logo
Engineering aspirants can now apply through state CET cell for admission under institutional quota

Engineering aspirants can now apply through state CET cell for admission under institutional quota

Indian Express20-06-2025
Engineering aspirants seeking admission under the 20% institutional quota in Maharashtra can now apply through the Common Admission Process (CAP) conducted by the state CET Cell. While colleges will retain the right to issue their own merit lists, this new option aims to give students an alternative to apply if direct applications to colleges is not possible due to any reason.
With MHT-CET results out, engineering admissions in Maharashtra are expected to start soon. The Higher and Technical Education Department announced revised rules on Friday.
The government has already declared clear eligibility criteria for NRI candidates—who will occupy 5% of institutional quota seats. Additionally, colleges are already informed about fee-related guidelines for these seats. They charge up to three times the regular fees for management quota seats and five times more for NRI quota seats. All this streamlining is expected to bring greater transparency to engineering admissions, including those under institutional quota.
The notification declaring amendment to the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission to the Full Time Professional Undergraduate, Post Graduate, Integrated or Dual Degree Technical Courses) states, 'in case candidate is unable to submit the application directly to the institution concerned for any reason, the candidate shall have the opportunity to apply through the website of the Competent Authority till the date of allotment of final CAP Round. These applications will be forwarded to the respective institutions after the allotment process of CAP Round-IV. The concerned institution shall consider such applications while preparing the Inter-Se-Merit.'
Traditionally, 80% of engineering seats are filled through CAP, with the remaining 20% filled by colleges under the institutional quota. As per information shared by the Directorate of Technical Education (DTE), while this process remains unchanged, students now have the CAP portal as an optional route for institutional quota applications.
Director of DTE, Vinod Mohitkar, said, 'There is absolutely no intrusion on admissions done at the institutional level. We are only providing an optional platform for students to apply for those seats. This is only because we would receive random complaints from students that certain institutes are not taking their application of admission under institutional quota. In such cases they will have another option to apply. These applications will be sent to colleges to consider while declaring merit list.'
Another significant change is the introduction of a fourth CAP round, as opposed to established practice of three CAP rounds. This is expected to allow students one additional chance to secure admission through CAP before the institutional round begins. Furthermore, there will be stricter rules for admission confirmation. Previously, confirmation was only mandatory if candidates were allotted their first-choice college. Now, in Round 2, confirmation is required if the allotted college is among the top three choices, and in Round 3, if it is among the top six.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Korea, US launch annual military drills against North Korean threats
South Korea, US launch annual military drills against North Korean threats

Business Standard

time12 hours ago

  • Business Standard

South Korea, US launch annual military drills against North Korean threats

South Korea and the United States began their annual large-scale joint military exercise on Monday to better cope with threats by nuclear-armed North Korea, which has warned the drills would deepen regional tensions and vowed to respond to any provocation against its territory. The 11-day Ulchi Freedom Shield, the second of two large-scale exercises held annually in South Korea, after another set in March, will involve 21,000 soldiers, including 18,000 South Koreans, in computer-simulated command post operations and field training. The drills, which the allies describe as defensive, could trigger a response from North Korea, which has long portrayed the allies' exercises as invasion rehearsals and has often used them as a pretext for military demonstrations and weapons tests aimed at advancing its nuclear programme. In a statement last week, North Korean Defence Minister No Kwang Chol said the drills show the allies' stance of military confrontation with the North and declared that its forces would be ready to counteract any provocation going beyond the boundary line. Ulchi Freedom Shield comes at a pivotal moment for South Korea's new liberal President Lee Jae Myung, who is preparing for an August 25 summit with US President Donald Trump in Washington. Trump has raised concerns in Seoul that he may upend the decades-old alliance by demanding higher payments for the American troop presence in South Korea and possibly reducing it as Washington shifts its focus more toward China. Tensions on the Korean Peninsula remain high as North Korea has brushed aside Lee's calls to resume diplomacy with its war-divided rival, with relations having soured in recent years as North Korean leader Kim Jong Un accelerated his weapons programme and deepened alignment with Moscow following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Seoul's previous conservative government responded to North Korean threats by expanding military exercises with the United States and seeking stronger US assurances for nuclear deterrence, drawing an angry reaction from Kim, who last year renounced long-term reconciliation goals and rewrote the North's constitution to label the South a permanent enemy. In his latest message to Pyongyang on Friday, Lee, who took office in June, said he would seek to restore a 2018-inter-Korean military agreement designed to reduce border tensions and called for North Korea to respond to the South's efforts to rebuild trust and revive talks. The 2018 military agreement, reached during a brief period of diplomacy between South Korea's former liberal President Moon Jae-in and Kim, created buffer zones on land and sea and no-fly zones above the border to prevent clashes. But South Korea suspended the deal in 2024, citing tensions over North Korea's launches of trash-laden balloons toward the South, and moved to resume frontline military activities and propaganda campaigns. The step came after North Korea had already declared it would no longer abide by the agreement. When asked whether the Lee government's steps to restore the agreement would affect the allies' drills, the South's Defence Ministry said Monday that there are no immediate plans to suspend live-fire training near the Koreas' disputed maritime border. While the allies have postponed half of Ulchi Freedom Shield's originally planned 44 field training programmes to September, US military officials denied South Korean media speculation that the scaled-back drills were meant to make room for diplomacy with the North, citing heat concerns and flood damage to some training fields. Dating back to his first term, Trump has regularly called for South Korea to pay more for the 28,500 American troops stationed on its soil. Public comments by senior Trump administration officials, including Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, have suggested a push to restructure the alliance, which some experts say could potentially affect the size and role of US forces in South Korea. Under this approach, South Korea would take a greater role in countering North Korean threats while US forces focus more on China, possibly leaving Seoul to face reduced benefits but increased costs and risks, experts say. In a recent meeting with reporters, Gen. Xavier Brunson, commander of US Forces Korea, stressed the need to modernize the alliance to address the evolving security environment, including North Korea's nuclear ambitions, its deepening alignment with Russia, and what he called Chinese threats to a free and open Indo-Pacific. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Government pushes Bills even as adjournments continue
Government pushes Bills even as adjournments continue

