logo
Anti-racism protester attacked white Muslim convert ‘for how he looked'

Anti-racism protester attacked white Muslim convert ‘for how he looked'

Telegraph10-02-2025
A former nurse attacked a white Muslim convert at an anti-racism protest during the riots following the Southport killings after wrongly claiming he was a racist, a court heard.
Caroline Leneghan, who has the Palestinian flag as her Facebook profile, was outside the Roundhouse Hotel in Bournemouth, Dorset on Aug 7 last year when she turned on Dylan Fontaine and accused him of being far-Right.
Poole magistrates' court heard that Mr Fontaine and his brother Steven are practising Muslims who were there in solidarity with asylum seekers.
Leneghan, 43, was found guilty of assault and criminal damage following a trial. Her sentencing was adjourned but she was told by Orla Austin, the district judge, that she viewed the offences 'in the context of the widespread disorder' that took place around the country.
At the time there had been attacks on mosques and hotels housing asylum seekers that were fuelled by social media misinformation that Southport killer Axel Rudakubana was a Muslim asylum seeker.
The Roundhouse Hotel was said to be a possible target and a group of counter-protesters gathered outside to protect the occupants.
Leneghan said she was there as part of the Dorset Palestine Solidarity Campaign as she felt there was a 'crossover' with the plight of asylum seekers.
The Fontaine brothers said they had been made aware of the protest in the WhatsApp group BCP Against Racism.
Steven Fontaine told the court: 'We had seen lots of videos, up north mostly, of people smashing up mosques, beating up women and taking their hijab off so we were just there to support the police if anything escalated.
'[Leneghan] came over and said 'you don't belong here, you should be on the other side, you're racist'. I said 'what makes you think that?'
'She was basically saying 'you're not Muslim, judging by what you're wearing'. There were people in balaclavas and she wasn't talking to them so it was based on what I look like. She decided I wasn't a typical Muslim.'
He said Leneghan was 'loitering' around them so his brother started filming her.
He added: 'Everyone was on edge at the time because of all the violence. I was a bit nervous, she was saying we were racists. She was proper frantic and going mad.'
On video footage shown in court, Leneghan is heard confronting Dylan Fontaine, saying 'you clearly don't belong here', 'you're looking very suspicious' and 'I don't think you're one of us'.
Dylan Fontaine can be heard asking 'why are you assuming my beliefs?' to which she said 'because I can tell from looking at you' and added 'the clothes for a start'. Mr Fontaine was dressed casually in grey shorts, a black top and a cap.
In a second clip, Leneghan can be heard saying 'he's a fascist, you both are. Why don't you go back over there?' and pointed to the other side of the road where there was a small group of what were believed to be far-Right protesters.
Leneghan then grabbed Mr Fontaine's iPhone and threw it on the floor, smashing the back.
She then tried to prevent Mr Fontaine from picking it up and 'lunged' at him several times before shouting 'he's a racist, get him'.
He told the court: 'Tensions were high and I was being shouted at that I was a racist. Someone grabbed me, people were pulling and grabbing me. Luckily there were some people that knew me and they calmed down the situation. If I hadn't known anyone there it could have been a lot worse.'
Mr Fontaine said afterwards he wasn't physically injured but 'felt sick'. He spoke to a police officer but initially decided not to make an official complaint before later changing his mind.
'He was and still is a racist'
Leneghan told the court the brothers 'stood out' and seemed suspicious because they were keeping to themselves.
She said: 'They didn't look like they were trying to be part of our group.
'His replies just cemented my belief that they were there for nefarious purposes. He seemed to be filming people covertly and he wasn't filming the group on the other side of the road, he was filming our group.'
She claimed she put her hand in front of the camera lens to prevent him from filming and he dropped the phone but she denied saying 'get him' or inciting any violence towards him.
Victoria Hill, prosecuting, put it to Leneghan: 'Racists, fascists, they were quite dangerous things to say in the circumstances. Saying those things to them put them at risk of being targeted didn't it?'
Leneghan replied: 'I felt like we were at risk from them.'
She added: 'It was my strong belief that he was and still is a racist.'
Judge Austin said Mr Fontaine was a credible witness and found Leneghan guilty of assault and criminal damage.
She said: 'She had no right whatsoever to stop him filming and no right to grab his phone. I'm entirely satisfied that she touched him, it was unlawful. Throughout she was gesticulating, her language was offensive, making serious accusations which she made with no evidential basis.
'She took it into her own hands to decide who should or shouldn't be there and what they should do.
'There is no evidence Mr Fontaine was engaged in anything other than lawful activity. Miss Leneghan was the aggressor and committed two offences.'
She adjourned sentencing until April so a pre-sentence report can be carried out.
However, she warned her: 'I also note you were there to protect others being attacked based on their race and nationality yet approached the Fontaine brothers because you didn't think they looked like they should be there.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel

