
Paramount Settles Trump Suit For $16M With President's No-Tax Playbook
The news that Paramount settled with President Trump for $16 million over alleged 60 Minutes edits that Trump alleged favored then Vice President Kamala Harris prompted criticism from some in the media. When Harris was asked about the Biden administration's relationship with Israel's prime minister, CBS producers used different portions of her answer on two programs. One response was on CBS' 'Face the Nation,' with a shorter one on '60 Minutes.' Many in the media criticized Paramount, but like other lawsuits that Trump has settled, there was an interesting tax angle.
The money goes to pay Trump's legal fees, and to his Presidential Library. Trump used the same technique in his $15 million settlement with ABC News over alleged defamation by George Stephanopoulos. Meta also settled with Trump, paying $25 million over suspending his social media accounts, and the funds once again were for legal fees and his Presidential Library. The widespread assumption is that this avoids taxes.
In general, though, the IRS view is that settling a lawsuit by having the money paid to charity may not always be a 100% tax solution. In some cases, a plaintiff's request to have settlement funds paid to charity are viewed by the IRS as a payment first to the plaintiff, and then a contribution by him to charity. That may be subject to percentage income limits, which in some cases means that the whole charitable contribution deduction may not be available in the year of the settlement.
Paying Trump's Legal Fees
If the settlement pays legal bills that President Trump would otherwise owe, the IRS could call that taxable income. When someone discharges your liability, the IRS often views that as income, even you never handle the cash.
Similarly, if Trump receives a reimbursement out of the Paramount settlement for legal fees that he has already paid, is that income? It depends on whether Trump has deducted the legal fees on his taxes that are later reimbursed. If he has deducted the fees, the IRS usually requires reimbursed amounts to be treated as income.
Directing settlement money to charity can work in some cases, but even that is not foolproof, as noted above. And having the settlement agreement direct the money to someone else — say a friend or relative — usually does not avoid taxes to the plaintiff either. The IRS taxes the person who had a legal right to payment. Many plaintiffs win or settle a lawsuit only to be surprised that they have to pay taxes. Some don't realize it until tax time the following year when IRS Forms 1099 arrive in the mail.
Taxes on legal settlements are based on the origin of your claim. If you get laid off at work and sue for wages, you'll be taxed as wages, usually with a portion on a Form 1099 for emotional distress. But the rules are full of exceptions and nuances, so be careful, how settlement awards are taxed.
One limited exclusion from taxes applies to physical injury damages. Before 1996, all 'personal' damages were tax-free, so emotional distress and defamation produced tax-free recoveries. But since 1996, your injury must be 'physical.' Trump alleged that the the '60 Minutes' edits caused him mental anguish, but that clearly would not qualfy for a tax exclusion. The IRS treats mental anguish, as well as physical symptoms of emotional distress (like headaches and stomachaches) as taxable.
There are many chicken or egg tax cases, and many plaintiffs take aggressive positions on their tax returns, trying to explain their IRS Form 1099. Haggling over tax details before you sign and settle is best. Such agreements aren't binding on the IRS or the courts in later tax disputes, but they are usually not ignored by the IRS. Most legal disputes involve multiple issues. You might claim that the defendant kept your laptop, frittered away your trust fund, underpaid you, failed to reimburse you for a business trip, or other items. Even if your dispute relates to one course of conduct, there's a good chance the total settlement involves several types of consideration.
How Legal Fees Are Taxed
How legal fees are taxed is tricky too. If you are the plaintiff and use a contingent fee lawyer, you'll be treated (for tax purposes) as receiving 100% of the money recovered by you and your attorney, even if the defendant pays your lawyer directly. If your case is fully nontaxable (say an auto accident in which you are injured), that shouldn't cause any tax problems. But if your recovery is taxable, watch out. Say you settle a suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress against your neighbor for $100,000, and your lawyer keeps $40,000. You might think you'd have $60,000 of income. Instead, you'll have $100,000 of income.
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Commissioner v. Banks, that plaintiffs generally have income equal to 100% of their recoveries. even if their lawyers take a share. How about deducting the legal fees? In 2004, Congress enacted an above the line deduction for legal fees in employment claims and certain whistleblower claims. But outside these two areas, in some cases it is very difficult to find a deduction for legal fees. Tax advice early before the case settles and the settlement agreement is signed is best. Fortunately, there are often ways to deduct legal fees even under the new law.
Punitive Damages & Interest
Punitive damages and interest are always taxable. If you are injured in a car crash and collect $50,000 in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages, the former is tax-free. But the $5 million is fully taxable, and you can have trouble deducting your attorney fees. The same occurs with interest. You might receive a tax-free settlement or judgment, but pre-judgment or post-judgment interest is always taxable (and can produce attorney fee problems). Sometimes, that can make it attractive to settle your case rather than going to judgment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
6 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Gold Miner Aura Minerals Seeks $210 Million in US Listing
Aura Minerals Inc. is seeking to raise about $210 million in a US listing, as the gold and copper miner looks to expand its investor base. The company, which already trades on exchanges in Canada and Brazil, will offer 8.1 million shares in the deal, according to a filing Monday with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The listing is set to price on July 15, according to terms of the deal seen by Bloomberg News.


