logo
Slice SFB aiming to close FY26 in black, not looking to raise any capital

Slice SFB aiming to close FY26 in black, not looking to raise any capital

Slice Small Finance Bank has turned profitable on a monthly basis and is aiming to close FY26 in the black, a top official has said.
The entity, which came out of a surprising merger between the fintech Slice and the North East SFB a few months ago, is adequately capitalised and not looking to raise any capital, its executive director Rajan Bajaj told PTI.
The current focus is to build a pan-India business using the low-cost digital channels, and the entity is not interested in any more mergers, Bajaj said, adding that it may look at transitioning to a universal bank in the next five years.
Before the merger, the North East SFB had reported a loss of Rs 441 crore, and Slice was also reporting losses.
"We have turned profitable post-tax on a monthly basis and will close the year in profits," Bajaj said.
The bank is adequately capitalised and the buffers will also be supported by the profits, he added. As per recent media reports, the bank was aiming to raise up to USD 300 million in capital.
It is adding up to 3 lakh new accounts to its base on the back of digital journeys, Bajaj said, pointing out that the savings bank interest rate offering is at par with the RBI's repo rate and the fixed deposit offerings are a notch higher, which is helping in attracting customers.
The pace of account opening is the fifth or the sixth fastest in the industry and at par with much bigger rivals, he said.
On the lending front, it does consumer credit including unsecured personal loans and business credit which includes loans against property, he said, stressing that the focus is on serving people who may be underserved by the banking system.
Aiming for a big increase in its borrowers and loan portfolio, the bank launched a UPI-based credit card on Saturday, Bajaj said, pointing out that over 30 crore of UPI users can be the potential target audience for such an offering.
The bank stands to make an interchange of up to 1 per cent depending on where the credit facility is availed, and will also make revenues from rollovers and fees, he said.
Bajaj said its personal credit vertical has been able to deliver credit at a cost which is a tenth of the industry courtesy digital inputs, and added that the credit costs are also 30 per cent lower than the industry average because of the analytics engine which is used for diligence.
The bank also launched a 'UPI-powered bank branch' in Bengaluru, which can be used by any bank's customers for a slew of transactions, including cash deposits into any account using cash accepting machine, and then remitting the money to any mobile number, Bajaj said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit, lawyer argues
Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit, lawyer argues

