How social media can 'trigger' eating disorders in young people
Young women and girls are much more likely to suffer from illnesses such as anorexia, bulimia and binge eating disorder, though rates among men have been increasing.
Research has shown the percentage of people worldwide who have had some kind of eating disorder during their lives rose from 3.5 percent in 2000 to 7.8 percent in 2018, a timeframe that captures the rise of social media.
For the professionals trying to help teenagers recover from these disorders, misinformation from influencers on platforms such as TikTok and Instagram is a huge problem.
"We no longer treat an eating disorder without also addressing social media use," French dietitian and nutritionist Carole Copti told AFP.
"It has become a trigger, definitely an accelerator and an obstacle to recovery," she added.
The causes of eating disorders are complex, with psychological, genetic, environmental and social factors all having the potential to make someone more susceptible.
Social media "is not the cause but the straw that may break the camel's back," said Nathalie Godart, a psychiatrist for children and adolescents at the Student Health Foundation of France.
By promoting thinness, strictly controlled diets and relentless exercise, social media weakens already vulnerable people and "amplifies the threat" to their health, she told AFP.
- 'Vicious cycle' -
Just one recent example is the #skinnytok trend, a hashtag on TikTok full of dangerous and guilt-inducing advice encouraging people to drastically reduce how much food they eat.
For Charlyne Buigues, a French nurse specialising in eating disorders, social media serves as a gateway to these problems, which are "normalised" online.
She condemned videos showing young girls with anorexia exposing their malnourished bodies -- or others with bulimia demonstrating their "purges".
"Taking laxatives or vomiting are presented as a perfectly legitimate way to lose weight, when actually they increase the risk of cardiac arrest," Buigues said.
Eating disorders can damage the heart, cause infertility and other health problems, and have been linked to suicidal behaviour.
Anorexia has the highest rate of death of any psychiatric disease, research has found. Eating disorders are also the second leading cause of premature death among 15- to 24-year-olds in France, according to the country's health insurance agency.
Social media creates a "vicious cycle," Copti said.
"People suffering from eating disorders often have low self-esteem. But by exposing their thinness from having anorexia on social media, they gain followers, views, likes... and this will perpetuate their problems and prolong their denial," she added.
This can especially be the case when the content earns money.
Buigues spoke of a young woman who regularly records herself throwing up live on TikTok and who had "explained that she was paid by the platform and uses that money to buy groceries".
- 'Completely indoctrinated' -
Social media also makes recovering from eating disorders "more difficult, more complicated and take longer", Copti said.
This is partly because young people tend to believe the misleading or fake diet advice that proliferates online.
Copti said consultations with her patients can feel like she is facing a trial.
"I have to constantly justify myself and fight to make them understand that no, it is not possible to have a healthy diet eating only 1,000 calories -- that is half what they need -- or that no, it is not normal to skip meals," she said.
"The patients are completely indoctrinated -- and my 45-minute weekly consultation is no match for spending hours every day on TikTok," she added.
Godart warned about the rise of people posing as "pseudo-coaches", sharing incorrect, "absurd" and potentially illegal nutrition advice.
"These influencers carry far more weight than institutions. We're constantly struggling to get simple messages across about nutrition," she said, pointing out that there are lifelines available for those in need.
Buigues takes it upon herself to regularly report problematic content on Instagram, but said it "serves no purpose".
"The content remains online and the accounts are rarely suspended -- it's very tiring," she said.
The nurse has even advised her patients to delete their social media accounts, particularly TikTok.
