GPs Voice Top 10 AI Concerns
The MPS told Medscape News UK that all AI-themed queries came from GPs. No questions were raised by secondary care doctors.
Key Concerns Identified
The assessment revealed 10 main areas of concern for GPs:
Patient safety
Data protection
Patient consent
Liability
Indemnity
Transcribing tools
Generation of fit notes
Clinical prompts
Processing of laboratory results
Generative AI
GPs Wary of AI Risks
Medicolegal advice on these themes has been published on the MPS website.
"We know members are keen to explore and adopt AI tools, which may enhance patient care and help to facilitate more efficient working," Dr Ben White, MPS deputy medical director, said in a press release.
However, calls to the medicolegal advice line showed members were wary of potential risks.
Particular concerns included liability and defence society cover, safety for patients, data protection, and patient consent. Such concerns echo a survey by Medscape last year which found that one in five respondents were apprehensive about using AI in clinical practice.
More specific advice was sought on the medicolegal implications of using AI software for transcribing patient consultations, generating fit-to-fly letters or fit notes, using clinical prompts, and processing laboratory results.
"AI is of course fast-evolving, and we will continue to revisit the guidance," White said.
The MPS Foundation has contributed to a white paper on AI in healthcare , aimed at ensuring AI tools are developed and integrated to be usable, useful, and safe for both patients and clinicians.
"Bringing about greater confidence in AI among clinicians is vital if the potential benefits are to be unlocked," White said.
Doctors Support AI But Remain Concerned
Nell Thornton, improvement fellow at the Health Foundation, said the MPS findings echoed the foundation's own research.
"If AI is to help fulfil its promise to improve patient care, further clarification is needed on issues like regulation and professional liability," she told Medscape News UK .
Doctors are keen to ensure that the human dimension of care is protected in an increasingly digitised system, she added. "Addressing these issues will be crucial for ensuring the development and adoption of AI is responsible and works for everyone."
Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners, told Medscape News UK that the college was "always open to introducing new technologies that can improve the experience of patients – and GPs are often at the forefront of this". However, AI use is "not without potential risks" and its implementation "must be closely regulated to guarantee patient safety and the security of their data".
"Technology will always need to work alongside and complement the work of doctors and other healthcare professionals, and it can never be seen as a replacement for the expertise of a qualified medical professional," Hawthorne emphasised. "Clearly there is big potential for the use of AI in general practice, but it's vital that it is carefully implemented and closely regulated in the interest of patient safety."
Consultation Summaries Show Promise and Peril
Dr Rosie Shire from the Doctors' Association UK GP committee told Medscape News UK : "As more AI tools become available, the possibilities of how they could assist GPs grows, but so do the concerns, as highlighted by the MPS."
The idea of AI software providing a summary of a GP consultation was "very appealing", she said. It could enable GPs to focus fully on the patient rather than taking notes, which could improve communication and patient satisfaction, and save time on recall and typing up notes.
"However, it's vital software is accurate and reliable, able to distinguish who is speaking, and understands accents and dialects,' Shire stressed. 'Otherwise it could lead to increased workload, as GPs spend additional time checking the AI has performed correctly."
AI Can't Replace 'Gut Feeling'
There is potential for inaccuracies being introduced into patient records if clinicians become over-reliant on AI records of consultations, Shire said.
In time-pressured clinics, GPs might not read through AI summaries.
"It's important clinicians are given time to review and confirm any AI-generated outcome to ensure accuracy. We also need to remember that AI can't replace that gut feeling you occasionally get as a GP when you see a patient you know, and feel that something just isn't right,' she added.
Liability Questions Remain
Shire said that a standard policy on AI use in general practice was needed. Clarity is also required over who would be responsible if AI software malfunctioned and led to patient harm.
"Would it be the practice partners, as the data owners, the GP who saw the patient, or the AI software provider?"
White said the MPS would not normally provide indemnity for issues relating to AI software failure. While the society is not currently aware of any binding case law, "we would expect the designers or producers of the AI software to be liable for any issues relating to the failure of the AI software'.
Where a practice has purchased an AI system, the individual GP using it would remain potentially liable for any harm that results from its use.
