logo
Congress approves public media and foreign aid cuts: What to know

Congress approves public media and foreign aid cuts: What to know

The Hill2 days ago
Congress this week approved a bill that claws back about $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funds, as Republicans look to begin locking in cuts pursued by his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
The package includes about $8 billion in cuts for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and other foreign aid, as well as more than $1 billion in cuts to the Corporation of Public Broadcasting (CPB), which provides some funding to NPR and PBS.
Here are five things to know about the bill.
NPR and PBS brace for cuts
The bill yanks back more than $1 billion in advanced funding appropriated for CPB over fiscal years 2026 and 2027.
Many Republicans say the cuts are long overdue, singling out NPR and PBS, for what they perceive as political bias. But some are concerned about how the cuts would impact smaller stations.
In the previous fiscal year, NPR received upwards of $13 million from CPB, the corporation's grants and allocations data shows. More than $70 million went to PBS based in Arlington.
About one percent of NPR's current operating budget comes directly from the federal government, compared to 15 percent for PBS, multiple outlets report.
At the same time, however, fees from member stations, which rely on a larger share of CPB funding on average, make up about 30 percent of NPR's funding. PBS says it also receives annual programming dues from stations to carry national programming.
About 35 percent of the annual funding for PBS News Hour, the organization said, comes from CPB and national programming funds it described as 'a combination of CPB appropriation funds and annual programming dues paid to PBS by stations re-allocated to programs like ours.'
Public media faces fiscal 'cliff' in October
Opponents of the cuts have already sounded alarm about the fiscal 'cliff' that some stations will face as a result of the latest legislation come October, the start of fiscal year 2026.
'It is a cliff,' Rep. Rosa Delauro (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, told The Hill Thursday. 'They're already speaking about it, frightened to death, particularly in rural communities that they're not going to have access to important information or alerts about weather situations, information that they need to know, education for their kids, because they're not in communities where there are multiple sources of information.'
In a statement responding to passage of the cuts on Friday, CPB president Patricia Harrison said 'many local public radio and television stations will be forced to shut down.'
'Cutting federal funding could also put Americans at risk of losing national and local emergency alerts that serve as a lifeline to many Americans in times of severe need,' Harrison also said.
Senators on both sides of the aisle have raised similar concerns.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said at the Hill Nation Summit on Wednesday that the cuts could put rural radio stations in her home state out of business, calling them 'the lifeblood of these communities when it comes to emergency alerts.'
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), one of two Republicans in the upper chamber to vote against the bill, pointed to a recent earthquake in her home state.
Seven-point-three [magnitude] earthquake off of Alaska and tsunami warnings. You know how I got this information? From public broadcasting,' she said on the Senate floor.
Less than 5 percent of the nonprofit corporation's funding goes toward its operations, while more than 70 percent 'goes directly to local public media stations,' CPB states on its website. And almost half of its 'total 544 radio and TV grantees are considered rural.'
However, many Republicans have downplayed the cuts.
'There's so many means for communications now that we didn't have in the 1960s. Everyone has it on their phone,' Rep. Mark Alford (R-Missouri) told The Hill this week. 'Everyone, pretty much, has a smartphone, even in rural districts that that I represent, there's all types of access for information that we didn't have in the 1960s'
'I don't think the American taxpayer should be funding journalism,' Alford, who is also a former television news anchor, also said, while arguing there's a 'liberal, progressive bent towards NPR and PBS.'
Foreign aid
The request initially sent by the White House called for $8.3 billion in cuts to USAID and other foreign aid.
But the White House ended up agreeing to exempt the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which was established under former President George W. Bush in 2003 and totaled about $400 million, after those cuts became a critical point of contention for moderate GOP lawmakers.
The administration said the bill targets items like migration and refugee assistance that 'could be more fairly shared with non-U.S. Government donors,' USAID efforts officials say have been used to 'fund radical gender and climate projects,' and development assistance they argued 'conflict with American values' and 'interfere with the sovereignty of other countries,' among other rescissions.
Republicans in both chambers have overwhelmingly cheered the cuts. But a few have also voiced concerns about the proposal in recent weeks, sounding alarm over what they see as a lack of information about the accounts being targeted.
Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) specifically singled out a proposed $2.5 billion in cuts to the Development Assistance account. She noted in a statement that the account 'covers everything from basic education, to water and sanitation, to food security,' but said lawmakers still lacked key details as to how those programs would be affected.
More cuts could be coming
Republicans see the bill as a critical 'test run' for the party, as Trump administration officials have already indicated they aim to send multiple special requests to Congress to claw back more funding if the first package makes it through.
White House budget chief Russell Vought said Thursday that another rescissions package is 'likely to come soon,' though he stopped short of offering specifics as to what programs could be on the chopping block.
'Have nothing to announce, but we've been talking about it, and there's certainly an enthusiasm, although,' Vought said. 'I spent a good hour with Senate Republicans, there is still a great enthusiasm for these rescissions bills, because Congress wants to be a part of voting for these cuts and making them permanent.'
Hardline conservatives have ramped up calls in recent months for the president to use the rare 'rescissions' tool – which unlocks a process that Republicans can use to secure funding cuts with GOP-only votes – as the party looks to codify DOGE cuts amid legal challenges over the administration's efforts to reshape the federal government.
Implications for Sept. 30
Fewer than 20 legislative days stand between Congress and a looming Sept. 30 deadline to prevent a government shutdown.
Both chambers are running behind in marking up and pushing their annual funding bills across the floor — increasing the likelihood Congress will have to resort to a stopgap measure to keep the lights on and buy time for lawmakers to finish their funding work.
Senate Democrats have already warned the passage of the recent rescissions package threatens already fragile bipartisan funding talks.
And some Republicans are also eager to begin shifting more focus to crafting and approving new funding levels for fiscal 2026.
Asked about the administration's plans to send Congress additional requests for cuts, Murkowski, a senior GOP appropriator, said, 'I do not think that should be our path.'
'It's not legislating. It's basically the White House saying this is what we want you to do. Take it or leave it,' she told reporters this week.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Key senator makes bipartisan plea to Trump to invest in weather and early warning networks
Key senator makes bipartisan plea to Trump to invest in weather and early warning networks