Leader Live

time27 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel

Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'

NHS worker's smile hid sickening desires which made colleagues' 'skin crawl'
NHS worker's smile hid sickening desires which made colleagues' 'skin crawl'

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

NHS worker's smile hid sickening desires which made colleagues' 'skin crawl'

Tracy Turner and her husband Stuart Compton pleaded guilty after they schemed to carry out horrific attacks on children, one of whom they said they wanted to 'dispose' of A seemingly friendly NHS worker's smile hid her evil twisted desires with apparently innocent comments about colleague's children taking on a sinister new meaning. ‌ Tracy Turner, 52, a long-serving operating theatre assistant at Cardiff's University Hospital of Wales, and her husband Stuart Compton, 46, were jailed recently for plotting to rape children as well as for hoarding sickening images of children being abused. ‌ They exchanged messages with one another about vile plans to bring a young girl to a shed where she would be raped before they "disposed" of her. During sentencing, Turner's barrister said she had worked for the NHS for 33 years "without blemish." ‌ Her colleagues were left reeling when her disgusting fantasies came to light and were unable to reconcile their memories about the "friendly, hardworking and knowledgeable" hospital worker with the monster who plotted unspeakably evil schemes. One recalled: "She was just normal. "She was not very educated and she was very, very loud and confident, but she was well-liked. She knew her job as a theatre assistant and would help others." Colleagues said they did notice a change in Turner about a year before the horrifying news came to light, WalesOnline reports. "She went from being on it, very efficient and good at training other people up, to the complete opposite. "She would disappear from the theatre for ages and then randomly reappear an hour later. She'd come back and say, 'I've been on the phone to Stuart, he's been driving me crazy.' She'd often use that as an excuse for disappearing, and not for the odd 10 minutes but for an hour or more." The court heard Turner had been taking cocaine every day after Compton introduced her to the Class A drug. She also became a heavy drinker. ‌ "Instead of her doing it, some of the newer members of staff ended up having to train recruits. They were doing the job better than she was. It was a massive change." One NHS source said a few of the operating theatre staff had been friends with Turner on social media and now look back at their online interactions with revulsion. "She would comment on pictures of their kids, nothing inappropriate, just as friends or family would," one said. "Of course now it makes their skin crawl." ‌ They were unsettled looking back on the Facebook comments and the fact she worked at the NHS while some paediatric surgery took place in main theatres. "It's terrifying to think she could have had access to these children when they were anaesthetised," said one. "Everything crosses your mind." Her duties included stocking and cleaning theatres as well as helping patients with positioning during operations. She had been considered to be highly competent throughout the majority of her career and had taken a course to become a band three senior theatre assistant. One former colleague said: "I was absolutely disgusted and shocked [to learn of her crimes]. She was friendly, hardworking and knowledgeable. I'd never expect this from her." Turner and Compton began discussing raping a girl in 2022. ‌ They plotted to take her to a nearby woodland and cemetery before raping her. Both admitted to finding pleasure from the sickening thought. Prosecutor Matthew Cobbe said: "They both recognised the brutality of the sexual acts that they discussed, they recognised that they would need to take steps to ensure [the child] could not cry out or scream as she was being abused." They also discussed abusing a boy and discussed Turner having intercourse with the boy. After police learned Compton adopted different identities to distribute indecent images on WhatsApp to paedophiles. ‌ Compton, of Daniel Street, Cathays, pleaded guilty to six counts of arranging a child sex offence, three of making indecent images, and three of distributing indecent images. Turner, of Ninian Road, Roath, pleaded guilty to six counts of arranging a child sex offence and two of making indecent images. Myrthyr Tydfil Crown Court also heard how both had been of previous good character. Compton was initially sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of seven years. Turner, who cried during the hearing, was initially sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment with an extended licence period of two years. Turner's sentence was later cut to 10 years in jail with two on extended licence, with Compton retaining a life sentence but with the tariff being increased to eight years and 11 months.

How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel

Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store