"Doctors remain responsible for the decisions they make whilst using such technology,' he said. 'In order to mitigate the risk of a complaint or claim, doctors should assure themselves that any system they are using is fit for purpose and appropriate for the patients that they are seeing."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
First impressions of Alexa+, Amazon's upgraded, AI-powered digital assistant
I owned a lot of Alexa-powered devices in my former home: There were Amazon Echos in most rooms, including an older Echo Plus in the living room, a smattering of Dots, a Spot in a bedroom, and an Echo Show in the kitchen. A Fire TV ran in the bedroom. And, in a drawer, a rarely used Fire HD tablet sat collecting dust. With the total loss of the home due to a March 2024 house fire, there also came a new opportunity: We could now make a fresh start to create a more modernized smart home after rebuilding our house. But whether Alexa still deserves to be the center of our connected home remains to be seen. To find out whether Alexa is still the best smart assistant for my family, I'm going to test Amazon's AI-powered devices, experiment with AI queries, and write out my thoughts in a multi-part series. With this series, I hope to offer consumers insights as to how well Alexa works in various real-world situations, not company demos. Alexa needed to catch up Amazon's assistant, which once gave its users Star Trek vibes as they ordered their home computer to close the blinds or turn off the lights or order milk, no longer seemed as revolutionary in the ChatGPT era. Today, people can engage with AI via text and voice chat. Modern AI chatbots and AI-powered services can answer so many more questions, are imaginative, can reason, can create images and art, generate videos, and, with the agentic AI, they can even perform online tasks on your behalf. In February 2025, Amazon announced a complete makeover of its digital voice assistant with the arrival of Alexa+, powered by generative AI. That service began rolling out slowly to customers in March and is now available to 'many millions' of users, Amazon says. The system is also model-agnostic, meaning Alexa+ can use whatever it needs in the moment to answer the question or complete the task. Alexa+ is using models from Anthropic and Amazon Nova, among others. The company teased that this improved Alexa could do more than set timers and alarms, control smart home devices, and answer questions. It leverages generative AI to make sense of information stored in Amazon users' accounts, understand their schedules, and their preferences. It can remember things, process files, and summarize a Ring camera's footage. Notably, Amazon says it's been working with partners to allow it to take actions for people, like booking dinner reservations or Uber rides, or buying concert tickets. Integrations with Amazon's own grocery service could also have it make shopping lists by speaking to it, and then have those products delivered. Essentially, it's aiming to bring agentic AI into the home. But before we can get to that, let's see how Alexa+ handles the basics. In the first part of this series, I'm going to set up Alexa+, use the app, and ask the assistant some questions that only the new Alexa+ can do. Later, I'll test the agentic AI features and smart home integrations. Setting up Alexa+ on an Echo Spot Device: Echo SpotDefault music service: Spotify (Premium) Before moving to my new home, I put Alexa+ to the test on a brand-new Echo Spot after being accepted into the beta. Since I couldn't yet hook up smart home devices in the Airbnb that's served as a temporary residence for over a year, I initially tried to test the device's AI in other ways. Mainly, I wanted to know if Alexa+ was really all that smart and useful, and if she could do all the things Amazon promised. Setting up the Spot was easier than it was with past devices, as now you only needed to scan a QR code to get the process started in the Alexa app. The app connected automatically to the home's Wi-Fi; no more weird toggling between the device's network and your own Wi-Fi. On the next screen, I accepted the invite to upgrade to the new Alexa+ for free, knowing that it's still possible to downgrade to the old Alexa service at any time, if things go wrong. Onboarding included a short video that explained that Alexa would learn more as I use it, and instructed me on how to talk to Alexa. I then connected my Google account, giving Alexa access to my inbox and calendar. I ended up on a blank page after doing so, oddly, but after closing the window, the screen informed me that my 'Account Linked.' (Disclosure: I am running the iOS 26 developer beta on my iPhone, so maybe that's the problem?) On the following screen, I picked the services I wanted to use with Alexa+, which today include OpenTable, Ticketmaster, Uber, and Thumbtack. I checked all the boxes, then moved to the following screen to grant the necessary permissions, one by one. While it's a bit tedious to do so — and something that could be even more tedious in time as more services are added — I did appreciate that it felt like I was in control of the data sharing and could see exactly what each service was requesting before agreeing. The following screen confirmed that Fodor's travel planning service was already integrated with Alexa+, but it didn't require permissions. It also noted that services like Uber Eats, Grubhub, and Vagaro would be