Privacy is blockchain's missing link—and America's opportunity to lead
Every transaction on-chain is etched into a public ledger for all to see. This means that user addresses, financial behavior, and asset holdings are exposed permanently and immutably. In traditional financial systems, such data is closely guarded. In crypto, it's open by default.
This is not just a theoretical concern. The lack of privacy on public blockchains is exposing individuals to real-world risks: profiling, extortion, digital surveillance, and even physical threats. Anyone with a blockchain wallet is a potential target—whether they are a Ukrainian citizen receiving aid, a whistleblower relying on digital assets for safety, or a consumer simply transacting online.
The stakes are escalating. According to Chainalysis, nearly $46 billion worth of crypto was transferred through illicit channels in 2023, with many transactions linked to sanctioned entities. Blockchain's radical transparency makes tracing those funds technically feasible, but it also means innocent users may be swept up in guilt-by-association logic, flagged by automated compliance systems, or monitored by adversarial nation-states exploiting open ledgers for intelligence purposes.
Subscribe to the Daily newsletter.
Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day
Privacy Policy
| Fast Company Newsletters
We are at an inflection point. On one hand, blockchain has evolved from an experimental idea into a foundational layer for decentralized finance (DeFi), gaming, cross-border payments, and digital identity. On the other, the absence of privacy threatens to stall its momentum. Without privacy guarantees, Web3 won't scale into a secure, inclusive internet economy—it will remain a risky, self-surveilling shadow of its potential.
It's not just user safety at stake. Institutional adoption, long seen as the tipping point for crypto's maturation, is lagging in part because privacy solutions are underdeveloped. Financial institutions and enterprises cannot embrace systems that force them to reveal business-sensitive transactions to competitors and regulators alike. Privacy is not the enemy of compliance; it's a prerequisite for serious engagement. The road ahead
The good news? A path forward exists.
Recent regulatory tailwinds—particularly in the United States—point to a growing willingness to integrate blockchain into the regulated financial system. Lawmakers are increasingly exploring frameworks for stablecoins, digital asset custody, and decentralized finance. And with the emergence of advanced cryptographic tools such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), we now have the technical foundation to reconcile transparency with confidentiality.
Zero-knowledge cryptography allows users to prove the validity of information—such as identity or solvency—without revealing the underlying data. In practical terms, this means users can comply with regulations (e.g., AML, KYC) without exposing every transaction to the world. ZKPs are already being piloted by privacy-forward networks and could become the industry standard if policy and investment align.
And alignment is possible. In 2024, the European Union began implementing its Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation, while Hong Kong and the UAE continue developing regulated environments for digital assets. Yet the U.S. retains a unique advantage: its history of open innovation, its global financial leadership, and its robust civil liberties tradition. If it embraces blockchain privacy not just as a feature but as infrastructure—akin to encryption on the internet—it can set a global standard.
advertisement
The stakes for leadership are high. In a world defined by rising geopolitical tension, blockchain privacy is becoming a matter of national security. Adversarial governments are already using blockchain analytics to trace and target users, conduct financial espionage, and undermine dissident movements. Without privacy, blockchains risk becoming tools of surveillance rather than instruments of freedom.
At the same time, user demand for private, secure financial tools is surging. A recent survey by the Electric Coin Company found that 84% of crypto users consider privacy to be a critical feature of digital finance. And among developers, privacy-preserving technology is one of the fastest-growing areas of investment, according to Electric Capital's 2023 developer report. A host of solutions
So what can be done?
First, policymakers must move past the false binary of privacy versus compliance. These are not mutually exclusive goals. Clear guidelines that embrace advanced cryptography, establish safe harbors for privacy-preserving innovation, and differentiate between consumer protection and surveillance will enable the next generation of secure digital finance.
Second, industry leaders need to elevate privacy to the level of consensus mechanisms, scalability, and user experience. Just as we wouldn't launch a blockchain without validating transactions or securing the network, we shouldn't deploy them without protecting users. Privacy must be a baseline, not a bonus.
Finally, public-private collaboration is essential. The early internet thrived because of cooperation between universities, startups, civil society, and government. Blockchain deserves the same collaborative energy. By fostering research, funding privacy innovation, and supporting interoperability standards, the U.S. can lead the world in building a safer, more trustworthy digital economy.
In the end, privacy is not a fringe concern. It is the cornerstone of user trust, the foundation of financial inclusion, and the safeguard of democratic values in the digital age.
