logo
World War 3: Doomsday clock inches closer to midnight as nuclear war imminent between these countries; experts says threat level for US is...

World War 3: Doomsday clock inches closer to midnight as nuclear war imminent between these countries; experts says threat level for US is...

India.com4 days ago
The Doomsday Clock is just 89 seconds shy of midnight. (File)
The symbolic Doomsday Clock is closest to midnight–the hour when a global catastrophe such as a nuclear war could erupt on the planet– it has been since its inception about 78 years ago, after the US decimated the Japan's Hiroshima and Nagasaki with atomic bombs on August 6 and August 9, 1945, respectively– the only battlefield use of a nuclear weapon in history. How close are we to a nuclear war?
Earlier, in January this year, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists moved the Doomsday Clock, closer to midnight than its ever been in its 78-year history, signifying how close the world to a nuclear war in wake of the ongoing conflicts, especially the imminent war between the United States with China and Russia– the top three nuclear armed superpowers in the world today.
The symbolic clock is just 89 seconds shy of midnight, which signifies an unprecedented threat level, higher than what was witnessed during the peak of the Cold War, when the US and USSR had nuclear weapons armed and aimed at each other. Why US faces a higher nuclear threat?
According to Rebeccah Heinrichs, a nuclear expert and a senior fellow at Hudson Institute as well as the director of its Keystone Defense Initiative, the US is facing an unprecedented nuclear threat because this is the first time when its faced with two major nuclear-powered opponents, Russia and China, both of whom are rapidly developing new nuclear capabilities, and actively working together to counter Washington.
'The current nuclear threat environment is more than the pressure faced by the US during the Cold War . At that time, the US had only one nuclear rival in Soviet Union, but today China and Russia have have heavily invested in their nuclear capabilities, with the only goal being to thwart a US nuclear strike or make a preemptive one,' Heinrichs told Fox News. Which countries face the highest nuclear threat?
As per experts, the US, Russia and China face the highest level of nuclear threat despite being three of biggest superpowers on the planet and the ones with largest nuclear stockpile. Smaller players like North Korea, and India and Pakistan are unlikely to resort to nuclear weapons, unless faced with an existential threat, while there are also concerns over Iran's alleged nuclear ambitions and Israel opting for the nuclear option, they say.
Several western experts have blamed the increased threat level on Russia's alleged flouting of international nuclear treaties and China's insistence on expanding its nuclear arsenal, while other believe that the US under Donald Trump and his tariffs, is pushing Washington's rivals to enhance their nuclear capabilities.
Despite growing nuclear threats from North Korea and concerns over the Iranian nuclear program, the threat level is limited to the three biggest players in the nuclear field: Russia, the US and China. The increased threat is attributed to Russia's refusal to abide by international nuclear treaties and China's insistence on expanding its nuclear arsenal. Is World War 3 imminent?
Last month, Russia media reports, citing experts and analysts close to the Kremlin, claimed that NATO is preparing for a major conflict with Russia, amid heightened tensions between Moscow and the US-led Western powers due to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. Experts believe that such a conflict could potentially trigger World War 3 as Russia's allies like China would step in military, resulting in a global conflict.
Its believed these reports are designed to prepare the Russian citizens for a major war with NATO, including a nuclear conflict.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Incentivising infiltration: The US military's dangerous bet on Pakistan
Incentivising infiltration: The US military's dangerous bet on Pakistan

