logo
Why Ozempic and Wegovy Might Change Some People's Favorite Foods

Why Ozempic and Wegovy Might Change Some People's Favorite Foods

For most of her life, Alyssa Fraser took comfort in cooking. Fraser, a former food reporter from Minnesota, used to relish the process of whipping up her favorite chicken and vegetable recipe or batches of pasta. But after she started taking the popular weight-loss medication Wegovy, her culinary interests seemed to disappear because she became disinterested in food—and certain types of food became particularly off-putting. Many savory meals lost their appeal, and some proteins began to taste too much like the 'barnyard' the animal came from, she says. Even her favorite wine, which usually tasted crisp and citrusy, seemed weirdly 'vegetal.'
Similar to Fraser, other users of Wegovy (known in its generic form as semaglutide), along with those of Ozempic (a form of semaglutide used to treat type 2 diabetes), Zepbound (known generically as tirzepatide) and other medications broadly called glucagonlike peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, have described peculiar changes in the way food tastes. GLP-1 drugs—initially designed to help treat type 2 diabetes by triggering insulin release—can cause weight loss by making people feel full faster. But some people report that in addition to an increase in satiety, they experience changes in their preferences for specific foods—they find meats suddenly repulsive, fried foods too heavy and savory snacks unappealing. On online forums and in scientific surveys, some people have expressed a general loss of interest in food overall—a few have even said that the drugs have redefined food as a necessity rather than a joy for them. These accounts may even be captured in grocery store data that suggest people on GLP-1 medications spend less on food, especially calorie-dense and processed items.
Some preliminary evidence suggests changes in food preferences might play a role in weight loss, but it's not clear how much such changes contribute to that result compared with the medications' effect on satiety. And research on the phenomenon has mostly involved animal models or small studies of humans. Experts, however, are starting to gain some clues as to how common these apparent shifts in food preference and taste really are among users and what might be behind them.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
A recent study published in Food Quality and Preference found that people on GLP-1 medications reported reaching for processed foods, as well as refined grains and beef, less often. They also said they were drinking less soda and other sweetened drinks and increasing their intake of fruit, leafy greens and water. Further, they reported consuming about 700 fewer calories per day. These findings rely on self-reported data, however, which can sometimes be unreliable, says Brandon McFadden, a professor in food policy economics at the University of Arkansas and co-author of the study.
Additionally, although GLP-1 users reported eating fewer calorie-dense foods, most people didn't necessarily lose all desire for them. This is because liking a food is different from wanting it, says John Blundell, an emeritus professor in psychobiology at the University of Leeds in England, who was not involved in the recent paper. A person might not find a food particularly tasty (in other words, they might not enjoy the specific sensory experience of consuming it) but still have a strong behavioral drive to eat it. GLP-1 medications seem to involve the reverse: people still like certain foods but have less of an immediate urge to eat them.
These drugs mimic a hormone called GLP-1, which the gut naturally secretes in response to food and which binds to the hormone's receptors around the body—including in brain areas involved in appetite regulation and in reward pathways that reduce the pleasure response to food. Researchers have found that this is the primary way the drugs cause people to lose weight, and some think it might be involved in altered food preferences.
Desires for specific foods can change depending on whether a person is generally hungry or full. For example, when you're hungry, you're more likely to want meaty, high-protein or sometimes high-fat foods rather than sweet ones, Blundell explains. 'When you become full, the reverse happens,' he says: a big piece of meat or a high-fat food becomes aversive—but you might feel like you have a so-called second stomach for dessert. One plausible explanation for this, Blundell says, could be that GLP-1 drugs' satiating effect simply makes such end-of-meal preferences kick in. It's also possible that some aspects of the drugs' compounds could directly act on specific food preferences through some other biological mechanism. 'But it hasn't been demonstrated,' says Blundell, who is working with a food company to develop foods that are more palatable for people on GLP-1 medications.