"It may seem radical but until young people are better informed, the app is too dangerous," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
15 hours ago
- News.com.au
CSL set to slash 3000 jobs in major restructure
Australia's largest pharmaceutical company could cut nearly 3000 jobs from its workforce as it looks to reduce its headcount across a number of businesses. The biggest shake up of the business in decades will see nearly 15 per cent of the global workforce reduced in a move aimed at 'simplifying the business.' Currently CSL employs about 30,000 staff globally. CSL said the one-off restructure would cost the business $770m pre tax before saving $500 to $550m over the next three years. The business said it would use these savings to invest in 'high priority' opportunities. Its share price dropped 11.15 per cent off the back of Tuesday morning's news — wiping roughly $12 billion off the company's market cap. CSL also announced its intention to demerge its influenza prevention vaccines-focused unit known as Seqirus into a separate ASX listed business in 2026. Gordon Naylor, a former president of CSL Seqirus, will run the new business. It will also combine the commercial and medical operations of its core blood plasma and iron deficiency businesses into one unit. The remaining CSL group will continue to have positions in multiple rare and serious diseases. The demerger will be subject to third party consents, regulatory approvals and CSL will conduct a voluntary shareholder vote. It has been tough 12 months for CSL, with the business facing unpredictable tariffs on its exports to the United States. On August 6 US President Donald Trump announced the first 'small tariff' on foreign-made drugs. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals,' Mr Trump told US business news channel CNBC. 'In one year, one-and-a-half years maximum, it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' He did not say what the initial rate would be, but earlier in the year he said duties on the sector would start from 25 per cent. Mr Trump said he is lifting prices as he wants to make American drugs cheaper for locals. CSL on Tuesday announced a 14 per cent increase in full-year underlying profits, up to $US3.3bn ($5.1bn) which was at the top of its forecasts. eToro market analyst Josh Gilbert said while the restructing comes with a sizeable one off cost, the move is expected to sharpen the group's focus on its high-growth plasma and kidney care business. 'For investors, the view here is that CSL is trying to create a clearer business structure and improve investor returns. However, markets hate uncertainty, and this shake-up brings plenty of it,' he said. 'These are huge changes that come with execution risk, and in my view, the market will react poorly to the news short term.' Mr Gilbert said CSL overall delivered a 'solid' full-year result with net profit ahead of expectations. 'But the real headline isn't the profit beat, it's the sweeping shake-up announced alongside it. As part of a major reset, CSL will reduce its workforce by around 15 per cent, close underperforming plasma centres, and spin off its Seqirus vaccine arm to list separately on the ASX by the end of the fiscal year,' he said. CSL chief executive officer Paul McKenzie said the business recognises a dynamic global backdrop, competitive pressure and organisation complexity have challenged CSL and hindered its ability to deliver superior returns. 'CSL Seqirus continued to show the resilience of its differentiated portfolio and platforms by generating growth in a challenging environment,' he said. 'The majority of avian flu contracts globally were awarded to CSL Seqirus, which was strong recognition of our best-in-class, differentiated platforms.'
News.com.au
19 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Why?': Aussies baffled by ‘white dot' on all Macca's burgers
If you've ever sat down to enjoy a cheeky McDonald's burger and suddenly noticed a strange white blotch on the bottom of your bun, you're not alone. Social media has been set alight with people sharing their shock at discovering the mysterious dot, which seems to appear on almost every iconic Macca's burger. Posts and videos racked up thousands of comments from confused customers, with some joking it must be mould, a 'secret tracking device' or even proof the buns were lab-grown. But the truth, as it turns out, is far less sinister. A spokesperson for McDonald's Australia told that the burgers are about as real as it gets. 'Macca's delicious burger buns are produced right here in Australia, baked fresh with 100 per cent Aussie wheat for that signature taste and quality we all know and love. 'Those little marks on the buns are formed during the baking process, as we create the perfect, fresh, fluffy bun for your Macca's favourites,' they said. Essentially, the dot is nothing more than a baking quirk. During the process, bakers dust the dough with flour to stop it sticking to trays and equipment – sometimes leaving a pale spot behind once the buns are baked. Thankfully, the practice is a common occurrence in commercial baking and is entirely harmless to consumers.
ABC News
19 hours ago
- ABC News
Microplastics are in our food, water and air. How can we minimise our exposure to them?