Blockchain has the potential to reshape the global financial system—but only if we build it securely. The time to act is now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
VivoPower Commences $29 Million Shareholder Loan Financing Retirement Plan
LONDON, July 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VivoPower International PLC (Nasdaq: VVPR) ('VivoPower' or the 'Company') announced today that its independent directors have approved the commencement of a shareholder debt principal reduction plan. The initial repayment was made to AWN Holdings Limited ('AWN') on July 3, 2025. AWN, a private investment office, is backed by a member of Dubai's Al Maktoum ruling family, signalling institutional and sovereign wealth funding support for VivoPower and its growth objectives. The unaudited balance of the principal component of the AWN shareholder loan was $28.8 million as of June 30, 2025. The Company's objective is to retire the AWN shareholder loan in full. This initiative reflects VivoPower's long term commitment to strengthening its balance sheet and optimizing its capital structure, while ensuring adequate financial capacity to support its transformational growth strategies. Execution of this objective remains subject to ongoing approval from the Company's independent directors and the availability of sufficient liquidity. About VivoPower VivoPower International PLC (NASDAQ: VVPR) is undergoing a strategic transformation into the world's first XRP-focused digital asset enterprise. The Company's new direction centers on the acquisition, management, and long-term holding of XRP digital assets as part of a diversified digital treasury strategy. Through this shift, VivoPower aims to contribute to the growth and utility of the XRP Ledger (XRPL) by supporting decentralized finance (DeFi) infrastructure and real-world blockchain applications. Originally founded in 2014 and listed on Nasdaq since 2016, VivoPower operates with a global footprint spanning the United Kingdom, Australia, North America, Europe, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. An award-winning global sustainable energy solutions B Corporation, VivoPower has two business units, Tembo and Caret Digital. Tembo is focused on electric solutions for off-road and on-road customized and ruggedized fleet applications as well as ancillary financing, charging, battery and microgrids solutions. Caret Digital is a power-to-x business focused on the highest and best use cases for renewable power, including digital asset mining. Forward-Looking Statements This communication includes certain statements that may constitute 'forward-looking statements' for purposes of the U.S. federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterisations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions. The words 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'continue,' 'could,' 'estimate,' 'expect,' 'intends,' 'may,' 'might,' 'plan,' 'possible,' 'potential,' 'predict,' 'project,' 'should,' 'would' and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements may include, for example, statements about the achievement of performance hurdles, or the benefits of the events or transactions described in this communication and the expected returns therefrom. These statements are based on VivoPower's management's current expectations or beliefs and are subject to risk, uncertainty, and changes in circumstances. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by the statements herein due to changes in economic, business, competitive and/or regulatory factors, and other risks and uncertainties affecting the operation of VivoPower's business. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies include changes in business conditions, fluctuations in customer demand, changes in accounting interpretations, management of rapid growth, intensity of competition from other providers of products and services, changes in general economic conditions, geopolitical events and regulatory changes, and other factors set forth in VivoPower's filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. There can be no assurances that VivoPower will continue to comply with all of NASDAQ's Listing Rules at all times, given inherent uncertainty in business conditions and financial markets. The information set forth herein should be read in light of such risks. VivoPower is under no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions or otherwise. Contact Shareholder Enquiries media@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Carnival Corporation & (NYSE:CCL) Restructures Debt with €1B and $2B Note Offerings
Carnival Corporation & undertook a notable debt refinancing initiative last quarter, which may have influenced its stock price jump of nearly 80%. The company issued €1 billion of unsecured notes due in 2031 and $2 billion of similar notes due in 2032, focusing on reducing secured debt and simplifying capital structure. During this period, broader market trends showed mixed results, with a 1.8% rise for the week amidst broader uncertainties such as tariff worries. However, Carnival's specific actions likely added weight to its substantial positive movement against the backdrop of these broader market conditions. Be aware that Carnival Corporation & is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis and 1 of those is a bit concerning. This technology could replace computers: discover the 27 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. The recent debt refinancing by Carnival Corporation, which involved issuing €1 billion and US$2 billion in notes due in 2031 and 2032, respectively, aligns with its ongoing fleet modernization strategy. This move may enhance long-term earnings stability by reducing secured debt and thereby potentially lowering interest expenses. Analysts forecast earnings to grow to US$3.7 billion by 2028, with profit margins expected to expand to 12.6%. This outlook reflects the company's aim to strengthen its financial health through effective capacity management and sustainability initiatives. In terms of share performance, over a three-year period, Carnival achieved a total return of 252.89%, reflecting a very large appreciation in shareholder value. Over the past year, the stock has also outperformed the US market, which returned 13.7%. This notable longer-term performance indicates strong market reception of Carnival's initiatives, including its unique private destinations and loyalty programs. Even though the company's share price recently experienced a substantial increase, bringing it close to the analysts' consensus price target of US$30.80, the current valuation suggests there could still be a 7% upside compared to the price target. The performance is underpinned by the anticipated growth in revenue and earnings, as well as improved Return on Equity. Investors, however, should consider the potential risks from geopolitical instability and modernization costs that could impact profitability. Insights from our recent valuation report point to the potential undervaluation of Carnival Corporation & shares in the market. