Privacy is blockchain's missing link—and America's opportunity to lead
Every transaction on-chain is etched into a public ledger for all to see. This means that user addresses, financial behavior, and asset holdings are exposed permanently and immutably. In traditional financial systems, such data is closely guarded. In crypto, it's open by default.
This is not just a theoretical concern. The lack of privacy on public blockchains is exposing individuals to real-world risks: profiling, extortion, digital surveillance, and even physical threats. Anyone with a blockchain wallet is a potential target—whether they are a Ukrainian citizen receiving aid, a whistleblower relying on digital assets for safety, or a consumer simply transacting online.
The stakes are escalating. According to Chainalysis, nearly $46 billion worth of crypto was transferred through illicit channels in 2023, with many transactions linked to sanctioned entities. Blockchain's radical transparency makes tracing those funds technically feasible, but it also means innocent users may be swept up in guilt-by-association logic, flagged by automated compliance systems, or monitored by adversarial nation-states exploiting open ledgers for intelligence purposes.
Subscribe to the Daily newsletter.
Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day
Privacy Policy
| Fast Company Newsletters
We are at an inflection point. On one hand, blockchain has evolved from an experimental idea into a foundational layer for decentralized finance (DeFi), gaming, cross-border payments, and digital identity. On the other, the absence of privacy threatens to stall its momentum. Without privacy guarantees, Web3 won't scale into a secure, inclusive internet economy—it will remain a risky, self-surveilling shadow of its potential.
It's not just user safety at stake. Institutional adoption, long seen as the tipping point for crypto's maturation, is lagging in part because privacy solutions are underdeveloped. Financial institutions and enterprises cannot embrace systems that force them to reveal business-sensitive transactions to competitors and regulators alike. Privacy is not the enemy of compliance; it's a prerequisite for serious engagement. The road ahead
The good news? A path forward exists.
Recent regulatory tailwinds—particularly in the United States—point to a growing willingness to integrate blockchain into the regulated financial system. Lawmakers are increasingly exploring frameworks for stablecoins, digital asset custody, and decentralized finance. And with the emergence of advanced cryptographic tools such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), we now have the technical foundation to reconcile transparency with confidentiality.
Zero-knowledge cryptography allows users to prove the validity of information—such as identity or solvency—without revealing the underlying data. In practical terms, this means users can comply with regulations (e.g., AML, KYC) without exposing every transaction to the world. ZKPs are already being piloted by privacy-forward networks and could become the industry standard if policy and investment align.
And alignment is possible. In 2024, the European Union began implementing its Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation, while Hong Kong and the UAE continue developing regulated environments for digital assets. Yet the U.S. retains a unique advantage: its history of open innovation, its global financial leadership, and its robust civil liberties tradition. If it embraces blockchain privacy not just as a feature but as infrastructure—akin to encryption on the internet—it can set a global standard.
advertisement
The stakes for leadership are high. In a world defined by rising geopolitical tension, blockchain privacy is becoming a matter of national security. Adversarial governments are already using blockchain analytics to trace and target users, conduct financial espionage, and undermine dissident movements. Without privacy, blockchains risk becoming tools of surveillance rather than instruments of freedom.
At the same time, user demand for private, secure financial tools is surging. A recent survey by the Electric Coin Company found that 84% of crypto users consider privacy to be a critical feature of digital finance. And among developers, privacy-preserving technology is one of the fastest-growing areas of investment, according to Electric Capital's 2023 developer report. A host of solutions
So what can be done?
First, policymakers must move past the false binary of privacy versus compliance. These are not mutually exclusive goals. Clear guidelines that embrace advanced cryptography, establish safe harbors for privacy-preserving innovation, and differentiate between consumer protection and surveillance will enable the next generation of secure digital finance.
Second, industry leaders need to elevate privacy to the level of consensus mechanisms, scalability, and user experience. Just as we wouldn't launch a blockchain without validating transactions or securing the network, we shouldn't deploy them without protecting users. Privacy must be a baseline, not a bonus.
Finally, public-private collaboration is essential. The early internet thrived because of cooperation between universities, startups, civil society, and government. Blockchain deserves the same collaborative energy. By fostering research, funding privacy innovation, and supporting interoperability standards, the U.S. can lead the world in building a safer, more trustworthy digital economy.
In the end, privacy is not a fringe concern. It is the cornerstone of user trust, the foundation of financial inclusion, and the safeguard of democratic values in the digital age.
