Iran's 'paper tiger' leadership will fall, predicts Nobel peace laureate Ebadi
She spoke a day after a shaky ceasefire brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump took hold between Iran and Israel, ending a short but intense air war in which Israeli strikes seemingly targeted Iran's senior leadership at will.
"The people of Iran and the world saw that and realised what a paper tiger this administration is," Ebadi told Reuters in an interview in London, where she has lived in self-imposed exile since 2009.
Ebadi, a lawyer who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003 for her work defending human rights, has been a staunch critic of the Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment that has ruled Iran since 1979.
Security officials said Khamenei, 86, went into hiding during the conflict, which wiped out the top echelon of Iran's military leadership and killed its leading nuclear scientists.
"The people will not trust a leader who hides during times of war," Ebadi said. She said previous protests, such as those around the death of Iranian-Kurdish woman Mahsa Amini in 2022, had shown mass public support for change.
"I predict the people will succeed this time around and this regime will be gone."
There have been no signs of significant street protests against the Islamic Republic, with relief dominating the first response of many Iranians to the ceasefire.
While Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, a relative moderate, has said the atmosphere of national solidarity during Israel's attacks would spur domestic reform, hardline security organs have also moved swiftly to demonstrate their control with mass arrests, executions and military deployments, officials and activists have said.
"The regime is trying to compensate for its defeat by arresting the people," Ebadi said. "Because it fears that now that it has been defeated in this war, the people will find more courage and take to the streets."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Today I was sanctioned by Russia – it's a badge of honour
As I was touching down this afternoon on a flight from Copenhagen to London, I was informed that my name was included on the Russian Foreign Ministry's latest counter-sanctions list. This means that I am no longer able to travel to Russia for research, tourism or any other purpose. My reaction to this news was conflicted. On the one hand, I viewed it as a badge of honour. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, I have written two books and done countless media hits on the war's devastating impact on the Ukrainian people and international security. It was heartening to be included in a list alongside my distinguished Rusi colleague Tom Keatinge, who is a leading voice in support of smarter sanctions against Russia, and many other commentators whose work I admire. On the other hand, it was a bittersweet feeling. In the years leading up to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, I was a regular visitor to Moscow and St. Petersburg. I cherished Russia's spectacular art museums, scenic beauty and extraordinary history. I also used my visits to engage with Russian experts, officials and fellow graduate students. My aim was to better understand Russia's socioeconomic, political and foreign policy changes, so I could produce enriching publications and provide accurate advice to Western governments. Even though there were many issues of profound disagreement, which spanned from interpretations of Soviet history to the wars in Ukraine and Syria, I hoped that my engagements would contribute in a very small way to a more peaceful future. Russia's war against Ukraine and the accompanying total breakdown of Russia-West relations were worst-case scenarios that I was desperately hoping to prevent. Aside from my mixed personal feelings, I cannot help but cringe at the dystopia that Putin's Russia has become. The grounds for sanctioning British academics, consultants and journalists were phrased in a uniquely ludicrous manner. We were accused of promoting militant Russophobia, supporting Neo-Nazism in Ukraine and enabling Western neo-colonialism in the Global South. As a person with Russian-Jewish and Indian ancestry, I could not help but laugh at the seemingly endless slew of unintended ironies. Nonetheless, the humour wore off quickly. Russia's newest sanctions list reflects a society that is pursuing an inexorable course of self-isolation. While the Russian state claims that it is protecting its compatriots from alien values and subversive influences, the Russian people stand to lose the most from the Kremlin's power-driven self-quarantine. Russia has forced some of its most talented cosmopolitan intellectuals into exile and imprisoned many of those who courageously chose to stay. Each day, the Kremlin is finding new insidious ways to close off Russians from the outside world. Russia is cracking down on messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram, which are now linked to fraud and terrorism, and is planning new acts of gratuitous repression like the criminalisation of 'inappropriate' Internet searches. As President Donald Trump tries to cajole Russia into accepting peace in Ukraine and offers it a window of opportunity to escape from sanctions, the Kremlin keeps steering Russia towards a darker totalitarian future. The text of Russia's sanctions list provides a window into the irrationalities and paranoias that make a lasting peace in Europe impossible if Putin and the system he's created endure. When Russian dissident Vladimir Kara-Murza's FSB escort taunted him that he would never see his motherland again, he quipped, 'Look man, I am a historian, I don't just think, I don't just believe, I know that I'll be back home in Russia, and it's going to happen much sooner than you can imagine'. I too hope to one day return to Russia that lives at peace with its neighbours and accepts a basic modicum of human freedom. Today, that moment feels unnervingly far away.
