
Tensions are rising on the border but FPIs aren't worried
Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) do not expect the border fury to rock the stock markets, their positions in the derivatives market indicate, besides expecting good tidings from a US trade deal.
The Pahalgam terror attack has raised concerns of a potential retaliatory strike on Pakistan, a development which could rattle market sentiments. However, FPIs appear to believe that stocks will remain unscathed.
Data from Friday showed that FPIs have closed out a huge quantity of bearish option contracts, which protect them during sharp market corrections. They also continued to buy in the cash segment last week, which experts attribute to their hopes of a bilateral trade agreement materialising with the US.
On Friday, when public ire against the Pahalgam massacre hit a crescendo, FPIs actually slashed their cumulative net index put (Nifty and Bank Nifty) option positions to just 6,359 contracts from 177,784 the previous day, NSE data showed.
Also read |
Will lower tariffs lure back FPIs from other emerging markets?
The gross figures show that FPIs sold many more index puts on Friday than they purchased, which helped bring down the net long figure. Total puts sold stood at 517,043 contracts on Friday, up from 250,793 a day earlier.
FPIs purchase put options to hedge their portfolios against market falls. If the market corrects, the value of the puts increases, offsetting a fall in portfolios. Similarly, if the market rises, the increase in the portfolio value offsets the loss in the put options.
"This shows FPIs don't expect the tensions with Pakistan to snowball into something worse, as of now at least," said Rajesh Palviya, senior vice-president, head of derivatives & technical research at Axis Securities.
The two nuclear-armed countries have massed troops on their borders after Pakistan-backed terrorists killed 26 Indians and a foreign national in Pahalgam on 22 April. This should have raised the risk for market participants. However, latest FPI activity on put options suggests otherwise.
Offering an alternative rationale, Nirmal Jain, founder of IIFL Group, said anecdotal evidence suggested that markets tend to remain "resilient" during periods of conflict or geopolitical tensions.
Read this |
FPIs continue to snub consumption, even after budget incentives
"While markets are currently volatile due to the geopolitical tensions, historical patterns indicate that Indian equity markets tend to be resilient during conflicts," he said, citing the Kargil war, which witnessed the Nifty rising 37% during its duration from May to July 1999.
Even during Balakot air strikes on 26 February 2019, the market remained flat at 10888.75, only to rise almost 7% to 11,624
by March end of that year.
However, a veteran fund manager said he doesn't envisage a surgical or air strike akin to Uri retaliation in 2016 or Balakot in 2019, which might explain the FPI behaviour. This sits in with Axis Securities' Palviya's logic for FPI unwinding.
"It is likely to be a slow burn over a long period of time across the entire border," he said, calling it "a long grind".
The unwinding of FPIs' long put positions has also been accompanied by cash market buying.
In the second half of the month through Thursday,
FPIs
had net purchased secondary shares worth
₹
27,648 crore, NSDL data showed. This has brought down the selling intensity from
₹
34305 crore in the first half of April to just
₹
6657 crore in the month through 24 April.
Apart from the unwinding of puts, provisional data from BSE indicates that FPIs net purchased shares worth
₹
2952 crore on Friday.
Also read |
These foreign funds have been selling more Indian stocks than the others. They aren't the ones you thought they were.
Axis Securities' Palviya attributed the recent FPI cash buying to hopes of a trade deal between India and the US, rather than being concerned about a deadlier fallout from the Pahalgam massacre.
Option traders expect the Nifty to get support at 23840 followed by 23446 next week, per NSE data. Resistances are pegged at 24500 and 25000.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Local Court Lawyers Up In Arms Over Shifting Of 34 Digital Courts
New Delhi: Lawyers from the district courts decided on Saturday to roll back their decision to abstain from work in protest against the shifting of the judges of the 34 digital Negotiable Instruments Act courts to the Rouse Avenue courts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A statement released by the All District Courts Bar Association of Delhi on Saturday said that the lawyers' coordination committee met the chief justice of and was assured that all digital courts would function strictly as digital platforms only. The remaining proceedings and judicial work only would be conducted in the regular local courts, the statement said. "Necessary directions are being issued to all presiding officers instructing them not to insist on the physical appearance of any stakeholders, including parties, counsel, police officers, etc, in c+ourt," the statement added. On May 30, high court chief justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya inaugurated the 34 digital courts at the Rouse Avenue Courts complex to hear cases under the NI Act. Only judges of these courts will operate from Rouse Avenue, while the staff —readers, ahlmads and stenographers — will operate from their respective districts. The association on Friday, June 6 decided to abstain from work opposing the decision of shiftingthecourts. The digital courts deal with cases related to cheque bounces across six court complexes. The Lok Sabha was informed by the Union law minister in Dec 2024 that Delhi ranked fourth among top five Indian states with regard to NI Act cases and has 4.5 lakh pending cases. A judge in a NI Act court, on average, holds 80 hearings every day. According to the National Judicial Data Grid, until June 7, there were 15.1 lakh cases, of which 31% were cheque bounce cases. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Last year, advocate Jagriti Jain filed a public interest litigation, highlighting administrative lapses in the digital NI Act court in North district. The petition pointed out the huge pendency of cases as well as connectivity problems of the portal used for digital hearings. In April 2024, a division bench comprising then acting chief justice Manmohan and justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora directed steps to be taken to address the issue of digital connectivity and network problems. On May 22 this year, the bench disposed of the Jain's PIL, noting that connectivity issues had been resolved after the registrar general of the high court submitted a report on May 9 outlining the remedial measures taken. A second digital NI Act court was established in the North district and all pending matters were evenly distributed between the two courts. Advocate Parthesh Bhardwaj, who appeared for Jain, told TOI, "As of June, with multiple functioning courts, better cause list management and strengthened technical infrastructure, the average time between hearings at digital NI Act courts in all districts has significantly reduced."


