Migrants BLOCKED from hotel at centre of protests in landmark ruling after asylum seeker ‘sexually assaulted teen girl'
The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, has been at the centre of anti-immigration demonstrations after one of its guests was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.
5
5
A second asylum seeker has since also been charged with sexual assault.
Epping Forest District Council launched a bid at the High Court last week to block migrants from being housed at the hotel.
A top judge today granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the hotel.
The decision comes after Home Secretary Yvette Cooper made a last-ditch bid to intervene in the battle.
Edward Brown KC argued the block would have a 'substantial impact' on the Home Secretary's statutory duty to house asylum seekers.
He also said there is a 'powerful public interest' in her being able to intervene to make arguments in the case - but the court heard an application was not made until last night.
It claimed Somani Hotels breached planning rules as the site is not being used for its intended purpose as a hotel.
Lawyers for the council also claimed the situation "could not be much worse".
Philip Coppel KC said: "There has been what can be described as an increase in community tension, the catalyst of which has been the use of The Bell Hotel to place asylum seekers.
"It is a problem that is causing great local anxiety."
The council sought to block Somani from housing asylum seekers within 14 days.
But barristers for the company said the "draconian" move would cause "hardship" for those inside the hotel.
They also argued "political views" were not grounds for an injunction and that contracts to house asylum seekers were a "financial lifeline".
Lawyers said the hotel was only one per cent full in August 2022, when it was open to paying customers.
Moment riot cops smash shield into man's face and 'knock his teeth out' in clash after migrant 'sexually assaulted' girl
Protests erupted outside the taxpayer-funded 'surge' accommodation for illegal arrivals last month.
Up to 2,000 far-Right activists marched on the building in just one demonstration.
The unrest saw yobs launching themselves on riot vans, smashing windshields and ripping off wingmirrors in senseless displays of "hooliganism".
Officers from at least six forces outside of the county were forced to swoop to try and keep the peace.
Missiles were thrown and a number of police vehicles were damaged as the demonstrators clashed with cops.
One man was run over while attempting to stop a police van gaining access to the hotel, while another had his teeth knocked out after riot cops smashed a shield into his face.
It came after a Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, was charged with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity.
Hadush Kebatu, 41, from Ethiopia, has denied the offences and remains in custody.
Since tensions reached boiling point, violent demonstrations have cost the force around £100,000.
A total of 28 people have been arrested in relation to disorder at the hotel, and 16 of them have been charged.
5
5
5
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lucy Connolly to walk FREE: Tory Councillor's wife who was jailed last year for 'racist' Tweet during the Southport riots is being released from prison in a matter of hours
Lucy Connolly is set to walk free from prison in just a matter of hours after being jailed for writing a racist tweet during last summer's riots. The mother and former childminder has spent more than nine months behind bars after admitting making the inflammatory post on X in the wake of the Southport attacks in July last year. Connolly, who is also the wife of Tory Councillor Ray Connolly, pleaded guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred and was handed a 31-month sentence in October. The post, which she later deleted, said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... if that makes me racist so be it.' She has been serving time at HMP Peterborough and had an application to have her sentence reduced rejected in May. But, the Daily Mail can now reveal that Connolly is due to be released on Thursday. The news will come as a huge boost to her husband and 12-year-old daughter as well as campaigners calling for her release. Connelly's imprisonment had prompted allegations that she was a victim of 'two-tier justice', with claims that those with right-wing views are treated more harshly than others in the UK. Connolly's X post was made just hours after killer Axel Rudakubana murdered three young girls and attempted to murder 10 others at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class on July 29, sparking nationwide unrest. She was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account. But other messages which included other condemning remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. The Southport atrocity sparked nationwide unrest, with several people - including Connolly - jailed as a result. Her tweet was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it. She later pleaded guilty to distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred at Birmingham Crown Court and was sentenced to 31 months in prison in October. In May, she had an appeal against her sentence refused by three Court of Appeal judges at the Royal Courts of Justice. In a written judgment, Lord Justice Holroyde, said: 'There is no arguable basis on which it could be said that the sentence imposed by the judge was manifestly excessive. 'The application for leave to appeal against sentence therefore fails and is refused.' He added that the principal ground of appeal 'was substantially based on a version of events put forward by the applicant which we have rejected'. Connolly argued she had been 'really angry' after the Southport attacks, but hours after posting the rant on X realised it was not an acceptable thing to say, so deleted it. She also said that news of the Southport murders had triggered her anxiety caused when her baby son, Harry, died as the result of a hospital blunder 13 years earlier. At her appeal case, Adam King, representing Connolly, asked if she had intended for anyone to set fire to asylum hotels or 'murder any politicians'. She replied: 'Absolutely not.' Naeem Valli, for the prosecution, told the court the post was a reflection of her attitude towards immigrants. At the time Mr Connolly told of the pain of his wife's long imprisonment, saying: 'The 284 days of separation have been very hard, particularly on our 12-year-old girl.' Connolly's case later became international news, with US officials saying earlier this year they are keeping tabs on developments over their 