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Free speech row as man arrested after holding sign that had words 'Palestine' and 'action' written on it outside Kneecap court hearing
A free speech row has erupted after a man holding a provocative pro-Palestine sign was arrested outside Westminster Magistrates Court during a demonstration in support of Irish rap trio Kneecap. The Metropolitan Police were on Wednesday accused of 'over-zealous policing' after a protester holding a sign containing the words ' Palestine ' and 'action' was detained by officers. It is the latest free speech challenge the police have faced following the proscription of campaign group Palestine Action. Toby Young, co-founder of the Free Speech Union, remarked: 'This isn't quite as bad as the police arresting someone for holding up a sign saying "Plasticine Action", but it's excessive nonetheless. 'The over-zealous policing of pro-Palestinian protestors risks turning anti-terrorism legislation into a joke.' The homemade sign at the centre of this latest controversy stated: 'If you're looking at Palestine and think there should be no action, you're on the wrong side of the genocide.' The words 'Palestine' and 'action' were coloured in black, green and red (the colours of the Palestinian flag) compared with the blue and orange colouring of the rest of the letters - meaning the words clearly stood out. Direct-action protest group Palestine Action was banned by the UK Government on July 5 after supporters of the organisation damaged two Voyager aircrafts at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. Its proscription has prompted widespread protest and the arrests of hundreds of demonstrators who have routinely sat in Parliament Square holding signs which state: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.' There has also been increasing confusion from police regarding the exact threshold for a criminal offence. Earlier this week, Miles Pickering was arrested and then de-arrested for wearing a t-shirt emblazoned with the words 'plasticine action'. Last night, the Metropolitan confirmed they had arrested a man 'on suspicion of supporting a proscribed terrorist group, Palestine Action, in Marylebone Road'. Responding to the controversial arrest on Instagram, Palestine Lobby, a pro-Palestine advocacy group dedicated to campaigning for Palestinian rights, wrote: 'This is an unacceptable misuse of power.' The demonstration this morning was in response to the trial of Liam Og O hAnnaidh - a musician for the band Kneecap. Mo Chara, whose real name is Liam Og O hAnnaidh, is facing a terrorism charge after allegedly displaying a Hezbollah flag at a concert in London Mr O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of displaying a flag in support of the terrorist group Hezbollah at a gig in November last year 'in such a way or in such a circumstance as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a supporter of a proscribed organisation'. A decision over whether he will stand trial for this alleged offence was postponed until late September.
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
BBC wrong not to call Hamas terrorists, says former head of news
The BBC was wrong not to use the word 'terrorist' to describe Hamas in its coverage of the Oct 7 attacks, the broadcaster's former head of news has said. James Harding, who led the BBC's news output between 2013 and 2018 and is now editor-in-chief of the Observer, took aim at the corporation for its decision not to use the term, arguing that 'journalists shouldn't censor words, but use them accurately'. The BBC triggered outrage and accusations of anti-Semitism after it refused to use the term 'terrorist' to describe the gunmen who massacred more than 1,000 people and took hundreds hostage in the worst loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. It instead describes them as militants and states that Hamas is proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the UK, Israel and others. Mr Harding, who is Jewish, said newsrooms had been plunged into 'furious argument' over how to cover Israel and Gaza, adding that the conflict was 'very hard to view dispassionately'. He admitted that the corporation had 'for sure made mistakes', including serious ones during his tenure. However, he insisted that the BBC was not 'institutionally anti-Semitic'. Delivering the James MacTaggart Memorial Lecture at the Edinburgh TV Festival on Wednesday, Mr Harding said: 'I am Jewish, proudly so. I'm proud, too, to have worked for the most important news organisation in the world. 'The BBC is not institutionally anti-Semitic. It's untrue to say it is. 'It's also unhelpful – much better to correct the mistakes and address the judgment calls that have been wrong, than smear the institution, impugn the character of all the people who work there and, potentially, undermine journalists in the field working in the most difficult and dangerous of conditions.' Despite its pledge to describe Hamas as a banned terror group, analysis of the BBC's online news stories earlier this year found that the broadcaster was failing to do so in nine out of 10 reports. The BBC has said it makes clear that Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organisation 'where possible and appropriate', but argued that the longevity of the conflict means there is less need to constantly repeat the phrase. However, the broadcaster came under further scrutiny last month after its current head of news told staff that the Hamas government of Gaza and the organisation's military wing were 'different'. Deborah Turness made the comments after the BBC broke its own editorial guidelines by broadcasting a Gaza documentary without disclosing that its 13-year-old narrator was the son of a Hamas official. The Board of Deputies of British Jews condemned the remarks, accusing Mr Turness of 'obfuscating and minimising the BBC's failings'. The broadcaster has also been embroiled in a row over its decision to air a controversial Glastonbury set by artist Bob Vylan, which led chants of 'death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]'. That scandal prompted an intervention by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, who warned there was a ' problem of leadership ' at the BBC, sparking uncertainty over the future of director general Tim Davie. In his speech, Mr Harding described Ms Nandy's comments as 'chilling', arguing that the corporation should be kept 'beyond the reach of politicians'. The veteran news executive, who raised concerns about Reform's pledge to scrap the licence fee, said the Prime Minister should not be involved in the appointment of the BBC's chairman and director general. He also called for an independent commission to be set up to decide the future of the BBC's funding model. He said: 'Political interference – and the perception of a political presence looming over the BBC – is a problem, one that we've got too accustomed to. 'And it looks likely to get worse. We need to get on with putting the country's most important editorial and creative organisation beyond the reach of politicians now.'