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:CCL. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Selling In America. How European Startups Can Bridge The Atlantic
Martin Mignot of Index Ventures says the build in Europe sell in America model has proved successful ... More For a significant number of European startups, going global means breaking into the U.S. market. According to research published by VC firm Index Ventures, almost two-thirds of Europe's startups (64%) say they have expanded to the U.S. as early as the Seed or even the Pre-Seed Stage. That compares with just 33% five years ago. This shouldn't come as any surprise. North America is the world's largest software market, and ambitious European tech companies naturally want to go where their customers are. The question is, how can a business based in London, Paris, Barcelona or Tallinn successfully establish a bridgehead in a marketplace that has no shortage of well-funded domestic innovators? Helpfully, Index Ventures has published a playbook for European companies seeking success on the other side of the pond. Titled Winning In The US: The Founder's Guide to Building a Global Company from Europe, the book is intended to encourage more startup businesses to think about expansion into North America from day one while also providing practical advice on just how that can be done. So, what does a 'conquer the U.S.' game plan look like? To find out more, I spoke to Index Ventures partner Martin Mignot, a contributor to the book. I started by asking him what thinking globally from day one means in practice. Global Building Blocks As he acknowledges, not every European company will have the resources or the opportunity to sell outside its domestic market on the first day - or even the first year - of operations. But for those who believe they have a product that can be sold overseas (with the U.S. as an obvious target) founders should put the building blocks in place. It starts with the product. 'It should be designed so it can be sold globally,' he says. In addition, Mignot stresses the need to think about the make-up of the team, and in particular hiring people who speak English - not only the lingua franca for international business but also a must for addressing customers in the U.S. 'Everything should be documented in English,' he adds. 'And English should be the common language.' Once designed for a global audience, a product can be localised for specific markets, he adds. Finding Customers Arguably, that's the easy part. Connecting with the target market and selling is likely to be more difficult. Index Ventures makes a distinction between 'marketing-led' companies, such as digital games creators who can address a global audience from a single HQ and businesses working in sectors such as Enterprise Software. As Mignot sees it, corporate customers will expect - even in the age of Zoom, Teams and Meet - to engage with representatives who turn up at the office, pitch the product and provide ongoing support. 'If you have a sales-driven strategy and your aim is to sell to corporations in middle-America, you have to have boots on the ground. You have to spend time with them,' he says. There are a number of ways to establish a U.S. presence. In some cases, European founders move to the U.S. first and build the company there, before edging back into Europe. Mignot says this is less common today. Instead, startups might choose to adopt what Index calls the 'magnet archetype' ( or playbook), which will see one or more founders moving to the U.S. with a team while co-leaders remain in Europe. Alternatively, founders could simply travel a lot between HQs or bases, an approach dubbed the 'pendulum' by Index. Of course, not all companies will prioritize the U.S.. Some will anchor their operations in Europe, establishing only a small presence in the U.S. at least initially. Mignot says you choose a playbook, and build the detail around it. Economic Nationalism The thought of promising European startups moving their HQs to North America is enough to give many European policymakers nightmares. In strategically and nationally important sectors such as AI, quantum, life sciences, and climate, politicians are keen that businesses should remain based in Europe. The concern is that the sheer size of the U.S. opportunity will result in businesses relocating most of their operations and, ultimately, their value. Mignot says this is not something that bothers most European founders. 'What is clear is that despite the narrative around nationalism. Entrepreneurs are internationalists. If you have a great product, you should seize the opportunity to sell it in the largest market – the US,' he says. That could mean a complete relocation but not necessarily. One concern for policymakers is much of the growth capital for scaleups comes from overseas investors who may encourage businesses to move their operations to the U.S.. Here in the U.K. efforts are being made to improve the flow of later stage funding, in particular, by harnessing pension fund money. The Index Ventures research suggests relocating startups are seeking customers not capital, but the various playbooks identified by the new book illustrate that it is possible to have boots on the ground overseas while continuing to build the product in Europe. Indeed, Europe-based firms have an advantage in that talent is not so expensive as it is in the U.S. and it is also more available. 'The build in Europe, sell in the US formula is a winning one.' says Mignot.
