logo
John Torode's sacking ‘over a rap lyric' puts all middle-aged men like me at risk

John Torode's sacking ‘over a rap lyric' puts all middle-aged men like me at risk

Telegraph18-07-2025
To my unoffendable sensibilities (just don't say toilet, moist, perfume, vomit, diarrhoea, lounge or couch) John Torode's alleged crime, for which he was sacked from MasterChef where we worked together, appears to be that he was in a bar singing along to a Kanye West hit.
The tune in question by the US rapper features the actor Jamie Foxx singing a refrain ('I got a woman') originally written by Ray Charles in 1954. It's a clever, mesmerising record and rather than discuss its provenance (which may have been more sensible), Torode is said to have been singing along. The song is called Gold Digger so you can see why its rhyming nature might have got him into trouble.
I say 'singing' but it's actually rapping. And, to my mind, the idea of a middle-aged man in a bar rapping along to Kanye West is a crime worth a sacking. Get your quote-hungry teeth into that one, Downing Street.
The likes of near-60-something Torode should be safely at home after work with some Puccini playing in the background. Or, if he insists, doing karaoke in his shed with headphones on.
And don't I know it, because some of us middle-aged blokes grew up with the greatest, most violently lyrical rappers in history. And God forbid they pop up in the queue at the karaoke when it's our turn. NWA long being one of my favourite late Eighties and Nineties hip-hop groups. The lyrics are tricky stepping stones across the fruitiest nuggets of the English language and don't ask what their name stands for.
But their songs aren't my fault. Someone put them out into the ether in Compton, south Los Angeles. Perhaps it was the contrast that partly excited me, lying in the spring sunshine on the south front of my grandfather Sacheverell's home of Weston Hall, Towcester, Northamptonshire, my headphones filled with the verbiage of Dr Dre, Eazy-E, Ice Cube and MC Ren spoken from some of the most violent streets in America.
'It's a treatise on excessive policing, Mother,' was how I dealt with inquiries. But little did I know of the dangerous end that this path could bring.
The genre of hip-hop practically celebrates the use of foul, culturally sensitive language yet spoken from the mouths of artists this parlance is par for the course. From the lips of a middle-aged bloke, a TV presenter no less, and it becomes a crime for which the penalty is the loss of a job and a very public rinsing. And it's a very clear example of cultural two-tier policing. Which was once highlighted, brilliantly, in 2020 by the US comedian Tom Cotter who contrasted the cultural cancelling of the 1940s song Baby It's Cold Outside (offending, toxic masculinity-soaked lyrics include 'My mother will start to worry/Beautiful, what's your hurry?') with the then number-one hit WAP (Wet-A-- P---y).
Now these songs, and those by NWA, Kanye West, 50 Cent and thousands more, are not banned. We don't do that anymore. Broadcasters and governments know that if you want to see a song race up the charts you just need to ban it. Which, famously, was the case in 1984 when Radio One DJ Mike Read persuaded the BBC to ban Relax by Frankie Goes to Hollywood and it promptly became one of the biggest-selling singles in the UK.
So bars, pubs and clubs pump this stuff out, wooing the after-work crowd and the likes of John Torode and TV crew looking for distraction after another day of tasting parfaits of venison liver and self-saucing chocolate fondants.
As the music thumps and pulsates, drinks are sipped, the feet start to tap and the middle-aged chap attempts to impress the young folk around him as he sings along to the purposefully confrontational lyrics.
The hangover is bad enough, but imagine waking up to discover – or being alerted to the fact some seven years later – that the undercover lyrics police were patrolling that night and noting down which dastardly fools had the temerity to sing along to Gold Digger.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK online safety law leads to 5m extra age checks a day and surge in VPN use
UK online safety law leads to 5m extra age checks a day and surge in VPN use

