Diego Morales: 'I will not apologize' for overseas trips, no-bid contracts for campaign donors
A defiant Secretary of State Diego Morales is defending himself to lawmakers against criticism after Morales' no-bid contracts to campaign donors, spot bonuses to a relative, overseas trips, absence at a crucial legislative budget hearing, alleged election law violation, and $90,000 taxpayer-paid luxury SUV.
Morales, who appeared before the State Budget Committee on June 18 to request budget augmentations totaling more than $10 million from various state funds, faced a grilling — and criticism — from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers.
"I will not apologize to anyone because my work ethic is unmatched," Morales told lawmakers. "I'm going above and beyond the call of duty."
Morales said he's been "criss-crossing the state" in record time by visiting all 92 counties, as well as arriving at the Statehouse daily around 5 a.m.
He also asserted he's never used taxpayer money to fund any of his overseas travel, and that he purchased a new luxury SUV because he had put too many miles on his previous vehicle.
He defended missing a legislative budget hearing earlier this year to go on an overseas trip by saying he was "not the first secretary of state who has missed one of these."
Those explanations didn't appear to satisfy lawmakers on both the left and right. In fact, some of the most pointed questions and comments came from Republican state Sen. Chris Garten, R-Charlestown.
"I just want to be on the record as saying you have a vehicle that cost almost twice as much as the average salary of a Hoosier," Garten said.
Garten then pressed Morales about whether any of the expenses slated to be funded by the budget augmentations were to financial contributors to Morales' campaign. The biggest augmentation request was for $8.1 million to fund IT upgrades and personnel, subject to sufficient revenue from the Electronic and Enhanced Access fund.
"A lot of people contribute to my campaign," Morales responded to Garten.
"It's a yes or no," Garten said. "I think Indiana Hoosiers deserve to know that. ... I would like them to be identified."
Morales acknowledged that some firms with contracts were campaign donors, including contractor MTX, which donated at least $80,000 to Morales and has been paid more than $2.5 million in the 2025 fiscal year, according to secretary of state records.
But he defended the deals to companies as experts who are "getting the job done."
Meanwhile, state Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis, criticized Morales for failing to meet his basic duties or being transparent with taxpayers.
"I'm disappointed in your leadership," Qaddoura said. "I'm disappointed in the way you're leading your office. Please do better for the state of Indiana."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
37 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Fox News Poll Spells Bad News for Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new Fox News poll shows a significant majority of American voters oppose President Donald Trump's federal budget legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Newsweek reached out to House and Senate Republican leaders for comment. Why It Matters The poll's findings highlight significant public skepticism over major policy changes proposed by the president and his Republican allies in Congress. The lack of widespread voter approval may place pressure on the administration and Congress as they attempt to advance the bill, invoked by Trump as a cornerstone achievement. The large margin of public disapproval illustrates deeper concerns about the nation's economic direction and government spending priorities. Although many voters saw Trump as the better candidate in last year's election to address economic concerns, his management of the economy has emerged early as a central issue for Americans during his second term. What To Know The Fox News poll, conducted between June 13 and 16 with 1,003 registered voters, revealed that the majority of Americans surveyed disagreed with the House-approved federal budget bill. The poll's margin of error was plus or minus 3 percentage points. Only 38 percent favored the bill, while 59 percent opposed it, a 21-point gap against the bill. About half of all voters believed the legislation would be detrimental to their families, and just a quarter thought it would deliver any benefit. The poll indicated that negative sentiment crossed party lines to some degree, as less than half of Republicans said they believed the bill would help their own families. At the same time, nearly two-thirds of Republicans in the survey supported the bill, while 89 percent of Democrats and 73 percent of independents opposed. President Donald Trump attends a working session during the G7 Summit in Alberta, Canada, on June 16, 2025. President Donald Trump attends a working session during the G7 Summit in Alberta, Canada, on June 16, 2025. Ludovic Marin/AFP via Getty Images Economic Pessimism Lingers Under Trump The Fox News survey showed that while positive ratings of the economy rose modestly since the start of Trump's second term—from 21 percent in March to 31 percent in June—overall economic sentiment has not yet recovered to the levels seen in early 2020. Approximately 62 percent of respondents said their family finances were stable or improving, but 55 percent continued to express pessimism about the broader economy. Additionally, 84 percent reported being highly concerned about inflation and 68 percent rated economic conditions as only "fair" or "poor." Trump's Approval Rating Remains Underwater Trump's job approval rating stood at 46 percent in the latest Fox News polling, with a disapproval rate of 54 percent, meaning his overall approval is underwater by 8 points. These numbers reflected a marginal improvement over previous months, yet still signaled a presidency facing continued dissatisfaction from a majority of voters. Recent polls have consistently shown disapproval of Trump's handling of the economy, a reversal from his first term when economic approval ratings often exceeded 50 percent. Trump's overall job approval has remained in negative territory throughout most of his second presidency. The survey also found that policy measures, such as tariffs, have not reassured the public, with 57 percent of respondents believing that tariffs harm the economy, the highest level recorded by Fox News polling. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump, Thursday morning on Truth Social: "The Crooked FoxNews Polls got the Election WRONG, I won by much more than they said I would, and have been biased against me for years. They are always wrong and negative. It's why MAGA HATES FoxNews, even though their anchors are GREAT. This has gone on for years, but they never change the incompetent polling company that does their work." Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, on X (formerly Twitter) on June 10: "BBB does not cut enough spending to offset its tax cuts and new spending. Even using schizophrenic math and rosy economic assumptions, there's no scenario in which this bill doesn't increase our deficits every year that Trump is President and Mike Johnson is Speaker." House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, on X on June 11: "It's clear: The American people SUPPORT our One Big Beautiful Bill. Republicans in Congress will get this done and deliver real relief for the American people!" Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, on X on June 10: "While billionaires get more tax breaks, here is what the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' means for the rest of America: Health care costs go up, Hospitals and health centers close, 850,000 health care workers lose their jobs. This bill is ugly. It's a betrayal to the American people." What Happens Next The Big Beautiful Bill Act continues to face debate in the Senate as revisions are discussed, with public opinion data indicating challenges to its passage. The White House and congressional Republicans will have to address persistent voter concerns as new polling and potential amendments emerge in the legislative process.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Weighs In on Plan To Increase Minimum Wage
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump expressed uncertainty over whether he would support a Republican-led proposal to raise the federal minimum wage, when asked about the measure at the White House on Wednesday. The bill, introduced by Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri last week, seeks to double the current federal minimum wage to $15 per hour. In response to a reporter's question on the plan, Trump replied: "I haven't seen it. I'd have to speak to Josh. He's a very good friend of mine." "That's interesting that Josh did that," Trump added. "You have to think about that one." Newsweek contacted Senator Hawley's office via email on Thursday for comment on the bill and President Trump's reaction. Why It Matters The federal minimum wage was last increased in 2009, rising to $7.25 While many states have independently adopted minimum wages well above the mandated rate, advocates for increasing this nationwide maintain that this would directly benefit lower earners, while reducing income inequality and improve average living standards. Critics, however, contend that a significant hike would raise labor costs to the detriment of employers, particularly small businesses, and result in increased unemployment. What To Know Hawley's $15 Minimum Wage Proposal Last week, Senator Hawley, along with Vermont Democrat Senator Peter Welch, introduced the "Higher Wages for American Workers Act of 2025." If signed into law, the bill would doubled the current minimum wage to $15 from January 2026 and allow increases with inflation in subsequent years. Hawley has in the past proposed similar measures, including a 2021 plan to force companies with revenues over $1 billion to pay their employees $15 per hour, and has argued that the latest bill is necessary for earnings to "keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day." Hawley also addressed the bill's bipartisan sponsorship of the bill, describing it as "a populist position," and telling NBC News that, "if we're going to be a working people's party, we have to do something for working people." Current U.S. Minimum Wage Context Thirty states have adopted their own minimum wages above the 2009 federal rate, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI). These include Hawley's home state of Missouri, which increased its baseline to $13.75 and plans to raise it to $15.00 starting January 1, 2026. Ben Zipperer, senior economist with the EPI, a progressive think tank that supports raising the minimum wage, told Newsweek that a Republican's sponsorship of the bill "is admission that minimum wages are a very popular policy to correct the widespread problem of low pay." However he expressed skepticism that the party would "abandon their consistent role as the chief obstacle to federal minimum wage increases." Advocates for raising the federal minimum wage have argued that increases benefit low-income workers, increasingly grappling with inflation and strained budgets, while detractors worry about potential negative impacts for businesses and on employment. US President Donald Trump speaks to the press in the Oval Office of the White House as members of Italian soccer club Juventus pay a visit in Washington, DC, on June 18, 2025. US President Donald Trump speaks to the press in the Oval Office of the White House as members of Italian soccer club Juventus pay a visit in Washington, DC, on June 18, 2025. Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images Zipperer said that the hike proposed by Hawley and Welch, or the Democratic bill introduced earlier this year which would raise this incrementally to $17 an hour by 2030, would "unambiguously benefit low wage workers and their families and communities." He cited a 2024 EPI study which found that most research into the topic has found either no resulting job losses or "only small disemployment effects." However, economist David Neumark of the University of California, Irvine, said that research "overwhelmingly points to some job loss for the least skilled, and no gains on net for low income families, as some gain higher wages but others lose jobs or have hours reduced." Neumark's recent research into the topic, he told Newsweek, "says the burden falls very disproportionately on blacks, not whites. I.e., whites get more of the wage gains, and blacks experience more of the jobs/hours loss." U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with Sarah Wynn-Williams, former Director of Global Public Policy at Facebook, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on April 09,... U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with Sarah Wynn-Williams, former Director of Global Public Policy at Facebook, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on April 09, 2025 in Washington, DC. MorePresident Trump has previously expressed some openness to raising the minimum wage. In an interview with NBC's Meet the Press in December, Trump acknowledged that $7.25 was "a very low number," and that there "is a level at which you can do it." "Let me give you the downside, though: In California, they raised it up to a very high number, and your restaurants are going out of business all over the place," Trump told host Kristen Welker. "The population is shrinking, it's had a very negative impact," But there is a level at which you could do it, absolutely." California had a $15 per hour cap on mimimum wage, which most employees hit in 2023. High inflation allowed for a further 50 cents in 2024. The state last rose minimum rose in January 2025, reaching $16.50. Its population grew by 108,000 people in calendar year 2024, according to new data from the California Department of Finance released last month. "Despite the common myth of a continually declining population," a media release said. "California has only saw a short period of population loss in its 174 year history — during the peak of the COVID pandemic, when it decreased by 379,544 people (which represents about 1% decrease over those two years), according to the U.S. Census Bureau." What People Are Saying President Trump, asked about the bill on Wednesday, said: "Some people agree with it. Some people don't. You know, some people say it really turns away business, restaurants, clothes and a lot of things happen. Other people agree. I'd have to speak to Josh—he's a good guy." Senator Josh Hawley said in a statement last week: "For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline. One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day. This bipartisan legislation would ensure that workers across America benefit from higher wages," Ben Zipperer, senior economist with the Economic Policy Institute told Newsweek he had "no predictions" about Trump's position on the issue, adding: "I'd hope that he would be concerned that over 14 million workers are paid less than $15 per hour, but given that he was unaware of a bill to raise their wages, it seems he's out to lunch." David Neumark, professor of economics at the University of California, Irvine, told Newsweek: "This isn't new for [Senator] Hawley. He is conservative on many issues, but a populist when it comes to labor. Still, some Republican support could make this happen, and would be popular politically." Michael Reich, professor of Economics and Chair of the Center on Wage and Employment Dynamics at the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, told Newsweek: "Public opinion polls and polls of economists have long revealed majority support for a $15 federal minimum wage. Yet Hawley's proposal has not drawn support from any other Republican politicians, even among those in states that already have $15 minimum wages." He added that Trump was "famously fickle on many economic policies." "He expressed varying views about raising the minimum wage during the 2024 campaign, but has not raised it himself since." What Happens Next? Hawley and Welch's bill has been referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions for review and consideration, who will be tasked with deciding whether it should move forward to a vote.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Paramount delays $35M settlement with Trump: sources
A potential $35 million settlement of President Trump's lawsuit against Paramount's CBS affiliate has been delayed after the company's management continued to fear a potential legal backlash, The Post has learned. Paramount's hesitancy to make a deal prompted members of Trump's legal team to maintain its initial bargaining position and demand even more money to end the protracted legal dispute, according to people close to the matter. The two sides, however, remain in active settlement negotiations, according to a regulator filing. A potential deal breakthrough is always a possibility. 5 The impasse over President Trump's lawsuit against CBS News threatens to continue to throttle a bigger prize — media heiress Shari Redstone's plan to sell Paramount to independent studio Skydance. Christopher Sadowski The $35 million settlement was recently floated and considered by both sides, according to two sources, as negotiations over the $20 billion lawsuit enter their sixth month. The impasse threatens to throttle a bigger prize — media heiress Shari Redstone's plan to sell Paramount to independent studio Skydance. Approval of the deal by Trump's regulators at the Federal Communications Commission is seen as contingent on settlement of the case, people at Paramount tell The Post. Trump legal reps and officials deny that that two issues are related, but Paramount executives are concerned that any large settlement would be considered a bribe since the fate of the $8 billion Paramount-Skydance merger is at stake. A settlement for $35 million would have been a 30% haircut from the original $50 million Trump's legal advisers had tried to squeeze out of the company to end the lawsuit filed in Texas federal court last year, as The Post previously reported. '(The Trump people) appeared to be willing to settle for less but even that amount worries the Paramount people,' one deal insider told The Post. A source close to the Trump legal team denied that it was on the verge of settling for $35 million. 