Blockchain has the potential to reshape the global financial system—but only if we build it securely. The time to act is now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Groq launches its first European data centre in Helsinki
US-based artificial intelligence (AI) chipmaker Groq has unveiled a new data centre in Helsinki, Finland. The new facility will cater to the growing demand for AI inference services in the European region. Additionally, it will offer reduced latency, quicker response times, and enhanced data governance. The new data centre, Groq's first in Europe, has been established in partnership with US-based Equinix, a global digital infrastructure company. It further solidifies the association between both companies, building on their previous site in Dallas, Texas, US. Jonathan Ross, CEO and founder of Groq, remarked that the new European data centre offers the lowest possible latency and ready infrastructure. "As demand for AI inference continues at an ever-increasing pace, we know that those building fast need more – more capacity, more efficiency, and with a cost that scales,' he further added. Regina Donato Dahlstrom, managing director for the Nordics at Equinix, reaffirmed Finland as a standout choice for hosting the new data centre. She attributed it to the country's sustainable energy policies, free cooling, and reliable power grid. "Combining Groq's cutting-edge technology with Equinix's global infrastructure and vendor-neutral connectivity solutions enables efficient AI inference at scale,' she added. Headquartered in the US state of California, Groq builds AI accelerator application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). It has around 500 employees globally. Last year, it announced an expansion in Saudi Arabia. "Groq launches its first European data centre in Helsinki" was originally created and published by Investment Monitor, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China hits back at EU ban with ‘tit-for-tat' medical device restrictions
China has imposed restrictions on procurement of European medical devices, following a similar move made by the European Union (EU) earlier this year. Last month, the EU voted to ban Chinese companies from participating in public procurement tenders for medical device contracts valued at more than €5m ($5.72m) after an investigation found that fair access was not being reciprocated in China. The Chinese Government has now issued its own freeze, excluding EU-based companies from procurement for certain medical devices. The purchasing threshold for China's restrictions is a price of over 45 million yuan ($6.3m). The notice was effective immediately when it was announced on 6 July. Published in January 2025, the EU's investigation concluded that Chinese policies, such as the nation's 'Made in China 2025' economic roadmap, favoured domestic medical devices over imported ones by design. The Chinese commerce ministry has rebuffed the EU's ban, commenting that it continues to set up barriers for Chinese companies in public procurement. A spokesperson for the ministry said: 'Regrettably, despite China's goodwill and sincerity, the EU has insisted on taking restrictive measures to build new protectionist barriers. "Therefore, China has no choice but to take reciprocal restrictive measures to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and maintain a fair competition environment." Dr Andrew Thompson, director of therapy research and analysis in medical devices for GlobalData, commented: 'It seems almost exactly tit for tat – China is rejecting entirely the EU's findings about China's anti-competition restrictions from 2024.' Since the Covid-19 pandemic, the country's demand for EU imports has slowly reduced, with exports to the EU being pretty flat; $10bn in 2021 and $10.4bn in 2023. However, in 2024, exports to the EU surged to almost $11.4bn, while imports continued to decline, resulting in the EU having a negative trading relationship with China for the first time, Thompson says. 'This is reflective of how Chinese brands are beginning to dominate all tiers of the Chinese healthcare market. I suspect China will hold fast in negotiations, and that it is the EU which will climb down," added Thompson. Trade association MedTech Europe said in a statement: 'We regret China's decision to further restrict access to its public procurement market for medical technologies produced in the European Union. Measures of this nature risk deepening trade tensions and ultimately deny patients timely access to indispensable medical technologies.' 'We urge both the European Union and China to engage in constructive dialogue to resolve the current challenges to market access and to uphold fair, predictable, and reciprocal trading conditions.' Crucially, the Chinese policy does not include products made in China, a major respite for device companies that have shifted to localise production in the country such as Siemens Healthineers and Philips. Philips' posted 33.3% higher losses for 2024 compared to 2023 in part due to weaker demand in China. The company previously stated that 90% of its sales in China is via local manufacturing, any impact of the announced EU ban will be unveiled in its next earnings release. As of November 2023, the Chinese market represented 15% of global revenue for Siemens Healthineers. A spokesperson for the company said the China restrictions are not expected to have a material impact on its business. Beijing's retaliatory restrictions mark the latest breakdown in life sciences relations with Europe, which have left the medtech industry reeling. GE HealthCare cut its 2024 outlook last year due to China's anti-corruption drive while Roche posted flat diagnostics sales in Q1 2025 due to pricing reforms in the country. Tensions between China and the US have also left the global medtech industry exposed to financial headwinds. Thompson says: 'The EU's drive to get more of an EU component to healthcare will likely drive up costs for the payers, and establishing local manufacture by Chinese firms, with an element of EU material input, might be the mutually beneficial solution. However, with frosty relations with the US, China might be looking to dump medtech products elsewhere at a reduced price.' "China hits back at EU ban with 'tit-for-tat' medical device restrictions" was originally created and published by Medical Device Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