The scourge of plastic pollution will continue to grow, at least for now, after talks to strike a global treaty fell apart this month. It was the sixth round of such negotiations in three years, but despite a last-ditch scramble on Friday, delegates could not reach agreement. Meanwhile, new research continues to expose plastic's quiet presence in our food, tap water and the air we breathe. A study published last month found higher-than-expected levels of inhalable plastic particles in a handful of apartments and cars in France. Recent Australian research found even compost contains teeny plastic fragments, which may eventually make their way into agricultural soils and food crops. These are a couple of the latest studies into microplastics: fragments or fibres of plastic between a micron (one millionth of a metre) up to 5 millimetres in size. Microplastics can be created as a result of larger pieces of plastic shedding or breaking apart, or be added to products, such as plastic powders added to some cosmetics. Along with microplastics, there are also nanoplastics. These are plastic particles less than a micron wide. For context, a human hair is about 50 microns in diameter. Being so tiny, nanoplastics might more easily infiltrate human cells and tissues such as our blood, "so they're the ones scientists are interested in", University of Queensland microplastics researcher Cassandra Rauert said. So considering micro- and nanoplastics are everywhere, from the summit of Everest to the deepest ocean, how can we minimise our exposure without living in a cave? The short answer is: we don't yet know. Part of that stems from the fact that we don't know a whole lot about microplastics in general, such as where they come from, how many are in our environment, how they might get into our body, what they do once they're in there, and how much we excrete. "Unfortunately, microplastics is a very new field of research," Dr Rauert said. Compared to other everyday pollutants such as pesticides, scientists don't have a good handle on the potential effects of microplastic or nanoplastic exposure. And current techniques to identify micro- and nanoplastics in various organs "are not perfect". "We really don't have good data showing that plastics are ending up in our brains or our liver or our placenta and things like that. "There's a lot of reactive media to those studies and it's causing a lot of concern, which is very understandable, but … we really don't have a good grip on if plastics are actually getting into our bodies yet." So what do we know? More research needs to be done, but it seems that micro- and nanoplastics can generate inflammation, Dr Rauert said. It's not just the physical presence of plastic particles in the body that may affect our health — it's also the chemicals they bring with them, she added: "You're getting a double hit when you're exposed to these things." Such chemicals can be picked up by plastic particles from the environment, or are additives used during manufacturing that make the plastic more malleable, for instance. These chemicals can disrupt hormones, and "there's evidence coming out now that they're linked to type 2 diabetes", Dr Rauert said. "It's these chemicals that we … are more concerned about exposure to [than the plastic itself]." Despite not yet having definitive evidence that microplastics cause harm to our health, researchers suggest avoiding them as much as possible. That can be hard, considering just how much plastic is all around us all the time. When it comes to food, there is some good news: there's probably less plastic in what we eat than originally feared. One of Dr Rauert's students surveyed food a typical Australian would buy from the supermarket and found low concentrations of nano- and microplastics in them. Any plastic present in food probably comes from the packaging around it. But it's what we do with the food when we bring it home that can contribute to microplastic levels, Dr Rauert added. "If you're using a plastic chopping board, every time you use that [and] you can see it's deforming and degrading as you're using it, there are small pieces of plastic that are going to be coming off that board and end up in the food you're eating." The same goes with plastic ladles and the like. So if possible, try to use wooden chopping boards and metal or wood utensils. Tap water is a potentially bigger source of microplastics than food. These plastic particles can come from any number of sources, from the water treatment process to the PVC pipes that plumb your home. Putting tap water through a filter may be helpful in removing some of the larger microplastics, Dr Rauert said, even if some of the smaller microplastics and nanoplastics slip through. "I reckon in the next couple of years there probably will be some [microplastic-filtering devices] on the market." The air inside our home and the dust that settles on surfaces could well be teeming with micro- and nanoplastics small enough to get into our lungs. Synthetic textiles such as polyester and nylon shed tiny fragments and fibres of plastic, and they are found everywhere from furniture to clothes to manchester and carpet. "A lot of our carpets are polypropylene, so when pieces of the carpet are just wearing off over time, then you're getting small pieces of polypropylene in the air," Dr Rauert said. It might sound boring, but wiping down dusty surfaces and vacuuming regularly can reduce microplastics in your home. Another big source of microplastics in the home, Dr Rauert said, is the clothes dryer, especially if you use it to dry synthetic materials. As they tumble in the hot air, synthetic materials release plastic fibres that aren't captured by the dryer filter. And if that hot air blows out into your home, it carries all those fibres with it. It's often not available to people in apartments, but having a dryer that exhausts to the outside environment instead of inside your house can help keep microplastics down, as can avoiding using the dryer for synthetic materials altogether. Generally, the air outside has fewer microplastics than indoor air, especially in winter when windows might remain closed to keep the warmth in. So it's worth periodically opening windows and doors to ventilate the air in your home and let microplastics out. While we can take individual action to keep our home environment as microplastic-free as possible, plastic pollution will continue to be a problem until large-scale changes are made, such as tougher action from governments, Dr Rauert said. "There are small things we can do, but we really need a bigger, collective global effort to try and really cut down the amount of unnecessary plastic that we keep on producing every year. "You don't actually consider how much plastic you use in your everyday life. It's always there. It's just you don't think about it." For more on microplastics, check out the full episode of Lab Notes.
