I Just Learned Why Humans Originally Kept Cats, And I'm Horrified
But at least I'm not as vicious as the world's first cat owners.
Recently, a study published in bioRxiv has called into question the timeline of cat ownership.
Previously, scientists believed that cats became domesticated during the Neolithic period as African wildcats were drawn in by the cosy fires and abundance of food linked to farming, while humans welcomed their presence as they got rid of rodents.
But not only does this new paper suggest that this timing is off (the authors put it at the 'first millennium BC' in Egypt), but it suggests the relationship believed to have existed between the first cat/human pairs was gorier than we thought.
The scientists looked at ancient cat remains found in a variety of spots across Europe and North Africa, including a 9,500-year-old site in Cyprus.
Though these had previously been believed to show domesticated cats, a combination of carbon dating, genetic testing, and bone research suggests they were actually wildcats.
Their results suggest that the 'closening of human-cat relationships occurred more recently,' and appeared to have begun in Egypt for religious, and not practical, reasons.
Cats, they explain, are linked to the Egyptian goddess Bastet, who first appeared with a lion's head, but was increasingly represented with the head of an African wildcat in later centuries.
'This transformation was coincident with the rise of cat sacrifice, whereby millions of free-ranging and specifically-reared cats were mummified as offerings to the goddess,' they wrote.
As statues dedicated to Bastet tended to be in more arable areas, the rodent-killing benefits of cats may have proven useful to humans and 'provided the context for the tighter relationship between people and cats that led to the wildcat's domestication, motivated by their newly acquired divine status'.
Still, the paper posits that we wanted them for sacrifices first; their more gentle and manageable traits were selected for easier handling.
As if that wasn't horrific enough, it turns out Victorian-era Brits may have used those mummified cats for fertiliser.
Speaking to BBC Science Focus, Dr Sean Doherty, the study's lead author, said: 'At temples dedicated to [Bastet], we find millions of mummified cats.
'There were so many that in the Victorian period, tonnes of them were brought back to Britain to be ground down and used for fertiliser.'
TikTok Says These 2 Sounds Can Get Cats To Come To You ― Here's What The Experts Think
So THAT's Why Cats Love Catnip So Much
It Turns Out Cats Like Playing Catch Too – But Only On Their Terms
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Experts ask where the center of the universe is
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. About a century ago, scientists were struggling to reconcile what seemed a contradiction in Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity. Published in 1915, and already widely accepted worldwide by physicists and mathematicians, the theory assumed the universe was static – unchanging, unmoving and immutable. In short, Einstein believed the size and shape of the universe today was, more or less, the same size and shape it had always been. But when astronomers looked into the night sky at faraway galaxies with powerful telescopes, they saw hints the universe was anything but that. These new observations suggested the opposite – that it was, instead, expanding. Scientists soon realized Einstein's theory didn't actually say the universe had to be static; the theory could support an expanding universe as well. Indeed, by using the same mathematical tools provided by Einstein's theory, scientists created new models that showed the universe was, in fact, dynamic and evolving. I've spent decades trying to understand general relativity, including in my current job as a physics professor teaching courses on the subject. I know wrapping your head around the idea of an ever-expanding universe can feel daunting – and part of the challenge is overriding your natural intuition about how things work. For instance, it's hard to imagine something as big as the universe not having a center at all, but physics says that's the reality. First, let's define what's meant by "expansion." On Earth, "expanding" means something is getting bigger. And in regard to the universe, that's true, sort of. Expansion might also mean "everything is getting farther from us," which is also true with regard to the universe. Point a telescope at distant galaxies and they all do appear to be moving away from us. What's more, the farther away they are, the faster they appear to be moving. Those galaxies also seem to be moving away from each other. So it's more accurate to say that everything in the universe is getting farther away from everything else, all at once. This idea is subtle but critical. It's easy to think about the creation of the universe like exploding fireworks: Start with a big bang, and then all the galaxies in the universe fly out in all directions from some central point. But that analogy isn't correct. Not only does it falsely imply that the expansion of the universe started from a single spot, which it didn't, but it also suggests that the galaxies are the things that are moving, which isn't entirely accurate. It's not so much the galaxies that are moving away from each other – it's the space between galaxies, the fabric