A Pivotal Week Ahead Is for Grain Futures Markets. What to Watch Now.
Let's break each market down.
More News from Barchart
Coffee Prices Give Up Early Gains on Comments From Brazil's Ag Minister
Soybeans Are Heating Up. Here's What Could Take Them Much Higher.
What Will the 2025 US Midwest Crop Tour Tell Us This Week?
Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines.
Corn Flattened, But Then Posts Solid Recovery
The corn (ZCZ25) market bulls were already on the ropes but then suffered a knock-down last Tuesday following a surprisingly bearish USDA report that forecast record U.S. corn production when the combines start rolling this fall.
However, the bulls got back up Wednesday and then ended the week by scoring some strong counter punches that began to suggest a seasonal price bottom may have been put in place. December corn futures prices last week lost only 1/4 cent from the week prior. Bulls will have to show some important follow-through buying strength this week to better suggest a near-term price bottom is indeed in place.
Traders in the corn and soybean markets this week will be focusing on the annual Pro Farmer Crop Tour that starts Monday and concludes with its final crop yield estimates released Friday at 1:30 p.m. CDT.
Weather in the Corn Belt will see another two weeks of favorable growing conditions for corn and soybean crops, suggesting high production potential. Drier weather beginning late next week will be beneficial for early maturing corn.
A bullish element for corn going forward is export demand for U.S. corn that has been strong due to current lower prices and a subdued U.S. dollar. That's continuing to better drive exports and domestic demand.
Soybean Bulls Come Back to Life
The soybean (ZSX25) market bulls had a very good week last week, to suggest some more follow-through buying interest from the speculators this week. The USDA released a bullish monthly supply and demand report early last week that showed lower-than-expected U.S. soybean production and lower ending stocks forecasts. November soybeans last week hit a six-week high and closed at a technically bullish weekly high on Friday, suggesting some follow-through, chart-based buying from the speculators early this week.
A bullish National Oilseed Processors Association (NOPA) crush report released Friday also gives the soybean market some legs this week. The U.S. soybean crush rose to a six-month high in July and exceeded most trade expectations. NOPA members crushed 195.699 million bushels last month, up 5.6% from the 185.270 million bushels in June and up 7% from a crush of 182.881 million bushels one year ago. It was the largest July crush ever reported by NOPA and the fifth largest for any month on record, NOPA data showed.
However, a lack of new-crop U.S. soybean purchases from China continues to worry soybean market bulls, even though President Donald Trump last week extended the tariff truce for an additional 90-day period. The pace of new-crop soybean export sales is at a six-year low, though USDA reported impressive export sales last week. Soybean traders will continue to monitor U.S.-China trade talks, or lack thereof.
Winter Wheat Futures Markets Continue to Languish
The winter wheat (KEZ25) (ZWZ25) futures markets hit contract lows last Thursday, basis December contracts. However, good gains in corn and soybean futures markets late last week likely spilled over into some buying interest in wheat markets Friday. This week, look for wheat traders continuing to eye the corn and soybean markets for daily price direction.
The U.S. winter wheat harvest is winding down and that means less commercial hedging pressure in the futures markets. Spring wheat has seen consolidative, sideways trade following a 92-cent drop from the June high to the August low. USDA's lower-than-expected U.S. spring wheat production estimate last week failed to excite the bulls. Spring wheat harvest continues to advance, although it lags the five-year average pace.
On the positive side, the USDA last week lowered U.S. wheat ending stocks amid forecasts of increased U.S. wheat export demand. Also, global wheat ending stocks were lowered to a 10-year low. These are elements that will likely come closer to the front burner of the grains marketplace as U.S. harvests are completed.
Tell me what you think. I really enjoy getting emails from my valued Barchart readers all over the world. Email me at jim@jimwyckoff.com.
On the date of publication, Jim Wyckoff did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
a minute ago
- E&E News
US soybean farmers hope Brazil probe can help rebuild Chinese market
American soybean farmers have lost billions of dollars worth of sales in China and other markets because of President Donald Trump's first trade war in 2018. Now, they hope his trade actions against their archrival Brazil will help bring back that export market. In particular, they are cheering the Trump administration's new investigation into Brazilian farmers' conversion of Amazon forestland into new soybean acreage — a long-term practice that accelerated last decade when China turned to Brazil to replace American suppliers. Advertisement 'As a result of the trade war and the incentives it provided to Brazil to significantly increase production, the U.S. soybean industry now faces enormous competition with Brazil in every export market, not just China,' Caleb Ragland, president of the American Soybean Association, told the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative in a set of comments this week regarding the investigation.
WIRED
3 minutes ago
- WIRED
Trump Is Betting Big on Intel. Will the Chips Fall His Way?