Blundell led a small study, published in 2017, that found people taking semaglutide not only reduced their overall daily food intake but also preferred and consumed fewer high-fat and savory foods. Previous research that he published in 2007 showed that being full also diminishes similar cravings.
But satiety alone may not fully explain the shift in eating preferences. Emerging evidence and anecdotal user accounts suggest changes to the body's taste mechanisms could also play a role. Some users describe flavors becoming stronger or unpleasant while on the medications, though individual experiences seem to vary: Siobhan, a Los Angeles–based writer, who has been taking Wegovy since 2021 and withheld her last name for privacy, says she still finds fatty foods such as French fries appealing—but her favorite food, panang curry, has become too bitter. 'I've been eating that curry for 20 years,' Siobhan says. 'It just didn't taste right anymore.' Two-year Wegovy user Sarah Streby says she can no longer stomach eggs or broccoli, and her love for spicy food has waned—causing her to change how she cooks for her family. 'Now everyone's complaining the food is too mild because [I] can't handle the spice,' she says.
At press time, Novo Nordisk, the manufacturer of Wegovy and Ozempic, had not responded to a request for comment from Scientific American. A spokesperson for Eli Lilly, which makes the weight-loss drug Zepbound, told Scientific American in an e-mail, 'We do not have data to share concerning changes in food taste or preference among individuals taking GLP-1 medications.' The spokesperson added that known side effects are listed on the medication's labels and that anyone experiencing those side effects should contact their health care provider.
Scientists have found GLP-1 receptors in human taste buds, which hints at a possible explanation for alterations in taste, but findings remain mixed. Some past research has found that people with a higher body weight tend to perceive flavors less intensely, and some evidence suggests this may prompt people to eat more in an attempt to get a bigger sensory reward. In the case of sweet foods, people with a higher body weight also may be less able to perceive a high sugar content, though findings on this have been contradictory. A small study presented at the Endocrine Society's 2024 annual conference found that women taking semaglutide were more sensitive to taste compared with those on a placebo. Brain scans showed increased activity in a region involved in processing sensory rewards when participants tasted something sweet, suggesting that semaglutide may heighten taste perception and make certain foods less appealing.
But another study published in March in Physiology & Behavior seems to suggest the opposite. It found that 46 people taking these medications experienced a reduced sensitivity to all five basic tastes —sweet, sour, salty, bitter and brothy (or umami)—compared with people in a control group. Past studies in mice linked the activation of GLP-1 receptors to alterations in sweet taste perception, but researchers were surprised to see that the effect in humans was broader than anticipated, says Richard Doty, director of the Smell and Taste Center at the University of Pennsylvania and co-author of the March paper. Previous research that linked GLP-1 medications to alterations in taste has mostly looked at diabetic populations, Doty says, adding that 'the focus has always been on sugar, and so people haven't looked at the other sensory systems any great detail.' He suspects the GLP-1 receptors found in taste buds are behind the March findings, 'but we really don't know; there needs to be more research on that.'
For some, the drugs' effects on satiety and taste are welcome changes that make it easier to eat less. But for others, it's more complicated. 'Not only am I not cooking or really taking an interest in food—if I want it, it's sweets,' Fraser says. 'And even then, if it's super sweet, I'll take a bite or two, and I'm like, I gotta put it down.' She says savory foods have lost their appeal entirely.
Fraser is still considering the trade-offs for the improvements she's seen in her health as she navigates this shift and deals with the loss of a loved hobby. But 'the mental load of weight loss has been greatly reduced,' she says, 'and that is worth it to me.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CMS Review of Organ Procurement Organizations Sparks Debate
CMS Review of Organ Procurement Organizations Sparks Debate