of the universe itself, that's ever-expanding as time goes on. In other words, it's not really the galaxies themselves that are moving through the universe; it's more that the universe itself is carrying them farther away as it expands. A common analogy is to imagine sticking some dots on the surface of a balloon. As you blow air into the balloon, it expands. Because the dots are stuck on the surface of the balloon, they get farther apart. Though they may appear to move, the dots actually stay exactly where you put them, and the distance between them gets bigger simply by virtue of the balloon's expansion. Now think of the dots as galaxies and the balloon as the fabric of the universe, and you begin to get the picture. Unfortunately, while this analogy is a good start, it doesn't get the details quite right either. Important to any analogy is an understanding of its limitations. Some flaws are obvious: A balloon is small enough to fit in your hand – not so the universe. Another flaw is more subtle. The balloon has two parts: its latex surface and its air-filled interior. These two parts of the balloon are described differently in the language of mathematics. The balloon's surface is two-dimensional. If you were walking around on it, you could move forward, backward, left, or right, but you couldn't move up or down without leaving the surface. Now it might sound like we're naming four directions here – forward, backward, left and right – but those are just movements along two basic paths: side to side and front to back. That's what makes the surface two-dimensional – length and width. The inside of the balloon, on the other hand, is three-dimensional, so you'd be able to move freely in any direction, including up or down – length, width and height. This is where the confusion lies. The thing we think of as the "center" of the balloon is a point somewhere in its interior, in the air-filled space beneath the surface. But in this analogy, the universe is more like the latex surface of the balloon. The balloon's air-filled interior has no counterpart in our universe, so we can't use that part of the analogy – only the surface matters. So asking, "Where's the center of the universe?" is somewhat like asking, "Where's the center of the balloon's surface?' There simply isn't one. You could travel along the surface of the balloon in any direction, for as long as you like, and you'd never once reach a place you could call its center because you'd never actually leave the surface. In the same way, you could travel in any direction in the universe and would never find its center because, much like the surface of the balloon, it simply doesn't have one. Part of the reason this can be so challenging to comprehend is because of the way the universe is described in the language of mathematics. The surface of the balloon has two dimensions, and the balloon's interior has three, but the universe exists in four dimensions. Because it's not just about how things move in space, but how they move in time. Our brains are wired to think about space and time separately. But in the universe, they're interwoven into a single fabric, called 'space-time.' That unification changes the way the universe works relative to what our intuition expects. And this explanation doesn't even begin to answer the question of how something can be expanding indefinitely – scientists are still trying to puzzle out what powers this expansion. So in asking about the center of the universe, we're confronting the limits of our intuition. The answer we find – everything, expanding everywhere, all at once – is a glimpse of just how strange and beautiful our universe is. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Medscape
2 hours ago
- Medscape
Aluminum in Vaccines Not Linked to Childhood Disorders
Early childhood vaccines containing aluminum are not linked to a higher risk for developing autoimmune, allergic, or neurodevelopmental disorders, according to a nationwide study of Danish children. The study, which looked at more than 1.2 million children over 24 years, provides additional evidence supporting the safety of aluminum-adsorbed vaccines, said senior author Anders Peter Hviid, MSc, DMSc, of Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen. 'Our results provide robust evidence to help parents make the right decisions about the health of their children and for clinicians and public health officials to communicate about the excellent safety of the childhood vaccines,' Hviid told Medscape Medical News . 'It's understandable that more and more parents are concerned about vaccine safety, given the mixed messages that they receive currently. We hope that our study can help settle the issue on this particular concern.' Aluminum adjuvants have been used in non-live vaccines to boost immune response for nearly a century. While years of research have demonstrated the safety of these adjuvants, concerns about potential risk remain. Robert F. Kennedy Jr, secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, has blamed exposure to aluminum in vaccines for widespread allergies, and one of his close associates has petitioned regulators to halt distribution of certain vaccines until the makers of those shots provide more information about the amount of the metal in their products. Findings from animal studies have mostly driven concerns about aluminum in vaccines, Hviid and his colleagues wrote; however, a 2022 study looking at more than 326,000 US children did find a positive association between vaccine-associated aluminum and asthma. 