Iran's uranium stocks said to be intact, UK media says citing European intelligence probe
LONDON — Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium is believed to be largely intact following US strikes on the country's main nuclear sites, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing European officials.
The newspaper, citing two people briefed on preliminary intelligence assessments, said European capitals believe Iran's stockpile of 408 kilograms of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels was not being held in Fordow and may have been moved prior to US strikes on Sunday.
Claims that uranium was moved from any of Iran's nuclear sites were dismissed by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday.
"We were watching closely and there was no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved," she said.
The initial European intelligence assessment is unlikely to go down well with US President Donald Trump who is currently engaged with a fight with his own spy agencies about the impact of the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites.
On Thursday, CIA Director John Ratcliffe said the strikes had caused "severe damage" to Iran's nuclear facilities after a leaked report downplayed the extent of the operation.
According to Ratcliffe, key sites had been destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the "course of years."
But he stopped short of supporting Trump's claims that the operation on Iran's nuclear programme had been a "spectacular military success" that had "obliterated" the facilities.
Trump's claims were supported by Israel's Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) which said on Wednesday that US and Israeli strikes had rendered the Fordow underground enrichment site "inoperable."
In a handout, the IAEC claimed the "devastating" strikes "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure."
The new US intelligence assessment comes a day after a leaked early report from the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) played down the extent of the destruction and concluded that key components of Iran's nuclear program could be restarted in months.
Speaking at the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday, Trump rejected that assessment, insisting that his country's spies did not have the full picture and defended his own conclusion that American bombs and missiles delivered a crushing blow.
"This was a devastating attack and it knocked them for a loop," Trump said as his administration scrambled to support claims he made only hours after the attack.
The impact of the US strikes was also downplayed by Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
In his first public remarks since Iran and Israel agreed to a ceasefire which brought an end to the 12-day conflict, Khamenei said Trump's assessment had been "exaggerated."
"They could not achieve anything significant," Khamenei said in a video message broadcast on state television.
The US launched strikes on Sunday on three of Iran's nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
At Fordow, which is buried deep under a mountain north of the city of Qom, US stealth bombers dropped several 14,000-kilogram bunker-buster bombs, collapsing the entrance and damaging infrastructure.
But the facility itself was not destroyed, US intelligence found.
Iran's ongoing nuclear program was at the heart of the recent conflict with Israel, which Israeli officials see as an existential threat to their country.
Iran was previously subject to an international nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which saw the country receive sanctions relief in exchange for strict limits on its nuclear activities.
During his first term in office, President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the pact in 2018, slamming it as "the worst deal ever negotiated" and slapping new sanctions on Iran.
Since then, the other signatories to the deal have scrambled to keep Iran in compliance, but Tehran considers the deal void and has continued with uranium enrichment, which at current levels sits at 60%.
That's still technically below the weapons-grade levels of 90%, but still far above the 3.67% permitted under the JCPOA.
