New Balance ‘Made in USA 1300JP': Hands-On With the $500 Sneaker That Releases Once Every 5 Years
By Ben McKimm - News
Published: 30 May 2025
Share Copy Link
Readtime: 4 min
Every product is carefully selected by our editors and experts. If you buy from a link, we may earn a commission. Learn more. For more information on how we test products, click here.
The cherry on top of Grey Day 2025 is the New Balance Made in USA 1300JP, which is only released every five years. You rarely get the chance to get your hands on a near-handmade sneaker from one of the biggest brands on earth, but now's your chance as the 1300JP is set to be released on newbalance.com.au and New Balance The Galeries store beginning on May 29th, 2025, with a suggested retail price of AUD$500.
It might sound crazy to spend this much money on a pair of sneakers, but the 1300JP is specially crafted in New Balance's Skowhegan, Maine, manufacturing facility. Here, it is produced with a level of detail, expertise, and premium quality that is quite frankly unrivalled in the sneaker world, especially amongst the top brands.
'The 1300JP is a shoe like no other, an emblem of the soul of New Balance, that is prized by collectors and appreciators around the globe,' said Shinichi Kubota, Vice President, New Balance Japan. 'Even before joining New Balance myself 34 years ago, I was inspired by my father's work with the brand on the innovative sole design for the original 1300JP. This legacy model has been a constant throughout my career at New Balance, from spending years perfecting the first reissue to working diligently on each subsequent launch to subtly evolve the style while remaining true to its roots.'
New Balance 1300JP | Image: Ben McKimm / Man of Many
To provide some historical context before I jump into my hands-on thoughts, the 1300JP was first released in 1985. It was known for its combination of technological innovation and premium materials, but it was never appreciated as a pure performance running shoe. It was all about comfort, style, and wearability, and people were happy to pay for it.
When it was released, the New Balance 1300JP had a retail price of nearly USD$130, which significantly raised the ceiling for sneaker prices. That works out to be about AUD$460 in today's money!
Sneakerheads know that this is a special shoe, but in an industry where cost-cutting is constantly changing (ruining) the most famous sneakers in the world, it's refreshing to see a brand reproduce a shoe in its original form with only minor changes. New Balance has kept the construction true to the shoe, with a slightly updated design that adds premium comfort and design features. Cushioning is provided by full-length ENCAP alongside premium materials, mostly nubuck and mesh.
New Balance 1300JP | Image: Supplied / New Balance
New Balance 1300JP | Image: Supplied / New Balance
New Balance 1300JP | Image: Supplied / New Balance
New Balance 1300JP | Image: Supplied / New Balance
The first reissue of the 1300JP was in 1995. It has been released every five years, celebrating the brand's rich heritage and building anticipation for this extremely limited release every year since.
It's one of those shoes that you almost don't want to put on your foot. You know it's going to be a comfortable shoe, but it's equally a work of art, constructed in a special factory that only produces the brand's most famous models. There's some 574-like design here, which was a takedown model that launched at a more affordable price-point back in the day, but has gone on to be a successful shoe in its own right. However, I find that this shoe has a more authentic appeal, utilising elevated materials and with meticulous craftsmanship.
It's easy for me to see (and feel) why this shoe continues to capture the attention of fashion and sneaker culture every five years. 'With 2025's launch, we are excited to continue the 1300JP's legacy, showcasing the Confidential – Not for Public Consumption or Distribution design's timeless appeal to loyal fans and a new generation,' said Kubota.
