logo
Motorists ‘could save £850 a year by choosing an electric car over a hybrid'

Motorists ‘could save £850 a year by choosing an electric car over a hybrid'

The Guardian22-04-2025

British households could miss out on savings of more than £800 a year on running costs if they choose a hybrid car over an electric one, amid concerns that recent government rule changes open the door for manufacturers to sell more polluting cars.
Owners of hybrid cars only save an average of £13 a year compared with drivers of petrol vehicles, but could save as much as £850 annually if they buy electric rather than petrol, according to analysis by the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), a thinktank.
This month, Keir Starmer's government changed electric vehicle rules to allow more sales of cars with petrol and diesel engines until 2035, after extensive lobbying by the automotive industry.
Allowing sales of hybrids, which combine a small battery with an internal combustion engine, was a key part of the changes to rules, known as the zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate, that force carmakers to sell an increased proportion of electric cars each year. The government allowed sales of models such as the Toyota Prius and those using Nissan's 'e-Power' until 2035. Those cars use the engine to charge the battery, meaning they are not capable of zero-emission driving.
Carmakers argued successfully that hybrids cut carbon emissions compared with petrol cars. However, their main motivation for continuing with hybrid sales is that they are more profitable than electric cars. Petrol carmakers said that they needed those profits to invest in future electric production, with a global economic slowdown amid the US president Donald Trump's trade war making it even harder to switch.
Colin Walker, head of transport at the ECIU, said: 'While pitched as a response to the economic chaos of Trump's tariffs, these changes could actually make things worse, costing UK consumers. With less onus on manufacturers to compete to sell EVs in the UK, and the government encouraging them to sell more hybrids instead, potentially millions of families could be left to foot [the bill] for more expensive driving.
'Given how popular EVs are with their drivers, this looks like bad policy for families, driving up the nation's driving bill.'
Hybrids can still be attractive financially for households, partly because they cost less upfront than electric cars. Hybrids can also appeal to car buyers who do not have easy access to charging, a problem in many urban areas, particularly outside London.
However, electric cars make significant savings on fuel and maintenance, meaning the total cost of ownership is lower for most people using electric cars.
The switch to electric cars is unavoidable if the UK is to hit its climate goals. Walker criticised 'policy flip-flopping' on electric car rules, which he said would ultimately make the transition more expensive. The nascent and fast-growing EV charging industry has also warned of lost investment because of the changes.
The ZEV mandate changes will also give incentives to carmakers to sell more plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), hybrids whose battery can be charged from a plug. PHEVs are theoretically significantly greener than hybrids because they are capable of running with zero emissions – although there are concerns over whether PHEV owners plug in enough to realise the green savings.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
The ECIU's analysis found that the UK's bestselling PHEVs offer their owners savings of £117 a year in running costs over their petrol equivalents. However, running cost savings for the equivalent electric models jump to more than £1,050 a year.
Quentin Willson, the founder of FairCharge, which campaigns for policies that support electric vehicles, said: 'Government extending the sales of new hybrids to 2035 is a grave misstep. Well-intentioned drivers are being misled by the alleged benefits of hybrids, which are neither significantly more economical than combustion cars nor better for urban air quality.
'The softening of the ZEV mandate allows carmakers to build combustion engines for longer and ease back on EV targets. The UK is currently Europe's most successful market for EVs, but succumbing to pressure from carmakers to dilute the mandate threatens that success and will allow Chinese carmakers to dominate. This is shortsighted, disappointing and ill-judged government policy.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and China's Xi have 'very good' phone call and agree to more talks amid trade war
Trump and China's Xi have 'very good' phone call and agree to more talks amid trade war

Sky News

time28 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Trump and China's Xi have 'very good' phone call and agree to more talks amid trade war

