
As Israel-Iran war escalates, Ukraine fears ‘more losses' to Russia
Kyiv, Ukraine – There is a Persian word millions of Ukrainians fear.
Shahed – also spelled as Shaheed or Shahid, originally a Quranic term for 'martyr' or 'witness' – is the name given to the triangular, explosives-laden, Iranian-designed drones that became a harrowing part of daily life and death in wartime Ukraine.
These days, they are assembled in the Volga-region Russian city of Yelabuga and undergo constant modifications to make them faster, smarter and deadlier during each air raid that involves hundreds of drones.
Their latest Russian versions shot down in Ukraine earlier this month have artificial intelligence modules to better recognise targets, video cameras and two-way radio communication with human operators.
'The word 'Shahed' will forever be cursed in Ukrainian next to 'Moscow' and 'Putin',' said Denys Kovalenko, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Kovalenko's face and arms were cut by glass shards after a Shahed exploded above his northern Kyiv neighbourhood in 2023.
Shaheds are the most visible and audible part of the military alliance between Moscow and Tehran that is being tested this month amid attacks by Israel and the United States on Iran.
Other aspects of the alliance that affect the Russia-Ukraine war include Iranian-made ammunition, helmets, and flak jackets, according to Nikita Smagin, an author and expert on Russia-Iran relations.
However, the year 2022, when Putin started the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, was the 'peak of Iran's significance for Russia as a military partner', Smagin told Al Jazeera.
The Kremlin has invested tens of billions of dollars into its military-industrial complex and shadow systems to supply chips, machine tools and dual-purpose goods for its weapons that bypass Western sanctions.
The flow of military technologies usually went the other way as Moscow supplied advanced air defence systems, missiles and warplanes to Tehran, keeping Israel worried.
In 2009, then-Israeli President Shimon Peres told this reporter in Moscow that his visit was aimed at convincing the Kremlin to 'reconsider' the sale of S-300 surface-to-air missiles to Tehran.
Russia's advanced Su-35 jets were supposed to be delivered to Tehran earlier this year, but were not seen in the Iranian sky.
Washington's arms supplies to Israel have already affected Kyiv's ability to withstand Russia's air raids and slow advance on the ground.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on June 9 that the White House decided to divert 20,000 anti-drone missiles earmarked for Kyiv.
'Without the help of the United States, we'll have more losses,' Zelenskyy said in televised remarks.
More Ukraine-bound military aid may now be diverted to Israel, and the Kremlin 'counts on this scenario', analyst Smagin said.
This possible diversion already alarms Ukraine's top brass.
Arms that were 'made for Ukraine will go to the Middle, so there are no illusions about it', Lieutenant General Ihor Romanenko, former deputy head of Ukraine's general staff of armed forces, told Al Jazeera.
There should be no illusions about Russia's ability to protect Iran, he said.
Even though Moscow and Tehran hail their strategic partnership, it does not envisage a mutual defence clause.
Therefore, the Kremlin will hardly be able to commit to military action similar to the Russian air raids against Syria's then-opposition to support then-President Bashar al-Assad's faltering regime, he said.
'They won't change anything significantly,' Romanenko said. 'But they will have enough for arms supplies.'
Any arms supplies may, however, enrage US President Donald Trump, who has so far showed unusual leniency towards Moscow's actions in Ukraine as his administration botched peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv.
Moscow's condemnation of Israeli and US strikes on Iran evoked a sense of hypocrisy, some observers said, as Russia's description of the attacks sounded familiar.
'No matter what arguments are used to justify an irresponsible decision to subject a sovereign state's territory to missile and bomb strikes, [the decision] rudely violates international law, the United Nations charter and the resolutions of the UN Security Council,' Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on Sunday.
'Moscow and Iran compete for China's market'
There is an area where Russia and Iran compete for multibillion-dollar oil trade profits that keep their sanctions-hobbled economies afloat.
'Moscow and Iran compete for China's market, and China will respectively have to buy more Russian oil at a higher price,' Smagin said.
A third of global oil exports go through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow channel between Iran and Oman that is fully controlled by Tehran's 'mosquito fleet' of tiny warships.
Crude prices will skyrocket worldwide if Tehran opts to close the strait to tankers. It would also strike a financial bonanza for Russia that could further finance the war in Ukraine.
And as Moscow's war in Ukraine consumes most of Russia's resources, its reputation in the Middle East will suffer.