The Guardian

timea few seconds ago

  • The Guardian

UK online safety law leads to 5m extra age checks a day and surge in VPN use

Five million extra online age checks a day are being carried out in the UK since the introduction of age-gating for pornography sites, according to new data. The Age Verification Providers Association (AVPA) said there had been a sharp increase in additional age checks in the UK since Friday, when age verification became mandatory for accessing pornography under the Online Safety Act. 'As a result of new codes under the Online Safety Act coming into force on Friday, we have seen an additional 5m age checks on a daily basis, as UK-based internet users seek to access sites that are age-restricted,' said Iain Corby, the executive director of the AVPA. The UK has also seen a surge in popularity of virtual private networks, which obscure a user's real location and thus allow them to access sites blocked in their own country. Four of the top five free apps on the Apple download store in the UK are VPN apps, with Proton, the most popular, reporting a 1,800% increase in downloads. Last week the UK's communications regulator and enforcer of the act, Ofcom, indicated that it could start formal investigations into inadequate age checking this week. Ofcom said it would be actively checking compliance with age-checking requirements and if necessary would launch investigations into individual services. The AVPA, the trade association for age-verification companies in Britain, surveyed members who were carrying out checks for UK pornography providers. These providers were required to introduce 'highly effective' age verification on 25 July. The age-checking companies were asked to submit 'the volume of checks you carried out today for highly effective age assurance'. The AVPA said it could not offer a baseline comparison but effective age assurance was new to dedicated pornography sites in the UK. Previously, many porn sites in the UK only required users to tick a box to verify their age. An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Until now, kids could easily stumble across porn and other online content that's harmful to them without even looking for it. Age checks will help prevent that. We're now assessing compliance to make sure platforms have them in place, and companies that fall short should expect to face enforcement action.' Ofcom has said service providers should not encourage users to deploy VPNs in order to circumvent age controls. Punishments for breaching the Online Safety Act, including for inadequate age-checking procedures, range from 10% of worldwide revenue to blocking access to the site or app in extreme cases. Age-assurance methods supported by Ofcom and offered by AVPA members include facial age estimation, where technology assesses a person's likely age through a live photo or video; checking a person's age via their credit card provider, bank or mobile phone network operator; photo ID matching, where a passport or similar ID is checked against a selfie; or a 'digital identity wallet' that contains proof of age. Major pornography providers including Pornhub, the UK's most popular pornography site, have pledged to implement the strict age checks required under the act. The act also requires sites and apps to shield children from other forms of harmful material, particularly content that encourages suicide, self-harm and eating disorders. It requires tech platforms to suppress the spread of content that is abusive or incites hatred against people with protected characteristics under the Equality Act such as age, race and sex. Free speech campaigners have said the child-harm content restrictions have led to material on X being age-gated unnecessarily, along with some forums on Reddit including one dedicated to tackling alcohol abuse. Reddit and X have been contacted for comment.

Who are Palestine Action? The proscribed ‘terror' group taking the government to court
Who are Palestine Action? The proscribed ‘terror' group taking the government to court

The Independent

time2 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Who are Palestine Action? The proscribed ‘terror' group taking the government to court