Medscape

time2 hours ago

  • Medscape

CMS Review of Organ Procurement Organizations Sparks Debate

In late May, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its latest performance report for the nation's 55 Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs), the nonprofits responsible for recovering organs from deceased donors. The 2025 report shows notable improvements from the 2003 assessment with the number of lowest-performing Tier 3 OPOs declining from 24 (42%) to 10 (18%), and the number of top-performing Tier 1 OPOs doubling to 30 (54%). However, a plan by CMS to begin revoking the certification of Tier 3 OPOs following the 2026 report has heightened an ongoing debate about the reports' accuracy, fairness, and repercussions. The Report CMS began ranking OPO performance in 2022 as part of a larger effort to modernize the nation's transplant system following years of criticism that it was inequitable and inefficient. Each annual CMS assessment uses data from 2 years prior (eg, the 2025 assessment reflects 2023 data). CMS then applies two metrics to measure OPO performance: Donation rate: the percentage of potential donors from whom at least one organ was transplanted the percentage of potential donors from whom at least one organ was transplanted Transplantation rate: the number of transplanted organs as a percentage of potential donors Potential donors are defined as hospital patients ≤ 75 years whose deaths are compatible with donation. CMS then compares each OPO against the prior year's national data. The top 25% are designated Tier 1, those below the prior year's median are placed in Tier 3, and those in between are assigned Tier 2. To date, CMS has never revoked an OPO contract — but that will change with the 2026 performance assessment. At the end of the current 4-year contract cycle next year, all Tier 3 OPOs will be decertified and higher-performing OPOs will be able to bid for their contracts. Tier 2 OPOs will also have to compete with other interested OPOs to keep their service areas. Disputing the Metrics The improved OPO performance in the 2025 report is 'the result of greater transparency and accountability associated with the current outcome measures,' a CMS spokesperson told Medscape Medical News . The new outcome measures 'obviously would light a fire' under OPOs striving to improve, said Jeff Trageser, president of the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations (AOPO) and the executive director of Livesharing, a consistently Tier 1 OPO based in San Diego. Many OPOs, he noted, have been investing heavily in advocacy to convert eligible deceased donors into actual donors, tailoring donation strategies to their communities, and expanding organ offers to distant transplant centers to reduce the number of discarded organs. AOPO and its 47 member organizations have raised multiple objections. Trageser called CMS' performance assessments seriously flawed and warned they could penalize OPOs making steady progress. OPOs shouldn't be held accountable for transplant numbers as hospitals decide which organs to accept or reject, Trageser said. Sean Fitzpatrick, chief public affairs officer at New England Donor Services (Tier 2), argued in a recent statement that CMS' methodology unfairly penalizes large OPOs. A recent simulation study published in American Journal of Transplantation made a similar claim, suggesting the system 'systematically identifies larger OPOs as underperforming.' But CMS disagrees, noting through its spokesperson that 'both large and small OPOs have moved among performance tiers [from year to year], indicating that success is driven by operational effectiveness, not size.' Regional Differences a Concern David DeStefano, president and CEO of We Are Sharing Hope SC in Charleston, South Carolina, said his OPO has boosted donations and transplantations by 30% since 2017 through community partnerships and better coordination with transplant centers. Yet the OPO remains in Tier 3, which he attributes to higher rates of diseased, unusable organs in his largely rural service area that lacks access to health care. CMS should risk-adjust the performance metrics to reflect geographic differences in sociodemographic factors, he said. The CMS spokesperson noted that 'while population differences exist across geographic areas, there is no indication these differences would impact the donor potential resulting in a disadvantage to one OPO compared with other OPOs.' Approaching Decertification In 2026, Tier 3 OPOs can appeal their decertification. Their contracts will remain in effect through January 31, 2027, 'to allow time for appeals and prevent disruption to organ donation services,' the CMS spokesperson said. But disruption is unavoidable, said Trageser. 'Decertification will lead to chaos and fewer organs available for transplant,' he said. Incoming OPO leadership would spend valuable time managing the logistics of taking over a service area instead of on 'their core mission of working with families in a time of crisis to advocate for donation and then getting those organs allocated.' Staff departures at decertified OPOs could further erode relationships with transplant hospitals, said AOPO CEO Steve Miller. Tier 1 OPOs Eye Expansion Matthew Wadsworth, president and CEO of Life Connection of Ohio (Tier 1), supports CMS' review process. While taking over of a service area would involve 'a lot of work,' donation would improve quickly and sharply under new leadership, he said, adding that there would be no chaos. Wadsworth is preparing to bid on at least one Tier 3 service area. Expansion, he said, would create economies of scale for his smaller OPO and reduce its operating costs. 'We've even gone through the financial modeling of it and had conversations with our bank,' he said. However, details about the decertification process remain unclear, including whether incoming OPOs would inherit assets from outgoing OPOs. The lack of clarity 'puts us in a tight situation,' said Wadsworth, because he needs to talk with his board of directors now about additional resources and staffing. CMS said only that decertification guidance will be released sometime before next spring's performance assessment.