'Reputation-wise, Russia suffers huge losses as it risks not to be seen as a great power in the Middle East,' Smagin said.
If Tehran rejects Trump's 'ultimate ultimatum' to work out a peace deal, Washington's attention to Iran and Israel may spell disaster for Kyiv.
'Undoubtedly, the US's refocusing on the Middle East and Iran is a geopolitical catastrophe for us; there's nothing to argue about,' Kyiv-based analyst Aleksey Kuschch told Al Jazeera.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
26 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
What to know about the US's Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar after Iran's attack
Iran has responded to the United States' direct involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict by targeting its military assets in the Middle East. On Monday, Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, announced that bases used by US forces 'in the region or elsewhere' could be attacked in retaliation for US attacks on Iran's underground nuclear sites the previous day. Later that evening, explosions were heard over Qatar's capital, Doha, as Iran attacked Al Udeid Air Base, the largest US military base in the Middle East. Here's everything you need to know about Al Udeid: What is Al Udeid? Gas-rich Qatar, which lies 190km (120 miles) south of Iran across the Gulf, is home to the US's largest military base in the region, Al Udeid. The 24-hectare (60-acre) base, in the desert outside the capital Doha, was set up in 1996 and is the forward headquarters for US Central Command, which directs US military operations in a huge swathe of territory stretching from Egypt in the west to Kazakhstan in the east. It houses the Qatar Emiri Air Force, the US Air Force, the United Kingdom's Royal Air Force, and other foreign forces. It houses around 10,000 troops. Earlier this year, The Hill, a Washington, DC-based newspaper, reported that Al Udeid's 'long, well-maintained runways enable rapid deployment, making it a critical component of US force projection'. The Hill also reported that Qatar's investment in Al Udeid has kept it 'at the forefront of military readiness while saving US taxpayers billions of dollars'. Over the years, it said, Qatar had spent more than $8bn upgrading infrastructure. The base has played a central role in air campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, and in humanitarian missions, including the 2021 evacuation of Kabul. Why is it in the news? On Monday, Qatar's Foreign Ministry announced it had temporarily closed its airspace amid threats of Iranian retaliation. 'The competent authorities announce the temporary suspension of air traffic in the country's airspace, as part of a set of precautionary measures taken based on developments in the region,' the ministry said. The closure came several hours after the US and UK embassies urged their citizens in Qatar to shelter in place out of what it said was 'an abundance of caution'. Later, news agency Reuters cited a Western diplomat as saying there had been a credible Iranian threat against Al Udeid since noon on Monday. That evening, Qatar's Defence Minister, cited by Al Jazeera, said the country's air defences had intercepted missiles directed at Al Udeid. Was Al Udeid prepared for the attack? Before targeting Iran's nuclear sites, it appears that the US started taking precautionary measures. As US President Donald Trump mulled direct involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict, news agency AFP reported that dozens of US military aircraft were no longer on the tarmac at the air base, basing its assessment on satellite images published by Planet Labs PBC. Nearly 40 military aircraft – including transport planes like the Hercules C-130 and reconnaissance aircraft – were parked on the tarmac at the base, the regional headquarters of the Pentagon's Central Command, on June 5. But in an image taken on June 19, only three aircraft were visible. One US official who spoke to Reuters said aircraft that were not in hardened shelters had been moved from Al Udeid base. Additionally, he said US Navy vessels had been moved from a port in Bahrain, where the US military's 5th fleet is located. 'It is not an uncommon practice,' the official said. 'Force protection is the priority.' Was Al Udeid involved in US attacks on nuclear sites? No. Prior to the US attack on nuclear sites on Sunday, it was reported that B-2 bombers were heading to Guam – a ruse, as it turned out. As all eyes looked West, seven B-2 stealth bombers took off from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri in the US at 00:01 EDT (04:01 GMT), according to the Pentagon. The top-secret flights flew straight over the Atlantic to Iran. None of the US bases in the Middle East were deployed in the US offensive on Iran. How has Qatar responded to the attack on Al Udeid? Qatar condemned the attack on the air base, calling it a 'flagrant violation' of its sovereignty. 'We express the State of Qatar's strong condemnation of the attack on Al Udeid Air Base by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, and consider it a flagrant violation of the State of Qatar's sovereignty and airspace, as well as of international law,' Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed Al-Ansari said in a statement. Iran and Qatar enjoy fraternal diplomatic relations. Qatar has condemned the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites.


