logo
3 gunmen involved in Indian Kashmir tourist attack killed

3 gunmen involved in Indian Kashmir tourist attack killed

Kuwait Times2 days ago
PAHALGAM, India: Indian soldiers trek back after a search operation around Baisaran meadow, a day after an attack on tourists in Pahalgam, about 90kms (55 miles) from Srinagar on April 23, 2025. -- AFP
NEW DELHI: Indian security forces have killed three Pakistani gunmen who were involved in an April attack on tourists in Indian Kashmir that led to an intense military conflict between the two countries, home minister Amit Shah said on Tuesday. The heavily-armed men were killed in a military operation on Monday, more than three months after 26 people were gunned down in a popular resort town of Indian Kashmir on April 22.
'I want to tell the parliament (that) those who attacked in Baisaran were three terrorists and all three have been killed,' he said. Shah said all three were Pakistani nationals and identified two of them as members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a UN-designated terrorist group based in Pakistan.
'Indian security agencies have detailed evidence of their involvement in the attack,' he said in a speech in the lower house of parliament. Monday's operation took place in the mountains of Dachigam, around 30 kilometers (18 miles) from the disputed region's main city of Srinagar, the army said in a statement. The attack in April saw gunmen burst out of forests near Pahalgam and rake crowds of visitors with automatic weapons.
All those killed were listed as residents of India except one man from Nepal. Survivors said gunmen had separated the men from the women and children and ordered some of the men to recite the Muslim declaration of faith. India accused Pakistan of backing the attackers, a charge Islamabad denied, sparking an intense four-day conflict between the nuclear-armed rivals in May that killed more than 70 people on both sides.
Muslim-majority Kashmir has been divided between India and Pakistan since their independence from British rule in 1947, and the neighbors — who both claim the region in full — have fought two wars and several conflicts over its control. Shah said a security meeting was held immediately after the attack and it was decided that the attackers should not be 'allowed to leave the country and return to Pakistan'.
Investigators relied on eyewitness accounts and forensic evidence to establish that the rifles found on the men were the same that were used in the April attack, he said. 'It was confirmed that these three rifles were involved in killing of our innocent civilians,' said Shah. A shadowy group called The Resistance Front (TRF) initially claimed responsibility for the April attack.
But as public criticism mounted over the killings, the group retracted its claim. Earlier this month, the United States described the TRF as a 'front and proxy' of Lashkar-e-Taiba. – AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why is Britain recognizing a Palestinian state
Why is Britain recognizing a Palestinian state

Kuwait Times

time6 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Why is Britain recognizing a Palestinian state

LONDON: Britain has said it will formally recognize a Palestinian state in September unless the Zionist government takes substantive steps to end suffering in Gaza and meets other conditions. What did Starmer say? He said Britain would make the move at the United Nations General Assembly unless Zionist entity agreed to certain conditions. Those were: •a ceasefire between Zionist entity and Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza •substantive steps to allow more aid to enter the Gaza Strip •a clear declaration there will be no annexation of the Zionist-occupied West Bank •a commitment to a long-term peace process that delivers a 'two-state solution' - a Palestinian state co-existing in peace alongside Zionist entity Starmer said there was 'no equivalence between Zionist entity and Hamas and that our demands on Hamas remain, that they must release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, accept that they will play no role in the government of Gaza, and disarm'. Why did Starmer do this? Successive British governments have said they will formally recognize a Palestinian state when the time is right and when it will be most effective to support a two-state solution. Until Tuesday, the government had said it was more focused on improving the situation on the ground for civilians stricken by the conflict than recognition. But Starmer has become increasingly vocal over the starvation and devastation in Gaza, and has been under pressure to act from lawmakers in his Labour Party. Britain hopes its move will have a practical impact on Zionist entity's behavior, initially by increasing the flow of aid, but also by reviving the diplomatic push for a two-state solution. What will this mean in practice? The move carries great diplomatic and moral weight, even if it is mostly symbolic, according to Julie Norman, an associate professor at University College London specializing in Middle Eastern politics. The most immediate impact may be an upgrading of diplomatic relations with the Palestinians, according to one British government official. Britain currently hosts a 'Palestinian mission' of officials in London, but the recognition of a Palestinian state means it may be allowed open a fully fledged embassy. The official said Britain could eventually open an embassy in the West Bank, where the Western-backed Palestinian Authority exercises limited self-government under Zionist military occupation. The PA seeks the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem for a future state. Hamas has refused to recognize Zionist entity and the group's 1988 founding charter calls for its destruction. Vincent Fean, a former British consul general to Jerusalem, said recognition of Palestine as a state would result in the government having to review its relations with Zionist entity. This, he said, could result in Britain banning products from Zionist settlements in occupied Palestinian territories. 'That would only be symbolic in that sense that those goods are a pinprick in the overall size of the Zionist economy,' he said. What is currently unclear is the impact recognition would have on the close intelligence and security ties between Britain and Zionist entity, including defense-related supply chains. — Reuters