Weight Loss Jab Found To Shrink Breast Cancer Tumors
Weight Loss Jab Found To Shrink Breast Cancer Tumors

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Weight Loss Jab Found To Shrink Breast Cancer Tumors

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Millions of Americans have turned to weight-loss injections originally developed to treat diabetes—and now, research suggests that these medications may offer a surprising additional benefit: shrinking obesity-related breast tumors. A new study in mice shows that tirzepatide—the active ingredient in the popular drugs Mounjaro and Zepbound—not only helps shed pounds but may also slow or reduce the growth of breast cancer tumors linked to obesity. Dr. Sue Decotiis, a New York City-based physician who specializes in medical weight loss, told Newsweek she is encouraged by the findings. She said: "These results, although preliminary, are very promising. From my experience as a weight loss physician, I am not surprised." The study was conducted by researchers from the University of Michigan. It found that obese mice treated with tirzepatide not only lost about 20 percent of their body weight, but also experienced a significant reduction in breast tumor volume. A stock image of an overweight female injecting into stomach. A stock image of an overweight female injecting into stomach. Vincent Scherer/iStock / Getty Images Plus Tirzepatide's Rise and Dual Potential More than two in five adults in the U.S. have obesity and weight-related diseases continue to place a heavy burden on public health. In November 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Zepbound (tirzepatide) as a treatment for chronic weight management in adults. The drug is also marketed as Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes. Together with other GLP-1-based medications like Ozempic, these drugs have become widely used—data shows that around 6 million Americans are currently prescribed either Ozempic or Mounjaro, according to the Indiana University School of Medicine. Now, the new research hints that these drugs could serve a dual role—helping individuals lose weight while potentially reducing cancer risk. A Study in Mice: Fat Loss and Tumor Shrinkage The study involved 16 female mice genetically prone to obesity. The mice were fed a high-fat diet until they became significantly overweight. At 32 weeks old—roughly middle-aged in human terms—they were divided into two groups. One group received tirzepatide injections every other day for 16 weeks, while the other was given a placebo. The team found that the tirzepatide-treated mice lost about 20 percent of their body weight, mostly from reduced fat mass. In tandem, their breast tumors shrank, with researchers noting that tumor volume was directly tied to body weight and total fat—suggesting a strong link between fat reduction and tumor growth suppression. Paper author and and physiologist Amanda Kucinskas said in a statement: "Obesity is a significant risk factor for breast cancer, and while it is very preliminary data, our studies in mice suggest that these new anti-obesity drugs may be a way to reduce obesity-associated breast cancer risk or improve outcomes." Why Obesity Increases Cancer Risk The link between excess body fat and cancer is well established. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reviewed over 1,000 studies and found consistent evidence that higher body fat increases the risk of at least 13 types of cancer, including colorectal and breast cancer. Decotiis explained the biology behind this link: "Obesity increases the risk of breast cancer especially in postmenopausal women. Overweight or obese women often experience more aggressive cancer growth and poorer response to treatment. "Higher levels of estrone, a secondary type of estrogen produced in fatty tissue that is inflammatory and carcinogenic, are found in overweight women after menopause. Additionally, insulin resistance, which is another inflammatory state, aids abnormal cellular growth patterns, which contribute to cancer." Fat cells aren't just passive—they secrete substances that can trigger inflammation and influence how nearby tissues behave. In obese individuals, this can create an environment that fosters cancer growth. Tirzepatide, by dramatically reducing fat stores, may indirectly weaken that cancer-friendly environment. What's Next? Separating Weight Loss from Cancer Effects The Michigan team is now working with nutrition scientist Steve Hursting at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to investigate whether tirzepatide's effect on tumors is solely due to weight loss—or if the drug may have direct anti-cancer properties. "While these are very preliminary results, they suggest that this new anti-obesity drug may also have a beneficial impact on breast cancer outcomes," Kucinskas said. Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about tirzepatide? Let us know via health@