Al Jazeera
41 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump's budget demands, Iran to split NATO summit focus
As NATO leaders prepare to gather in The Hague on Tuesday, efforts to satisfy United States President Donald Trump's call for a big new defence spending goal may be overshadowed by the repercussions of US military strikes on Iran. Trump has demanded that NATO allies commit to spending 5 percent of their gross domestic product (GDP) on defence at their two-day gathering, starting on Tuesday. The summit is also intended to signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that NATO is united, despite Trump's previous criticism of the alliance, and determined to expand and upgrade its defences to deter any attack from Moscow. On Monday, NATO chief Mark Rutte said the new defence spending pledge to be announced at the summit is fundamental for ensuring that the alliance can deter Russia. 'The defence investment plan that allies will agree in The Hague introduces a new baseline, 5 percent of GDP to be invested in defence,' Rutte said. 'This is a quantum leap that is ambitious, historic and fundamental to securing our future.' The US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend, however, makes the summit much less predictable than Rutte – a former prime minister of the Netherlands hosting the gathering in his home city – and other NATO member countries would like. In 2003, the US-led war on Iraq deeply divided NATO, as France and Germany led opposition to the attack, while Britain and Spain joined the coalition. European allies and Canada also want Ukraine to be at the top of the summit agenda, but they are wary that Trump might not want President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to steal the limelight. Iran adds uncertainty Much will depend on the precise situation in the Middle East when the summit takes place – such as whether Iran has retaliated against the US – and whether other NATO leaders address the strikes with Trump or in comments to reporters. On Monday, Rutte told reporters the strikes on Iran over the weekend did not violate international law. Al Jazeera's Kimberly Halkett said that currently, European leaders are focused on diplomacy as the path towards de-escalation and limiting Iran from having nuclear weapons. However, an escalation in fighting, including Iran's targeting of a US military base in Qatar on Monday, makes diplomacy more difficult. 'Given the escalation that has taken place in recent days, that is a task that has become much more challenging to accomplish, which is why this meeting [at the NATO summit] has become so much more critical,' Halkett reported from Washington, DC. Speaking from The Hague, Al Jazeera's Hashem Ahelbarra said Rutte's view is that consensus among NATO allies is almost universal: 'Blaming the Iranians for failing to come forward in the past and negotiate a way out with the international community and with the IAEA.' A dangerous moment for NATO If the meeting does not go to plan, NATO risks appearing weak and divided, just as its European members see Russia as at its most dangerous since the end of the Cold War and are bracing for possible US troop cuts on the continent. On Monday, Putin dismissed NATO claims that Russia could one day attack a member of the alliance as lies that Western powers use to justify vast military spending. Under the new NATO defence spending plan, countries would spend 3.5 percent of GDP on 'core defence' – such as weapons, troops – and a further 1.5 percent on security-related investments such as adapting roads, ports and bridges for use by military vehicles, protecting pipelines and deterring cyberattacks. Such an increase – to be phased in over 10 years – would mean hundreds of billions of dollars more spending on defence. 'The reason they're doing this is so when Trump comes to the Hague, they'll tell him: Listen, we've been listening to your concerns, therefore, we're from now onwards committed to the 5 percent benchmark you have been talking about in the past,' said Ahelberra. Trump has long insisted it is time for Europeans to take on more of the financial and military burden of defending their continent. Rutte said Monday that Spain had not been granted an 'opt-out' from the pledge, despite Madrid claiming it had agreed it would not have to reach the headline figure of 5 percent. Last year, alliance members collectively spent about 2.6 percent of NATO GDP on core defence, amounting to about $1.3 trillion, according to NATO estimates. The lion's share came from the US, which spent almost $818bn. European Union leaders, said Ahelberra, 'want to convince Trump that NATO is taking into account his demands, but they're looking forward to being able to convince Trump to continue to team up with the military allies for the sake of tackling many issues … particularly Ukraine.' 'They don't want the Americans to abandon the Ukrainians. They don't want to see the Americans negotiate a settlement with Putin without taking into account the real concerns of Ukraine,' he added.


Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
After Donald Trump bombs Iran, what comes next?
The US has bombed nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. Meanwhile in Washington, political parties are divided about President Donald Trump's decision to strike. What could be next in what many fear to be a regional war?