Democrats contemplate walkout in Texas
Texas and national Democrats have vowed to fight back while blasting the GOP plans, which could give Republicans five more seats, as discriminatory.
Visiting with Democratic state lawmakers in Austin, U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) vowed Thursday that 'all options' should be on the table to stop the GOP plan.
But because Democrats are a minority in the state Legislature, they have few options to stop the GOP and face an uphill battle legally and politically.
One very real option would be to seek to deny the quorum necessary to keep the Texas state House and Senate functioning, something Democrats might have the numbers to accomplish.
'Democrats don't have many arrows left in their quiver. There simply aren't a lot of things they can do to be able to challenge these maps in the near term,' said Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston.
A quorum break could be the 'nuclear option,' Rottinghaus said, 'because most members don't want to do it that way. They want to stay and fight.'
'But the problem is that they simply don't have a lot of tools legislatively, or in terms of their total numbers to stop or slow things here in Austin.'
The map proposal, filed this past week during a special session called by Gov. Greg Abbott (R), comes after President Trump pressed Texas Republicans to draw new maps to protect the party's narrow 219-212 House majority.
A public hearing before the state House's Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting was held Friday. Republican state Rep. Cody Vasut, chair of the redistricting panel, said he expects committee action in the coming days, followed by a full state House debate early next week.
Specifics of the proposed lines could change as the plan works its way through the state chambers. But it's unlikely that Democrats have enough leverage in the state Legislature — where Republicans are 88-62 in the House and 19-11 in the Senate — to significantly change things in their favor.
Faced with similar dynamics in 2003 and 2021, Democrats walked out to stall the Legislature on redistricting efforts and voting restrictions.
'Breaking quorum is a big task, and there's a lot of problems that come with it,' said Lana Hansen, executive director of Texas Blue Action, an Austin-based Democratic advocacy group.
'And I think this situation is particularly volatile because … this [redistricting] is a call from the president of the United States.'
Fleeing would likely draw more attention to the brewing redistricting battle, but Abbott could continue to call sessions and the Democrats' absence would stall other business.
A quorum break would also be expensive, due to new rules that impose fines for each day a lawmaker has fled, as well as the threat of arrest. Democrats are reportedly fundraising to help pay up if that happens, according to The Texas Tribune.
'In the past, it worked to sort of pause the conversation and start over,' Hansen said of the previous quorum breaks, but she noted that Republicans still got their way. 'At the end of it, it wasn't as successful as we had hoped.'
Asked about a potential walkout, U.S. Rep. Lizzie Fletcher (D-Texas) told reporters Thursday that 'there are a lot of ways to fight.'
Jeffries, asked whether he's urging Texas Democrats to break quorum, said 'all options should be on the table' but deferred to Texas Democrats.
If Democrats can't block the GOP efforts within the Legislature, they'll likely pursue legal action as leaders in and out of the state decry the proposal as discriminatory.
Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas), one of the lawmakers whose district would be impacted, called the moves 'part of a long, ugly tradition of trying to keep Black and brown [Texans] from having a voice.' Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) called it 'a power grab to silence voters and suppress votes.'
Democrats' chances of success with potential legal challenges likely relies on the fate of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), said Mark McKenzie, an Texas Tech associate professor of political science who has practiced law in the state.
A major Louisiana redistricting battle is set to be reheard by the Supreme Court next term, and Republicans are increasingly bullish on chipping away at the VRA.
'I think the Democrats, assuming the Supreme Court doesn't eviscerate the Voting Rights Act … would have a good case, in terms of African American majority districts in Texas and how they'll be impacted,' McKenzie said, noting that they might be harder pressed to argue the same of Latino voters, who have increasingly leaned toward the GOP in Texas.
'Legally speaking, the Democrats are not in a great position,' McKenzie added.
The party appears to be gearing up for a political battle either way.
'The current map violates the law, and this congressional map will double and triple down on the extreme racial gerrymandering that is silencing the voices of millions of Texans,' Jeffries said Thursday in Austin.
'We will fight them politically. We will fight them governmentally. We will fight them in court. We will fight them in terms of winning the hearts and minds of the people of Texas and beyond.'
