'I have little sympathy for the lenders - where was the car finance value for consumers?'
Fast forward several years to where Rushby set up car finance app Carmoola to help consumers and get rid the "horrendous" commissions which could see millions owed compensation following the motor loan mis-selling scandal.
'There is something about serving and helping people,' says Rushby, co-founder and CEO of the fintech start-up. It's about delivering value for consumers so they can get a great product and ultimately you can drive a great business. I love seeing customers' reactions to the product.'
Read More: I ditched waking up before 5am every day to grow my luxury bedding brand
Rushby knew he was on to something when his mother-in-law understood the concept of Carmoula when he pitched it to her, ahead of launching the company in late 2022.
Carmoola has since processed around four million loan applications in the three years since the app first came to market — and acquired total funding to the tune of £146m.
Before car financing came car washing when he set up his first business as a 15-year-old. He later set up his own motor racing team, made websites at university selling T-shirts before working in property and 'being out and about' in Bristol.
In 2013, Rushby started to think about digitising the rental experience and set up his first business venture, Movebubble, which lasted seven years. 'It was painful and I made so many mistakes,' he admits.
'I had a fair amount of childhood trauma and I was in this loop of failing. I was quite persistent and kept on trying to raise money to keep it going.
'It's not a great place as an entrepreneur to fear failure as you really need to embrace it. I wasn't scared of taking risks, I was more scared of how others would perceive it if it didn't work.'
Rushby, who has dyslexia, stepped away as CEO in 2021 and sensed an opportunity in the car finance market after mulling consumer business ideas in the mortgage and investment space.
He tested demand with a basic landing page website under a different brand name. Within a few hours, there were hundreds of sign ups for the product offering and it gave Rushby confidence to drive the business forwards.
'I saw that consumers were being ripped off by all these traditional lenders where they were paying the dealerships massive commissions and raking up the APRs,' he says. 'I thought there was a big opportunity to go direct to the consumer and deliver a modern fintech product experience.'
Read More: 'In our workplace, we look for passionate, slightly unhinged mountain climbers'
There were still stumbling blocks ahead of launch as investors began to ask questions after regulatory approval took six months longer than expected.
Carmoola received the green light in the same week that Russia's invasion of Ukraine escalated. With two of Rushby's co-founders and engineers hailing from Ukraine, there was a frantic move to make the border crossing to Poland before it closed a few hours later.
Of Carmoola's 50 staff, half are engineers now based in Warsaw and the rest housed at the firm's Primrose Hill headquarters in London. A revenue run rate is closing in on £20m, with Carmoola growing at 150% year-on-year.
Its customer support team is employed directly and based in the UK, with Rushby noting that salaries are paid above market average in a bid to be pivotal, on-hand support to its customers.
'Consumers are trusting Carmoola with a very big purchase, probably the most important purchase after their home,' he says.
'It's an incredibly stressful time for those people who can't pay their car loan. They need professionals who can help them on that journey during periods if they lose their job or something happens in the family.'
Rushby is also eyeing the looming Supreme Court ruling which could see payouts for millions of drivers after dealerships increased commission without being disclosed to consumers.
The Financial Conduct Authority could then set up a redress scheme for lenders to compensate consumers, while payouts could take up from six months up to one year.
'It was one reason why Carmoola was created, to get rid of the horrendous commissions,' says Rushby.
'These people [lenders] were well aware of what they were doing in terms of ripping the consumer off. I have little sympathy. The traditional process was so opaque and they were acting for their own pockets. Where was the delivery of value to the consumer?'
Read More: 'I returned to my old office to sell ties after being made redundant'
Carmoola's next port of call is to build out financial products centred around the vehicle by launching a leasing-style PCP product as well as car insurance. New markets' expansion outside of the UK will also be explored.
One senses that with the plentiful hurdles that Rushby has overcome during his career, both privately and in business, the entrepreneur relishes opportunities to solve them. Sure enough, as a founder he admits this to being 'super fun'.