22 killed in Angola fuel hike unrest
22 killed in Angola fuel hike unrest

Kuwait Times

time6 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

22 killed in Angola fuel hike unrest

LUANDA: Two days of unrest and looting in Angola during a protest against a fuel price hike claimed the lives of 22 people, the government said Wednesday, as a tense calm returned to the capital. Violence erupted on Monday, the first day of a strike called by taxi drivers to protest the July 1 increase in fuel costs in the oil-rich nation where millions live in poverty. It was some of the worst unrest in several years in the Portuguese-speaking southern African country, which has been governed by the MPLA party since 1975. Sporadic gunfire was heard across Luanda and several other cities on Monday and Tuesday as people looted shops and clashed with police. 'We regret 22 deaths, including one police officer,' Interior Minister Manuel Homem told reporters on the sidelines of a Council of Ministers meeting chaired by President Joao Lourenco. Nearly 200 people were injured in the violence, he said, and more than 1,200 people had been arrested. The unrest was marked by massive looting in which people raided supermarkets and warehouses, making off with food and other supplies. Sixty-six shops were damaged, Homem said. The streets of Luanda were tense and largely empty Wednesday, although there were some queues outside petrol stations and shops, AFP reporters said. There was a heavy presence of security forces. Many shops remained closed, but public transport had slowly resumed in some areas after a two-day standstill. With the protests having spread outside the capital, a statement after the ministers' meeting said vandalism and rioting had 'triggered a climate of widespread insecurity'. It said 'elements with criminal intentions' had turned the demonstration into a 'threat to security'. Police in the southern city of Lubango confirmed separately that a police officer had shot and killed a 16-year-old on Tuesday. The teenager was part of a group attempting to invade the headquarters of the ruling MPLA party, a statement said. The strike was the latest in a series of protests this month after the price of fuel was hiked from 300 to 400 kwanzas ($0.33 to $0.43) a liter on July 1. The government's move to lower its heavy fuel subsidies reportedly followed International Monetary Fund calls for more public money for health and education. But it has angered many in the country of 36 million people, already under pressure from inflation of around 20 percent while nearly 30 percent are unemployed. High inflation and limited growth 'are likely to keep poverty rates high, around 36 percent by 2026, underscoring the need for a stronger social safety net and more development spending', according to the World Bank. At a demonstration of around 2,000 people in Luanda on Saturday, protesters condemned the fuel price hike but also brandished signs denouncing MPLA 'corruption' or discontent with the rule of Lourenco, who was re-elected for a second five-year term in 2022. There had been similar protests the two previous weekends. In a joint statement Wednesday, the opposition UNITA and Bloco Democratico parties said Angola was in a 'severe economic and social crisis' that was a result of government policies 'disconnected from the country's reality'. Amnesty International and other rights groups have accused the police of using excessive force against protesters in Angola, which suffered through a 1975-2002 civil war and almost four decades of repression under former president Jose Eduardo dos Santos. - AFP

African Union says does ‘not recognize' Sudan parallel govt
African Union says does ‘not recognize' Sudan parallel govt

Kuwait Times

time6 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

African Union says does ‘not recognize' Sudan parallel govt

CAIRO: Boys gesture as they sit in a compartment of a special train arranged by the Egyptian government to carry families of Sudanese refugees returning home voluntarily, before departure from Cairo Central Station bound for Aswan on July 28, 2025. -- AFP ADDIS ABABA: The African Union said on Wednesday it would not recognize a 'so-called parallel government' in Sudan, urging its members to follow suit. A bitter two-year civil war in Sudan has pitted the government against the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which announced it was forming a government and appointed a prime minister on Saturday. The AU's Peace and Security Council 'called on all AU Member States and the international community to reject the fragmentation of Sudan and not recognize the so-called 'parallel government' which has serious consequences on the peace efforts and the existential future of the country,' it said in a statement. Sudan is split, with the army controlling the north, east and centre, having recently retaken the capital Khartoum, while the RSF holds most of Darfur and parts of Kordofan, where recent attacks have killed hundreds according to local rights groups. The internationally-recognized army-aligned government, formed in May, is headed by former UN official Kamil Idris. On Saturday, the RSF announced its own 'government of peace and unity' with Mohamed Hassan Al-Ta'ayshi as prime minister and a presidential council. United Nations officials warned the move could deepen Sudan's fragmentation and complicate diplomatic efforts to end the conflict that began in April 2023. The AU statement also 'unequivocally condemned all forms of external interference, which is fuelling the Sudanese conflict'. The UN has repeatedly warned of outside forces fueling the war. The United Arab Emirates has been widely accused of arming the RSF, in violation of a UN arms embargo on Sudan's western Darfur region. Abu Dhabi has issued repeated denials, despite multiple reports from UN experts, diplomats, US politicians and international organizations. The war began after a power struggle between army chief Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan and Dagalo—once allies who ousted Omar Al-Bashir in 2019. Two years later, the pair led a coup that derailed Sudan's transition to civilian rule. The war has killed tens of thousands and created the world's largest hunger and displacement crises. –AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store