Donald Trump and Xi Jinping have held a "very good" phone call amid their ongoing trade war, during which they agreed to more tariff talks. Trade negotiations between the United States and China stalled shortly after a 12 May agreement between the two countries to reduce their tariff rates while talks took place. The call was first reported by Chinese state media and confirmed by the Chinese foreign ministry. According to Chinese state media, Mr Trump initiated the call with the Chinese president. In a post on his Truth Social site the US president said: "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi, of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal." He said the call lasted around an hour and a half and "resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries". There "should no longer be any questions" on rare earth products, he said. "The conversation was focused almost entirely on TRADE. Nothing was discussed concerning Russia/Ukraine, or Iran," Mr Trump added. He said the two nations had agreed to more tariff talks, and both leaders invited each other to visit their respective countries. According to Chinese state media, Mr Xi "pointed out that it is especially important to correct the course of the big ship of China-US relations, which requires us to keep the rudder and set the direction, especially to remove all kinds of interference and even sabotage". Mr Xi "emphasised that the US should handle the Taiwan issue carefully to avoid the two countries being dragged "into a dangerous situation of conflict and confrontation". According to the readout of the call, Mr Trump "expressed great respect for President Xi Jinping and the importance of the US-China relationship". It came a day after Mr Trump declared it was difficult to reach a deal with his Chinese counterpart. "I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but he is very tough, and extremely hard to make a deal with!!!," Mr Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site. The US president has cut his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days to allow for talks, while China reduced its taxes on US goods from 125% to 10%. The trade war has produced sharp swings in global markets and threatens to damage trade between the two nations. Mr Trump's treasury secretary Scott Bessent had suggested only a conversation between the two leaders could resolve their differences in order for talks to begin in earnest. Mr Trump and Mr Xi last spoke in January, three days before his inauguration, where they discussed trade, as well as Mr Trump's demand for China to do more to stop the drug fentanyl from entering the US.

Fury as Labour peer accuses 'out of control' Ukrainian president Zelensky of 'scuppering' Russia peace deal with drone strikes on Kremlin airfields
Fury as Labour peer accuses 'out of control' Ukrainian president Zelensky of 'scuppering' Russia peace deal with drone strikes on Kremlin airfields

Daily Mail​

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Fury as Labour peer accuses 'out of control' Ukrainian president Zelensky of 'scuppering' Russia peace deal with drone strikes on Kremlin airfields

A Labour peer triggered outrage today by suggesting Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelensky was 'out of control' and jeopardising efforts to end the war with Russia by approving a major drone strike. Octogenarian Lord Dale Campbell-Savours stunned the House of Lords by suggesting Mr Zelensky had been 'allowed to run amok' with his country's celebrated weekend attack on Russian airfields. The former MP suggested the embattled war leader had 'scuppered' the chances of reaching a truce in the deadly conflict being sought by US president Trump. Ukraine's Security Service claim the attack, dubbed operation Spider Web, destroyed or damaged 41 Russian aircraft, including strategic bombers. At the same time, Russia has continued to carry out strikes across Ukraine, including the targeting of residential areas. Lord Campbell-Savours, whose son is a Labour MP, was swiftly rebuked in the Lords by figures on all sides, including foreign minister Baroness Chapman of Darlington. Former defence chief Lord Stirrup, who led the Armed Forces from 2006 to 2010, icily said: 'Has the minister noticed any reticence or reluctance on the part of President Putin to killing Ukrainian civilians while so-called peace talks continue? 'And has she identified any actions at all on the part of the American administration to try and compel President Putin down that path of reticence?' US President Donald Trump said this week Mr Putin had told him 'very strongly' in a phone call that he would respond to Ukraine's daring drone attack on Russian air bases. Mr Zelensky, who has accepted a US ceasefire proposal and offered to meet Mr Putin in an attempt to break the stalemate in negotiations, wants more international sanctions on Russia to force it to accept a settlement. But Mr Putin has shown no willingness to meet Mr Zelensky and has indicated no readiness to compromise. US-led diplomatic efforts to end the long-running war have so far failed to make any significant progress. Raising the issue in Parliament, Lord Campbell-Savours said: 'Whilst recognising the sheer bravado of those who executed operation Spider Web, we have to accept that action has undermined Trump's wider initiative, jeopardised his offer on the provision of security guarantees, and hardened Russia's attitude on conflict resolution. 'How can we ever secure a settlement and avoid substantial defence costs being imposed on European taxpayers, if Zelensky is allowed to run amok with unilateral actions, therefore scuppering any prospect of an early settlement. 'Why can't we, with our long experience in diplomacy, think out of the box and engage with Trump's people in discussions with Russia over measures to end this war. 'We can't rely on Zelensky. He's out of control.' However, the peer's controversial view was rejected outright by Baroness Chapman, who said she 'profoundly' disagreed and repeated the UK Government's staunch support for Kyiv. She pointed out it was Russia's leader Vladimir Putin who could end the war, which he had triggered by his full-scale invasion in 2022. She added: 'President Trump wants to see peace. We want to see peace. President Zelensky has agreed to a ceasefire. 'The person who could achieve that ceasefire, who could bring peace to Ukraine, who could see the children return to their homes, is President Putin.' Her Tory counterpart Lord Callanan said: 'I completely agree with the minister's sentiments. 'I think Lord Campbell-Savours is absolutely wrong, and all of us who are strong supporters of Ukraine were greatly encouraged by the recent audacious attack on the Russian airfields, in which nobody was killed by the way, it was just equipment that was damaged. 'But to secure Ukrainian sovereignty in the longer term, it is vital that Ukraine possesses armed forces which have a strong strategic and tactical advantage in the region. 'So could the minister please update the House on the steps that the Government is taking to support the Ukrainian military, to ensure that it has troops which are well trained, well equipped in the longer term to our high standards to help deter further Russian aggression?' Lady Chapman pointed out the UK had committed £3 billion a year for as long as Ukraine needed it and also signed a '100-year' pact, which formalised economic and military support provided by Britain. She also highlighted UK efforts to establish a peacekeeping mission that would enforce a possible future ceasefire in Ukraine, a so-called coalition of the willing.

