Bihar SIR: Rationalisation of polling stations, change in BLOs spark confusion on ground
The number of polling stations in the State has now gone up from 77,895 to 90,712. This has been done to adhere to the SIR order of June 24, which had directed that the number of voters in each polling station be limited to 1,200 from the earlier ceiling of 1,500.
The ECI has said that Bihar is the first State to implement this new ceiling of voters for each polling station.
However, the ECI, instead of numbering the new booths separately, has given fresh numbers to all the booths. In addition, the Booth Level Officers (BLOs) in charge of each polling station have been reassigned, according to the new numbering. This, coupled with the fact that the rationalisation process was implemented on July 26, after the first phase of SIR was over, has meant that the BLOs who collected the enumeration forms in the first phase would not be the ones handling the claims and objections from voters.
Political workers as well as voters on the ground said that many a time, the BLO who had collected the form was not available to answer their concerns regarding deletion of names, or documents that must be submitted in case a voter's booth had been changed.
In a letter to District Election Officer, Begusarai, Congress district president Abhay Kumar Singh Sarjan, said: 'BLOs of newly created parts/booths have complained that much confusion has been created by this modification of existing booths during the SIR process, because they have to procure the enumeration forms and documents collected by the BLOs of older parts/booths. Such confusion [among] the BLOs has made the process of verification of deleted electors even more difficult.'
Another Congress district president, Anil Singh, who heads the Chapra unit, told The Hindu: 'Some of the BLOs who have moved to new booths are not even answering calls of voters from whom they had collected their forms'.
Similar concerns have been raised by parties like the Rashtriya Janata Dal and the Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) as well.
However, sources in the Bihar State Election Office said that polling station rationalisation was carried out in a transparent and organised manner and all political parties were informed through distribution of the new list. Public meetings were also organised, they said.
The sources said that in cases where one polling station was divided into two, there was seamless data transfer between the two BLOs and since the officials are local residents, contacting them was not difficult for voters.
The list of polling stations has also been pasted on each building which houses them.
A senior ECI official in Delhi said that the rationalisation of polling stations was done to prevent long queues and overcrowding in booths during voting.
'Smaller booths also ensure a higher voting percentage, it has been observed,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
9 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Investigate, don't intimidate': Congress on Election Commission press conference
Shortly after the Election Commission held a press conference defending the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, the Congress on Sunday asked the poll panel to 'investigate' the allegations raised by Opposition parties and not to 'intimidate' them. Jairam Ramesh, the party general secretary in charge of communications, also claimed that the Election Commission stood ' thoroughly exposed ' for its 'incompetence and blatant partisanship'. He further described as 'laughable' the statement by the Election Commission that it makes no distinction between the ruling party and the Opposition. Earlier in the day, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar claimed that a deliberate attempt was being made to spread confusion by ignoring the ground reality of the voter roll revision. 'For EC neither anyone is Opposition nor ruling party,' Kumar said. 'There is no discrimination between parties, all are the same.' He also said that no political party had lodged objections so far after the draft roll was published on August 1. Kumar added that the main purpose of the revision exercise was to 'purify' the voter list, adding that it was carried out after receiving several complaints from political parties. However, The Hindu had quoted workers of political parties as saying on August 9 that they had filed several complaints. Party workers had told the newspaper that when they flag the deletion of names of eligible voters through complaints, the electoral registration officers tell them to ask the voters to submit Form 6, which is for the registration of new voters. In a social media post on Sunday, Ramesh asked if the poll panel would fully implement the Supreme Court's Thursday order directing that the list prepared after the revision of voter rolls should be displayed on the websites of the state's district electoral officers and the chief electoral officer. 'It is constitutionally bound to do so,' Ramesh said. 