The Hindu

time16 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Government pushes Bills even as adjournments continue

In yet another day full of adjournments, the Lok Sabha passed the Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 on Wednesday (August 6, 2025) after an extremely brief discussion. Introducing the Bill in the Lok Sabha, Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways Sarbananda Sonowal said, 'This Bill represents a decisive step towards positioning India as a global leader in maritime trade and governance. It is a progressive and advanced legislation, up to date with international maritime conventions and informed by the best practices of leading maritime nations.' 'The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024, with 16 Parts and 325 clauses, modernises India's maritime legal framework by aligning with international conventions, enhancing safety at sea, improving emergency response, and ensuring environmental protection. It reduces compliance burdens, promotes Indian tonnage, and prioritises seafarer welfare and ship safety. The Bill aims to make India a globally respected maritime jurisdiction and unlock sustainable growth, investment, and innovation in the sector,' Mr. Sonowal added. The Bill introduces significant changes to India's maritime framework, using best practices of leading maritime jurisdictions like the U.K., Norway, and Singapore. It has reforms related to flexible vessel registration; easing ownership norms to attract foreign and NRI-led investment; enhanced safety and environmental standards aligned with international conventions to protect marine ecosystems; support for capital-deficient entrepreneurs and MSMEs through bareboat charter arrangements; expanded coastal security provisions in response to threats like 26/11; welfare measures for Indian seafarers, benefiting the 85% serving on foreign-flagged vessels; and a legal framework for maritime education to standardise over 160 training institutes across India. The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 is meant to be a progressive, future-ready legislation that replaces the Merchant Shipping Act of 1958. On the other hand, the Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, 2024, was passed in the Rajya Sabha. It adopts the Hague-Visby Rules, a globally accepted maritime standard also followed by countries like the United Kingdom, and repeals the century-old Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The legislation is expected to simplify maritime trade laws, reduce litigation risks, and enhance transparency and commercial efficiency in cargo movement by sea. All through this, Opposition members continued to protest in both the Houses, demanding a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise undertaken by the Election Commission of India in Bihar. In the Lok Sabha, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is open to all discussions suggested by the Opposition, but since the SIR issue is sub judice in the Supreme Court and is also an exercise by the ECI which is an autonomous body, it cannot be taken up for discussion in Parliament. Will Thursday see more discussion in Parliament or will it be yet another day full of adjournments? We shall see. For live updates, click here. Until next time.

Maharashtra B. Pharm admissions: Another extension in application submission deadline has led to panic among aspirants
Maharashtra B. Pharm admissions: Another extension in application submission deadline has led to panic among aspirants

Indian Express

timea day ago

  • Indian Express

Maharashtra B. Pharm admissions: Another extension in application submission deadline has led to panic among aspirants

The deadline for submitting application forms for admission to Bachelor of Pharmacy (B. Pharm.) courses in Maharashtra have been extended once again — now pushed to August 19, from the earlier deadline of August 12. Multiple extensions have led to growing anxiety among aspirants, who are left wondering when the seat allotment rounds will begin. It has now been over two months since the MHT-CET results were announced, following which registration for pharmacy admissions began. While admissions to other technical courses have already progressed to their second or third rounds of seat allotment, B. Pharm admissions remain stuck at the registration stage, largely due to the ongoing approval of new colleges. Both aspirants and colleges are frustrated by the prolonged wait for the centralised admission process (CAP) to begin. While candidates fear a significant delay in academic schedules and potential academic loss, colleges are concerned that this delay may push students toward private universities or alternative courses — leading to vacant seats in B. Pharmacy programs. According to many frustrated candidates, it is unfair to make them wait for admissions just because new colleges are still being included in the seat matrix. One candidate said, 'This might be the third extension of the registration process. If new colleges are upcoming, they can be included later. But admissions for the existing seats should begin immediately.' Candidates also pointed out that fewer students would join new institutions anyway, making the delay even less justified. Colleges, meanwhile, fear that the prolonged admission process will drive students toward other undergraduate programs. Prof. Milind Umekar, National President of the Association of Pharmaceutical Teachers of India (APTI), said, 'In Maharashtra, the number of pharmacy colleges has increased far beyond the actual requirement. Excessive delays in the centralised admission process have led to students opting out of pharmacy courses in the past as well.'He pointed out that last year's B. Pharm. admissions continued until the end of December, causing significant academic disruption. Colleges also point out that private universities have already commenced their admission processes. 'The uncertainty caused by the delay in CAP pushes many candidates toward private universities, which are not bound to admit students through CAP. On the other hand, colleges affiliated with state universities where admissions are determined by the CET Cell are facing serious challenges because of this delay,' said one college principal. Further highlighting the paradox of the situation, Prof. Umekar noted that this year's delay is again due to waiting for the final number of new colleges, even though the state government has already begun inspecting newly approved pharmacy colleges in the past three years, due to an alarming increase in their number. 'The state should at least set a cut-off date and declare that only colleges approved by that date will be included in the current admission cycle. And the rest will have to wait until the next cycle,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store