The 1300JP is set to be released on newbalance.com.au and New Balance The Galeries store beginning on May 29th, 2025, with a suggested retail price of AUD$500.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Retirement at 70? It's coming, whether we like it or not
The full Danish folkepension pays around AUD $57,000 a year, but after tax, most retirees take home between roughly AUD $40,000 and $42,000. That includes a base pension, which everyone gets, and a supplement, which is means-tested. About half the payment is universal; the rest tapers off if you have higher income from savings or investments. Loading It's a lot more generous than our pension, but it's still a safety net, not a luxury. But if you haven't built up your own retirement savings, you'll be working longer or retiring lean. Meanwhile, in Australia we haven't made any big statements about retirement age recently, but we've quietly been moving in the same direction. The age pension age is now 67. Access to super starts at 60. Most Australians retire somewhere in the middle, not because of the rules, but because of redundancy, burnout, or the long-awaited chance to actually enjoy life. We don't really have a set retirement age. What we have is a cluster of access points at 60, 65 and 67, and a silent expectation that you'll figure it out for yourself. And while we've built one of the best savings systems in the world in superannuation, we've failed to finish the job. We've neglected the retirement phase almost entirely. Most Australians don't know how much to take out, how long it will last, how it works together with the age pension, or whether they're even on track. And let's be clear: there's no $40,000-a-year pension coming to everyone at 67 or even 70 here. Ours is fully means-tested, a fair amount lower and difficult to understand. So maybe our government doesn't need to lift the retirement age to 70. Perhaps they'll just wait for superannuation to lift many Australians out of eligibility for it, and won't have to make any bold or controversial moves that might see one party lose an election because of angry pensioners revolting in the streets. So while we're not lifting our pension age to 70 just yet, we shouldn't assume we'll never go there. The economics of longer lives don't just go away. Here's what we need to face. We're living longer. Much longer. One in four 50-year-olds today will live past 95. That means a 30-year retirement isn't extreme – it's average. Maybe even an underestimate. Raising the retirement age to 70 feels harsh to today's retirees. But if you're 50 today and not planning for retirement, knowing you might live such a long life? That's reckless. And expecting the pension to carry the full load of your living costs, when we've got one of the best private savings systems in the world in super - that really is a missed opportunity. So what happens next? Honestly, I think we should expect change. Maybe not next year, but eventually. The pension age will rise, and the system will have to adapt. But here in Australia, we're on a different path to the Danes so it might not need to be as extreme. We don't pay every citizen more than $20,000 a year for 20 plus years - so the pressure on our public system isn't the same, despite what headlines might suggest. Over the next 20 years, superannuation will take on more of the heavy lifting. Most Australians who've worked throughout their lives won't rely on the age pension the way 44 per cent of retirees do today. They'll have their own savings, and with that comes greater choice and flexibility - but also a bigger need to plan and prepare. Loading That's what we need to recognise now. Retirement is increasingly going to be on our own backs. So let's stop treating it like a finish line or a grand holiday. It's a phase. A long one. And we need a system that reflects that - supporting phased retirement, guiding drawdown decisions, and offering real help without a $5000 advice bill for the basics. Right now, we're leaving people to guess. And that guesswork is costing Australians their lifestyle, their confidence, and sometimes their dignity. Will we raise the retirement age to 70? Eventually - maybe, maybe not. But honestly? It doesn't matter. Because whether the number shifts or not, the burden is already shifting away from the government. Superannuation is steadily replacing the pension. The responsibility for funding your own retirement is now sitting squarely on your shoulders.
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Retirement at 70? It's coming, whether we like it or not
The full Danish folkepension pays around AUD $57,000 a year, but after tax, most retirees take home between roughly AUD $40,000 and $42,000. That includes a base pension, which everyone gets, and a supplement, which is means-tested. About half the payment is universal; the rest tapers off if you have higher income from savings or investments. Loading It's a lot more generous than our pension, but it's still a safety net, not a luxury. But if you haven't built up your own retirement savings, you'll be working longer or retiring lean. Meanwhile, in Australia we haven't made any big statements about retirement age recently, but we've quietly been moving in the same direction. The age pension age is now 67. Access to super starts at 60. Most Australians retire somewhere in the middle, not because of the rules, but because of redundancy, burnout, or the long-awaited chance to actually enjoy life. We don't really have a set retirement age. What we have is a cluster of access points at 60, 65 and 67, and a silent expectation that you'll figure it out for yourself. And while we've built one of the best savings systems in the world in superannuation, we've failed to finish the job. We've neglected the retirement phase almost entirely. Most Australians don't know how much to take out, how long it will last, how it works together with the age pension, or whether they're even on track. And let's be clear: there's no $40,000-a-year pension coming to everyone at 67 or even 70 here. Ours is fully means-tested, a fair amount lower and difficult to understand. So maybe our government doesn't need to lift the retirement age to 70. Perhaps they'll just wait for superannuation to lift many Australians out of eligibility for it, and won't have to make any bold or controversial moves that might see one party lose an election because of angry pensioners revolting in the streets. So while we're not lifting our pension age to 70 just yet, we shouldn't assume we'll never go there. The economics of longer lives don't just go away. Here's what we need to face. We're living longer. Much longer. One in four 50-year-olds today will live past 95. That means a 30-year retirement isn't extreme – it's average. Maybe even an underestimate. Raising the retirement age to 70 feels harsh to today's retirees. But if you're 50 today and not planning for retirement, knowing you might live such a long life? That's reckless. And expecting the pension to carry the full load of your living costs, when we've got one of the best private savings systems in the world in super - that really is a missed opportunity. So what happens next? Honestly, I think we should expect change. Maybe not next year, but eventually. The pension age will rise, and the system will have to adapt. But here in Australia, we're on a different path to the Danes so it might not need to be as extreme. We don't pay every citizen more than $20,000 a year for 20 plus years - so the pressure on our public system isn't the same, despite what headlines might suggest. Over the next 20 years, superannuation will take on more of the heavy lifting. Most Australians who've worked throughout their lives won't rely on the age pension the way 44 per cent of retirees do today. They'll have their own savings, and with that comes greater choice and flexibility - but also a bigger need to plan and prepare. Loading That's what we need to recognise now. Retirement is increasingly going to be on our own backs. So let's stop treating it like a finish line or a grand holiday. It's a phase. A long one. And we need a system that reflects that - supporting phased retirement, guiding drawdown decisions, and offering real help without a $5000 advice bill for the basics. Right now, we're leaving people to guess. And that guesswork is costing Australians their lifestyle, their confidence, and sometimes their dignity. Will we raise the retirement age to 70? Eventually - maybe, maybe not. But honestly? It doesn't matter. Because whether the number shifts or not, the burden is already shifting away from the government. Superannuation is steadily replacing the pension. The responsibility for funding your own retirement is now sitting squarely on your shoulders.