'The nation is waiting and watching.' The Congress leader also alleged that the poll panel had failed to address the concerns raised by Rahul Gandhi and pointed out that the claims made by the leader of the Opposition were based on the Election Commission's data. Today, the Election Commission of India held a press conference. This was the first time this 'new' ECI was speaking directly and not planting through sources. Yesterday, the ECI had released a 'Press Note', the purpose of which was to place the onus of voter list correction on… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) August 17, 2025 During the press conference, Kumar cited a 2019 ruling of the Supreme Court to say that machine-readable voter lists cannot be released as they could violate the privacy of voters. The Election Commission's press conference coincided with the launch of the Congress' 16-day Voter Adhikar Yatra, or a voter rights march, in poll-bound Bihar against alleged fraud during the special intensive revision of electoral rolls. On claims made by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi that his party had found discrepancies in more than one lakh names in the Mahadevapura Assembly segment of the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency, Kumar said that an affidavit would have to be submitted or an apology made to the country. 'There is no third option,' he said. 'If the affidavit is not received within seven days, it means that all these allegations are baseless.' EC facilitating 'vote theft': Rahul Gandhi Rahul Gandhi on Sunday alleged that the poll panel was colluding with the Bharatiya Janata Party to carry out 'vote theft' under the guise of revising electoral rolls in Bihar. He said he was not afraid of Election Commission officials and vowed not to allow the alleged theft of votes. Speaking in Aurangabad at the end of the first day of his voter rights march, Gandhi said that while he was asked to submit an affidavit on his claims about alleged electoral fraud, no such demand had been made of Bharatiya Janata Party leader Anurag Thakur, who made similar allegations in a separate press conference. EC ने ज़िंदा लोगों को मरा हुआ घोषित कर दिया। EC ने उन लोगों को भी वोटर लिस्ट से हटा दिया जिन्होंने अभी लोकसभा चुनाव में वोट डाला था। EC ने एक बार फिर डिजिटल, मशीन-रीडेबल वोटर रोल देने से इनकार कर दिया। EC अब CCTV फुटेज न देने के लिए बहाने पर बहाना बना रही है। पहले वोट चोरी… — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) August 17, 2025 Bihar voter roll revision The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list needed to submit proof of eligibility to vote. The draft voter roll was published on August 1 ahead of the Bihar Assembly polls expected to take place in October or November. The list will be revised by September after the Election Commission assesses objections and claims about the exclusion and inclusion of voters in the draft roll. On Thursday, the Election Commission was directed by the Supreme Court to publish a district-wise list of the 65 lakh Bihar voters whose names were removed from the draft along with the reason for each deletion such as death, migration or double registration. Sharing the list and the reasons for deletions will improve 'voter confidence' in the institution, the court said. The bench said that the documents should be searchable based on the Elector Photo Identity Card numbers. Scroll had reported on August 9 that the Election Commission had replaced the digital draft voter lists in Bihar with scanned images of the voter lists on its official websites. The digital draft lists are machine-readable and easier to analyse for errors and patterns on a large scale. The scanned versions make this process harder. On Saturday, the poll panel said that political parties or individuals who had concerns about electoral rolls prepared in the past should have raised them during the claims and objections period. It did not name any political party or person in the statement. On August 7, Gandhi said that his party had spent six months examining the electoral rolls in Mahadevapura Assembly segment of the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency and found discrepancies in more than one lakh names. He alleged that this was evidence of the poll panel having colluded with the Bharatiya Janata Party. The Election Commission had on Wednesday dismissed Gandhi's allegations as ' false and misleading '.
Hans India
39 minutes ago
- Hans India
KTR all in for SIR, albeit on ECI itself!
Hyderabad; BRS working president KT Rama Rao on Sunday advocated for Special Intensive Revision (SIR), not on electoral rolls, but on the Election Commission of India itself. Responding to the press conference by the ECI, Rama Rao said, 'Yes! We need an SIR! The Special Intensive Revision not of the electoral rolls but of the Election Commission of India itself.' The BRS leader said that the press conference on Sunday left all with more questions than answers. The Chief Election Commissioner's explanations seemed more like excuses than solutions, he alleged. KTR said, 'The only thing that we clearly now know is that the Election Commission of India (ECI), which is supposed to safeguard the democratic process seems to be functioning as an extended arm of the NDA. If the ECI acknowledges discrepancies in the voter list, shouldn't they also accept the dereliction of their duties? It is high time that we demand a revision not of the voter list but a revision of ECI's appointment process… a clinical overhaul of the system so that we can still continue to call ourselves a democracy.'
