Cash-strapped council pushed to AXE £3m Denburn restoration after grant snub
The restoration project was launched two years ago to make the ancient stream and surrounding wetland habitat more accessible to residents.
Under the plans, the 1.5 mile stretch from the Den of Maidencraig nature reserve to King's Gate in the west of the city would have been enhanced.
It was also proposed to re-meander the Denburn and create new footpaths for visitors to stroll along.
And for the last two years, council leaders have been trying to work out how to fund the project – securing extra support from Sepa and Nestrans.
But now, planning officials are recommending the project is kicked in the long grass after they were denied a £1.5m grant from the National Lottery Heritage Fund.
The local authority has already secured some promises of cash to help bring the project to fruition.
Sepa pledged to pay up to £950,000 through its Water Environment Fund, however, this funding is time-limited and would be lost if the project is delayed.
This is on top of another £250,000 which they gave the council for the designs.
Money was also secured from Nestrans and bus lane fines for the new path works, which will also only be awarded if the proposal moves forward.
However, planning chief David Dunne explains that if they don't find the remaining money needed to complete the project by September, they will have to refund it all.
The whole scheme is estimated to cost around £3m – nearly a million more than initially expected.
After securing the first batches of cash and joining with Sepa to develop the project, city chiefs were tasked with finding external sources for the final piece of the puzzle.
The National Lottery Heritage Fund was found as the best match and the application was submitted in November – but refused just a few months later.
Lottery bosses explained they preferred to give the cash to other projects and suggested the Denburn one would benefit from more financial support from the council instead.
And now Mr Dunne has advised that it would be wise to shelve the project until they find other avenues to fund.
This is one of four options drawn up by his planning team, which also include moving forward as planned despite the grant snub and scrapping the restoration altogether.
In his report, he writes: 'The Den Burn Restoration Project is an active project with SEPA and is prioritised for funding with them.
'Pausing the project indefinitely will very significantly raise the risk of losing this existing external funding.
'However, there appear no other choices in the absence of match funding.'
Members of the local authority's net zero, environment and transport committee will discuss the Denburn project when they meet next week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 hours ago
- The Independent
Rare Barbara Hepworth work to be displayed in public for first time
A rare 1943 sculpture by Yorkshire -born artist Barbara Hepworth, titled Sculpture with Colour (Oval Form) Pale Blue and Red, has been acquired for permanent public display. A total of £3.8 million was raised to secure the artwork, following a temporary export bar that prevented it from leaving the UK last year. The fundraising appeal was led by The Hepworth Wakefield and national charity Art Fund, with major contributions from the National Lottery Heritage Fund, Art Fund, and over 2,800 public donations. Having been in private ownership for decades, the wooden carving will now be publicly exhibited for the first time at The Hepworth Wakefield in West Yorkshire, the artist's birthplace. The piece is one of only a few wooden carvings Hepworth created in the 1940s and the first to use strings, reflecting her adaptability during wartime in Cornwall.