'The more scary it is, the better sometimes,' he adds. 'It's a fun intellectual challenge of how to fix these things.'
View from the top: how to build a successful start-up
Go with your own gut
Don't look for other people to give you advice. You have to make the decisions and they come from listening to other people. Very few people have the context that you are trying to solve, so you have to form your own judgement and be disciplined as an entrepreneur.
Writing a journal is powerful
I write a CEO report outlining what we are doing at strategic and operational levels. It's a powerful tool to look back over time in how I was thinking at the time and whether it played out.
Show value proposition
To show real understanding, are you able to communicate that to somebody who has no idea? Do they get it and does it make sense to them? I pitched Carmoola to my mother-in-law and she got it straight away. I wouldn't say that is the golden rule but it is a useful way of articulating whether the business model makes sense.
A step by step process
This gave me a high level of confidence to make sure it would work after the lessons from my first business. What is the real size of the market? How is revenue generated and how many people are likely to use the product? How cost effective is it to acquire the customers in this space? Then it's how to generate revenue and what the unit economics look like for the product. I forecast all of that before we even started.
The real thinking
From here, it is whether you are confident in acquiring these customers, what the competition is going to do and if they can stop you; to how much time you have got to really make it fly and the key elements of what you need to deliver on so that they can't copy you.
Read more:
'I returned to my old office to sell ties after being made redundant'
'In our workplace, we look for passionate, slightly unhinged mountain climbers'
Britain's 'king of billboards' who sold his business for £1bn
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Entrepreneur
30 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
4 Signs It's Time to Abandon Your Patent
How to make smart, strategic calls on when to abandon patents — and why doing so is essential to long-term innovation and budget health Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Patents are often filed early, before a startup knows what the market really wants. That's smart, but it comes with a challenge: Not every idea turns out to be worth protecting. Markets shift. Products pivot. And eventually, founders ask: Should we keep paying for this patent or cut our losses? It's a tough call. Abandoning a patent midway can feel like giving up. But continuing just because you've already spent money? That's the sunk cost trap, and it quietly drains your budget. Many startups keep prosecuting every idea, paying rejections, annuities and attorney fees. But a smart IP strategy means knowing what to keep and what to walk away from. Here's how to make that call strategically. Related: How to Identify the Patent-Worthy Innovations in Your Business Built-in checkpoints in patent lifecycle — use them Roughly, you can split a patent's entire lifecycle cost into three parts. The first third goes to drafting the application, another third is for arguing the patent through issuance, and the final third covers patent maintenance fees for the next 20+ years. In a way, these financial checkpoints are decision checkpoints, too. When drafting, consider whether the invention aligns with your core business or is just a side experiment that may never get to market. During prosecution, evaluate whether it's still worth the legal wrangling, as each round of argument is costly. And when renewal fees come due, ask if the patent still supports your product, blocks competitors or adds leverage against others in the market. Unfortunately, many startups treat these pivotal stages as administrative formalities. Instead of evaluating whether continued investment is justified at each stage, many companies default to pushing forward — whether by extending prosecution unnecessarily, filing continuations without a clear purpose, or simply paying maintenance fees — without assessing strategic alignment. That's how portfolios get bloated with low-impact patents. The only solution here is patent pruning: Abandon some patent filings at the right checkpoints. Related: Don't Let Patent Costs Crush Your Startup — Here's How to Protect Your IP Without Breaking the Bank What are the signs that it's time to abandon a patent? Every dollar spent defending or maintaining a weak patent is a dollar not spent protecting something truly valuable. Therefore, you must look for the signs at different checkpoints to spot a patent to discard. Here are some signs to look for: 1. No market validation A patent is only valuable if the protected product actually sells. If your invention fails to gain customer traction, the patent will be a failure. Experts emphasize focusing on "high-impact" problems with real demand. Without that market pull, even a granted patent is a dead weight. For example, Google Glass — once hyped as the future of AR eyewear — never found a viable consumer market. It was pulled from sale in 2015 (and again in 2023) due to poor adoption, illustrating how patents tied to unvalidated products offer no return. 