for the month.
But global shares slumped, with the US S & P 500 fell 0.7 per cent and the MSCI World ex-Australian index slumped 1.84 per cent for the month of April in Australian dollar terms.
This follows a rough March for members when the median superannuation balance are estimated to have fallen by 1.9 per cent.
Despite the volatility, those invested in the median balanced option returns are back to where they were at the start of January and are still up 6 per cent for the financial year to date.
Mr Rappell said despite the volatile sharemarket, Australians benefited from diversification across asset classes, with around 45 per cent of money invested in non-share assets.
'We saw a strong response from markets to the announcement of tariffs by the US early in the month, which resulted in superannuation returns bouncing around much more than usual' Mr Rappell said.
'Importantly, the large declines seen at the beginning of the month were quickly regained as tariffs were paused, reinforcing the difficulty of timing the market.'
Mr Rappell warned the markets could remain volatile for a while to come.
'The pause on tariffs, we continue to believe there will be ups and downs over the coming months, however funds have consistently demonstrated their ability to navigate changing markets and provide strong long-term outcomes for members,' Mr Rappell said.
'Setting and sticking to a long-term strategy remains the best approach to achieving long term success and we encourage any member thinking of changing their strategy to seek advice from their fund or a trusted financial adviser.'
Superannuation members in the pension returns also saw similarly subdued over April, with the median balanced pension option gaining an estimated 0.7 per cent.
The median capital stable pension option is estimated to have risen by 0.8 per cent over the month while the median growth pension option is estimated to rise 0.7 per cent for the same period.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
35 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Hunger for growth ‘missing' from economic policy, productivity tsar says
Decision makers must adopt a 'growth mindset' to fix the productivity problem plaguing the economy, according to Australia's productivity tsar. Labor's highly anticipated Economic Reform Roundtable will kick off on Tuesday, bringing together 'a range of people with a range of views', as described by Anthony Albanese. The point of getting unions, business leaders, and policy experts in the same room as politicians is building consensus on how to boost productivity, or how efficiently an economy produces goods and services. Productivity Commission (PC) chair Danielle Wood will use a major speech on Monday to call on fellow roundtable attendees to be bold as they 'thrash out potential reforms to kickstart Australia's flagging productivity growth', warning that failure could bust the 'generational bargain' of handing over a better country to the future. 'I'm thrilled by the new appetite for economic reform that the roundtable has created over the past two months,' Ms Wood will tell the National Press Club, according to a copy of her speech seen by NewsWire. 'Ultimately the government will be judged on its actions and the outcomes they achieve. 'But it has taken an important step by recognising and pursuing economic growth, and the productivity that drives it, as a prime goal of policy. 'This 'growth mindset' – an elevation of growth and the benefits it brings – has been missing from Australian policy for far too long.' Faced with challenges posed by geopolitical turmoil, climate change and an ageing population, she will point out that young Australians do not believe they will have 'better lives than their parents'. 'The expectation that life will get better for each successive generation is Australia's generational bargain,' Ms Wood said. 'For many generations we have fulfilled its promise. Until, perhaps, this one. 'Overwhelmingly, young people today believe they won't live better lives than their parents did. 'As chair of the Productivity Commission, I'm worried too.' She will note that the PC has already given the Albanese government some options. Her agency released five reports over the past month zooming in on key areas, ranging from increasing economic agility and workforce training to harnessing artificial intelligence and the net zero transition. On economic dynamism, the PC proposed reforming Australia's corporate tax system to encourage business investment, which has declined since the Global Financial Crisis. It would cut the corporate tax rate for most businesses to 20 per cent and introduce a 5 per cent cashflow tax on all businesses, with a view to creating friendlier conditions for investors. The result, according to Ms Wood, 'would increase investment by $7.4bn and GDP by $14.6bn'. 'Big enough to get out of bed for, I would think,' she will say. On AI, the PC warned against a new overarching regulatory framework for AI and instead update existing regulations to address risks like fraud and discrimination. 'This would translate to an additional $116bn in economic activity – equivalent to boosting incomes for each Australian by $4300 a year over that period,' Ms Wood will say. 'A growth mindset means that we must not regulate our way out of this opportunity.' Less regulation was an overarching theme in all the PC's reports. Using those the reports as guides, Ms Wood will put forward three 'lessons about what a growth mindset looks like'. 'Regulate with growth in mind,' she will say, calling for 'leadership from the top when the policy sausage is being made'. In a nod to AI, she will say, 'Real growth comes from new ideas and technology,' arguing that productivity growth comes from new ideas, products, processes, and ways of managing people. While physical inputs have limits, human ingenuity does not, Ms Wood will say. Therefore, a growth mindset should focus on fostering innovation and enabling Australia to benefit from its own inventions and those of others. Her final lesson is that productivity 'is a game of inches'. 'There is simply no single policy reform that can bring productivity growth back to its long-term average of 1.6 per cent,' Ms Wood will say. 'To shift the dial, governments will have to make a lot of pro-productivity decisions.' Though, acknowledging the mammoth task, she will say she is 'optimistic that there is a package here that can make a difference to Australia's prosperity'. 'Governments must embed the importance of growth in every decision they make,' Ms Wood will say. 'This means engaging with trade-offs, better program delivery and design, and the 'boring but important work' of reducing administrative burden. 'We must ensure that governments pursue a growth agenda, for the benefit of businesses and workers today and, more importantly, for the generations to come. 'And that's worth a few days locked in a room.'