Latest Crypto Buzz Fades As TON Admits No UAE Visa Agreement
Ton announces a Golden Visa for the UAE and then retracts it. In a dramatic turn of events, what initially looked like a groundbreaking fusion of crypto and blockchain technology and global mobility has been walked back. Earlier this week, excitement exploded online after an announcement suggested that staking $100,000 in TON for three years, plus a one-time $35,000 processing fee, would grant applicants a 10-year UAE Golden Visa. The initiative appeared to offer quick processing, family eligibility, and was even promoted through a TON Foundation webpage. TON's token surged on the news. One of the tweets from Ton about the UAE Golden Visa. But on July 7th, 2025 the TON Foundation issued a statement to clarify the situation and reset expectations. Despite the enthusiastic rollout, no formal partnership exists between TON and the United Arab Emirates government. The initiative, while real in its experimental goals, is still in development and has not been endorsed or authorized by any UAE governmental entity. Why the Correction Is a Big Deal For Ton, Crypto And The UAE The initial reaction made sense. If true, this would have been the first time a decentralized crypto staking mechanism directly enabled access to a government residency program. It signaled a future where your crypto wallet could unlock real-world benefits, an intersection of Web3 and public policy. But the correction from the TON Foundation was swift and firm. They emphasized that the program is an exploratory effort, being developed in collaboration with a licensed blockchain partner, but it does not have any government approval or involvement at this time. The UAE's Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security, the Securities and Commodities Authority, and the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority released a joint statement confirming that no such initiative has been launched or approved. This wasn't just a clarification. It was a necessary course correction. And it highlighted the risks of moving too fast in regulated territory, especially when dealing with programs that involve immigration and national benefits. The Impact on the UAE and TON For Crypto The UAE's rapid response showcased its evolving role as both a crypto-forward country and a firm regulatory actor. This is a country that has welcomed crypto exchanges, startups, and tokenization initiatives. But it is also focused on transparency, structure, and legal compliance. The message from regulators was unmistakable. Innovation is encouraged, but only when it is aligned with approved frameworks. For TON, the news cycle was a mixed bag. On one hand, the initial buzz helped put TON back in headlines, demonstrating the community's appetite for real-world applications of blockchain. The idea of using smart contracts to automate a residency pathway is compelling. On the other hand, the abrupt reversal could cause reputational damage if it's seen as over-promising or sidestepping regulatory rigor. Still, TON has an opportunity here. The Foundation's quick clarification and willingness to align with regulators shows maturity. Rather than doubling down, they acknowledged the premature nature of the rollout and reaffirmed their intent to build responsibly. In Web3, that kind of responsiveness is essential for long-term trust. What It Means for Crypto Users For crypto investors, digital nomads, and builders who were excited about the initial announcement, the walk-back may be disappointing. Many saw this as a way to convert digital assets into real-world benefits, without needing to go through traditional banking or property-based investment programs. It is important to note that the program still exists in concept. A licensed partner is collaborating with TON to explore compliant, blockchain-based frameworks that could one day support access to residency. But there is no guarantee, and certainly no official program at this stage. Any applications submitted through the site are not linked to government decisions, and all visa issuance remains at the sole discretion of UAE authorities. This moment is a good reminder that Web3 is still maturing. The tech may move fast, but sovereign processes take time. That gap is not a flaw—it's a signal that serious innovation needs patience, governance, and careful alignment with law. Downside and Risk Moving Forward In Crypto The biggest risk from this situation is credibility. When projects rush out announcements that suggest real-world impact—especially something as high-stakes as immigration—they must be airtight in messaging. This fate happened just recently with Robinhood announcing that they could tokenize stocks, including access to OpenAI. Regulatory authorities do not operate on crypto timelines, and trust is hard to regain once it's lost. There's also a user risk. People who moved funds or acted on the early announcement may feel misled. While TON clarified things quickly, it's a cautionary tale for the space as a whole. The excitement around on-chain access to identity, location, and sovereignty is real—but those things must be grounded in established legal frameworks. Market volatility is another factor. TON's token surged following the initial announcement, only to retract after the clarification. That kind of price movement, driven by sentiment rather than fundamentals, is a reminder of how fragile these narratives can be. Looking Ahead with Realistic Optimism For Crypto Even without a live program, this story matters. It shows where the future is headed. The demand for blockchain-based access to real-world benefits is real, and the idea of tokenized residency will likely continue to evolve. The idea that your wallet might one day hold more than just currency—maybe your ID, your health record, your global access—is not far-fetched. TON now has an opportunity to lead in that direction. If they can work in tandem with regulatory bodies and refine this program into something official, it could become a model for how Web3 bridges into policy. But that path must be paved with clarity, structure, and mutual respect between technologists and governments. For now, there is no golden visa from TON. But there is a golden opportunity to build one, the right way. Did you enjoy this story about Ton, crypto and the UAE? Don't miss my next one: Use the blue follow button at the top of the article near my byline to follow more of my work.