Activist group Palestine Action has been allowed to challenge the Home Office in court over its prescription as a terrorist organisation, a judge has ruled. The direct action group was banned by the Home Office after several of its members broke into an Oxfordshire RAF base to spray-paint military planes. Formed in 2020, Palestine Action has conducted a series of direct action protests over the past five years, largely against arms manufacturers operating in the UK and selling weapons to Israel. Unveiling the intention to ban the group following the incident on June 23, Ms Cooper said it was the latest in a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. Proscription has branded the group a terrorist organisation and made it illegal to become a member of Palestine Action or solicit support for it. Co-founder of the group Huda Ammori had sought to challenge the government's decision, with his lawyers arguing that the ban breaches the right to free speech, and is gagging legitimate protest. Around 200 people have been arrested on suspicion of publicly protesting support for Palestine Action since it was banned. One recent case saw a man arrested under the terrorism act for holding up a Private Eye cartoon at a demonstration in Leeds. Delivering his judgement on Wednesday, Mr Justice Chamerlain said that Mr Ammori's case against the government was 'reasonably arguable,' and so should proceed to trial. The judge added that a ruling on the ban may not come until 2026, saying it 'will have an impact on the claimant's and others' freedom of expression and freedom to protest on an issue of considerable importance to them and, whether one agrees with them or not, to the country as a whole.' What else has Palestine Action done in the past? Palestine Action was established on 30 July 2020 after a group of activists broke into and spray-painted the interior of Elbit Systems' UK headquarters in London. The defence contractor has continued to be the main target of Palestine Action's protests since its formation. Based in Israel Elbit Systems is the country's largest weapons manufacturer. It supplies the majority of the drones and land-based equipment used by the Israeli military. In the UK, Elbit has multiple UK subsidiaries which operate across 16 sites across the country, with 680 employees. Its latest new site is a manufacturing and development facility in Bristol, opened in 2023. On 19 May 2021 four members of Palestine Action dressed in boilers suits climbed onto the roof of an Elbit-owned drone factory in Leicester. The action was taken in response to a period of unrest in May of that year, in which 256 Palestinians and 17 Israelis were killed. Similar occupations have been carried out at Elbit-owned sites in Bristol, Oldham and Tamworth. In April 2024, the group targeted Somerset County Hall, a Grade II-listed building owned by Somerset council, by splashing it with red paint. This was in response to the local authority leasing a building to Elbit near Bristol. This site was targeted by Palestine Action for the 17th time in March 2025, with four of the groups members using a cherry picker to damage the building. One used a sledgehammer on a rope to smash windows while others spray painted the building. In June 2025, four activists allegedly part of the group damaged two planes at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire by using repurposed fire extinguishers to spray red paint into their turbine engines and cause further damage with crowbars. Counter Terrorism Policing South East (CTPSE) said the four had been charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage.

Former Scotland captain Colin Hendry admits harassing ex-partner
Former Scotland captain Colin Hendry admits harassing ex-partner

The Independent

time2 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Former Scotland captain Colin Hendry admits harassing ex-partner

Former Scottish international footballer Colin Hendry has been given a 12-month community order and a restraining order for harassing his ex-partner. The former central defender who captained Scotland at a World Cup and helped Blackburn Rovers win the Premiership title, was sentenced at Preston Magistrates' Court on Wednesday. Hendry, 59, had admitted harassment of his former partner over a period of six weeks in 2024 after their relationship ended. Natasha Clark, senior crown prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) North West, said: 'Colin Hendry harassed a former partner for over six weeks after their relationship ended after she stopped returning his calls. 'He ignored her wishes and breached boundaries she put in place, using multiple different platforms to contact her. 'Hendry's behaviour was intimidating and persistent, causing the victim immense distress, but despite this he initially refused to accept it was harassment. 'This outcome is a clear indication that the CPS will not hesitate to prosecute anyone guilty of harassment whether this is in person or online.' The court heard Hendry sent his ex messages from multiple different email accounts, utilising no caller ID to call her after she blocked his number. When his calls went unanswered, he turned to other means, including dozens of emails and messaging her on LinkedIn. After she said she no longer wanted any kind of relationship with him, Hendry consistently attempted to contact her, showing up at her house with unwanted gifts and flowers on several occasions. The victim reported Hendry to the police, saying she felt depressed and anxious because of his behaviour. She said she was unable to leave the house without fearing an unannounced visit from him. Lancashire Police contacted Hendry to warn him about his behaviour, telling him to stop all communications to the ex-partner which were unwanted. While Hendry admitted to his conduct, he tried to deny it was harassment, claiming he never received a written warning from police so continued to contact her and that he was simply concerned for the affected person and her dog. Hendry later admitted one count of harassment without violence. He started his football career with Keith in the Highland League before moving to Dundee then winning the league title with Blackburn Rovers and also played for Manchester City. He was Scotland's captain for the 1998 World Cup campaign and also played for Rangers in the Scottish Premiership.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store