Hans India

time6 hours ago

  • Hans India

Incentivising infiltration: The US military's dangerous bet on Pakistan

As the Middle East approaches a new boiling point, the US Central Command (CENTCOM) finds itself at the heart of an escalating geopolitical storm - from defending Israel against Iranian missile barrages to containing the reach of Chinese influence across the Indian Ocean. In this high-stakes arena, operational clarity and strategic trust are non-negotiable. Yet, CENTCOM's recent embrace of Pakistan—underscored by the award of the prestigious Nishan-e-Imtiaz (Military) to CENTCOM Commander General Michael Kurilla—raises troubling questions about the judgment guiding America's military partnerships. CENTCOM's responsibilities have grown dramatically since Israel's inclusion in its command structure in 2021. No longer a regional player, CENTCOM is now the fulcrum of US military power projection in one of the world's most volatile theatres. When Iran unleashed swarms of missiles and drones on Israel in April and October 2024, it was CENTCOM that coordinated the multinational defence response. American destroyers in the Mediterranean and Red Sea shot down more than 80 drones and multiple ballistic missiles—actions that underscored CENTCOM's frontline role in protecting Israel and maintaining regional balance. Against this backdrop, welcoming Pakistan into CENTCOM's inner circle is not just ill-advised - it's strategically reckless. Needless to say, Pakistan has always played a double game with the West. Pakistan has been found sheltering militant networks and hedging its alliance. It has been cultivating parallel partnerships with US adversaries. It has done so, while publicly pledging cooperation in counterterrorism. That duplicity is more dangerous than ever in the current situation. Pakistan may have been removed from the FATF grey list in 2022, but its financial system remains compromised. It is the US State Department itself which continues to flag significant money laundering and terror financing risks. At the same time, FATF's July 2025 report warned of persistent state-sponsored extremist activity. There is no denying that several UN-designated terrorist groups still operate freely on Pakistani soil, fundraising and training with impunity. Clearly, Pakistan's counterterrorism record remains deeply suspect - precisely the kind of red flag CENTCOM cannot afford to ignore. What also merits attention is Pakistan's growing military-industrial entanglement with China that further complicates the entire picture. Joint development of JF-17 fighter jets, naval systems, and missile technology not only cements Islamabad's dependency on Beijing but potentially opens a backdoor into CENTCOM's security architecture. Sensitive intelligence, operational planning, and defence technologies shared with Pakistan could easily end up in Chinese hands—an unacceptable risk when CENTCOM is actively countering Chinese influence across the Indian Ocean and Middle East. Pakistan's enthusiastic embrace of China's Belt and Road Initiative—especially through strategic ports like Gwadar—makes clear where its long-term allegiances lie. In any future confrontation involving Iran, China, or their proxies, Pakistan's loyalties are unlikely to align with American interests. History offers ample warning. This is the same Pakistan that hosted Osama bin Laden within a stone's throw of its military academy while claiming to be a key U.S. ally in the war on terror. The same Pakistan that facilitated Taliban resurgence while cashing American checks. The same Pakistan is now receiving CENTCOM's highest military honours! To trust such a partner with sensitive intelligence—while CENTCOM coordinates missile defence operations in the Gulf, interdicts Iranian proxy arms shipments, and supports Israeli deterrence—defies logic. It invites risk at the very core of the US regional command. A critical US partner in the Indo-Pacific, India has repeatedly exposed Pakistan's duplicity. The recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir—traced back to Pakistani-based networks—highlighted the continuing threat posed by militant sanctuaries across the border. CENTCOM's tolerance of such contradictions not only undermines US counterterror efforts but also alienates regional allies who share American strategic concerns. Pakistan's chronic economic dysfunction compounds the danger. Heavily reliant on IMF bailouts and deep in debt to China, Islamabad's foreign policy is increasingly up for sale. Economic leverage from Beijing - or even Tehran - could skew Pakistan's decision-making at critical moments. CENTCOM simply cannot afford operational dependencies on a state so vulnerable to external pressure. CENTCOM's evolving mission—neutralising Iran's nuclear ambitions, stabilising Gaza, deterring Houthi aggression, and defending Israel—demands absolute trust among partners. Pakistan has never earned that trust. Recent developments only confirm Islamabad's status as a strategic liability. Operational integrity cannot coexist with geopolitical hedging. Intelligence sharing with a country enmeshed in parallel alliances, riddled with terror links, and beholden to Chinese debt is a recipe for disaster. General Kurilla's commendation may have been intended as diplomacy. In reality, it broadcasts strategic confusion at a time when clarity and conviction are needed most. The stakes in the Middle East are too high to tolerate divided loyalties. It's time for CENTCOM to draw clear lines—and Pakistan belongs on the outside of them.

Turkey's latest weapon has multiple operational capabilities, even US, Russia, and China don't have anything like this; it is...
Turkey's latest weapon has multiple operational capabilities, even US, Russia, and China don't have anything like this; it is...