BREAKING NEWS Birmingham's bin strike misery could go on until CHRISTMAS as union workers vote to continue industrial action
BREAKING NEWS Birmingham's bin strike misery could go on until CHRISTMAS as union workers vote to continue industrial action

Daily Mail​

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS Birmingham's bin strike misery could go on until CHRISTMAS as union workers vote to continue industrial action

Birmingham bin workers have voted to continue industrial action in a dispute over pay and jobs, which means strikes could last until December, Unite have announced. It comes after Union bosses accused Government-appointed commissioners of 'sabotaging' peace talks and claim Keir Starmer 's Labour-led Government is complicit in blocking a deal. The all-out strike by members of Unite has dragged on for more than two months now, leaving piles of rubbish rotting in the streets of Britain's second largest city and prompting fury from long-suffering residents. And now the union is pointing the finger squarely at Whitehall officials parachuted in after the council's effective bankruptcy last year. Rotting rubbish is still piling up in Birmingham despite council claims last month that collections are back to normal. Pictures show huge mounds of bin bags spilling out over pavements in England's second city. Birmingham City Council says it has cleared 100 per cent of the large piles of waste in hot-spot areas and 85 per cent of rubbish from the rest of the city. But grim images show overflowing bins, split rubbish bags and rotting food strewn across residential streets. Photographs taken in Bordesley Green last week show old boxes and waste dumped on the pavements and roads. Another shot shows a red wheelie bin crammed with trash next to bulging bin bags piled up on the path. Graham Marlow, 45, who lives in the area, said: 'How the council can keep a straight face and say they have everything under control is mad. 'They only need to come down from their ivory towers and have a look at the streets to know the city is still waist deep in rubbish. 'My family are sick of it. I'm sick of it. I can't wait to leave this city. It's little wonder people now call Birmingham Scummy Brum.' More pictures show fly-tipping is still plaguing the city, with old beds, mattresses, shop mannequins and even an industrial-sized freezer being dumped on the streets. Other images show how residents have struggled to even park their cars as the mountains of rubbish swamps residential areas. The bin strike has attracted worldwide attention with shocking pictures of giant 'cat-sized' rats chasing council workers. Disabled people reliant on wheelchairs have also been trapped in their homes by piles of rubbish dumped on pavements and in alleyways. Opposition politicians have accused the Labour-led council of failing to end the dispute. Birmingham's Conservative leader councillor Robert Alden said: 'What we've seen sadly over the last two weeks, since national support from the army has been withdrawn, [is that] bin lorries have not been going out again. 'Indeed by the end of the week, barely any bin lorries were going out and that's leading to more rubbish starting to build up on the streets.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store