Support and pragmatism from Starmer ahead of Ukraine meeting
Sir Keir has not said it explicitly but I am told the UK government privately accepts the premise of "land for peace" - Ukraine ceding territory as part of a peace deal with Russia.That might only involve land already under the control of the Russian military, but it nonetheless points to a painful process ahead for Kyiv.No 10 sources have stressed, however, that any questions about territory are ultimately a matter for Ukraine, and Ukraine only."There are three issues", one British official told me. "How much land, which land, and whether de facto or de jure."This final issue refers to a possible grey area in negotiations. Ukraine could accept land as "de facto" Russian territory because Moscow controls it militarily. Or it might be accepted as Russian "de jure" and internationally legally recognised as such.
The Starmer strategy
I am told the UK government is hoping for two things from today's mass leaders' visit to the White House.Firstly they want to encourage President Zelensky to carefully listen to and consider what Donald Trump is offering. Memories of February's Oval Office argument remain fresh and all are keen to avoid a repeat.Secondly, Keir Starmer and his European colleagues want to flesh out details of what they hope will be "ironclad" security guarantees - measures to protect and defend Ukraine in the event a peace deal is struck.Trump envoy Steve Witkoff's recent endorsement of these proposed security guarantees as "game changing" is seen in No 10 as proof that months of work on Starmer and Macron's 'coalition of the willing' is finally paying off.UK government sources point out that many had argued this effort was an irrelevance or would not happen, and yet the opposite is now the case.Sir Keir's role at the White House today is likely to rely on the rarity of his strong relationships with both Trump and Zelensky. The PM seems keen to continue his role as a diplomatic 'bridge' between the White House and European leaders.But what exactly will Donald Trump contribute?Witkoff has said the "United States could offer Article 5-like protection", a reference to the section of Nato's treaty which outlines its principle of collective defence.Zelenskyy has praised this as "a historic decision".But a firm, public, on camera commitment from President Trump as to the US's role might calm anxieties in London, Paris, Berlin and Rome.One UK government source described President Trump's role in Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations as an "exercise in raw power".The assessment of UK officials is that Donald Trump will strain every American muscle to get a deal.He ideally would like to bring Western nations along, yet they believe his hunger for peace outweighs his wish to ensure European leaders are mollified.Keir Starmer's calculation seem to be that for now he should be supportive and pragmatic, even if his hostility and scepticism towards Vladimir Putin does not seem to be shared by the US president.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Britain's AI strategy: the risk is that it is dependency dressed up in digital hype
There was a time when Britain aspired to be a leader in technology. These days, it seems content to be a willing supplicant – handing over its data, infrastructure and public services to US tech giants in exchange for the promise of a few percentage points of efficiency gains. Worryingly, the artificial intelligence strategy of Sir Keir Starmer's government appears long on rhetoric, short on sovereignty and built on techno-utopian assumptions. Last week Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, was promoting the use of AI-generated discharge letters in the NHS. The tech, he said, will process complex conversations between doctors and patients, slashing paperwork and streamlining services. Ministers say that by applying AI across the public sector, the government can save £45bn. But step back and a more familiar pattern emerges. As Cecilia Rikap, a researcher at University College London, told the Politics Theory Other podcast, Britain risks becoming a satellite of the US tech industry – a nation whose public infrastructure serves primarily as a testing ground and data source for American AI models hosted on US-owned cloud computing networks. She warned that the UK should not become a site of 'extractivism', in which value – whether in the form of knowledge, labour or electricity – is supplied by Britain but monetised in the US. It's not just that the UK lacks a domestic cloud ecosystem. It's that the government's strategy does nothing to build one. The concern is that public data, much of it drawn from the NHS and local authorities, will be shovelled into models built and trained abroad. The value captured from that data – whether in the form of model refinement or product development – will accrue not to the British public, but to US shareholders. Even the promise of job creation appears shaky. Datacentres, the physical backbone of AI, are capital-intensive, energy-hungry, and each one employs only about 50 people. Meanwhile, Daron