logo
Acting CJ Hasnah summons urgent 3pm JAC meeting, say sources

Acting CJ Hasnah summons urgent 3pm JAC meeting, say sources

Daily Express7 hours ago
Acting CJ Hasnah summons urgent 3pm JAC meeting, say sources
PETALING JAYA:
Acting Chief Justice Hasnah Hashim has summoned an urgent meeting of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), the body that proposes judges for appointment and elevation, according to sources.
The sources said the meeting is scheduled for 3pm today, although Section 13(2) of the JAC Act 2009 stipulated that 10 days' written notice be given to commission members.
Advertisement
Hasnah, who took office yesterday, is the commission's chairman by virtue of her position as the nation's top judge.
'The purpose for meeting on an urgent basis is unclear,' one source told FMT.
SPONSORED CONTENT
Sections 13(4) and (5) state that the quorum for the meeting is seven, but in the event of the disqualification of members, the quorum shall be reduced to a minimum of five members.
Currently, only seven members remain on the JAC following the mandatory retirement of former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat and Court of Appeal President Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim earlier this week.
Advertisement
Hasnah, in her capacity as Chief Judge of Malaya (CJM) and Abdul Rahman Sebli as Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak (CJSS) are JAC members by virtue of their positions in the judiciary.
Former attorney-general Idrus Harun, retired Federal Court judge Zainun Ali, former Sarawak attorney-general Talat Mahmood Abdul Rashid and UiTM legal adviser Hartini Saripan were appointed last year as eminent persons by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.
Advertisement
Federal Court Judge Zabariah Yusof was appointed to the JAC in March by the prime minister.
The JAC is tasked with selecting suitable candidates to sit as judges in the superior courts – the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal, and the High Courts.
Sources said a list of candidates for the posts of chief justice, Court of Appeal president, CJM, and CJSS have previously been submitted to the Prime Minister's Office during the tenure of Tengku Maimun.
Article 122B(1) of the Federal Constitution provides that the appointments are made by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the prime minister, and after consulting the Conference of Rulers.
The next conference is scheduled in two weeks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rectify systemic infringement on Sabah's constitutional and economic rights - LDP
Rectify systemic infringement on Sabah's constitutional and economic rights - LDP

Borneo Post

timean hour ago

  • Borneo Post

Rectify systemic infringement on Sabah's constitutional and economic rights - LDP

Chin KOTA KINABALU (July 4): Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) treasurer general Chin Kian Ming has issued a strongly worded statement, condemning the federal government under the leadership of Prime Minister Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim for continuously delaying, weakening, and even denying the constitutional rights granted to Sabah under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). The party warned that such actions constitute a double betrayal of the political dignity and economic future of the people of Sabah. Chin expressed deep dissatisfaction over the federal government's failure to fulfill Sabah's rightful entitlement to the 40% net revenue return. According to Articles 112C and 112D of the Federal Constitution, this return mechanism should have been a cornerstone of Sabah's financial autonomy. However, the revenue formula originally scheduled for completion by July 2024 has yet to be announced or supported by any legal implementation mechanism. Chin criticized, 'This is no longer just administrative delay — it reflects institutional disregard and a blatant violation of constitutional principles.' He pointed out that Article VIII of MA63 clearly requires that the provisions of the Agreement be implemented through legislation or other formal mechanisms, especially regarding the rights of the East Malaysian states. However, to date, the federal government has not taken any meaningful legal action to return powers to Sabah. The related committees have become mere 'symbolic platforms' with no tangible progress in restoring Sabah's legal position. He also harshly criticized the federal government for continuously relying on and enforcing the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA) and the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (TSA) without the consent of the Sabah state government. These two Acts effectively strip the state of control over petroleum and maritime resources. Such actions clearly violate Paragraph 24 of the Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) Report, which states that land and natural resources shall remain under the exclusive jurisdiction of the state unless otherwise amended by the State Legislative Assembly. He further pointed out that although Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution was amended in 2019 to restore Sabah and Sarawak's status as 'partner states' (rakan sekutu), this restoration has had no substantive impact in practice. Sabah continues to be treated as a second-class state in matters of federal budget allocation, project prioritization and national policy consultation, which is a serious departure from the founding spirit of the Federation in 1963. According to Chin, the federal government's persistent denial of Sabah's rightful status and autonomy has led to long-term structural developmental imbalance. Despite being one of the richest states in Malaysia in terms of natural resources, Sabah continues to suffer from the highest poverty rates and weakest access to education and healthcare services. This reflects not only economic exploitation, but also systemic neglect of Sabahans' right to survival and development. Chin emphasized that Sabah should enjoy localized decision-making powers in education and healthcare. According to Paragraphs 15 and 17 of the IGC Report, Sabah is entitled to tailor policies to local conditions. However, the reality is that the highly centralized federal system severely suppresses local reforms, leading to shortages in rural hospitals, deteriorated school infrastructure, and a massive outflow of local talent — creating a vicious cycle of 'resource extraction and entrenched poverty.' He also expressed concern over the gradual erosion of Sabah's rights in language and cultural-religious diversity. MA63 guarantees the right for Sabah to continue using English as an official administrative language and to preserve the state's multireligious environment. However, recent years have seen increasing pressure from federal unification policies that threaten Sabah's generational tradition of harmonious multiculturalism. Even more worrying is the systemic weakening of Sabah's immigration autonomy. According to Paragraph 6 of the IGC Report, Sabah has the legal authority to control the entry and residence of non-state residents to preserve demographic balance and social stability. The federal government's repeated attempts to pressure Sabah into relaxing these controls have led to increasing issues with illegal immigration and demographic imbalances, fueling deep public anxiety. He stressed that the Malaysia Agreement 1963 is not just a historical document, but a living political covenant that serves as the foundation of Sabah and Sarawak's entry into Malaysia. If the spirit of this covenant continues to be undermined, it will ultimately destabilize the unity of the Federation itself. He called for the immediate implementation of the 40% revenue return mechanism; the repeal of federal laws imposed without East Malaysia's consent; and full restoration of state autonomy in natural resources, education, healthcare, land and immigration. Chin further declared its intention to pursue additional political and legal measures, including proposing motions in the Sabah State Assembly, seeking judicial review, and strengthening strategic alliances with other local political parties to defend East Malaysian rights. 'We will no longer settle for symbolic gestures. The people of Sabah demand real autonomy and genuine respect — not hollow rhetoric and double standards. 'MA63 is not a relic of the past, but a living legal contract. If the federal government continues to violate its terms, it is not just betraying Sabah — it is undermining the rule of law in Malaysia. The Liberal Democratic Party stands united with the people of Sabah to defend our rightful entitlements, our resources, and our future,' Chin concluded in its statement.