7NEWS
3 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Banked $10,000 30 years ago instead of buying shares? You've cost yourself $180,000
When investor Adrian Blazic first put his money into the share market, it was a leap of faith. 'No one knows what's going to happen,' he says. 'It's not about predicting the future, it's about sticking to a strategy.' That strategy — staying invested through the ups and downs — has delivered for him. 'I'd be expecting to average 9.5 to 10 per cent per annum,' Blazic says. His story echoes the findings of Vanguard's 2025 Index Chart, released on Friday, which lays bare the extraordinary gap in returns between long-term investing and parking money in cash. According to Vanguard, a $10,000 investment in Australian shares made on July 1, 1995 would have grown to $143,786 by June 30 this year. The same amount invested in US shares would now be worth $214,332, more than $180,000 ahead of the cash equivalent and about $72,000 more than Australian shares. By contrast, a $10,000 deposit left in a savings account over the same 30-year period would have grown to just $33,677. The average annual returns since mid-1995 were: US shares: 10.8 per cent Australian shares: 9.3 per cent International shares (ex-Australia): 8.3 per cent Australian listed property: 8 per cent Australian bonds: 5.5 per cent Cash: 4.1 per cent All figures assume income was reinvested and exclude investment acquisition costs, fees and taxes. 'Share market investors on average achieved at least triple the dollar returns of individuals who chose to keep their cash tied up in savings accounts over the last 30 years,' says Daniel Shrimksi, managing director of Vanguard Australia. The three-decade period tracked by the Index Chart includes some of the most severe market events in modern history, including the dot com crash in 2000, the September 11 terrorist attacks, the Global Financial Crisis in 2008–09, the COVID-19 plunge in 2020, and more recent volatility driven by high US tariffs on some countries. Each event triggered steep declines. September 11 sent global stocks tumbling. The GFC wiped trillions from markets. COVID sparked a 34 per cent crash. Yet every time, markets recovered. 'The index chart demonstrates how investment markets have kept rising strongly over time despite several significant share market corrections, economic downturns, changes in governments and world leaders, wars, natural disasters, and the impacts stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic,' added Shrimksi. He argues investing should be approached like a long-distance race. 'Just like superannuation, investors should be focused on achieving longer-term outcomes rather than on shorter-term wins and losses,' he said. 'The most successful investors have a disciplined approach and understand that volatility is typically transient. The best investment results are generally achieved through compound growth over time, not by trying to time when to buy and sell, that's a futile exercise.' Scott Phillips from The Motley Fool says volatility can rattle even experienced investors. 'It can look really volatile, and sometimes it is,' he says. Vanguard's data shows why chasing last year's winners can be risky. Asset class rankings often change dramatically from one year to the next. 'The best and worst performing asset classes in any one financial year rarely mirrors the returns of the previous financial year for a whole range of reasons,' Shrimksi says. 'That's why it's so important to have a diversified mix of investments across asset classes and regions. While shares have delivered the strongest returns over the longer term, there have been years when more defensive assets such as bonds, and even cash, have achieved the best returns.' For Blazic, the takeaway from decades of data and lived experience is simple: 'With investing, it's certainly a long-term game.' The advice from the experts is just as straightforward: save consistently, invest regularly, build wealth slowly over time and avoid get rich quick schemes.
