AP High Court raps police for intervening in civil dispute cases
The HC clarified that civil disputes between individuals should be resolved through civil courts under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) or through statutory bodies like the State Legal Services Authority, District Legal Services Authority, and Mandal Legal Services Authority.
The court emphasised that police attempts to resolve civil disputes under initiatives like the Pre-Litigation Counselling Forum (PLCF) create confusion among parties and may escalate conflicts.
The HC explicitly directed Visakhapatnam police to refrain from interfering in civil cases under any pretext.
In a related case, 74-year-old S Shyamala from Visakhapatnam's Bay Colony approached the High Court, alleging harassment by the Visakhapatnam Commissioner of Police (CP), who repeatedly summoned her in connection with a civil land dispute. Shyamala sought court intervention to prevent police from pressuring her to resolve the dispute outside the legal framework.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Kerala high court to examine ART practices
Kochi: The high court (HC) will examine the practice of bringing women from other states to Kerala for assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The court noted that such activities are classic cases of 'daunting and inter-state human trafficking', involving transactions worth several lakh rupees. The bench of Justices Devan Ramachandran and M B Snehalatha had recently interacted with the additional secretary of health services, who is the designated authority under the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, regarding malpractices in the field. The court was hearing a petition from a private ART bank in Ernakulam seeking release of seven women brought from other states to Kerala for surrogacy. Police had detained the women after a raid conducted with authorities under the ART Act. During the hearing, the petitioners said the women came to Kerala in response to a newspaper advertisement. HC called it a 'startling submission' and asked for a copy of the ad. Petitioners produced one that appeared on social media. The court orally observed: "People are there in other states getting ladies and bringing them. Absolutely, it is inter-border trafficking." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The 5 Books Warren Buffett Recommends You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The court decided to examine the process of bringing women from other states for ART and surrogacy. The petitioners claimed seven women were detained. But state govt told the court there were only six women—five from WB and one from TN—and a child. One woman had already donated an oocyte (a cell in an ovary) in Hyderabad, though the Act allows such donation only once in a lifetime. While the petitioners named a seventh woman, the state denied this and said she was not present at the clinic during the raid. Govt also opposed the claim that the women responded to the petitioners' ad. It said the claim was implausible as the women spoke only their native languages and the ad was found on social media. The govt pleader said a probe is needed to find out how the women reached the clinic after seeing the ad. Police protection for 'detained women' Counsel for the shelter home where the women are housed told the court that many people were trying to gain access by claiming the women were detained illegally or needed to sign vakalaths or other contracts. She said this was causing a law-and-order issue. HC directed the SHO of Kalamassery station to maintain a beat around the shelter and respond quickly to any request for help. Hurdles faced by authorities Kerala has 110 ART clinics, 25 ART banks and 23 surrogacy clinics. Ernakulam alone has eight such clinics. ART clinics are classified into Level 1 (which perform intrauterine insemination) and Level 2 (which offer advanced treatments like IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, surgical retrieval of gametes, embryo transfer and storage). The state has only one designated authority, headed by an additional secretary of the health and family welfare department. This authority issues licences, inspects clinics and acts against violations under ART and surrogacy laws. But limited staff and resources make it hard to ensure compliance. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
HC: Testimony of minor rape survivor needs deeper scrutiny
New Delhi: Delhi High Court has said that the testimony of a child victim requires deeper scrutiny, considering children are prone to tutoring, but minor inconsistencies are immaterial. In a recent order, HC rejected a man's plea against the 20-year imprisonment awarded to him for raping a 13-year-old girl in 2017 after the court noted that the survivor's testimony found corroboration in the forensic analysis report. "It is trite law that the testimony of the child victim requires deeper scrutiny, the children being prone to tutoring. The testimony is to be carefully evaluated in the light of attending circumstances to see if the same inspires confidence. The court is required to see whether the child victim is wholly reliable, wholly unreliable, or partly reliable… this court has no hesitation to observe that the testimony of the child victim also finds corroboration in the forensic analysis report," the judge said. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi The HC added that in the case before it, the child survivor in her statement recorded during the investigation, as well as at the time of her deposition, categorically stated about the accused. The court said it is not to be forgotten that the child survivor, 13 years of age, was first examined in 2018 after a gap of around one year. The child alleged the convict, Pawan, gagged her, took her to his house, and raped her. He allegedly threatened to kill her if she confided in anyone about her ordeal. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The 5 Books Warren Buffett Recommends You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Attacking her testimony, Pawan's counsel claimed neither semen was found nor was any male DNA extracted in the vaginal swab of the victim. However, the HC pointed out that biological examination revealed that human semen was found on the underwear and saliva was also detected on the handkerchief. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Bombay HC seeks BMC's response to plea by occupants of ‘dilapidated' building which houses iconic eatery ‘Jimmy Boy' to repair structure
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday sought BMC's reply to a plea by the society of occupants of the dilapidated 129-year-old 'Vikas Building' in South Mumbai's Fort area housing the iconic Parsi eatery 'Jimmy Boy,' to repair the building instead of demolishing and redeveloping the same. Last month, the HC had dismissed a plea by occupants against action by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation seeking immediate vacation of the 'dilapidated and ruinous' premises. The building housed 37 units including 11 law firms or offices, Jimmy Boy restaurant on ground floor and other commercial establishments. The BMC's Disaster Control Cell had vacated the building on June 21 citing 'urgent situation.' A division bench of Justices Girish S Kulkarni and Arif S Doctor on August 13 passed an order on a plea by Vikas Premises Co-operative Society Ltd, seeking modification in the July 2 order to allow the occupants to repair or strengthen the subject building. Pending final disposal of the application, the petitioner society sought a stay on implementation of notices issued by BMC and not to take any steps to demolish the building. The high court on July 2 dismissed society's plea against BMC notices stating that situation had gone 'completely out of hand' and the court would 'permit the law to take its own course.' The court had said 'even persons occupying adjoining buildings, passers-by on the busy road have rights not to get affected in any manner by a building collapse.' After the BMC had opposed request by society to allow entry to its members to remove their belongings, the HC had last month clarified that it would be at their 'own risk' subject to civic body's decision and without holding BMC or state authorities liable in case of collapse. On Wednesday, the occupants referred to a July 16 report by Mahimtura Consultants Private Limited, which claimed that building was repairable and even while the said report classified it as C-1 (dilapidated and unsafe) category structure based on visual inspection, the private consultant suggested the repairs. The petitioner society through senior advocate Milind Sathe argued that the 'redevelopment of the building was virtually not possible' for various constraints including close proximity with Naval establishments which is likely to impede the development due to non-receipt of NOC from Naval authorities, and the litigation that the HC is flooded with. Moreover, the petitioner claimed that the development is in heritage precinct. Therefore 'it would be most appropriate to structurally repair the building rather than redevelopment, which is not a practical possibility.' Sathe also suggested that the court can appoint a committee of experts from IIT-Bombay to ascertain whether the building can be repaired. 'We passed an exhaustive judgment. We are at a serious stage…The corporation is consistent that it is a dangerous building. It should not be that someone comes and wants to have committees from IIT because they can afford. There is some sanctity to our orders. We want the corporation is consistent in its stand. We want to know what is correct,' the judges orally remarked and sought BMC's reply to interim application before the next hearing on August 20. 'In the meantime, the relief granted by this court vide judgment and order dated July 2, 2025 shall continue to operate,' the HC noted in its order.