House Majority PAC, a House Democratic super PAC, announced a new Lone Star Fund this week. It is hoping to raise millions for 2026 challengers if the lines are redrawn.
'If the GOP and the Trump administration think that Texas is the first state that they should look at doing this in, the place that he's most concerned with losing ground in, then we are in play, and my hope is that national investment will come this way,' Hansen said.
'There's still an opportunity for Democrats in Texas. We just might not be able to help flip to the congressional majority that we would like.'
And Democrats may have avenues for offsetting GOP gains in Texas with redistricting efforts in other states.
'There's a phrase in Texas: 'what happens here sometimes changes the world.' Well, this is the case where what's happening here is setting off a cascade effect across the country,' said Jon Taylor, the University of Texas at San Antonio's department chair of political science.
The developments in Texas have sparked congressional map conversations in several other states, including in California — where Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has said the Golden State might make its own midcycle changes if Texas moves forward.
There's also a chance that Lone Star State redistricting backfires on Republicans.
For one, the party may appear more focused on redistricting than on deadly Independence Day floods, another special session agenda item.
It may also be hard to predict midterm voting patterns.
'Just because Trump won in 2024 in certain parts and certain areas that are currently held by Democrats doesn't mean that's going to translate to success in a midterm election of '26, particularly a midterm election that, nationally, is expected to be potentially a wave election for Democrats,' Taylor said.
'So you could end up with a situation where you've drawn districts that are supposedly for, you know, friendly for Republicans, and all of a sudden, in a year where the economy is going south, Trump's opinion poll numbers continue to decline, you end up with Democrats winning in districts that were designed for Republicans.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
2 minutes ago
- New York Post
Miranda Devine: Biden abused his authority by turning FEMA into a far-left political machine
The Biden administration abused its power by turning the entire mechanism of the federal government into a Democrat voter mobilization campaign, according to newly unearthed White House documents viewed exclusively by The Post. The worst offender was FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, under the Department of Homeland Security, which was controlled for four years by Biden's Machiavellian border buster Alejandro Mayorkas. When responding to an emergency or a natural disaster, FEMA employees were directed to make voter registration a 'key priority.' They politically targeted vulnerable people in their hour of need instead of focusing on providing federal assistance. Left-wing NGOs were brought in to 'educate' FEMA staff about 'equity and voter access for individuals affected by disaster,' says a Trump administration official. 'FEMA's job is to make sure Americans who have suffered catastrophic loss due to some disaster in their community [can access] food, water and shelter . . . Under President Biden, FEMA, like every agency, produced a plan on how they would leverage these crisis situations for political [purposes]. I can't think of anything more disgusting.' FEMA snubbed GOP FEMA employees were so fixated on voter outreach that, when they visited hurricane-ravaged Florida last October, they didn't even bother knocking on the doors of houses that had Trump signs in the yard. Instead of assisting Hurricane Milton survivors, they were instructed to 'avoid homes advertising Trump,' according to an Office of Special Counsel complaint. FEMA supervisor Marn'i Washington was fired as a scapegoat after Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis called foul on the scam and The Daily Wire reported that at least 20 homes with Trump signs or flags had been skipped by FEMA and denied the opportunity of qualifying for federal assistance. It stands to reason that if FEMA's priority was getting out Democrats to vote, the last people they would want to visit were Trump supporters. The Florida scandal came on the heels of the Biden administration's sluggish response to Hurricane Helene in Trump-supporting rural areas of North Carolina and Tennessee. Whether it was Hurricane Helene, the Maui wildfires, Hurricane Ian, or the East Palestine train derailment, FEMA always came up short during the Biden years. The agency's inadequate performance is more understandable when you realize that providing actual disaster relief to victims had become simply a side dish to the partisan political priorities of the Democratic Party. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! It began the minute Joe Biden came into office, when he concocted a fake voter registration crisis by leveraging the same racial discord that he had exploited during the George Floyd riots the previous summer, claiming that 'many Americans, especially people of color, confront significant obstacles to exercising the fundamental right' to vote, including 'difficulties with voter registration, lack of election information, and barriers to access at polling places.' This was not true. In fact, voter turnout in the 2020 election of 67% was the highest recorded in the 21st century, according to the Census Bureau. Voter registration, likewise, was at a record high in 2020. 'Equity' and 'access' were euphemisms for policies designed simply to increase Democrat voter turnout by targeting demographics that traditionally vote Democrat. Biden launched his federal government-wide voter recruitment program with an Executive Order on March 7, 2021, to 'promote equity in voter access.' The date was chosen deliberately to fall on the 56th anniversary of Bloody Sunday to invoke the civil rights legacy of fighting voter suppression against black Americans. Biden announced the scheme at a breakfast in Selma, Ala., absurdly tying the Jan. 6 Capitol riot to what he claimed was a renewed struggle for voting rights. Fed turnout machine A federal lawsuit filed by nine states last August claimed that his order was drafted by progressive racial activist group Demos, which 'monitors implementation and advocates that federal agencies do more.' The EO was executed by Susan Rice, Biden's assistant to the president for domestic policy, whose primary focus was making 'equity' central to every arm of government. In 2021, she commanded all federal agencies to dream up ways to re-engineer their activities to prioritize voter turnout, especially in 'marginalized communities.' The Department of Energy, for example, targeted low-income households that qualify for federal weatherization assistance with voter registration paraphernalia before the 2022 midterm elections. The Department of Labor enlisted state workforce agencies to designate American Job Centers as voter registration agencies and coordinating exclusively with leftist 'voting rights' groups. The Department of Health and Human Services instructed federal health centers to engage in voter turnout, including 'encouraging patients to register to vote, assisting patients with completing registration forms, sending completed forms to the election authorities.' HHS also encouraged voter registration by ineligible illegal aliens who had access to health coverage through the Affordable Care Act, according to an expose by Heritage Foundation Senior Legal Fellow Hans von Spakovsky. DHS went above and beyond. A FEMA 'Strategic Plan for the Implementation of Executive Order 14019, Promoting Access to Voting' dated Sept. 10, 2021, and sent to Rice by Katherine Culliton-González, DHS officer for civil rights and civil liberties, summarized what DHS was doing to comply with Biden's EO by using disasters and emergencies to harvest voters: 'DHS has planned and begun implementing a variety of internal and external activities to promote access to voting.' The plan included 'key messaging and . . . resources to promote equity in voter access through their training preparedness initiatives for individuals impacted by a disaster or emergency event.' Also included were novel ways of harnessing 'internal resources, and points of public interface to promote equity in voter access before, during, and after a disaster or emergency event.' Registration drive Another arm of Mayorkas' empire, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), was enlisted for the turnout effort, with a plan to 'build up its existing efforts to facilitate voter registration for new citizens at the end of naturalization ceremonies, in coordination with governmental and nongovernmental organizations.' At 2,100 naturalization ceremonies for new Americans, DHS embedded 'voter-registration outreach,' inserting 2 million voter registration forms in 'welcome packets' and inviting only partisan left-leaning groups. Another White House document covering 'Partnerships and Outreach' showed that DHS signed 'Memorandums of Understanding' with the League of Women Voters in October 2022 and NALEO Educational Fund in February 2023, for naturalization 'ceremony support.' Another DHS outfit, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, co-hosted 'Your Vote Your Voice 'cyber-hygiene webinars' with another NGO, the Chicago-based Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). Taxpayer resources allocated by DHS for voter turnout in 2022-2024 included 12 full-time USCIS employees, $1.9 million in print contracts, and 'costs absorbed' for a dedicated five-person team from FEMA's Individual and Community Preparedness Division. President Trump issued a new executive order in March this year to reverse Biden's subterfuge, calling on every federal agency to ensure the voter outreach schemes are dismantled. The cost of this Sovietization of the federal government is incalculable. But let's hope FEMA and the other agencies can get back to their day jobs.


New York Post
2 minutes ago
- New York Post
US Attorney Jeanine Pirro backs Trump's DC takeover threat and demand for lower prosecution age limit: ‘Stop coddling!'