The National
12-08-2025
- The National
Coulport nuclear leaks spark alarm among local nuclear campaigners
Pipes which the Ministry of Defence (MoD) had allowed to fall into disrepair leaked nuclear waste into Loch Long from the Trident base at Culport. The revelations came after an investigation by The Ferret which forced the release of information on the leaks the Government had tried to keep hushed up. Marian Pallister, chair of Pax Christi Scotland, said the revelations were unsurprising but concerning for people living in the area. Pallister, a writer and journalist who lives near Lochgilphead, told The National: 'I'm afraid that it wasn't a surprise, we have known about this for a long time.' She dismissed the MoD's claims that there had been 'no unsafe releases of radioactive material into the environment', adding: 'They would say that, wouldn't they? 'They are obviously going to lessen their involvement but however big or small the leaks might be, they are leaks into waters that are a part of our lives, part of our heritage. 'I live in mid-Argyll, as the seagull flies, I'm about 35 miles from Faslane, it's a much longer journey by road. These are waters that we sail in, that we swim in, that our fish come from et cetera. Even if it's one milli-whatever of contamination, then it affects the whole population.' Pallister also raised concerns about the impact on tourism to the area, which is a major boost to its economy. She said: 'This area relies so much on tourism. Do you think that tourists are going to come up here if they think that the waters around the Clyde Estuary are contaminated with radiation?' The scandal has led to calls from the Scottish Greens for an investigation after a six-year battle to have the files released. READ MORE: Investigation urged into radioactive leak in Scottish loch and 'cover-up scandal' An investigation by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) found that the leaks had occurred because of 'shortfalls in maintenance'. There was one pipe burst in 2010 and a further two in 2019, one of which released 'significant amounts of water' flooding a nuclear weapons processing area where the water became contaminated with tritium, a material in nuclear warheads. This water was released into Loch Long. After an investigation by Sepa, the MoD promised 23 actions to prevent more bursts and floods in March 2020. However, there were two more pipe bursts in 2021 including another incident in an area with radioactive substances. (Image: POphot Barry Wheeler/Ministry of Defence/PA Wire) The SNP said the incidents were a 'direct consequence of Westminster's decision to impose nuclear weapons on Scotland'. Bill Kidd, the MSP for Glasgow Anniesland, said: 'Trident is dangerous, immoral, and completely incompatible with the peaceful, forward-looking nation we want to be. 'Scotland has a proud tradition of opposing weapons of mass destruction. With independence, we can scrap Trident, clean up the mess it has left behind, and invest instead in the real priorities of our people – tackling the climate crisis, improving public services, and building a fairer economy.' The MoD was approached for comment.
Scotsman
11-08-2025
- Scotsman
Come on in, the water's lovely
Kirsty McArthur says the case for expanding Scotland's bathing water network is persuasive Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... However, it is important to note that not all bodies of water are officially recognised as bathing waters under Scottish law. Of those that are, 87 per cent earned excellent or good classifications in 2025, and it's clear this could be an opportunity for Scotland to develop its bathing waters into a new boost for local economies. For landowners, communities and local authorities, the designation of new bathing waters offers more than just a public good. It is an opportunity to not only harness the value of these natural resources for tourism and local business, but also to ensure the protection of both public health and the environment. What is bathing water? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The popularity of wild swimming suggests there is an opportunity to develop bathing waters that would be a real asset for landowners and local communities (Picture: Under the Bathing Water (Scotland) Regulations 2008, a bathing water is an area of surface water – coastal or inland – that has been officially recognised by Scottish ministers as a popular swimming spot. These areas typically already attract regular use and have supporting infrastructure in place, such as toilets, car parks or lifeguard cover. Designation status is not just a label, it's a commitment: to maintaining water quality, managing public access, and protecting the environment. Who oversees bathing water? The commitment is shared across a number of key stakeholders. Landowners, particularly where access to water runs across private land, may be involved in maintaining paths, providing facilities or helping manage waste and footfall. Local authorities also play a critical role in supporting infrastructure and submitting formal applications for designation. This is part of the important role of local authorities in supporting initiatives to boost local economies. Meanwhile, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) monitors water quality during the official bathing season (15 May-15 September) and classifies sites as Excellent, Good, Sufficient or Poor, based on four years of test results. For landowners, the opportunity to support or apply for bathing water designation should not be overlooked. It can bring increased footfall to rural or under-visited areas, support local businesses such as cafes, accommodation or tour operators, and contribute to broader community wellbeing. At a time when more people are seeking meaningful, outdoor experiences, having a recognised, well-managed swimming location can be a real asset to locals and visitors alike. Kirsty McArthur is a Solicitor in MF Mac's Real Estate team Of course, designation also brings responsibilities. A site must be able to support increased public use, meaning appropriate parking, clear signage, accessible pathways, and in some cases, toilets or bins. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ongoing coordination with SEPA and local authorities is also vital to maintain water quality and protect surrounding habitats. With the right support and infrastructure in place, these sites could offer safe, sustainable access to wild swimming for years to come. There is an abundance of opportunities to build destinations focused on the natural environment that can bring people from all over to appreciate and connect with the stunning landscapes of Scotland. As interest in open water recreation grows, so too does the case for expanding Scotland's bathing water network. By working together, landowners, councils, environmental bodies and local communities, there is an opportunity to create more spaces that are not only beautiful, but safe, sustainable, and ready to be enjoyed.