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Amid Donald Trump-Elon Musk public feud, a ‘truth' from the crash of Truth Social
The past few days have been nothing but a roller coaster ride as the public and politicians alike witnessed the growing feud between President Donald Trump and his one-time billionaire ally, Elon Musk. The buzz was so much so that Trump's Truth Social network crashed amid the online war of words on June 6 and spilt the biggest "truth" instead. The error screen that appeared on Trump's Truth Social relayed the message that there were "no truths" to be found on the platform. The fallout began on Tuesday when Musk, who left the Department of Government Efficiency to focus on his EV-making company Tesla, denounced Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act over concerns that it could add approximately $3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next 10 years. He had described the GOP-backed tax cuts and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination". Later, Trump said that he was "very disappointed" after his former ally and top donor expressed criticism over his "big, beautiful" spending bill before Congress. "I'm very disappointed in Elon. I have helped Elon a lot," the President said. Musk responded to Trump's remarks, and the two traded insults over social media back and forth. While Trump hinted at potential cuts against Musk's companies, the Tesla CEO claimed that the President was in the controversial Epstein files. An allegation post that he later deleted. Trump on Saturday again warned Musk of "serious consequences" if the tech billionaire went on to fund democratic candidates to run against Republicans who vote in favour of his tax cuts and spending bill. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," he added. Trump also dismissed any ideas of mending the relations with Musk after their recent public feud. Elon Musk was one of the biggest Trump supporters during the 2024 presidential campaign. He was also the biggest donor to the Trump campaign, with a whopping $300 million. The Tesla CEO claimed that the Republican leader would not have won the 2024 election without his backing. The public feud brought unprecedented traffic to Trump's Truth Social platform, resulting in its crash and leaving followers to scramble to track the developing tiff. As per DownDetector, which was cited by Comic Sands, traffic on the Truth Social platform witnessed a crazy spike. Once the massive traffic led to the crash of Trump's page, users could see this message: "No Truths. When this user composes a Truth, or ReTruths, you will see it here." Several users took to X to point at the revealed "truth" about Trump. One user said, "Truth Social crashed, leaving this actual truth behind." "Truth Social has crashed from the traffic surge and in so doing accidentally created a hauntingly poignant image," another quipped. "Finally, something honest about Trump," wrote another user on X.


New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Embed Indian carbon market in global trade context
The PAT experience Though there are several areas where PAT, launched in 2012, could be implemented better, it has created industry familiarity with a measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) mechanism and a good number of accredited energy auditors. The carbon credit trading scheme (CCTS) will reduce the PAT reporting frequency from three years to an annual basisthereby increasing the spend on the MRV as well as speed of emissions reduction. Absent renewable energy, a majority of industrial emissions emerge out of energy consumption. PAT compliance has entailed over ten years of industry efforts to reduce energy consumption. The low hanging fruit of energy intensity has already been picked. Industry majors have invested in best available technology. Without further investment in technology, can the obligated entities reduce emissions further or will they simply bear the cost of purchasing carbon credits from other better performers? Indian carbon market embedded in global decarbonisation PAT was an autonomous measure to discipline industrial energy consumption. It did not function under any multilateral pressure or even context. CCTS on the other hand will have to respond to linkages and contestation with several carbon markets. CCTS will be a tool to defend Indian industry against cheap imports as well as to gain access to carbon conscious export markets. Building the trade dimension into the Indian Carbon market is imperative to create policy and business opportunities. The PAT experience Though there are several areas where PAT, launched in 2012, could be implemented better, it has created industry familiarity with a measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) mechanism and a good number of accredited energy auditors. The carbon credit trading scheme (CCTS) will reduce the PAT reporting frequency from three years to an annual basis thereby increasing the spend on the MRV as well as speed of emissions reduction. Absent renewable energy, a majority of industrial emissions emerge out of energy consumption. PAT compliance has entailed over ten years of industry efforts to reduce energy consumption. The low hanging fruit of energy intensity has already been picked. Industry majors have invested in best available technology. Without further investment in technology, can the obligated entities reduce emissions further or will they simply bear the cost of purchasing carbon credits from other better performers? Indian carbon market embedded in global decarbonisation PAT was an autonomous measure to discipline industrial energy consumption. It did not function under any multilateral pressure or even context. CCTS on the other hand will have to respond to linkages and contestation with several carbon markets. CCTS will be a tool to defend Indian industry against cheap imports as well as to gain access to carbon conscious export markets. Building the trade dimension into the Indian Carbon market is imperative to create policy and business opportunities.