Man of Many
2 days ago
- Man of Many
New Balance ‘Made in USA 1300JP': Hands-On With the $500 Sneaker That Releases Once Every 5 Years
By Ben McKimm - News Published: 30 May 2025 Share Copy Link Readtime: 4 min Every product is carefully selected by our editors and experts. If you buy from a link, we may earn a commission. Learn more. For more information on how we test products, click here. The cherry on top of Grey Day 2025 is the New Balance Made in USA 1300JP, which is only released every five years. You rarely get the chance to get your hands on a near-handmade sneaker from one of the biggest brands on earth, but now's your chance as the 1300JP is set to be released on and New Balance The Galeries store beginning on May 29th, 2025, with a suggested retail price of AUD$500. It might sound crazy to spend this much money on a pair of sneakers, but the 1300JP is specially crafted in New Balance's Skowhegan, Maine, manufacturing facility. Here, it is produced with a level of detail, expertise, and premium quality that is quite frankly unrivalled in the sneaker world, especially amongst the top brands. 'The 1300JP is a shoe like no other, an emblem of the soul of New Balance, that is prized by collectors and appreciators around the globe,' said Shinichi Kubota, Vice President, New Balance Japan. 'Even before joining New Balance myself 34 years ago, I was inspired by my father's work with the brand on the innovative sole design for the original 1300JP. This legacy model has been a constant throughout my career at New Balance, from spending years perfecting the first reissue to working diligently on each subsequent launch to subtly evolve the style while remaining true to its roots.' New Balance 1300JP | Image: Ben McKimm / Man of Many To provide some historical context before I jump into my hands-on thoughts, the 1300JP was first released in 1985. It was known for its combination of technological innovation and premium materials, but it was never appreciated as a pure performance running shoe. It was all about comfort, style, and wearability, and people were happy to pay for it. When it was released, the New Balance 1300JP had a retail price of nearly USD$130, which significantly raised the ceiling for sneaker prices. That works out to be about AUD$460 in today's money! Sneakerheads know that this is a special shoe, but in an industry where cost-cutting is constantly changing (ruining) the most famous sneakers in the world, it's refreshing to see a brand reproduce a shoe in its original form with only minor changes. New Balance has kept the construction true to the shoe, with a slightly updated design that adds premium comfort and design features. Cushioning is provided by full-length ENCAP alongside premium materials, mostly nubuck and mesh. New Balance 1300JP | Image: Supplied / New Balance New Balance 1300JP | Image: Supplied / New Balance New Balance 1300JP | Image: Supplied / New Balance New Balance 1300JP | Image: Supplied / New Balance The first reissue of the 1300JP was in 1995. It has been released every five years, celebrating the brand's rich heritage and building anticipation for this extremely limited release every year since. It's one of those shoes that you almost don't want to put on your foot. You know it's going to be a comfortable shoe, but it's equally a work of art, constructed in a special factory that only produces the brand's most famous models. There's some 574-like design here, which was a takedown model that launched at a more affordable price-point back in the day, but has gone on to be a successful shoe in its own right. However, I find that this shoe has a more authentic appeal, utilising elevated materials and with meticulous craftsmanship. It's easy for me to see (and feel) why this shoe continues to capture the attention of fashion and sneaker culture every five years. 'With 2025's launch, we are excited to continue the 1300JP's legacy, showcasing the Confidential – Not for Public Consumption or Distribution design's timeless appeal to loyal fans and a new generation,' said Kubota. The 1300JP is set to be released on and New Balance The Galeries store beginning on May 29th, 2025, with a suggested retail price of AUD$500.