'I think it's fair to say that in part our study was inspired by that report,' said Hviid, whose group published the findings July 14 in Annals of Internal Medicine . Linking Vaccination Records to Outcomes Researchers included 1.24 million children born in Denmark from 1997 to 2018. Eligibility required survival to age 2 years without congenital or preexisting conditions, including congenital rubella syndrome, respiratory disease, primary immune deficiency, or heart or liver failure. Researchers obtained vaccination information from Denmark's National Health Service Register and, for each child, calculated the total aluminum exposure by age 2. Since 1997, the Danish childhood vaccination program has offered an aluminum-containing vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, poliovirus, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Pentavac) in three doses at 3, 5, and 12 months. Since 2007, the program also offers an aluminum-adsorbed pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, also given in three doses in the first year of life. Researchers then tracked patient outcomes from age 2 to age 5 (or until Dec 31, 2020), looking for diagnoses of 50 chronic autoimmune, atopic or allergic, and neurodevelopmental disorders — including juvenile arthritis, asthma, and autism spectrum disorders. The median cumulative aluminum exposure for the cohort was 3 mg, with a range from 0 mg to 4.5 mg. Only 15,237 children received no aluminum-containing vaccines during the study period. Excluding Risk 'With Great Certainty' The analysis found no relationship between cumulative exposure to aluminum in vaccines and any of the 50 selected conditions. For any autoimmune disorder, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) per 1 mg of aluminum exposure was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.02). The aHR was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.01) for any atopic or allergic outcome and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97) for any neurodevelopmental outcome. The most observed conditions during the study period were asthma (28,346 cases) and atopic dermatitis (22,978 cases). The researchers found no association between either condition and cumulative exposure to aluminum in vaccines. 'For some of the key outcomes that people are most interested in, like asthma and autism spectrum disorders, the results are quite clear, and we can exclude meaningful increases in risk with great certainty,' Hviid said. Some of these associations even demonstrated a slightly decreased risk — for example, autism spectrum disorders; however, with confidence intervals close to one, 'we don't interpret this as relevant protective effects,' he said. Secondary analyses that extended follow-up to 8 years of age, removed all children with no exposure to aluminum-containing vaccines, and restricted the analysis to complete cases also found no association between these chronic conditions and exposure to vaccines containing aluminum. 'With all these adjustments, they still didn't find any differential in the effect. I think all of that is very reassuring,' said James Campbell, MD, MS, a professor in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore. This paper 'adds to the long history of studies' on the safety of aluminum-containing vaccines, said Campbell, who also is vice chair of the committee on infectious diseases for the American Academy of Pediatrics. 'Aluminum salts have been around for almost 100 years as an adjuvant; we have such a long history of using them, both in the United States and across the world,' Campbell told Medscape . 'The aggregate of the data are that aluminum salt adjuvants are safe to be given to children.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
This Is the Type of Fat You *Want* To Have To Stay Healthy as You Age
This Is the Type of Fat You *Want* To Have To Stay Healthy as You Age originally appeared on Parade. Body fat gets a bad rap when it comes to health—we're all always on a mission to get rid of belly fat! But it turns out that not all forms of fat are bad for healthy aging. As you've likely heard from your doctor or other health pros, maintaining healthy body fat levels, and potentially even more importantly, having (and maintaining) healthy muscle mass levels via strength training as you age can help reduce your risk of premature death by up to 17 percent. And while muscle mass is a key indicator of healthy longevity, new research from Rutgers University shows that a certain type of fat could be a game changer in how active you remain as you age and help promote longevity. 