5 Redstone, Paramount's controlling shareholder, stands to net as much as $2 billion when her long-held desire to unload the company to Skydance is completed. Getty Images 'We have a strong case,' the source said. A Paramount spokesman declined comment. A legal rep for Trump didn't return a request for comment. A Redstone rep didn't return a request for comment. One thing appears certain: Paramount's continued reluctance to pay a significant settlement, one lower than the Trump people had initially sought, hardened the president's legal team's position and could create a situation where the case remains in court for a protracted period, sources close to the matter say. The lawsuit, filed in Texas last year, alleges that CBS News' longtime news program '60 Minutes' doctored an interview with Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 presidential election. It comes as the Trump-nominated FCC Chair Brendan Carr subsequently launched a probe into the alleged biased editing, casting a cloud over whether the merger will get the green light from the regulator. 5 A settlement for $35 million would be a 30% haircut from the original $50 million Trump's legal advisers had tried to squeeze out of the company. AP Redstone, Paramount's controlling shareholder, stands to net as much as $2 billion when her long-held desire to unload the company to Skydance is completed. Without a settlement, there is no windfall for the cash-bleeding Redstone, and therein lies the issue for Paramount. Redstone has officially recused herself from negotiations given she will personally benefit, but the notion that the lawsuit is tied to the regulatory approval of her deal is vexing her management team and preventing them from signing off on a payment of any size that could be legally construed as a bribe, They fear they could be subject to litigation and even criminal bribery charges that are not covered by insurance, people with direct knowledge of the matter tell The Post. Several Democrats in Congress have raised the bribery issue and the worry is that a state attorney general or Congress — if it changes hands in the midterms — could launch an investigation. 5 CBS has denied the charges and the main allegation that it purposely edited the Kamala Harris interview to edit out her famous 'word salad' vernacular to make her sound more presidential. 60 Minutes / CBS Redstone had indicated in the past she was willing to pay as much as $50 million to make the case go away so she can preserve some semblance of her inheritance from her late father, media mogul Sumner Redstone, which has been decimated with the decline in Paramount's fortunes in recent years. The board has recently offered $15 million – the same amount paid by Disney-owned ABC News to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by Trump after 'This Week' anchor George Stephanopolous repeatedly accusing him of 'rape.' In the CBS lawsuit, both sides have weighed making up the difference with public service ads involving causes that the president would appreciate, including those combating antisemitism and promoting US veterans, The Post previously reported. But the stalemate continues with the Trump team brushing off the $15 million offer, the $35 million deal stalled and the PSA offer not advancing. Meanwhile, the delay – and its implications for the Paramount-Skydance deal – has been looming large for all the players involved. Skydance is run by movie maven David Ellison, the son of Trump friend and Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, who is worth approximately $250 billion. 5 Skydance is run by movie maven David Ellison, the son of Trump friend and Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, who is worth approximately $250 billion. Evan Agostini/Invision/AP Behind the scenes, Skydance continues to draw up plans for a massive restructuring of the media properties, including CBS, once considered the crown jewel of the Redstone empire for its top-rated shows, sports and influential news programming such as '60 Minutes.' Cord-cutting and changes to the media business landscape have squeezed profits at CBS News. The network's boss Wendy McMahon and longtime '60 Minutes' executive producer Bill Owens recently departed, voicing concerns over the settlement of what it considers a frivolous case with Trump in order to proceed with the deal. Skydance and its deal partner, private equity powerhouse RedBird Capital, have anointed former NBCU chief Jeff Shell as the new CBS chief if the deal gets done. He is likely to downsize the organization and, according to sources, address the alleged political biases in its news programming that are at the center of the Trump lawsuit. For years conservatives have complained that CBS tilts the scales in interviews and programming that projects a left-leaning political bias that under a strict reading of Federal Communications Commission rules could violate the law since it operates over public airwaves that demand it serve the 'public interest.' CBS has denied the charges and the main allegation that it purposely edited the Harris interview to edit out her famous 'word salad' vernacular to make her sound more presidential. If there is no settlement, the federal judge in the Trump lawsuit is expected to grant discovery in the case in the coming weeks, which would be a significant legal escalation that Paramount and Redstone wanted to avoid. If the matter doesn't get resolved by October, the deal could be voided under the preliminary agreement reached between Skydance and Paramount. Redstone has a looming tax bill coming due over her late father's estate and other obligations that could total in the hundreds of millions of dollars.