'concerns' about free speech. A State Department spokesman said in May: 'We can confirm that we are monitoring this matter. The United States supports freedom of expression at home and abroad, and remains concerned about infringements on freedom of expression.' It came after political commentator and Trump ally Charlie Kirk was made aware of Connolly's ordeal after a visit to the UK and vowed to get the US State Department involved in the process. Appearing on GB News, Kirk said: 'I am going to try and get the US State Department involved. I'm going to bring this up to Marco Rubio. I'm going to send him a text.' Kirk had been in the UK for a debate at the Oxford Union on Monday when the case of Mrs Connolly was raised. He later appeared on GB News, during which he said: 'I'm sorry, speaking as a citizen not on behalf of the US government, is this a way that a liberal democracy and ally of the United States acts? Kirk continued: 'I just find it so outrageous that she is now going to jail for two and a half years for a deleted social media post that she apologised for. As you guys (the UK) have birthed free speech to the world, you are now becoming a totalitarian country. 'I'm going to bring this up to Marco Rubio. I'm going to send him a text. This should be mentioned. It's not new.' Connolly's sentence was recently brought under the spotlight again last month after a man who abused a first class cabin crew on a flight from London was jailed for just 15-months. Recruitment tycoon Salman Iftikhar, 37, was flying in first class when he launched a vile tirade of abuse towards Virgin Atlantic staff on a flight from London Heathrow to Lahore in his homeland of Pakistan. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the sentence was evidence of 'two-tier justice', given Connolly was jailed for more than double his sentence. Mr Philp told the Mail last month: 'Iftikar was sentenced to only 15 months in prison last week for threatening an air stewardess with gang rape and for racially aggravated harassment. Iftikhar has multiple previous convictions. 'Yet Lucy Connolly got 31 months for a far less serious offence - a prosecution Lord Hermer personally authorised. 'This is two-tier justice in action. 'I have today referred the case to the Attorney General Lord Hermer for review under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme. 'We'll now find out if Hermer is willing to take action to fix Britain's two-tier justice problem.'
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Brazil's Bolsonaro drafted Argentina asylum request, police allege
BRASILIA, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Brazilian ex-President Jair Bolsonaro drafted a letter to Argentine President Javier Milei to request political asylum, federal police said on Wednesday. The letter had been saved on Bolsonaro's cell phone in February of last year, two days after his passport was seized, according to police. It was unclear whether it had been sent to Milei. Milei's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The document was part of the final police report that formally accused Bolsonaro and his son, Eduardo, of working to interfere in an ongoing legal process in which the former Brazilian president is on trial for plotting a coup. The trial is set to start in September. Bolsonaro has been under house arrest since earlier this month after Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes found Bolsonaro failed to comply with restraining orders, including regarding the use of social media. The younger Bolsonaro, a Brazilian congressman, moved to the United States this year and has been advocating in Washington on behalf of his father. Legal representatives for the two Bolsonaros did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In a Supreme Court decision based off the police report, Moraes gave Bolsonaro's layers 48 hours to clarify his repeated failure to comply with the restraining orders and his flight risk.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Calls for smacking ban in England grow as 8 in 10 adults say punishment is 'unacceptable'
Demands for a smacking ban in England are growing as a poll revealed eight in ten adults think the punishment is 'unacceptable'. Parents are still allowed to use 'reasonable punishment' against their children despite the practice being outlawed in Scotland and Wales. In both nations, any type of corporal punishment, including smacking, hitting, slapping and shaking, has been illegal for at least three years. Polling for children's charity NSPCC, carried out by YouGov, surveyed 3,800 adults across England – of whom 749 were parents with a child under 18 and 198 were aged 18 to 24. It found 82 per cent of adults aged between 18 and 24 believe it is unacceptable for a parent to use force, however slight, against a child – up from 64 per cent in 2023. And 81 per cent of parents with children under 18 felt the same, a slight increase from 80 per cent last year. Of all adults surveyed, 71 per cent said they believe physical punishment against a child is unacceptable, up from 67 per cent in 2023. Earlier this year, leading health experts urged parliamentarians to give children the 'fundamental right to safety and protection' by backing a smacking ban. Children's doctors and psychiatrists said decades of research showed the 'detrimental effects of physical punishment'. NSPCC chief executive Chris Sherwood said: 'Parents and young people are telling us loud and clear that they don't want physical punishment to be a part of anyone's childhood. File image: Parents are still allowed to use 'reasonable punishment' against their children despite the practice being outlawed in Scotland and Wales 'Parents know their children and what works best for them. It is therefore crucial their experiences and opinions are not ignored or undermined.' In June, as part of debate on the Bill, Conservative peer Lord Jackson of Peterborough warned that introducing a smacking ban in England would be 'disproportionate and heavy-handed'. He argued 'reasonable chastisement' was harmless and it risked 'criminalising good and caring parents, as well as overloading children's services departments'. But in the wake of the murder of ten-year-old Sara Sharif in 2023 by her father – who had claimed in a call to police after fleeing England that he 'did legally punish' his daughter and that he 'beat her up too much' – the UK's four children's commissioners jointly called for a wholesale smacking ban. The commissioners insisted 'loving, well-meaning' parents have no need to be concerned about a change in the law. The Government, which has previously said it has 'no plans to legislate at this stage', was contacted for comment.