🩺SIGN UP for tips to stay healthy & fit with the top moves, clean eats, health trends & more delivered right to your inbox twice a week💊 A recent study published in Aging Cell found that mice that had a specific form of brown fat tissue (which they had due to a missing gene) had better exercise capacity as they aged and increased longevity and lifespan by about 30 percent. The scientists working on the study transplanted some of the special brown fat to other mice that were not genetically modified and found that the normal mice responded within days, showing similar benefits. Related: The special type of fat researchers found had a positive health effect is brown fat, which is not a new discovery (although the fat they studied was a more potent type of it). The body has two main types of fat, FYI: white fat (AKA the "bad" kind known to contribute to health issues) and brown fat, or brown adipose tissue (BAT). "Unlike white adipose tissue, which stores energy, BAT burns calories to generate heat—a process driven by its rich mitochondrial content and the presence of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1)," says Ingrid Yang, MD, a board-certified internal medicine physician and longevity science expert. "This thermogenic capability not only helps in temperature regulation but has also been linked to improved metabolic outcomes. Recent research has shown that BAT activation may enhance insulin sensitivity and protect against metabolic diseases, such as obesity and diabetes, which are key factors in age-related health decline," she says. While brown fat is not a new discovery, the study brings a new understanding of how brown fat works. "This is an exciting step forward," says Dr. Yang. "It illustrates that brown adipose tissue is more than just an energy-burning organ—it plays a pivotal role in enhancing exercise performance and metabolic resilience. This dual function could have significant implications for healthy aging." Related: Stephen Vatner, MD, who is one of the authors of the study and Director of the Cardiovascular Research Institute at Rutgers University, noted that the study helped researchers show that brown fat could have the potential to increase exercise performance—something not many studies have found before. "There have been a lot of studies showing that exercise can affect brown fat, but fewer studies showing that brown fat can increase exercise performance, the major finding from this research article," he said. Something to note is that the study looked at a potent form of brown fat vs. normal brown fat, and the researchers discussed working to develop a pharmaceutical intervention that may mimic the potent brown fat they discovered. Dr. Yang cautions that there is still a lot to understand before something like this can be offered, so don't expect a "magic bullet" solution to boost brown fat anytime soon. "And while the study authors offer that the prospect of developing pharmaceutical analogs to activate BAT is exciting, we need a careful evaluation of the long-term safety and potential off-target effects. Enhancing BAT function could, for instance, affect overall energy balance in ways that we don't fully understand yet," she says. This study sheds more light on what we know about brown fat and how it could be a powerful for enhancing longevity. It's important to keep in mind that the study was performed on mice and may not directly translate to humans until we have more research to confirm the findings. "I would caution that while the results from this study are promising, it's important to note that findings in RGS14 knockout mice may not directly translate to humans. The rapid improvement in exercise capacity is intriguing, yet we must be cautious about overinterpreting these results until similar outcomes are observed in human studies," says Dr. Yang. Until we know more, you can incorporate some evidence-based methods for activating more brown fat tissue below, while focusing on the foundational tenets that we know are important for longevity and overall health, including: exercise, nutrition and sleep. Related: According to Dr. Yang, there are several evidence-based ways to help "activate" or convert some of the white fat in your body into the more beneficial brown fat. "Cold exposure is well-established in activating BAT and promoting the browning of white adipose tissue (WAT)," says Dr. Yang. You can hop in an ice bath, dip into a cold plunge, try cryotherapy or take a cold shower. "Both resistance and aerobic training have been shown to upregulate markers of browning, such as UCP1, in adipose tissue. Exercise-induced activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in skeletal muscle also plays a role in promoting BAT activity," says Dr Yang. Simply put: you'll want to do cardio and strength training to help activate brown fat. Dr. Yang says that there's some research that specific foods like chili peppers and green tea contain nutrients that support brown fat. "Capsaicin and capsinoids (found in chili peppers) and catechins (found in green tea) have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials. Other compounds such as curcumin, quercetin, berberine, lipoic acid, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and royal jelly have shown promising results in animal or in vitro studies, but clinical trials are needed to confirm their effects in humans," she explains. "Dietary interventions like calorie restriction and intermittent fasting also favor WAT browning and metabolic efficiency," she adds. But always be sure to consult a doctor before trying calorie-restrictive diets or intermittent fasting, since these diets are not safe for everyone. Up Next:Brown adipose tissue enhances exercise performance and healthful longevity. Healthy Aging. Ingrid Yang, MD,a board-certified internal medicine physician and longevity science expert This Is the Type of Fat You *Want* To Have To Stay Healthy as You Age first appeared on Parade on Jul 14, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 14, 2025, where it first appeared.