Bloomberg
6 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Apple Loses Its Top AI Models Executive to Meta's Hiring Spree
Apple Inc. 's top executive in charge of artificial intelligence models is leaving for Meta Platforms Inc., another setback in the iPhone maker's struggling AI efforts. Ruoming Pang, a distinguished engineer and manager in charge of the company's Apple foundation models team, is departing, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Pang, who joined Apple from Alphabet Inc. in 2021, is the latest big hire for Meta's new superintelligence team, said the people, who declined to be named discussing unannounced personnel moves.


CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump's government cuts and the catastrophe in Texas
President Donald Trump's approach to the federal government has been to cut, cut, cut, which means when there is a disaster in which the government plays a role, he will have to expect questions about those cuts. When there's a plane crash, as there was days into his second term, the shortage of air traffic controllers will be scrutinized. When the administration quietly backtracks on some layoffs and struggles to re-fill key positions, it will lead to concerns that cuts went too far. When there's a tragic flood that catches an area off-guard, the effect of his cuts on the National Weather Service and FEMA will become a line of inquiry. Flash floods killed at least 95 people over the July Fourth holiday, and many others are still missing. Rescue and recovery are still ongoing, so no one can say for sure that personnel cuts at the National Weather Service or open positions at forecasting offices in Texas amplified or even affected the flood's tragic outcome. There are many facts yet to be discovered, and a full investigation will certainly be conducted. Prev Next Recent reports about how staffing and budget cuts are affecting forecasting at the agency may ultimately be seen as an early warning. 'The National Weather Service is in worse shape than previously known, according to interviews with current and former meteorologists, due to a combination of layoffs, early retirements and preexisting vacancies,' CNN's Andrew Freedman wrote back in May. The report also noted that a third of National Weather Service forecasting stations lacked a top meteorologist in charge. CNN reported in April the Trump's administration plans to close weather research laboratories and climate research programs meant to improve weather detection as the climate warms. That budget proposal was more recently submitted to Congress. Project 2025, the conservative government blueprint that presaged many of the Trump administration's decisions, called for much less federal spending on weather forecasting and more reliance on private companies. We also can't say for sure that Trump's hands-off approach to emergency management will affect recovery in Texas. In fact, Trump quickly declared the flood zone to be a major disaster area. But he has also said he wants to shutter the Federal Emergency Management Agency and for the federal government to play a much smaller role. 'We want to wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it back to the state level,' he said at the White House in June. Asked if Trump is reconsidering that position in light of the horrible Texas floods, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said this: 'The president wants to ensure American citizens always have what they need during times of need. Whether that assistance comes from states or the federal government, that's a policy discussion that will continue. And the president has always said he wants states to do as much as they can, if not more.' CNN's Gabe Cohen recently reported that disaster decisions were being made directly at the White House, bypassing FEMA and the well-trod process by which states seek help. It also raises concerns that White House political allies could get more attention than political enemies, although a Department of Homeland Security spokesman denied that idea to Cohen. Wanting the federal government to do less has been a theme of the Trump administration so far. States will either have to pony up more of their own money for Medicaid and food aid or watch citizens fall off assistance as a result of the sweeping new policy bill he signed Friday. We also can't directly blame this or any one storm on climate change. But Republicans are currently bragging about killing the previous administration's climate agenda, which Trump and his allies call the 'Green New Scam.' In terms of specifics about the Texas floods, local residents and officials, still in shock during TV interviews, said they were caught off-guard by the floods. That may not ultimately be a forecasting issue. 'The weather service did their job,' Rick Spinrad, who was National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration administrator during the Biden administration, told CNN's Boris Sanchez on Monday, referring to the issuance of watches, warnings and 'WEAs,' the Wireless Emergency Alert system. But Spinrad admitted there could have been a breakdown in connectivity between the forecasters and emergency services in the morning. 'On first blush, the communications breakdown happened at that last mile,' he said. The San Antonio National Weather Service office was missing a key coordinator who Spinrad said 'is critical in that last mile of communications.' That position has been vacant since April, when a longtime employee took the Trump administration's buyout offer. Asked about that unfilled position, Leavitt said, 'The offices were fully staffed with forecasters.' Kerrville, Texas, Mayor Joe Herring Jr., told CNN's Pamela Brown on Monday that he lost friends in the floods and that local officials had not gotten word about the severity of the forecast. 'We didn't even have a warning. We did not know,' he said, fighting back tears. CNN's Brown, who reported from Texas, has a personal connection to the story: As a child, she attended Camp Mystic, the girls' camp where the flood claimed the lives of 27, including campers and staffers. 'I do think it's important to have patience and humility that those (answers on what happened) may not come as quickly as perhaps we want,' she said. 'It was a once-in-a-lifetime flood,' she added. Residents knew the river could flood, but people she spoke to are referring to this as 'an act of God.'