Ohio lawmakers join on letter supporting Planned Parenthood, resisting funding cuts from Congress
More than a dozen members of Ohio's state legislature signed on to a letter with 500 other lawmakers across the nation asking Congress to push back against efforts to reduce or eliminate budget funding that would go to Planned Parenthood health clinics.
The letter, sent to U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate and House Minority Leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, lays out support of Planned Parenthood specifically as a provider for 2 million patients per year of 'essential, preventive, reproductive health care,' according to the letter.
'We write in support of the millions of patients who rely on Planned Parenthood health centers,' the letter states. ''Defunding' Planned Parenthood blocks patients from getting the care they need and increases health care costs for everyone.'
The letter, organized by the State Innovation Exchange's Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council, comes as congressional budget reconciliation is ongoing, when U.S. legislators decide the funding priorities for the country, under which the Trump administration has attempted to push cuts to areas such as health care. This includes funding to Medicaid, the program that provides health care and services to low-income households, covering things like health screenings and vaccines.
U.S. House panel passes GOP plan that cuts Medicaid by $625B, adds work requirement
The state budget also stands to cut Medicaid funding, in a way that's triggered by changes to funding at the federal level. The House proposal of the state operating budget would eliminate Group VIII, the state's Medicaid expansion group, if federal funding for Medicaid dips below 90%. That would leave nearly 770,000 without medical coverage, forcing them to seek other options, like emergency rooms, for care, or even skip or delay care all together.
In the letter, the lawmakers state that a majority of Planned Parenthood patients 'rely on Medicaid and other federal and state programs to access care,' and that 64% of the organization's health centers are in rural of 'medically underserved' communities.
'Without Planned Parenthood, many patients would have nowhere to turn for care,' according to the legislators.
Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio has reported 43% of their patients are covered by Medicaid. Cuts are causing concern for many of the leaders of the organization's regional arms, who are stressing the effects that funding cuts could have not only on abortion services, but also infant mortality and maternal mortality programs, and health care overall.
'The reality is that stripping Medicaid reimbursements from providers who also provide abortion will do very little to stop abortion services,' said Nan Whaley, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, in a statement on Tuesday. 'Medicaid does not fund abortion care. What it will impact is access to critical preventive services like birth control, cancer screenings, wellness exams, STI testing and treatment, and more, leaving millions of folks in need and at risk.'
Cuts on the federal side also include freezes to Title X funding, which is federal funding historically directed at clinics who 'have played a critical role in ensuring access to a broad range of family planning and preventive health services,' according to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
The Trump administration has frozen $65 million in grants to 'family planning services' clinics in April as they look to broad cuts to federal spending overall.
In Ohio, Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio received $1.98 million in grants in 2024 from the Title X pot. The Ohio Department of Health also received grant funding, obtaining $7 million that year. The department received similar amounts in the previous two years of grant funding as well.
The state legislators who signed on to the letter were:
Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood
House Minority Leader Allison Russo, D-Upper Arlington
Sen. Willis Blackshear, Jr., D-Dayton
Rep. Juanita Brent, D-Cleveland
Rep. Darnell Brewer, D-Cleveland
Rep. Beryl Brown Piccolantonio, D-Gahanna
Rep. Karen Brownlee, D-Symmes Twp.
Rep. Christine Cockley, D-Columbus
Sen. Bill DeMora, D-Columbus
Rep. Michele Grim, D-Toledo
Sen. Paula Hicks-Hudson, D-Toledo
Rep. Dontavius Jarrells, D-Columbus
Rep. Lauren McNally, D-Youngstown
Rep. Tristan Rader, D-Lakewood
Sen. Kent Smith, D-Euclid
Rep. Anita Somani, D-Dublin
Rep. Eric Synenberg, D-Beachwood
Sen. Casey Weinstein, D-Hudson
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Massie says he assumes some of ‘Trump's friends' are in Epstein files
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said he assumes 'at least some of Trump's friends' could be among the many people named in Jeffrey Epstein's files, but said authorities may be hesitant to release information that could name people who actually did nothing wrong. Massie, a cosponsor of a bill that would require the Justice Department to release the Epstein files, is hopeful the measure will come up for a vote when the House returns in September. 'The thing about the files that everybody needs to understand is there are probably lots of names in there who haven't done anything criminal, and so there's a reluctance to release these files because of the embarrassment just having your name on the news in these files. And I always presumed that there were at least some of Trump's friends named in this, and that might be why,' Massie told reporters Wednesday. The Trump administration in recent days has released a number of other files of interest to the MAGA base, including some on Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election and others related to Hillary Clinton's email server and the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. But if designed to be a distraction, it doesn't appear to be working, as many of Trump's supporters are still demanding to see information on the Epstein case. Massie said he expected anticipation on the Epstein issue to build over the coming recess, noting members may face questions on their position on the files as they head to town halls. 'I think this issue will not dissipate. I think it will grow over the August recess,' he said. He also faulted Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) for recessing the House a day earlier than expected rather than taking a vote on the controversial measure. 'I think he's just trying to do Trump a favor, that makes sense? He doesn't want a paper thin sliver of daylight between him and the president, and so that's why he's avoided taking even the symbolic vote on the nonbinding resolution,' Massie said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Epstein lawyer says Bondi ‘jumped the gun a bit' on files
