How crucial is immigration for the US hotel industry?
NEW YORK, June 13 (Reuters) - A U.S. crackdown on foreign-born workers could spell trouble for the hotel and hospitality industry, which has lobbied for years to expand the pathways for immigration to the United States to help fill over 1 million job vacancies.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Thursday he would issue an immigration order soon, following a social media post in which he cited labor issues in the farm and hotel industries stemming from his immigration crackdown. But on Friday, the Washington Post reported that no such policy changes were under way, according to three people with knowledge of the administration's immigration policies.
In 2024, travel supported the jobs of 15 million U.S. workers and directly employed 8 million, with approximately one-third of those workers immigrants, according to the U.S. Travel Association and American Hotel and Lodging Association. There are about 1 million job openings in 2025.
Hotels and resorts have struggled to find enough Americans willing to work hospitality jobs, including seasonal or temporary jobs at ski resorts and amusement parks. The leisure and hospitality industries have quit rates higher than all other industries. The accommodation and food services subsector has experienced a quit rate consistently around or above 4% since July 2022, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
About 71% of the hotels that had job openings were unable to fill them despite active searches, according to a 2024 survey conducted by AHLA and Hireology, an employee management platform.
U.S. Travel and AHLA have lobbied Congress for broader pathways for legal immigration in an effort to close these gaps.
The industry's priority was to push for expanding the H-2B visa program, which was capped at 66,000 visas a year, to bring more seasonal workers to the United States.
In March 2024, then-President Joe Biden signed the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, which authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to increase the number of H-2B temporary nonagricultural workers if the agency determines there are not enough American workers "willing, qualified, and able to perform temporary nonagricultural labor."
DHS and the Department of Labor in December published a joint temporary final rule increasing the limit on H-2B non-immigrant visas for fiscal year 2025.
The industry also supported legislation that looked to make it easier for temporary workers to return to the U.S. and allow people seeking asylum to work as soon as 30 days after applying for asylum.
Industry executives, including those from Marriott (MAR.O), opens new tab and Hilton (HLT.N), opens new tab, have talked about the need for practical immigration solutions for years.
"One of the most important issues in our industry for time and eternity has been workforce ... and the need for comprehensive immigration reform," Hilton Worldwide CEO Chris Nassetta said at the Americas Lodging Investment Summit in January, according to a report by Travel Weekly.
Labor union Unite HERE, which represents thousands of workers in U.S. hotels, casinos, and airports, a majority of whom are immigrants, said the union will continue to fight "the increasingly arbitrary rules" about who can and cannot live and travel to the United States.
The Culinary Workers Union, which represents hospitality workers in Las Vegas, rallied against escalating Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Nevada and pushed back against claims the Trump administration was only responding to people breaking the law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
I built a tiny home on wheels for £1.5k, at 13 years old, it has a kitchen, bed & enough space to host family dinners
LUKE Thill, now 20, is on a mission to build incredible homes. When he was 12 years old, he took on his first challenge: building a tiny home on wheels. 6 6 In a video watched by 13 million people on his YouTube channel @LukeThill, he takes viewers around the finished build. Inspired by other DIY renovations on YouTube, Luke set about saving up. Over several months, Luke, from Iowa, raised £1,100 ($1,500) to pay for the materials needed for the build. Luke's local community chipped in by donating materials, and he swapped services for help with building. His dad helped him draw up plans and construct the house, while his mum assisted with the interior design. The tiny home is connected to electricity, and inside, Luke has fit a working stove, mini-fridge, a sofa with a drop-down table, and a loft bed. He even built a deck at the front using reclaimed materials. In total, the tiny home took the teenager a year and a half to complete. Luke, now a paramedic, said: 'The tiny house was always meant to be a space to have friends over and to entertain people.' And that's exactly what he did one Thanksgiving when he hosted his family in the space. We bought 2 shipping containers for $5,500 each and built our 'dream' tiny home - a key method helped us save even more Luke said: 'We had everything a normal Thanksgiving dinner would have. My family of five plus our dog all fit." Luke's build was such a success that at 14 years old, his twin brother, Cole asked him to build a 36-square-foot mini camper to go along with the tiny house. The camper is less than half the size of the tiny house and portable, so it was built in a different way to withstand high speeds in transportation. Since building it, the camper has been on more than 50 trips across the country, mainly used in the summer when the weather is fine. Inside, there is an L shape banquette seating which doubles into a sleeping area and a small table. 6 6 6 But the main attraction is outside as the camper has a huge pull-out drawer which houses all their camping cooking equipment, and then doubles into a worktop to prep food. 'It houses everything you need to cook - we even have a gas propane stove," Luke explained in another video. "It's obviously not a full kitchen but it has everything you need in this sliding drawer under the camper. But Luke admitted: 'The tiny house will always be my favourite.' 6 Tiny Homes FAQs The tiny house movement began in the USA before gaining popularity in the UK. What is a tiny home? Tiny houses are small, fully-equipped living spaces designed to lead a more sustainable, off-grid lifestyle. Although they vary in size and shape, tiny homes tend to be between 15 and 50 square metres in capacity, made of sustainable materials and are easier — and cheaper — to maintain than traditional brick homes. Are tiny homes legal in the UK? As long as the tiny house doesn't exceed 19.8m x 6.7m in size, it is defined as a caravan in UK law. Therefore, tiny houses are classed as legal additional living space. Can you get a mortgage for a tiny home? The small size and relatively low cost of tiny houses means they're not generally considered eligible for a mortgage. However, there are plenty of options to take out a loan to fund your dreams of the perfect, moveable home.