Aug 21, 2025 1:04 PM The Trump administration is aiming to take an equity stake in Intel, according to US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick. Experts say the unconventional deal could backfire. Photograph: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Getty Images The US government is aiming to take an equity stake in Intel in exchange for grants the company was already committed to receive under the Biden era CHIPS Act, according to comments US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick made in an interview with CNBC. The move is part of the government's efforts to boost US chip manufacturing. 'We should get an equity stake for our money, so we'll deliver the money which was already committed under the Biden administration,' Lutnick said. 'We'll get equity in return for it.' Previously, the government was discussing taking a 10 percent stake in Intel, according to the New York Times . The deal could help the venerable chipmaker fund its US-based semiconductor fabrication plants, or fabs, which have required billions of dollars to construct and maintain, even as demand for Intel chips has waned in recent years. Some chip industry experts and members of the Trump administration say that keeping Intel afloat is essential to US national security, because it lessens the country's reliance on chipmakers overseas. But analysts and one notable economist say a potential tie-up between Intel and the US government could present a conflict of interest, and may not result in the kind of domestic chip-making industry the administration is angling for. 'It's not the right policy to have the US government own things, to have privatization in reverse,' says Stephen Moore, a visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation and a former senior economic advisor to Trump's 2016 campaign. 'That's similar to Europe's industrial model, and we haven't done that often here in the US because a lot of it ends up failing.' Government Intervention The US government has some history of investing in the private sector. Moore cites a 1980s program called the Synthetic Fuels Corporation, a federally-directed multibillion dollar investment in companies producing liquid fuels from coal, oil shale, and tar sands. It was hailed by President Jimmy Carter as 'the cornerstone of our energy policy,' and had fallen apart by 1986. Then, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the US government stepped in with multibillion dollar bailouts to stop US automakers and some banks from going under. Those funds were issued either through the Troubled Asset Relief Program, in which the US Treasury Department bought up or guaranteed toxic assets, or in the form of bridge loans. Many were eventually repaid. More recently, the Department of Defense agreed to fund a US-based rare earth magnet company, MP Materials, via equity and loans, in order to expand production and decrease the country's reliance on China. The deal would in theory give MP Materials the capital to increase its manufacturing capacity from 3,000 to 10,000 metric tons. Moore says the ideal scenario is that these arrangements between the government and private industry have an endpoint. 'It should be an agreement to own a short-term stake, and then divest,' he says. But the current Trump administration has been taking some of these public-private business dealings a step further: In June, the administration approved a partnership between Japanese steel company Nippon Steel and Pittsburgh-based US Steel, dependent on a national security agreement and a so-called 'golden share' provision. The government insisted that it have a say in US Steel's company decisions, including board appointees and future relocation plans. (This deal was also designed to help the US compete with China on steel production.) Lutnick told CNBC that, in the case of Intel, the Trump administration would not get a voting stake or a say in the company's operations. 'Intel is deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership,' Intel spokesperson Cory Pforzheimer said in a statement to WIRED. 'We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump Administration to advance these shared priorities, but we are not going to comment on rumors or speculation.' The US Department of Commerce did not respond to questions from WIRED prior to publication. Political Theater Patrick Moorhead, a longtime semiconductor industry analyst and CEO of the research firm Moor Insights & Strategy, says the deal could benefit Intel in the short term. 'It means Intel gets its cash without a bunch of strings attached,' he says. So far, the company has received $2.2 billion of up to the $7.86 billion it was granted through the 2022 CHIPS Act— $1.1 billion in the first quarter of 2024 and another $1.1 billion in January 2025. But these grants are tied to milestones around fabrication construction and output; if Intel doesn't reach its goals, it doesn't receive CHIPS Act funding. The company has also far outspent the $2.2 billion of grant payments in fab construction and research and development over the same time period. Intel is currently valued at $101 billion, a steep decline from its heyday in the early 2000s. Earlier this week, Softbank announced it's buying roughly $2 billion worth of Intel shares, which briefly boosted the chip firm's stock price. Intel went through a major shakeup in executive leadership this year. In December 2024, Intel announced the retirement of CEO Pat Gelsinger, a chip industry veteran, after he struggled to turn around the company's fortunes. Lip-Bu Tan, the longtime previous CEO of the electronics design firm Cadence Design Systems, succeeded Gelsinger as chief executive. Insiders describe Gelsinger's tenure as an expensive one, in which the company invested heavily in building cutting edge technology and fabs. Over the last five years, Intel invested $107.5 billion in capital expenditures and $78.8 billion in R&D expenditures, the vast majority of which were dedicated to expanding its US manufacturing capacity. Tan, in contrast, is more measured, and has told employees that Intel's investment in its newest chip node will be based on 'confirmed customer commitments,' adding that 'there are no more blank checks.' Since he took over, Intel announced it was cancelling plans for chip-making plants in Germany and Poland and slowing down construction of an Ohio fab. Intel also plans to lay off 15 percent of its workforce this year. Tan got caught in the crosshairs of the Trump administration earlier this month: In reaction to a letter from Arkansas senator Tom Cotton flagging Tan's ties to investments that reportedly have links to the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Trump called on the CEO to resign from Intel. Less than a week later Trump met with Tan and began praising the CEO. Moorhead believes that it's essential for the US to support Intel so that the country has a thriving domestic chipmaker with research and development teams in close proximity to its fabs. He points out that even as TSMC builds out its US fab in Arizona, its research and development efforts still happen in Taiwan, and its top manufacturing engineers are kept close to home. For this reason and others, Moorhead says, even if the US government begins funneling money into US semiconductors, it might lag behind in staffing domestic fabs with top talent. Many questions remain: whether the deal with Intel will actually go through, if the administration plans to convert existing CHIPS Act grants to Intel into an equity investment or invest some other way, and whether the US government might try to coerce tech companies into buying more Intel chips. Money from Softbank and the US government might help Intel's balance sheet in the short term, but the company still needs to secure big customers. Until some of those questions are answered, Moorhead says, this proposed investment doesn't accomplish much. 'It's more political theater than anything else,' he explains. 'I think what it accomplishes is it gives the Trump administration the ability to say, 'What Biden did was a giveaway, and I'm making deals,'' he adds.
Bloomberg
3 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Now Would Be a Good Time for a Career Tune-Up
I'm writing with two reasons you might want to get a status update on your job. First, the gloomy one: There are signs the labor market is shifting into a lower gear globally. The US recently clocked the worst three months for job growth since the pandemic. Applications for US unemployment benefits rose last week to the highest level since June. My colleague north of the border just wrote about how young Canadians are getting 'ghosted' by potential employers at frustrating rates amid a deepening jobs crisis. And on the other side of the pond, Britons have been muddling through a labor market notching superlatives for all the wrong reasons.