CNN

time13 minutes ago

  • CNN

Key senator makes bipartisan plea to Trump to invest in weather and early warning networks

A prominent senator is calling on President Donald Trump to reverse course on his proposal to slash the budget for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, making a case for America to be a world leader in the weather forecasting space instead. Sen. Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington and the ranking member of the Senate commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, is advocating that the administration work with Congress to pursue bipartisan investments and outlined her plans in a letter addressed to Trump sent Monday. The letter spells out five recommendations to improve America's weather forecasting infrastructure, such as collecting far more observations and modernizing alert systems. The letter comes in the wake of devastating flash floods in Texas on the night of July 4 that killed more than 130 people. It also is being sent at a time when the Trump administration has reduced staffing at the National Weather Service and proposed even more significant cuts, such as eliminating NOAA's research arm and shutting down its many research centers. These labs contribute to forecast, technology and warning improvements. CNN has reached out to the White House for comment. All told, the Trump White House's budget proposal would shave off about $1.7 billion from the NOAA budget, about a 27% cut from current levels. Cantwell does not push back against the cuts in the letter but rather pitches an investment plan to try to appeal to the administration's desire to make America the leading nation again in many areas. 'We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to create the world's best weather forecasting system that would provide Americans with much more detailed and customized alerts days instead of minutes ahead of a looming extreme weather event,' Cantwell wrote. A noteworthy omission from the letter is any reference to climate change and the relationship between climate change and extreme weather events. The administration has taken a host of actions to rollback climate regulations and stifle climate science research at multiple agencies. The Texas floods have raised questions about NWS readiness for extreme weather events in the wake of staff cuts. The agency is scrambling to hire about 150 forecasters to fill the most critical gaps left by layoffs, early retirements and other incentives the Trump administration offered people to leave government service. Even with 150 new hires, who will take time to train, the NWS will still be more thinly staffed than at the start of the Trump administration. Prev Next The letter endorses next generation weather satellites, radars and new hurricane hunter aircraft to replace the current aging fleet, along with computing capabilities to catch up with, and eventually pass, the superior accuracy of European forecast centers. It also puts an emphasis on modernizing weather alert systems — a key topic in the wake of the disaster in Texas. Notably, it also endorses putting more money, not less, into 'basic and applied research.' Cantwell is in step with her colleagues on both sides of the aisle on the Senate Commerce Committee, who rejected most of the administration's proposed cuts in an initial fiscal year 2026 spending bill. House appropriators did the same, although the Trump administration has indicated it may seek other ways to restrict funding for agencies such as NOAA. 'Americans should have the best weather system. Why not?' Cantwell said on CNN this morning.

What are the best vocational schools in the US? See USA TODAY's list of the top 250.
What are the best vocational schools in the US? See USA TODAY's list of the top 250.

USA Today

time14 minutes ago

  • USA Today

What are the best vocational schools in the US? See USA TODAY's list of the top 250.