added later on. The Alexa app itself is still sorely lacking in user interface design. Despite many updates, the app still feels somehow both plain and too busy. It lacks color and traditional mobile app navigation patterns, and it tries to cram too many examples of 'things to do' on its home screen. Meanwhile, trying to locate how to do the necessary first steps — like linking my preferred music service — is buried in the interface. Nope, you don't tap on your profile icon, Settings, and then scroll down to 'Preferred service providers.' For some reason, that's where you set your preferred News, Calendar, and Email providers, but not your preferred Music service. Instead, you tap on the hamburger menu at the bottom of the screen. You then tap on the 'Music & More' screen. (What's the More? Podcasts? Audiobooks?) I set Spotify as my default music service, the default choice for artists and genre stations, and the default for podcasts. There was no option to set my default audiobooks service. In this section, there was also a list of services I had previously linked with Alexa. Here, Amazon's Audible — which I would prefer to set as the default for audiobooks — was listed alongside other streamers, like Pandora, Amazon Music, Apple Music, and others. But when I tapped on Audible, I simply got an error that says 'You've reached the end of Alexa's knowledge. Just kidding. This skill no longer exists. Click here to go back.' Uh, OK. I mean, would it not make sense to just remove the broken thing that no longer exists? In any event, I'm here to try Alexa+, not yell at a poorly designed mobile app. I'll figure out audiobooks later, I guess. Note for this series: In these tests, I may have shared personal information with Alexa that I will not be publishing. In those cases, I will put a description of the item — like 'child's school' — in [brackets]. I have also slightly changed some of the dates, times, and numbers to further obscure any personal information that could be used to develop an understanding of my accounts, meetings, or household routines. Can Alexa+ manage the family's schedule? Busy households, especially ones with kids, often use a family calendar to track activities, doctor's appointments, errands, meetings, classes, and more. Our family calendar is maintained in Google Calendar, accessed on our phones through the native Google Calendar app, and on Mac desktops via the calendar app Fantastical. Amazon suggests that Alexa+ can help summarize your day, add new events to your calendar, identify conflicts, and more. In practice, Alexa was fairly adept at letting me inquire about the schedule and various events, but it interrupted me when I was asking to add a new meeting to my calendar. I said, 'Can you add a meeting to my calendar on August 6 at 2 p.m. with [entity] about …' Here she cut me off to ask, 'What would you like to title this meeting?' Annoying, but not end-of-the-world terrible, I suppose. I was more easily able to ask things like 'What's on my calendar today?' and follow up to ask further questions — like if there were any meetings later in the week or to repeat one of the appointments. I didn't have to say 'Alexa' again to continue the conversation. It felt more natural, but there's a very slight lag with her responses at times. (As an aside, when I went to find the history of my voice chats for writing this post, I asked Alexa where they could be found. She told me to look in the app's Settings under the More menu, then look for Alexa Privacy or Review Voice History. She's wrong. Neither option was there. I did, however, find my history from the 'Recent Chats' link on the app's home screen. Alexa, c'mon! Know thyself.) Alexa, remember this Another thing Alexa+ is supposed to be able to do is store information on your behalf. To test this out, I asked her to remember my frequent flier number. This interaction went poorly. Me: Alexa, can you remember my Delta SkyMiles number? Alexa: Sure, I'd be happy to remember your Delta SkyMiles number for you. What's the number? Me: *opens mouth to speak* Alexa: I've added that to Remember This in the Alexa privacy section of the app. Also, keep in my that anyone who has access to any of your Alexa devices can use their voice to hear its contents. Um, what? I tried again. Me: Alexa, can you remember my SkyMiles number? Alexa: Certainly! I'd be happy to remember your SkyMiles number for you. What's the number? OK, saved it. She didn't even take a breath! Curious, I asked her what she thinks the number is. She responded, 'I don't have your SkyMiles number saved yet. Would you like to tell me your number now?' Me: Yes. Alexa: OK, go ahead and tell me your Delta SkyMiles number. Me: [says the 8-digit number] Alexa: OK, saved it. Me: What's my SkyMiles number? Alexa: 'Six hundred fifty-two million, four hundred eighty-six thousand…' (Note: I changed the number for the purpose of this post, but yes, Alexa read it out like a long numeral instead of just saying 6-5-2-4-8-6, etc. Not helpful!) Alexa, read my email Alexa+ can now supposedly understand documents you upload in the Alexa app or forward to her at alexa@ using the email address associated with your Amazon account. To try this, I forwarded an email from my child's school. These come frequently and have a lot of useful information in them, but are often lost in the inbox. Perhaps if Alexa can handle this task, a new Gmail forwarding filter is in order? Me: Alexa, summarize the recent email