India.com

time7 hours ago

  • India.com

Turkey's latest weapon has multiple operational capabilities, even US, Russia, and China don't have anything like this; it is...

New Delhi: The past 20-odd years have seen the emergence of new countries that develop and produce the most advanced weapons, which can compete, even beat, the best in the market. These new weapon-producing countries have broken the myth of the technical superiority of the US-led West. Who are the new powers that are creating noise after the Cold War? The new weapon-producing countries that have joined the league of the US-led West include India, China, Pakistan, Iran, North Korea, Japan, and Turkey. The new world order is not unipolar; it has become an open market. Nevertheless, the achievements of the pre-Cold War era cannot be shunned. The Soviet Union, in the 1960s, shocked the USA and the Western world with the Caspian Sea Monster, a massive, winged ship that simply glided above the water's surface, hidden from radar. The Soviet Union was a formidable power, a perfect foil to the USA and its allies, NATO. The power balance was maintained in equal halves. What is Turkey's TALAY drone that has made news worldwide? Turkey has been constantly introducing some of the most powerful and cutting-edge weapons. Its latest weapon is very similar to the Soviet Union's Caspian Sea Monster. This Turkish product is TALAY, said to be the world's first sea-skimming multipurpose unmanned aerial vehicle designed for low-altitude maritime missions. It is capable of stealth operations at just 30 cm above sea level. Talay's ability to fly so low to the surface of the water is almost an unprecedented feature. It uses the 'wing-in-ground' (WIG) effect, where the surface provides a cushion of air that increases lift and efficiency. This allows it to fly at very low altitudes above the sea, making it very difficult to detect by conventional naval radar systems. What are the features of the TALAY drone? The TALAY drone has been described as 'A drone that hides below radar'. It is developed by the Ankara-based company Solid Aero. It is not just another addition to the arsenal of unmanned vehicles but represents a significant leap in technological advancement. TALAY is capable of operating under challenging conditions and can carry a payload of up to 66 pounds. Unlike traditional UAVs that operate high above the surface, TALAY can just glide over the sea from 30 cm to 100 m, without being detected by radars. According to Solid Aero's webpage, 'this cutting-edge craft is production-ready and the first of its kind. It blends the stealth of a low-flying drone with the aerodynamic efficiency of a Wing-in-Ground (WIG) effect vehicle, creating a new category of maritime strike and reconnaissance platforms'. TALAY's design for maritime and coastal missions makes it a killer and a valuable asset for naval operations. It has a wingspan of 9.84 feet and a total length of 9.19 feet. This makes the drone a compact yet powerful tool. Its low radar cross-section and stealth-focused design allow it to evade enemy detection and perform precise missions with high accuracy. Its foldable wings allow for quick deployment. What is the range and firepower of TALAY? TALAY can carry up to 66 pounds (30 kg) of payload, advanced sensors or munitions comparable to smaller conventional anti-ship missiles. It is powered by an electric engine and Li-Po battery. TALAY's endurance is about 3 hours, with an operational range of up to 200 km, a maximum take-off weight is 60 kg (132 lbs), and flight modes are functional during day and night. TALAY's operational capabilities include Normal Attack, Top Attack, and Harbor Attack. The system uses a next-generation flight control unit with model-based and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software.

Geopolitical exposure: US-Russia-China dynamics have spelt a nightmare for India
Geopolitical exposure: US-Russia-China dynamics have spelt a nightmare for India