USA TODAY partnered with the research firm Statista to create the 2025 list of America's Top Vocational Schools. For decades, the value of a four-year college degree was indisputable. In fact, it was one of the few things Republicans and Democrats seemed to agree on. In recent years, however, that bipartisan agreement about the traditional college experience has shifted toward a different type of post-high school education: trade schools. 'Our workers deserve more postsecondary pathways, career-aligned programs, apprenticeships and on-the-job learning,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon, a Republican, said during her confirmation hearing in February. A year prior, Miguel Cardona, a Democrat who served as education secretary under former President Joe Biden, made similar remarks during a visit to his old high school. "We have a 'four years or bust' mentality in this country, and a stigma around technical education," he said. "Our kids are missing out if we don't give them the full range of options." Vocational programs – in fields like welding, culinary arts and auto repair – have grown in popularity and size. Between 2020 and 2023, trade school enrollment jumped by roughly 5%, according to a 2024 report from Validated Insights, a higher education marketing firm. In an April survey of more than 2,000 adults conducted by the American Staffing Association, 33% advocated for high school graduates enrolling in trade schools, while 28% recommended a four-year college or university. By several accounts, short-term training programs that offer certificates are the fastest-growing type of postsecondary credential in the United States. However, it's difficult to determine which ones are best, because research on vocational education, especially programs that last only a few months, can be contradictory and sometimes difficult to decipher. Listen to USA TODAY's podcast: Rethinking the American dream: Trade schools vs. college degrees | The Excerpt Short-term programs can generate immediate earnings and jobs, according to a recent paper in the Economics of Education Review. However, the paper says those benefits fade over time and many certificate holders end up earning poverty-level wages, according to a 2021 study. Research from New America, a left-leaning think tank, suggests that the economic value of short-term certificate programs is often overestimated. The shorter the program, the more controversial it is, too. For-profit schools, in particular, have developed a reputation in some circles for ripping off students with relatively expensive programs that do not provide the return on investment they promise. Despite these obstacles, politicians have continued to prioritize vocational education, especially as the cost of traditional four-year degrees has become out of reach for many families in recent decades. As part of the major tax and spending bill signed into law by President Donald Trump in July, Congress expanded Pell Grants to career training programs as short as eight weeks. The legislation, which takes effect in July 2026, will make millions of taxpayer dollars available to education providers far beyond traditional colleges. To help students navigate the trade school market, USA TODAY partnered with the market research firm Statista to create our first annual ranking of "America's Top Vocational Schools." The rankings, developed by Statista in collaboration with USA TODAY, were judged on five primary metrics: graduation rate, graduates' salary, years it takes to pay off net cost, social mobility and diversity. More rankings: For Earth Day 2025, list of America's Climate Leaders has grown significantly Data on school performance was collected by Statista through publicly available federal databases. The schools were ranked on a star system and excluded if they were unaccredited, failed specific financial responsibility metrics or had a high percentage of graduates defaulting on their student loans. Here is the 2025 list of America's Top Vocational Schools:

American Pride Bank Welcomes Kristie McMahan as Chief Credit Officer
American Pride Bank Welcomes Kristie McMahan as Chief Credit Officer

Business Wire

time14 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

American Pride Bank Welcomes Kristie McMahan as Chief Credit Officer

ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--American Pride Bank is pleased to announce that Kristie McMahan has joined the organization as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer. With nearly 25 years of banking experience, McMahan brings a strong track record of leadership across credit and risk management, commercial and private banking, and operational strategy. Throughout her career, McMahan has held a number of senior leadership roles, including Director of Commercial Administration, Credit Administration Manager, Loan Operations Manager, and Senior Credit Underwriter. She also has experience as a relationship and portfolio manager, along with financial leadership roles in private equity and international manufacturing, giving her a well-rounded perspective on financial strategy and credit discipline. McMahan holds a Bachelor of Arts in Finance from Wofford College and an MBA with concentrations in Finance and Risk Management from the University of Georgia. She is widely respected for her strategic insight and dedication to long-term organizational success. Kristie lives in Decatur, Georgia with her husband, Scott, and their two daughters. About American Pride Bank American Pride Bank was founded in 2007 by first-generation Americans and entrepreneurs to ensure that everyone has access to the financial products and services needed to earn their American Dream. The bank specializes in serving high-touch, relationship banking solutions that create pathways for generational wealth-building and business success. Through responsive financial services, American Pride Bank helps small business owners and communities thrive. We take pride in seeing our customers succeed and knowing we played a part in their journey. At American Pride Bank, your success is our pride.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store