The Hindu

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit, lawyer argues

A lawsuit filed by families of the Uvalde school shooting victims alleging Instagram allowed gun manufacturers to promote firearms to minors should be thrown out, lawyers for Meta, Instagram's parent company, argued Tuesday. Nineteen children and two teachers were killed in the May 2022 shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. The families sued Meta in Los Angeles in May 2024, saying the social media platform failed to enforce its own rules forbidding firearms advertisements aimed at minors. The families, who were present at last month's hearing, did not appear in court, with a lawyer citing the back-to-school season. Many plaintiffs attended the hearing virtually, he said. In one ad posted on Instagram, the Georgia-based gunmaker Daniel Defense shows Santa Claus holding an assault rifle. In another post by the same company, a rifle leans against a refrigerator, with the caption: 'Let's normalize kitchen Daniels. What Daniels do you use to protect your kitchen and home?' The lawsuit alleges those posts are marketed toward minors. The Uvalde gunman opened an online account with Daniel Defense before his 18th birthday and purchased the rifle as soon as he could, according to the lawsuit. He also owned various Instagram accounts and had an 'obsessive relationship' with the platform, at times opening the app more than 100 times a day, plaintiffs' lawyers found in an analysis of the shooter's phone. Meta attorney Kristin Linsley argued that the families provided no proof that minors, including the Uvalde gunman, even read the Daniel Defense posts on Instagram. She also said the posts didn't violate Meta's policies because they weren't direct advertisements and did not include links to purchase any products. Katie Mesner-Hage, representing the victims' families, said the defense's claim is 'fundamentally unfair,' as the plaintiffs don't have access to Meta data that would indicate whether the shooter encountered those posts. She added that if the content had landed on the shooter's feed, as the plaintiffs allege, then Meta 'not only knew about it, they designed the system so it would be delivered to him.' 'They knew more about him than anyone else on the planet,' she said. Linsley said content advertising firearms for sale on Instagram is allowed if posted by 'brick-and-motor and online retailers,' but visibility of those posts was restricted for minors under Meta's advertising policies from the end of 2021 to October 2022. 'This is not a playbook for how to violate the rules. This is actually what the rules are,' Linsley said. The plaintiff's team, however, showed a fake profile they created for a 17-year-old boy earlier this month, through which they were able to search Daniel Defense's Instagram account and see a post that included a picture of a gun, as well as a link to the gun manufacturer's website. When the link was clicked, the gun-maker's website opened, and the team was able to select a firearm and add it to their cart, all within Instagram's app — an experiment that refutes Meta's assertion that posts relating to firearms aren't visible to users under 21, Mesner-Hage said. Linsley said in her rebuttal that the experiment was done this year and not in 2021 to 2022, which is when the policy she described was in effect. The families have also sued Daniel Defense and video game company Activision, which produces 'Call of Duty.' Linsley said the Communications Decency Act allows social media platforms to moderate content without being treated as publishers of that content. "The only response a company can have is to not have these kinds of rules at all," Linsley said. 'It just gets you down a rabbit hole very quickly.' Mesner-Hage argued Meta is not protected by the act because social media platforms don't just host speech, but help curate it through its algorithms. Daniel Defense, she said, didn't have to pay for ads to get free access to Meta's analytical data through its business account on Instagram. That data shows the company which age bracket and gender engaged most with a specific post. 'Daniel Defense is not on Instagram to make friends. ... They're on there to promote their product,' Mesner-Hage said. 'It's not a paid advertisement, but I would struggle to describe this as anything other than an advertisement.' The lawsuit alleges that firearm companies tweaked their online marketing to comply with Meta's policies, including by avoiding the words 'buy' or 'sell' and not providing links to purchase, and that the social media company did not protect users against such strategies. Last month, lawyers for Activision also argued that legal proceedings against them should be thrown out, saying the families allegations are barred by the First Amendment. The families alleged that the war-themed video game Call of Duty trained and conditioned the Uvalde gunman to orchestrate his attack. Lawyers for the plaintiffs asked the judge to allow them to amend their lawsuit with the new information they presented Tuesday before ruling on the defense's motion. The defense claimed that was unnecessary, as the case would not have merit even with the amendments. The judge has yet to rule on Activision's motion and did not immediately rule on the Meta case.

Welspun One acquires 107 acres in Karnataka for warehousing projects
Welspun One acquires 107 acres in Karnataka for warehousing projects

Business Standard

time10 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Welspun One acquires 107 acres in Karnataka for warehousing projects

Welspun Group-backed warehousing and logistics platform Welspun One Logistics Parks (WOLP) on Wednesday announced it has acquired two land parcels totalling 107 acres in southern India for two warehousing projects. With this acquisition, the company's total footprint has expanded to over 260 acres across Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, marking a significant step in strengthening its pan-South India presence, Welspun One said. This portfolio represents a development potential of over 6 million sq ft, supported by a committed investment of $250 million (Rs 2,150 crore), the company said. Welspun One said it has acquired around 51 acres of land in Hoskote and 56 acres in Devanahalli, Karnataka. With these acquisitions, the company has further strengthened its presence in South India, underscoring its confidence in the region's long-term growth potential. "The Bengaluru market in particular holds immense promise, and these investments demonstrate our conviction and capability," said Balkrishan Goenka, Chairman, Welspun Group. These acquisitions will enhance Welspun One's warehousing capabilities, creating scalable hubs to serve diverse occupiers across multiple industries, the company said. In East Bengaluru's Hoskote cluster, Welspun One has acquired around 51 acres for its Proxima category park, a Grade-A warehousing facility built to serve 3PLs, FMCG, and retail players, it said. The second acquisition, around 56 acres in Devanahalli, is part of the upcoming Proxima Plus category, a first-of-its-kind premium warehousing development by Welspun One. Proxima Plus parks by Welspun One are designed to serve discerning occupiers, including electronics, aerospace, EV, and pharma firms, offering plug-and-play features, tech-enabled infrastructure, and superior design aesthetics. "From North Chennai to Bengaluru, we've stayed ahead of the curve, identifying and investing in the right micro-markets before they turn mainstream, " said Anshul Singhal, Managing Director, Welspun One Logistics Parks.