Iran maintains that its nuclear program is peaceful and purely for civilian purposes. — Euronews
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
30 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Congo and Rwanda to Sign US-mediated Peace Deal to End Conflict in Eastern Congo
The Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda are set to sign a peace deal facilitated by the US to help end the decadeslong deadly fighting in eastern Congo. The deal, to be signed in Washington Friday, would also help the US government and American companies gain access to critical minerals in the conflict-battered, mineral-rich region, The Associated Press said. The Central African nation of Congo has been ripped apart by conflict with more than 100 armed groups. The most prominent is the M23 rebel group, backed by neighboring Rwanda, whose major advance early this year left bodies littered on the streets. With 7 million people displaced in Congo, the UN has called it 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.' Lauded by President Trump last week as 'a Great Day for Africa and ... for the World,' the crucial deal comes as part of other ongoing peace talks to end the conflict, including ones mediated by the African Union as well as Qatar. The agreement involves provisions on respect for territorial integrity, a prohibition of hostilities as well as the disengagement, disarmament and conditional integration of non-state armed groups, US State Department deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott told reporters on Thursday. UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric also said on Thursday that such a deal is welcomed, adding: 'We talk almost every day about ... the horrific suffering of civilians, the hunger, the sexual violence, the constant fear, the constant displacement' in eastern Congo. The peace deal will likely not end the conflict quickly Congo hopes the US will provide it with the security support needed to fight the rebels and possibly get them to withdraw from the key cities of Goma and Bukavu, and from the entire region where Rwanda is estimated to have up to 4,000 troops. Rwanda has said it is defending its territorial interests and not supporting the M23. However, the M23 rebels have suggested the agreement won't be binding on them. The rebel group has not been directly involved in the planned peace deal although it has been part of other ongoing peace talks. Corneille Nangaa, leader of the Congo River Alliance that includes the M23, told the Associated Press in March that direct peace talks with Congo can only be held if the country acknowledges their grievances and that 'anything regarding us which are done without us, it's against us.' An M23 spokesman, Oscar Balinda, also echoed those thoughts in an interview with AP this week, saying the US-facilitated deal does not concern the rebels. The US' role in ending the conflict Analysts say the US government's commitment might depend on how much access it has to the minerals being discussed under a separate minerals deal being negotiated. The mostly untapped minerals — estimated to be worth as much as $24 trillion by the US Department of Commerce — are critical to much of the world's technology. Christian Moleka, a political scientist at the Congolese think tank Dypol, called the planned deal a 'major turning point' in the decadeslong conflict, but that the signing could "in no way eliminate all the issues of the conflict.' 'The current draft agreement ignores war crimes and justice for victims by imposing a partnership between the victim and the aggressor,' he said. 'This seems like a trigger-happy proposition and cannot establish lasting peace without justice and reparation.' In Congo's North Kivu province, the hardest hit by the fighting, some believe the peace deal will help resolve the violence but warn justice must still be served for an enduring peace to take hold. 'I don't think the Americans should be trusted 100%,' said Hope Muhinuka, an activist from the province. 'It is up to us to capitalize on all we have now as an opportunity.'
Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Katz: Israel Would Have Killed Khamenei if Given Opportunity
Defense Minister Israel Katz told media that Israel would have killed Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei during the war between the two countries if the opportunity had presented itself. "If he had been in our sights, we would have taken him out," Katz told Israel's public radio station Kan Thursday evening, adding that the military had "searched a lot.' "Khamenei understood this, went very deep underground, broke off contact with the commanders... so in the end it wasn't realistic," Katz told Kan. He told Israeli television Channel 13 Thursday that Israel would cease its assassination attempts because "there is a difference between before the ceasefire and after the ceasefire.' Katz had said during the war that Khamenei "can no longer be allowed to exist,' just days after reports that Washington vetoed Israeli plans to assassinate him. But on Kan, Katz advised Khamenei to remain inside a bunker. "He should learn from the late Nasrallah, who sat for a long time deep in the bunker,' he said, referring to Lebanese Hezbollah's former leader Hassan Nasrallah, who Israel killed in a Beirut airstrike in September 2024. The movements of the supreme leader, who has not left Iran since he took power, are subject to the tightest security and secrecy. Katz said Thursday that Israel maintained its aerial superiority over Iran and that it was ready to strike again. "We won't let Iran develop nuclear weapons and threaten (Israel) with long-range missiles,' he said. In his Channel 12 interview, Katz admitted that Israel does not know the location of all of Iran's enriched uranium, but that its airstrikes had destroyed the country's uranium enrichment capabilities. "The material itself was not something that was supposed to be neutralized," he said of the enriched uranium.
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Press review: Trump wins the NATO Summit and Mamdani makes waves in New York
In this episode of The Dailies, Rawia Alami takes a look at important news stories, reports, analysis, and articles published in newspapers and media outlets across the world. Newspapers focused on the outcome of the NATO summit, viewing it as a total win for US President Donald Trump. The leaked intelligence report that undermines Trump's claims of the extent of damage dealt to Iranian nuclear site by American strikes received attention and an equal amount of uproar. Zohran Mamdani's win in the mayoral primary elections in New York was also widely discussed by American outlets.