Interfaith council queries Anwar over non-extension of judges' tenure
Interfaith council queries Anwar over non-extension of judges' tenure

Malaysiakini

timean hour ago

  • Malaysiakini

Interfaith council queries Anwar over non-extension of judges' tenure

An interfaith group has questioned whether Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had referred the tenure extensions of three top judges to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, as stipulated under Article 125 of the Federal Constitution. In a statement, the Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) cited Anwar's recent remarks that procedures must be followed when judges reach retirement age.

Sept 10 set for decision on Rosmah's appeal over recusal of trial judge in solar case
Sept 10 set for decision on Rosmah's appeal over recusal of trial judge in solar case

Borneo Post

time2 hours ago

  • Borneo Post

Sept 10 set for decision on Rosmah's appeal over recusal of trial judge in solar case

Rosmah filed the recusal application at the eleventh hour before Judge Mohamed Zaini was slated to deliver his decision on Sept 1, 2022.- Bernama photo PUTRAJAYA (July 4): The Court of Appeal has fixed Sept 10 to deliver its decision on Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor's appeal to recuse a High Court judge who presided over her corruption trial involving the RM1.25 billion solar hybrid project in Sarawak. Court of Appeal deputy registrar Muhammad Noor Firdaus Rosli set the date during the case management today. On June 25, the Court of Appeal three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim, Datuk Azman Abdullah and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin reserved their judgment after hearing submissions from both the prosecution and defence. Rosmah's lawyer, Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kader, confirmed the date when contacted by Bernama . The wife of former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak is appealing against the decision by the then High Court judge, Mohamed Zaini Mazlan — who has since been elevated to the Court of Appeal — dismissing her application for his recusal from presiding over her case. Rosmah filed the recusal application at the eleventh hour before Judge Mohamed Zaini was slated to deliver his decision on Sept 1, 2022. The application was based on allegations that a draft judgment in her case, purportedly prepared by a third party, had been leaked before its official delivery. On the same day, Judge Mohamed Zaini found Rosmah, 73, guilty of three corruption charges linked to the hybrid solar project, and sentenced her to 10 years in prison and a RM970 million fine, in default 30 years in prison. However, she was granted a stay of execution on both the custodial sentence and the fine, pending the disposal of her appeal before the Court of Appeal. Rosmah was charged with one count of soliciting RM187.5 million and two counts of receiving RM6.5 million in bribes from former Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd managing director, Saidi Abang Samsudin. – Bernama Court of Appeal decision Mohamed Zaini Mazlan recusal Rosmah Mansor

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store