2. Shifting industry direction Industries evolve, and a patent can lose value if the tech horizon moves on. In practice, companies are advised to ask whether their invention still aligns with "the target industry and market." If adjacent innovations eclipse your solution (for example, cloud services replacing old networking hardware), the patent's relevance vanishes. In that scenario, it makes little sense to keep paying maintenance fees. Better to refocus on protections for innovations that fit the new direction of your field. 3. Prior art kills the novelty Sometimes, what initially feels like a breakthrough ends up being something others have already attempted or fully disclosed. If prior art eclipses your claims, the chances of securing meaningful protection drop significantly. At that point, even if you receive a patent, it may be so narrow that it offers little real-world value. Continuing to prosecute a case like this can quickly become a drain on time and legal budget. 4. Weak business use case Every patent in your portfolio should earn its keep through business impact or the potential to do so on your current roadmap. If it's not protecting a revenue-generating product, blocking a competitor or supporting licensing efforts, its value is questionable. Startups often hang on to patents without a clear path to monetization or strategic use. But unless a patent strengthens your market position or serves a legal or commercial purpose, it's just another expense on the books. To actively prune your patent portfolio, just looking for signs isn't enough. As the portfolio grows, you need a deliberate, repeatable process for patent abandonment assessment. Build a patent pruning system: Health checks and ranking framework An effective patent pruning system should take two things into consideration: 1) lifecycle stage and 2) multiple perspectives. For the first one, you want to start by ranking each patent across key lifecycle stages: At the idea stage : Is this innovation aligned with your product roadmap or market differentiation? Post-filing : Has the landscape shifted? Is the application still strategically relevant? Pre-renewal: Is the granted patent still supporting revenue, blocking competitors or enhancing leverage? The higher a patent scores at a certain stage, the more you want to invest in it. Please note that not only your legal counsel team but also others, such as product, technology, marketing and finance, must contribute to this ranking system, as pruning cannot be undone. The goal is to ensure that patents are evaluated through a business lens, not just a legal one. Consider using patent management tools that provide full portfolio visibility and enable seamless collaboration as part of your patent pruning process. Related: 4 Surprising Patent Myths That Could Cost You Big — What You Need to Know Now Pruning a patent portfolio isn't just about saving money; it's about fueling what's next with the reclaimed budget. In 2020, IBM stepped back from chasing patent volume. "We're no longer pursuing patent leadership," they said. "We're being more selective." The result? Fewer filings, stronger focus and more investment in high-growth areas like AI and quantum computing. That's the lesson: Pruning isn't cutting back. It's reallocating toward where your business is growing. Because IP should follow your future, not fund your past.


Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Sustainable Funds Rebound With Global Inflows of $4.9 Billion
The global market for sustainable funds recovered in the second quarter after posting record-high redemptions during the first three months of the year, according to an analysis by Morningstar Inc. Against a backdrop of 'ESG backlash and volatility sparked by geopolitical tensions and US tariffs, the picture for ESG funds improved last quarter,' led by investments in European-based offerings, said Hortense Bioy, head of sustainable investing research at Morningstar Sustainalytics.

Wall Street Journal
31 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
KKR Faces EU Probe Into Information Provided in $26 Billion NetCo Acquisition
The European Union opened an investigation into whether KKR KKR 1.62%increase; green up pointing triangle supplied the block's merger regulator with false or misleading information before the investment firm's multibillion-dollar purchase of Telecom Italia TIT 0.72%increase; green up pointing triangle unit NetCo was unconditionally cleared by officials last year. The European Commission approved the companies' deal in May 2024, initially ruling that KKR's bid to snap up Telecom Italia's broadband network assets for up to 22 billion euros ($25.90 billion) wouldn't affect competition in Europe. The watchdog had said the merged company wouldn't be able to deteriorate the conditions for rivals' access to services due to long-term agreements that FiberCop—a joint venture between Telecom Italia and KKR—held with several companies.