Dad as negotiator? Why Gen Z is now bringing parents to job interviews
Dad as negotiator? Why Gen Z is now bringing parents to job interviews

First Post

time10 minutes ago

  • First Post

Dad as negotiator? Why Gen Z is now bringing parents to job interviews

A survey by Resume Templates revealed that 77 per cent of US-based Gen Z candidates have brought a parent to a job interview. Among them, 27 per cent said their parents spoke about salary or perks, and some even introduced themselves to recruiters. Experts suggest this trend reflects Gen Z's lack of work experience and limited professional networks, which were further affected by the pandemic The survey says that 77 per cent of Gen Z job seekers have taken a parent along to an interview. AI-Generated/Representational Image Bad at negotiating skills? No worries. Your parents can step in and secure that job offer for you. A new survey shows that nearly three out of four Gen Z candidates have brought a parent along to an interview. Of those who had a parent present, about 27 per cent said their parents discussed pay or benefits, while a few even introduced themselves to the recruiters. But what makes Gen Z job seekers involve their parents in interviews? Does it really work in their favour? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Let's take a look: What's going on? A study by Resume Templates found that 77 per cent of Gen Z job seekers have taken a parent along to an interview. Even more surprising, 79 per cent said that once they got the job, their parents kept in touch with their managers, often asking for promotions, salary hikes or time off on their behalf. The survey questioned 831 US-based working Gen Z candidates to see how much their parents were involved in their latest job search and in getting their current roles. Among those whose parents went to interviews, 40 per cent said they stayed during the interview, while one in three shared that their parents spoke up or responded to questions. About 27 per cent said parents negotiated pay or benefits, and some even introduced themselves to recruiters, according to the report. It also found that 63 per cent had a parent send job applications. Nearly one in three got help with writing a resume. Almost half said parents finished test tasks for them, while 41 per cent let parents take the first HR call. About 27 per cent said their parents discussed pay or benefits. Pixabay/Representational Image These numbers are much higher than those in a December 2024 survey of 800 employers. That poll said 19 per cent of Gen Z applicants showed up with parents, something bosses felt made them look 'unprepared' and 'unprofessional.' Julia Toothacre, Chief Career Strategist at Resume Templates, said in a statement, 'I support parents helping with resumes, offering professional insights, or reviewing performance evaluations.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD She added, 'Parents can be supportive behind the scenes, but they shouldn't participate directly. It not only undermines the child's credibility [with managers and co-workers], but also risks stunting their professional growth and ability to navigate challenging situations.' 'Early-career professionals need to develop the confidence and skills to navigate workplace conversations independently,' she said. The study also showed parental involvement stretched far beyond interviews. More than three in four Gen Z candidates named a parent as a reference. Nearly half admitted parents completed test assignments, while 41 per cent said they answered HR calls. In total, 90 per cent asked parents to help find openings, 75 per cent used them as references, 70 per cent had them submit applications, and 60 per cent had them contact hiring managers. Over half relied on parents to finish test tasks (55 per cent) and to take screening calls from HR (45 per cent). About 35 per cent had parents write resumes, and 30 per cent cover letters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But why? Experts link this behaviour to Gen Z's limited work experience and smaller professional networks, which were further affected by the pandemic and its impact on social skills. Although many in Gen Z prefer working in offices (with only 23 per cent wanting fully remote roles), they often feel unprepared to handle workplace situations without extra help. It also found that 63 per cent had a parent send job applications. Pixabay/Representational Image The competitive entry-level job market has also played a role, leading young candidates to lean on their parents for guidance and support. While some see this as parents crossing a line, others believe it reflects how workplace norms are shifting. Experts also point to tools like ChatGPT as useful for improving job applications and interview preparation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store