Vida Health Appoints Leading Industry Executives to Accelerate Growth in Cardiometabolic Care
Vida Health Appoints Leading Industry Executives to Accelerate Growth in Cardiometabolic Care

Business Wire

time3 hours ago

  • Business Wire

Vida Health Appoints Leading Industry Executives to Accelerate Growth in Cardiometabolic Care

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Vida Health, a virtual, personalized obesity care provider that helps patients manage obesity and related conditions, today announced the appointment of Jason Macaleer as Chief Strategy Officer and Mike Rolla as Chief Growth Officer. Seasoned healthcare leaders with a combined 40+ years of industry experience, Macaleer and Rolla will partner to help scale the company's impact amid growing demand for evidence-based obesity and cardiometabolic solutions. The announcement of Macaleer and Rolla's appointments coincides with the completion of Vida Health's recent capital raise led by existing investor General Atlantic, with participation from Ally Bridge, Canvas Prime, and existing shareholders, underscoring leading investors' support for the company's strong market traction. In the last year, Vida has experienced significant growth, expanding its customer base by 70% and increasing revenue by greater than 90% year-to-date, driven by the company's Clinical Obesity Management program. Combined with deepening partnerships with consultants, PBMs, and payers, this momentum underscores Vida's emergence as the preferred partner for cardiometabolic care, particularly amid rising concerns about GLP-1 affordability and sustainability. 'Jason and Mike's leadership and vision will be instrumental in our next phase of growth. Their complementary experience strengthens our ability to deliver sustainable solutions for obesity, diabetes, and related conditions,' said Joe Murad, CEO at Vida Health. 'With our recent capital raise, which fully funds Vida to profitability, we are even better positioned to deliver on our mission and expand our impact, backed by the continued confidence of our investors.' Macaleer joins Vida at a pivotal moment in the market, as employers and health plans navigate rising cardiometabolic risk and the evolving GLP-1 landscape. Macaleer brings deep expertise from strategic roles at Transcarent, Teladoc Health, and Livongo, where he scaled employer and health plan partnerships and advanced value-based care. He will support Vida's mission of delivering partners and their members measurable, meaningful health outcomes, personalized care, and cost savings. 'It is a privilege to join the Vida team as we work to help address the obesity epidemic,' said Jason Macaleer. 'I am energized by the opportunity to contribute to Vida's continued growth and drive impactful results for our partners and their members.' Rolla has a strong track record in commercializing innovative medical technologies and leading enterprise growth at companies like AliveCor, Teladoc/Livongo, and Becton Dickinson. His leadership in go-to-market strategy and complex enterprise sales will advance Vida's expansion of responsible GLP-1 prescribing and comprehensive obesity care. 'It is rewarding to be part of Vida at such an exciting time of accelerated growth,' said Mike Rolla. 'We are off to a strong start in 2025 and poised to continue our momentum with Jason and the rest of this impressive management team.' Together, both executives offer a powerful blend of strategic vision, commercial acumen, and operational expertise as they work to strengthen employer and payer partnerships, optimize Rx integration, and accelerate Vida's growth in the cardiometabolic market. To learn more about how Vida helps health plans and employers improve the health of their members and employees, visit About Vida Health Vida Health is a virtual, personalized obesity care provider that helps patients manage obesity and related conditions like diabetes, high blood pressure, anxiety, and depression with evidence-based treatment. Vida's team of obesity medicine-certified physicians, nurses, registered dietitians, expert coaches, and licensed therapists take a whole-person approach leading to clinically meaningful body weight loss in one year. Practicing responsible prescribing, Vida supports patients, employers, and health plans by prioritizing proven behavior change and lifestyle interventions before introducing medications, ensuring that only those who really need anti-obesity medications receive them — helping to control costs. For individuals with obesity, employers and health plans can save up to $550 in monthly prescription costs. Vida serves members in all 50 states and Washington D.C., offers services in both English and Spanish, and operates on a value-based pricing model, putting outcomes at the center of care. To learn more, visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store