David Schoen, a former lawyer for Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, said Attorney General Pam Bondi and other officials 'jumped the gun a bit' in overhyping the Epstein files. Schoen in an interview with BBC 'Newsnight' Thursday said there is no Epstein 'client list' that would highlight connections between the disgraced financier and wealthy individuals. 'If someone were to think that there's actually a list — which Jeffrey Epstein wrote down the name of, you fill in the name of the famous, wealthy person with some young girl — that just doesn't exist,' he said. He also suggested that Bondi and other officials created a hyped environment about what might be included in the files that couldn't be matched by what was released. Schoen was careful to not blame President Trump for overhyping the files. He said he thought Trump had called on the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI to release anything big they found and that the others jumped the gun in how they described what was coming. 'I think what happened is, President Trump said he's open to the idea, and it should be disclosed if there's any such file that hasn't been disclosed so far. But he didn't know what was in it,' Schoen said. 'I think that maybe some of the others, the attorney general, director of the FBI, and so on, jumped the gun a bit. They were in favor, for good reasons, of disclosing and full transparency, but they didn't know what they had yet,' he said. 'When they saw what they had, there was no 'smoking gun' and therefore they said there was nothing to release of any substance. And now you see this catch-up,' Schoen said. The controversy over the Epstein files has continued for weeks, causing problems for Trump and Republicans in Congress. Democrats have sought to further divide the GOP over the issue by offering amendments in committee to release more federal information on Epstein. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday was set to meet with Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who is imprisoned on sex trafficking charges. Trump said Friday he hadn't thought about pardoning Maxwell. Republicans in Congress have been divided over how to handle the issue. Some have called for the release of all files on Epstein held by the DOJ, while others have wanted to put guardrails on disclosures. Schoen is far from the first person to argue the files were overhyped. Karl Rove, republican strategist, said Thursday, 'There's hell to pay when those who hyped the conspiracy have closed the books on the case.' Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino as a conservative pundit outside the administration was among those pressing the idea there were files that showed the government could be protecting wealthy associates of Epstein. Epstein's acquaintances include a number of luminaries — including Trump and former President Clinton — which has sparked conspiracy theories for years. Schoen previously made statements that no client list existed and that Trump was not involved in the Epstein case. He stated June 16 on NewsNation that Bondi and Trump were not hiding a client list. On June 5, Schoen posted on social platform X, 'I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Axios
33 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump ignites chain reaction with early redistricting gamble
The Trump White House is pushing ahead with an extraordinary effort to game the system by redrawing congressional maps ahead of the midterms. Democrats are finding it tricky to fight back. Why it matters: The push to add Republican House seats is sparking a chain reaction as the parties fight tooth-and-nail over the majority. "Why the f**k are we responding and reacting to the other side instead of taking offense on these things?" potential Texas Senate candidate Beto O'Rourke told Democrats this week. But going on offense is easier said than done: Democrats would need a court order or special election in most states where they could try to draw more favorable maps. The big picture: Republicans are hoping to pick off more than a half-dozen Democratic-held seats by redrawing congressional maps ahead of 2026. Redistricting for partisan advantage is nothing new, but it's usually done after the census every ten years. The next one's scheduled for 2030. In Texas, Trump has encouraged Republicans to embark on a redistricting project that he's said could net the party as many as five seats. In Ohio, which is required by law to redraw its House map, party strategists believe they can gain two or three seats. In Missouri, Republicans believe they can pick up another seat. Zoom in: Gov. Greg Abbott and other Texas Republicans were at first hesitant to take up redistricting, the Texas Tribune reported. After Trump's call to Abbott, it appeared on the special session agenda. Texas Democrats have limited options to push back, but have considered breaking quorum to prevent a vote on the issue. Republicans are looking to South Texas after Trump performed well with Latino voters there. It could backfire: Adding Democratic voters to GOP districts to build more Republican districts elsewhere risks turning safe seats into competitive races, said Jon Taylor, department chair and political science professor at the University of Texas at San Antonio. The other side: Democrats, led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, have vowed to punch back by drawing roughly as many new Democratic seats. Newsom will need to act fast. In his case, he's suggested calling a special election to green light redistricting ahead of 2026. Newsom hosted California and Texas lawmakers in Sacramento on Friday to plot strategy. Other big Democratic states — such as New York, New Jersey and Illinois — also have redistricting limits in their state constitutions. They'll need courts to help, or push through fast amendments. Between the lines: The White House has no bigger priority in the midterms than keeping the House. " The battlefield is extremely narrow compared to 10 or 20 years ago. To the extent the GOP can widen it, on favorable terms, that's a huge advantage," said Matt Gorman, a former National Republican Congressional Committee official. Should Democrats seize the lower chamber, it would paralyze Trump's legislative agenda for his final two years in office and potentially lead to him getting impeached. Trump was impeached following the 2018 midterms, when Democrats won the House majority. The bottom line: There's already a warning sign for Republicans as they weigh redistricting.