US Attorney Jeanine Pirro said in an interview Wednesday that she supports President Trump's threat to federalize Washington, DC, if local officials don't crack down on youth crime – arguing that juvenile delinquents are 'coddled' in cities run by Democrats. Pirro, the top prosecutor in the nation's capital, fumed that she's not allowed to charge minors accused of violent crimes and backed Trump's push to lower the age of legal accountability to as young as 14, in an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham. 3 Pirro noted that youth crime is on the rise in DC and fumed that she is unable to prosecute most minor offenders. AP 'I support him totally,' Pirro said of Trump's warning Tuesday that he would bring the District of Columbia under federal control if laws aren't changed to prosecute minors as adults. 'If that's what we need to do to get it done, that's what he should do. And I support the president.' 'He's the only one coming here saying, 'I want to make [DC] safe and beautiful.' I haven't heard anyone say that besides him,' Pirro added. During her appearance on 'The Ingraham Angle,' the former Fox News host and New York district attorney noted that she spoke to Trump on Tuesday – when he issued the takeover threat – and explained the situation in DC. 'I said, if you're 14, 15, 16, or 17-years-old, you get coddled, as you do in most American Democrat cities, so I can't charge these people,' Pirro explained. The US attorney went on to describe the early Sunday morning assault of former DOGE employee Edward Coristine, who was beaten up by as many as 10 assailants during an attempted carjacking just a mile from the White House, and how her hands are tied in that situation as well. 'This young kid who worked at the White House was beaten to a pulp … by a gang of punks,' Pirro said of the attack on the 19-year-old tech whiz nicknamed 'Big Balls.' 3 Trump threatened to federalize Washington, DC, Tuesday after a former DOGE employee was beaten up by teenagers during a carjacking attempt in the nation's capital. Truth Social/@realDonaldTrump 3 Pirro said she supports Trump's call for DC officials to crack down on juvenile crime. AFP via Getty Images Two of Coristine's alleged attackers – a 15-year-old boy and 15-year-old girl, both from Maryland – have been arrested by DC police. 'None of them come to my office because they're not considered criminals,' Pirro railed. 'They go to family court, where the effort is rehabilitation.' 'The DC Council – and the president is right – they've got to stop their coddling,' the top prosecutor demanded. 'We've got to lower the age of responsibility to 14.' 'If you think that these kids need to be coddled and they need to be hugged – they need to have consequences. They need to understand that enough is enough,' Pirro continued. 'If you tell me I can't prosecute a 17-year-old for carjacking, then you don't know what you're talking about, because the truth is that if you don't give me that power, and you want to send them to some arts and craft program, then you're out of your mind.'


The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Comer: Clintons should think ‘long and hard' about defying subpoena
House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) on Wednesday urged former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to comply with a subpoena requesting their testimony detailing their connection to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'If someone doesn't comply with a subpoena, we've seen it happen in the past, in both my committee, as well as on the Jan. 6 committee, when the Democrats had the majority, and you can hold them in contempt of Congress, and with a Republican attorney general, that's something that I think that the Clinton legal team is going to think long and hard about,' Comer said during an appearance on NewsNation's 'The Hill.' 'You're not going to have a lot of sympathy, probably from the Trump DOJ, if the Clintons failed to comply with a bipartisan, congressionally approved subpoena, which is what that was,' he added. Comer said bipartisan support is going to make it hard for the former president to dodge the congressional investigation. 'Obviously, when you subpoena a former president, your odds aren't the best at getting them in if you look at history. But what makes this different is this subpoena was approved in a bipartisan manner by a subcommittee vote,' the chair told anchor Blake Burman. 'So you had Democrats and Republicans on the record voting to subpoena that whole list you showed and there were Republicans and Democrats on that list. In addition to those subpoenas, I also subpoenaed [Attorney General] Pam Bondi for Epstein files,' he continued. In recent weeks, the Trump administration has been facing intense backlash over how it has handled information related to Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in 2019. The backlash has come from both MAGA faithful and left-wing progressives. Comer has taken the lead in a lengthy committee-led investigation. The Kentucky lawmaker told Burman that 'at the end of the day, I've been ordered by Congress to take the lead in this investigation, and we expect to get everything that we could legally get.'