Mint

time7 hours ago

  • Mint

Geopolitical exposure: US-Russia-China dynamics have spelt a nightmare for India

Kunal Singh New Delhi's ties with Moscow and Washington and their ties with each other were manageable for a long time, but India has suddenly been pushed out of its comfort zone by a sudden shake-up. Today, we face a threat from China even as Russia has weakened and America is bent on punishing India. Since independence, India has hardly ever enjoyed such an ideal world for its safety and prosperity. Gift this article The United States of America, Russia and China—the state of relations among these three countries tends to determine how safe the world generally is for India. India feels threatened by China at its doorstep, with which it also has a territorial dispute that has turned bloody on a few occasions. India, therefore, seeks good relations with both the US and Russia. The United States of America, Russia and China—the state of relations among these three countries tends to determine how safe the world generally is for India. India feels threatened by China at its doorstep, with which it also has a territorial dispute that has turned bloody on a few occasions. India, therefore, seeks good relations with both the US and Russia. An ideal world for India would be one in which it has good relations with both of them, and those two, the US and Russia, also have good relations with each other. In this world, India could build defence ties with both the US and Russia, and its relations with either will not be looked at with suspicion by the other. However, even if it can attempt to build good relations with both Washington and Moscow, bilateral relations between those two are beyond New Delhi's control. Since independence, India has hardly ever enjoyed such an ideal world for its safety and prosperity. During the Cold War, the US and Soviet Union were two superpowers engaged in an intense security competition. Despite not wanting to choose sides, India was forced to do so—and it chose better relations with the Soviet Union over the US for a variety of reasons. This choice had mixed results. It did not work in 1962, when Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev was still hopeful of salvaging Sino-Soviet ties and hence chose to remain neutral in the China-India war despite fearing that New Delhi might defect to the Western camp as a result of China's aggression. India's choice, however, worked in 1971, when the Beijing-Moscow split was complete and the Soviet leadership did not hesitate to sign a quasi-military alliance with India to deter China. The lesson was that India needed a great power partner fully committed to balancing China. After the Cold War and collapse of the Soviet Union, India's old choice set no longer existed. The US was now the sole great power. In 1991, it was not clear if China would truly emerge as a challenger to America's global hegemony or if Russia would regain its old strategic power and reach. By the beginning of the new century, the contours of a new world order were beginning to emerge. Russia might gain back some of its old power and glory, but China was going to be the real contender for great power status. This world was more dangerous for India. New Delhi's threat would now come not from a poverty-stricken People's Republic, dangerous as it was, but from a China that sported a modernized military, giant economy and the status of a tech superpower. Russia was a shadow of the erstwhile Soviet Union and was increasingly reliant on Beijing. The saving grace for India was that its economy had begun doing well and it fielded a nuclear arsenal that came to acquire the capability to threaten Shanghai and Beijing with long-range missiles. However, the growing power deficit vis-à-vis China meant India still needed a great-power partner that saw a common interest in deterring Chinese aggression, if not mitigating other adverse implications of its rise. This was the logic that gave birth to an India-US strategic partnership. Since China was rapidly growing to become America's strategic competitor, New Delhi and Washington had a shared interest in dealing with China's rise and providing security in the Indo-Pacific. What about Russia, though? It is here that the interests of India and the US diverged. India still saw Russia as an important defence partner. The Indian armed forces needed Russian military platforms and Moscow was the only partner willing to part with certain assets that no one else would—for example, leasing a nuclear-powered attack submarine. The US, however, could not move beyond looking at Russia as an adversary. Of course, Russia continued to pose a threat to American allies in Europe, but one thought the US would shift the burden of European defence to its trans-Atlantic allies and shift focus to its bigger threat in the Indo-Pacific. If American attention and resources could be secured for Indo-Pacific security, a close-to-ideal setting could be obtained for India through the confluence of the following: a growing economy at home that could over time be converted into military power, a strategic partnership with a US that is committed to balancing China, a defence partnership with Russia that could part with high-tech weapons that no one else would, and, finally, a China-focused US that would not mind India-Russia defence cooperation. Perhaps this was too much to ask. The US has made the right noises and written stacks of strategy documents talking about shifting its focus to the Indo-Pacific. However, all this talk and text faltered at the first hurdle in 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine. Since then, while US strategy documents still talk about China, the actual American strategy targets Russia. Indians had by and large believed that the election of Donald Trump as US president would change Washington's geo-strategic orientation and a change did seem to be happening for his first few months in office. As of August 2025, however, Trump is back to targeting Russia and has gone to the extent of punishing India for its ties with Moscow. Today, India faces a great power threat in China, a weakened Russia distracted by a war in Ukraine and a US bent on punishing it for its relations with Russia. Far from ideal, it's closer to a nightmare. The author is a Stanton Nuclear Security post-doctoral research fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Topics You May Be Interested In

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store