from school. Alexa: The recent email from [my child's school] is a welcome-back letter for the 2025-2026 school year. It announces an 'Early Start Day' orientation on August [date] for new students, with an information session for new parents that evening. Regular classes begin on August [date]. Me: Was there any information specifically for [grade] in that email? Alexa: I don't see any information specifically for [grade] in that email. The letter mainly covers general school information, orientation dates, and important deadlines for all students. Great, that worked, it seems. But here's where things got a little trickier. Me: Are there any important dates I should add to my calendar? Alexa: *repeats the important dates from above* Me: Can you add those to my calendar for me? Alexa: (Who must have misheard me?) Checking your calendar. Sarah, your calendar is looking busy. You have [activity] ongoing until August 16th, you have [activity]. On Thursday, … Me: (interrupting) I was asking if you could add the dates in the email to my calendar for me? Alexa: Certainly, I'll do that. (Pause) I've added the following dates to your calendar: Is there anything else you'd like me to add? While this process seems efficient and is certainly helpful in a pinch, you'll notice I left it up to Alexa to determine which dates were 'important.' As a result, she picked the three dates closest to today. The email itself, however, contained a list of 12 important school dates, including things like Meet the Teacher Night, Open House, Midyear Graduation, and more. All of them were formatted the same way in the email under the heading 'Important Dates.' Had I only relied on Alexa and had not read the email itself, I would have missed these. Oh, dear. Alexa, help me save money Another Alexa+ promise is that she can help you track prices on Amazon so you can save money when things go on sale. Alright, I'll bite! I like online shopping. I decided to try tracking a couple of things, including one skin care item and a Coach handbag. These are things I definitely don't need, but want — the kinds of things where a discount could prompt a purchase. Me: Alexa, I want to know when the Glow Recipe Plum Plumping and Hydrating Hyaluronic Acid Skin Care Serum goes on sale. Alexa: Just a second … I've set up a deal tracker for the Glow Recipe Plum Plumping Serum. I'll notify you when it goes on sale. Me: How much is it right now? Alexa: *silence* Me: Did you hear me? Alexa: Checking on that. Yes, I heard you. I've already set up a deal tracker for the Glow Recipe Plum Plumping Serum. You'll get a notification when it goes on sale. Me: How much is it now? Alexa: *More silence.* OK, I guess we'll wait on that one. Next up, I tried the handbag. Me: Alexa, I want to know when the Coach Swinger handbag goes on sale. Alexa: Certainly, I'll check that. Got it! I set up a deal tracker for the Coach Swinger handbag. I'll let you know when it goes on sale. Me: Is it out of stock in blue? Alexa: *Silence* Me: Is the Coach handbag I just asked you about out of stock in blue? (Note: it was, per Amazon's website at the time of the request.) Alexa: Let me check that for you. (Long pause) I found the Coach Swinger handbag, but it's currently available in black. The blue option isn't showing up in the search results, which might mean it's out of stock. Would you like more details about the available options? Me: No. The Coach Swinger handbag in blue does show up on the product page on the web, for what it's worth; it's listed as 'temporarily out of stock.' The bag is also available in both black and red, but Alexa only mentioned the black option for some reason. Not super helpful. And we'll have to wait to see if it ever goes on sale. Off to a slow start With these first introductory tests, Alexa+ seems very much like a beta product. She's trying but is prone to making mistakes and not being thorough. Sometimes, she doesn't even seem to hear me or doesn't know what to do. Given that many of these are out-of-the-box features that don't require integrations, you have to wonder how well Alexa+ will do at navigating the web and taking action for you. In the next installment of this series, I'll continue testing the AI and will try some of the agentic AI features with Alexa+. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The best states to have a baby in 2025 (and the 10 that need to do better)
If you're expecting a baby, where you live can make a big difference in everything from how much you'll pay for delivery to the quality of care your newborn receives. According to WalletHub's just-released 2025 Best & Worst States to Have a Baby report, the average cost of a conventional birth is more than $2,600 for mothers with insurance and nearly $15,000 for those without. For many parents, the financial and logistical realities of birth are prompting a bigger question: What does 'baby-friendly' actually look like when you're the one giving birth? WalletHub analyzed all 50 states and the District of Columbia across 31 factors, including hospital delivery costs, infant care expenses, healthcare access, and the number of pediatricians per capita. The results highlight how different the experience of welcoming a child can be depending on your zip code. The 10 best states to have a baby in 2025 Massachusetts North Dakota Minnesota New Hampshire Maine Rhode Island Vermont Washington Iowa District of Columbia Why Massachusetts leads the list Massachusetts