Acemoglu, the MIT economist and Nobel laureate, offers a still more sobering view: far from ushering in a golden age of labour augmentation, today's AI rollout is geared almost entirely toward labour displacement. Prof Acemoglu sees a fork: AI can empower workers – or replace them. Right now, it is doing the latter. Ministerial pledges of productivity gains may just mean fewer jobs – not better services. The deeper problem is one of imagination. A government serious about digital sovereignty might build a public cloud, fund open-source AI models and create institutions capable of steering technological development toward social ends. Instead, we are offered efficiency-by-outsourcing – an AI strategy where Britain provides the inputs and America reaps the returns. In a 2024 paper, Prof Acemoglu challenged Goldman Sachs' 10-year forecast that AI would lead to global growth of 7% – about $7tn – and estimated instead under $1tn in gains. Much of this would be captured by US big tech. There's nothing wrong with harnessing new technologies. But their deployment must not be structured in a way that entrenches dependency and hollows out public capacity. The Online Safety Act shows digital sovereignty can enforce national rules on global platforms, notably on porn sites. But current turmoil at the Alan Turing Institute suggests a deeper truth: the UK government is dazzled by American AI and has no clear plan of its own. Britain risks becoming not a tech pioneer, but a well-governed client state in someone else's digital empire. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Call for urgent cross-party action to save Lough Neagh
There has been a call for urgent cross-party action to save Lough Neagh. The lough has been blighted with blue-green algae in recent summers, with noxious blooms covering large swathes of the surface. However Gary McErlain, chairman of the Lough Neagh Partnership, said the devastation this week following recent warm weather is the worst he has seen in 40 years. Mr McErlain said urgent cross-party action is needed to save Lough Neagh. 'It is not news that Lough Neagh is in the midst of an unprecedented ecological crisis but with the weather providing the blue-green algae with the perfect conditions to bloom, this is an emergency that demands urgent and united political leadership,' he said. 'I believe the time for talking is over. In more than 40 years I have not witnessed the devastation on the lough that I am seeing today.' Nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural fertiliser running off fields and from wastewater treatment are said to be a contributory factor in the blue-green algae blooms. The spread of the invasive zebra mussel species is also understood to have played a role in the blooms, as they have made the water clearer, allowing more sunlight to penetrate, stimulating more algal photosynthesis. Climate change is another factor as water temperatures rise. The Stormont Executive last year launched an action plan to deal with the environmental crisis at the lough. Mr McErlain said all parties should enter into constructive engagement with Agriculture and Environment Minister Andrew Muir regarding the implementation of the proposed nutrient action plan. 'It is plain to see that the health of the lough is deteriorating at an alarming rate, threatening not only the delicate balance of its natural ecosystem but also the communities, livelihoods and cultural heritage that depend upon it,' he said. 'For too long, responsibility for Lough Neagh has been fragmented, with agencies and departments working in isolation and often without the resources or mandate to make meaningful progress. 'What is needed now is joined-up thinking, decisive action, and a clear solution that places the immediate, short and long-term health of the lough at its centre. 'The people who live around Lough Neagh, who rely on it for recreation, fishing, tourism and water supply, deserve to see that those elected to serve them are capable of rising above party politics to work together for the common good. 'I fear that if we fail to act collectively and urgently, the damage to Lough Neagh could quickly become irreversible, with devastating consequences for biodiversity, the local economy and our shared natural heritage.'
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Zelensky gifts Trump letter from his wife to give to Melania
Volodymyr Zelensky has given Donald Trump a letter to pass on to Melania Trump from his wife. The Ukrainian president arrived in Washington, DC for talks on ending the ongoing war with the US president on Monday (18 August) , with other world leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, also in attendance. After thanking Mr Trump for the invitation, Mr Zelensky handed him a letter from his wife Olena Zelenska, Ukraine's first lady. "It's not to you, it's to your wife," he told Mr Trump, with the pair both laughing. At a summit in Alaska on Friday (15 August), Mr Trump delivered a letter to Vladimir Putin on behalf of Melania, who wrote about the plight of children affected by the conflict.