Metro
33 minutes ago
- Metro
Iran threatens to strike US bases in vow to continue retaliatory blitz on Israel
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Iran retaliates with 200 ballistic missiles and barrage of drones Strikes between both enemies still ongoing after night of terror 78 people killed in Iran, while three people killed in Israel Fears America and Gulf nations will get dragged in fighting Fears are rising that the Middle East is teetering on the edge of an all-out war as strikes between Israel and Iran continue to escalate – with now US military bases becoming potential targets. Longtime adversaries, Israel and Iran, unleashed a barrage after a barrage of ballistic missiles and drones, with explosions slamming into Jerusalem, Tel Aviv ,Tehran and Zanjan. In Iran, more than 78 people have been killed, including including four of its top security chiefs, and 320 wounded, most of them civilians. Three people died in Israel, with dozens more injured in Iranian strikes. Pillars of black smoke rose from military sites and residential areas across both countries after a night of relentless bombardments. This could be the start of a prolonged military campaign as neither side is showing any inclination to end the fighting – despite international calls for de-escalation. There are fears that the US – where Donald Trump has been congratulating Israel for the 'excellent' attacks – and Gulf nations will be dragged into the conflict. Iran's Fars news agency reported that senior military officials have warned that the conflict will spread to US bases over the coming days. 'This confrontation will not end with last night's limited actions and Iran's strikes will continue,' Fars cited an unnamed official as saying. 'And this action will be very painful and regrettable for the aggressors.' Shahram Akbarzadeh, the director of the Middle East Studies Forum at the Alfred Deakin Institute, warned there are 'more attacks to come' as Israel and Iran 'settle in for the long haul'. 'There is every chance this could spread out to the whole region and draw in the US,' he told Al Jazeera. 'Israel is actually banking on this dynamic that once a conflict starts, the US has an obligation and commitment to Israeli security. 'So the US will be dragged into the conflict.' Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a recorded message Friday: 'We will not allow them to escape safely from this great crime they committed.' It was just hours after that Iran launched waves of missiles at Israel late Friday and early today. Iranians awoke to state television airing repeated clips of strikes on Israel, as well as videos of people cheering and handing out sweets. Meanwhile, Israel's military said more drones had been intercepted near the Dead Sea in the early hours of this morning. More Trending A hospital in Tel Aviv treated seven people wounded in the second Iranian barrage; all but one of them had light injuries. Israel's Fire and Rescue Services said they were wounded when a projectile hit a building in the city. A spokesperson for Beilinson Hospital said one woman was killed. Hours later, an Iranian missile struck near homes in the central city of Rishon Lezion, killing two more people and wounding 19, according to Israel's paramedic service Magen David Adom. Meanwhile, the sound of explosions and Iranian air defence systems firing at targets echoed across central Tehran shortly after midnight on Saturday. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Lonely Planet co-founder reveals three more countries 'not to visit' MORE: Israeli Mossad agents 'infiltrate heart of Iran with special-made weapons' MORE: Iran vs Israel: who has the strongest military?
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement
College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair. Eight female athletes filed an appeal this week, arguing the agreement violates Title IX, the US law banning sex-based discrimination in education. They say the way the money is divided, largely favoring football and men's basketball players, shortchanges women by more than $1bn. Their appeal has paused all back payments, potentially delaying them for more than a year. However, the NCAA's new plan to allow schools to pay current players directly starting 1 July will still go ahead. So what does this all mean for athletes as well as the future of college sports? Here's what's going on … The NCAA agreed to pay $2.8bn to compensate athletes who were previously barred from earning income off their name, image, and likeness (NIL), including things like video game appearances, jersey sales, or social media sponsorships. The settlement covers athletes going back to 2016. It also clears the way for a major change: beginning 1 July 2025, colleges will be allowed to directly share revenue with current players, up to $20.5 million per school per year. It's a major shift from the NCAA's traditional amateurism model, which argued that athletes should only be compensated with scholarships, not salaries or endorsement income. Eight female athletes who competed in soccer, volleyball, and track have filed an appeal. Their names include Kacie Breeding (Vanderbilt) and Kate Johnson (Virginia), along with six athletes from the College of Charleston. They argue the deal violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Specifically, they say the settlement gives up to 90% of the money to men in football and basketball, depriving women of $1.1bn in rightful compensation. Title IX is a 1972 US law requiring equal access and treatment for men and women in federally funded education programs, including athletics. Colleges must offer comparable resources, scholarships and participation opportunities across men's and women's sports. The female athletes argue that since NIL bans affected both genders equally, compensation for those bans must also be equitable, and that using historical TV revenue (which favors men's sports) ignores systemic barriers women have faced in marketing and media exposure. US district judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week and rejected Title IX-based objections, saying they fell outside the scope of the antitrust case. The female athletes disagree and are now asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene. Because of the appeal, no back pay will be distributed until the court rules. That delay could last several months or longer. According to the NCAA's lead attorney, the organization will continue funding the settlement pool, but the money will sit untouched until the case is resolved. The current payout formula is based on historical media revenue and licensing data. Because football and men's basketball generated the majority of money for schools – especially through TV contracts – those athletes stand to receive the most compensation. Critics say that approach bakes in decades of inequality, because women were denied the same marketing exposure and investment in the first place. Some worry that schools will cut so-called 'non-revenue' sports – like wrestling, swimming or gymnastics – to fund revenue-sharing with top athletes. Others fear this pushes college sports closer to a professional minor league system, undermining education and competitive balance. Still others say that without clear Title IX guidance, women may continue to be marginalized even in a post-amateurism era. The Ninth Circuit will now review the appeal. Briefs are due by 3 October, and while both sides say they'll push for speed, appeals in this court have been known to take 12 to 18 months. Until the case is resolved, no back payments will be made to athletes who played between 2016 and 2021. But the revenue-sharing era is coming, whether or not the NCAA is ready for it.