has the third-lowest infant mortality rate, the eighth-lowest maternal mortality rate, and strong parental leave policies. It also ranks high in childhood vaccination rates and food security. For new parents, that translates to better infrastructure, more accessible care, and policy-level support during one of life's most demanding transitions. Related: Where to give birth: Here are your labor and delivery options The 10 hardest states to give birth in While some states are building strong foundations for new parents, others leave families facing significant hurdles from the very start. According to WalletHub's analysis, these are the 10 lowest-ranked states when it comes to birth-related cost, healthcare access, and family support: 42. West Virginia 43. Oklahoma 44. Florida 45. Arkansas 46. New Mexico 47. Georgia 48. South Carolina 49. Nevada 50. Alabama 51. Mississippi Parents in these states often face higher rates of low birth weight, fewer OB-GYNs per capita, and little to no paid leave, all of which can increase stress during pregnancy and postpartum. Why Mississippi leads the list In Mississippi, for example, families navigate some of the highest risks and fewest resources in the country. Consistently limited access to care and support leaves many new parents without the tools they need to feel safe and prepared. Your state can shape your experience—long before and long after delivery The report revealed dramatic differences across the country: South Dakota has the lowest average annual cost for early child care—3.5 times lower than in D.C., which has the highest. That kind of gap can determine whether a parent returns to work out of choice or financial necessity, and whether care is chosen based on quality or affordability. District of Columbia has the most midwives and OB-GYNs per capita. More access means less time on waitlists, more flexibility in choosing providers, and a higher chance of being seen when it matters most. Massachusetts leads the nation in parental leave policies. These gaps reflect what many parents already know firsthand: the support you need to raise a child depends heavily on where you live. Related: The United States is the most expensive country to give birth in What parents can do—no matter where they live If you're in a state that ranks lower on WalletHub's list, it doesn't mean you're out of options. Experts recommend: Tapping into community resources: Local nonprofits and parent networks can help bridge the gap in childcare and healthcare access. Advocating for policy change: From zoning laws to parental leave policies, many of the solutions start at the local level. Leaning on support systems: Building your own 'village,' whether through friends, family, or community groups, is critical for both parents and babies. Because whether you live in Massachusetts or Mississippi, one thing is clear: parents shouldn't have to navigate this alone. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I push Keir Starmer to be more extroverted in Scotland
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has said he pushes Sir Keir Starmer to be more 'extroverted' when he comes to Scotland. Mr Sarwar said he speaks to the Prime Minister every two or three weeks, often calling at weekends when they both have more free time. The Scottish Labour leader also said he will not engage in any 'back room stitch-ups' with other parties if he becomes first minister following the Scottish election next year. At an Edinburgh Fringe event in front of a live audience, Mr Sarwar was interviewed by Catherine Salmond, editor of The Herald. He was pressed on his relationship with the UK Labour leader and whether Sir Keir was comfortable coming north of the border. He said: 'We're different personalities… I am much more probably conversational, out there, a bit of an extrovert. 'I think it's safe to say he's a bit more introverted in that sense.' Mr Sarwar said Sir Keir had become more relaxed and confident in the five years since becoming Labour leader. He said Sir Keir was more relaxed in Scotland than in other parts of the UK, adding: 'I think we've built up a rapport, probably because I am pushing to be a bit more of extroverted than perhaps he is in other parts.' He said he spoke to the Prime Minister around 'two or three times a month'. However he said the early part of Labour's response to the war in Gaza had been 'challenging' for his party, referring to an interview the Prime Minister gave where he said Israel had the 'right' to withhold power and water from Gaza in response to the October 7 attacks. 'I think the early part was challenging, he himself accepts that what he said in the LBC interview wasn't right,' Mr Sarwar said. Discussing the Middle East further, he said: 'I think we have to be doing much more to hold the Israeli government to account. 'To provide evidence that there is not any components that are being used in a proactive way in Gaza.' Looking ahead to the 2026 Scottish election, Mr Sarwar said he was putting his 'heart, soul energy, time' into winning. He said it would be a 'very close election' likely to result in a 'parliament of minorities'. Rather than doing deals such as the SNP-Green powersharing agreement, he said he would 'work progressively with the parliament' if he became first minister. He said: 'We are looking to form a minority Scottish Labour government that does no kind of back room stich-up but instead moves to govern based on what we promised.'