Hans India
39 minutes ago
- Hans India
Rahul's allegations against EC detrimental to the foundations of Indian democracy
'When the voter list revision happened, we were in power. It is our fault for not verifying it properly,' said Congress minister K.N. Rajanna in response to Rahul Gandhi's allegations of voter fraud in the Mahadevapura Assembly constituency. The Congress high command, angered that Rajanna had 'exposed their foolishness,' immediately removed him from his post. Yet, Rajanna's question is on everyone's mind. If the Congress party is in power in Karnataka now, how could voter fraud have happened in a way that would benefit the opposition? Before the Congress victory in the Assembly elections, the BJP was in power. If the BJP could have won by manipulating the voter list, why did they lose? And how did Congress win? Rahul Gandhi seems to have missed this logic, but the people have not. Normally, opposition leaders attack the ruling party to win public support and come to power. In our country's politics, this opposition leader is different; he targets the Election Commission. Rahul claimed that, based on his own investigation, the voter list in Mahadevapura contained irregularities. Yet, he is unwilling to affirm his findings as definite truth. The Election Commission asked him to formally file a complaint and submit an affidavit, but Rahul refused. Strategically, this was a mistake. If he wanted to expose voter list issues, he should have picked a state where Congress lost, such as Haryana or Maharashtra, especially since he complains that exit polls in those states predicted a Congress win but the party lost instead. Targeting Karnataka, where Congress is in power, is baffling. Mahadevapura is entirely urban, part of Bengaluru, an employment hub where people migrate from across India and register as voters even if they are still registered in their home states. This is why voter turnout in metros rarely crosses 50 percent, the same is true for Hyderabad. Rahul claims that out of Mahadevapura's 6.5 lakh voters, one lakh are fake. Whether this is true will be revealed in investigations. However, minor errors in voter lists cannot change election outcomes. Rahul also alleges rigging after 5 PM, but such a thing would require the cooperation of thousands of people, which is impossible in the election process. Moreover, in Karnataka, Congress has strong cadre representation at every polling booth until the EVM is sealed. How, then, could rigging occur? Media fact-checking of Rahul's claims revealed that while some addresses listed many voters, those people were actually migrant workers who had registered with rental agreements but later moved away. Their names remained on the list, as is common in cities. Duplicate votes, votes of deceased persons, and other such errors are common nationwide. Ironically, Rahul opposes the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, currently underway in Bihar, which aims to fix such irregularities. Instead of demanding a nationwide SIR to clean all voter lists, Rahul attacks the Election Commission. The real solution is linking voter ID with Aadhaar, but when this was attempted earlier, Rahul opposed it, filing court cases and stopping the process. From 2004 to 2014, Congress was in power. Yet, despite having the authority, Rahul did not implement these reforms. In fact, he once tore up an ordinance approved by his own cabinet in front of the media, humiliating his own Prime Minister. Rahul used to blame EVMs for Congress's losses, but suddenly he has shifted to voter lists. If he truly doubts both EVMs and voter lists, he should reject the Telangana election results, where Congress came to power in 2023 despite losing deposits in many previous contests, including the Munugode bypoll just a year earlier. In Bihar, illegal immigrants are being turned into a 'vote bank,' threatening national security. In Bengal, Mamata Banerjee is allegedly sheltering Bangladeshi Muslims to convert them into voters. Rahul and his allies, knowingly or unknowingly, are part of this 'mind game' to stop the EC from removing such names from voter lists. The Election Commission is the guardian of India's democratic foundations, and public trust in it is vital. Rahul Gandhi, by magnifying minor voter list errors, is attempting to damage the EC's credibility, thereby weakening democracy itself. As the heir of the Congress party, who has yet to deliver a single decisive victory, he is trying to shift the blame for his failures onto the EC. But the public is seeing through this. The Supreme Court even remarked, in reference to Rahul's statements, 'If you are a true Indian, you would not make such comments.' The question now resonates nationwide: why does Rahul take India's internal issues to the global stage, giving anti-India forces ammunition? If Rahul were a true Indian, would he conspire against the very foundations of our democracy? Would he attack the EC with baseless allegations? This attempt to weaken India must be defeated by the people themselves. (The writer is Vice President, Andhra Pradesh BJP)