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Gen Z only cares about one thing now
Rising rents, grocery prices that climb by the week, and staggering bills – Gen Z is growing up in the middle of Australia's cost-of-living crisis, and they're feeling the crunch. It turns out the most fashionable thing a brand can be in 2025 is affordable – and those that can't deliver value for money are losing ground fast. For Aussies like Bella Herlihy, 19, and Rayyan Hodges, 21, every purchase is a decision. Ms Herlihy works full-time while studying for her Certificate III in childcare, but her real dream is landing an apprenticeship at a beauty brand. Due to the cost-of-living crisis, Ms Herlihy lives in her mother's four-bedroom home with seven other family members. 'We had to turn the second loungeroom into a bedroom. It's too expensive, so they need to save their money,' she told On $16 an hour, Ms Herlihy earns around $1000 a fortnight. Once the rent, bills and groceries are paid, she's left with $50 to $100 for anything else. 'It goes so fast after rent and bills. Even if I want a snack I have to think about whether I can afford it,' she said. 'I don't splurge – I have to make sure what's left goes to the right places.' And, that's the big takeaway from this year's Top 100 Youth Brands report by YouthInsight and Student Edge, which asked 1000 Aussies aged 14 to 24 to name and shame the brands they love and hate. Aldi has officially taken the crown as the favourite supermarket of young Aussies, sending Woolworths down into sixth place, and Coles to eighth. 'We want cheaper prices,' Ms Herlihy said. 'Big brands need to understand the cost-of-living more and factor it in. It would be nice if they made a video or ran a campaign where they were open about the struggle. I want to know how they plan to help Gen Z.' Kmart has reclaimed its retail crown with budget-friendly homewares and essentials, while KFC has overtaken McDonald's as the demographic's fast food of choice. In fashion, budget-friendly Uniqlo has overtaken Cotton On, reflecting a growing preference for quality basics over trend-driven fast fashion. Social media habits are shifting too. Instagram still holds the crown but TikTok, Snapchat and Facebook are slipping. Brands like Pinterest and Uber are on the rise, and Duolingo and UberEats have muscled into the top ten. At the very top of favourite brands sits YouTube, loved by nine out of ten young Aussies. And what's not to love? It's free, versatile and just as useful for study hacks as it is for late-night entertainment. Bella says some brands are overrated – Woolworths and high-end beauty label Drunk Elephant among them – because they simply don't offer the value she's looking for. And with just a small portion of her income left for 'extras' each fortnight, she's choosy about who gets her business. For Mr Hodges, the squeeze of cost-of-living feels permanent. 'It feels like we've been locked out of the Australian dream,' he said. Since finishing his diploma and Certificate III and IV in cybersecurity and IT, he hasn't been able to land a job in his field. 'It's overcrowded,' he said. 'I've been looking everywhere.' In the meantime, he lives with his parents and has no plans to move out anytime soon. 'Not in this economy,' he laughed. He's constantly hunting for discounts and cheaper rates. His favourite store is JB Hi-Fi, but he also rates Officeworks for its regular sales. Still, he's selective: 'Even if it's cheap, it's not worth it if the company doesn't have good ethics.' Woolworths and Coles, he said, are 'price gouging', while Aldi's prices are decent but lack variety. He prefers to shop at his local IGA to support small businesses. Both Ms Herlihy and Mr Hodge's habits reflect the bigger sacrifices that Gen Z are having to make in order to enjoy what should be 'the best years of their lives'. Student Edge co-founder Damien Langley said these results 'reflect the times we're in'. 'Economic pressures have made affordability a higher priority for many young people and because of that brands like KFC and Aldi have overtaken their main rivals by helping young people through these difficult high cost-of-living times,' Mr Langley said. 'Australian success stories include Kmart which has emerged as the favourite Australian brand of Gen Zs as it helps them get new clothes and furnish their rentals without breaking the bank.' Gen Z's priorities are clear: they want brands that show they understand the squeeze, deliver real value, and maybe even admit they know it's hard out here.
