
Builder.ai Faked Business With Indian Firm VerSe to Inflate Sales, Sources Say
Umang Bedi, a VerSe co-founder, said it was 'absolutely baseless and false' that his company would have recorded expenses or billed services that it didn't receive or provide. 'We're not the kind of company that is in the business of inflating revenues,' he said in an interview. The company said that the services bought and sold to Builder.ai have been verified by reputable external organizations. Accusations of round tripping are 'defamatory and irresponsible,' and it's incorrect to say that the companies routinely billed each other for roughly the same amount, VerSe said.
A representative for Builder.ai declined to comment.
Builder.ai, once valued at about $1.5 billion, is the most high-profile AI startup to collapse since ChatGPT's launch started a global investment frenzy. Its downfall shows the risks inherent in the rush to back AI startups as investors seek to replicate the success of industry heavyweights such as OpenAI and Anthropic. The London-based startup, which pitched its tech as a way to make apps with little or no coding, said earlier in May it planned to file for bankruptcy after a major creditor seized most of its cash.Bloomberg reported earlier that Builder.ai overstated its projected 2024 sales to creditors by 300%, which contributed to the lenders' decision to seize the company's funds. Bloomberg also reported that US prosecutors have demanded that the company hand over financial statements, accounting policies and a list of its customers as part of a subpoena. Builder.ai has declined to comment on the subpoena. The company has acknowledged it's found discrepancies in its historical sales but has declined to comment on the scope of the alleged overstatement.
Builder.ai collected close to $60 million in revenue from VerSe in the four-year period for services such as application development, according to people with knowledge of the situation. In turn, the AI startup sent funds to VerSe and its subsidiary, Quark Media Tech, for services such as marketing, the documents show. The two companies appear to have interspersed the timing and amount of the invoices to avoid suspicion, though each firm ultimately spent approximately the same amount, according to the people and documents.
Bedi, a former managing director for Facebook in India and South Asia, said VerSe started working with Builder.ai around 2021, but denied that the companies were acting in cooperation or failed to deliver any services. 'There is no correlation on any timing of any payment to any partner,' Bedi said.
Builder.ai had raised more than $450 million from investors, including Insight Partners and the Qatar Investment Authority, or QIA, one of the largest sovereign wealth funds. Microsoft Corp. invested in 2023 and announced plans to integrate the startup's offerings with Microsoft's cloud and Teams product. 'We see Builder.ai creating an entirely new category that empowers everyone to be a developer,' Jon Tinter, a Microsoft corporate vice president, said at the time.
A representative for Insight Partners didn't respond to requests for comment. Spokespeople for Microsoft and QIA, which also invested in VerSe, declined to comment.
In February, Builder.ai's founder Sachin Dev Duggal stepped down as chief executive officer, although he remained on the board and retained his title as 'Chief Wizard' at the nine-year-old company. He was replaced as CEO by Manpreet Ratia, an investor with Jungle Ventures, a Builder.ai backer based in Singapore. Shortly after joining, Ratia said he planned to strengthen the company's governance and policies.
Three months after taking the role, he told employees the company planned to shut down. 'With no viable alternatives, the Board has made the extremely difficult decision to enter into insolvency,' he wrote in an internal email reviewed by Bloomberg.
A representative for Duggal declined to comment.
VerSe, which is based in Bengaluru, is one of the largest consumer tech newcomers in India. VerSe has said that its news aggregation app, Dailyhunt, has more than 350 million monthly users, and it released a video app, called Josh, right after the Indian government banned TikTok. In 2022, VerSe raised $805 million from the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and other investors in a round that gave the startup a $5 billion valuation. Goldman Sachs and Google had invested in VerSe earlier. Representatives for the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and Goldman declined to comment. Google didn't respond to requests for comment.
In VerSe's financial report for the year ending in March 2024, its auditor Deloitte wrote in its opinion that the startup lacked 'appropriate internal controls' over several aspects of its business, including its information technology, advertising revenue and relationship with suppliers. Those flaws 'could potentially result in material misstatement' of the company's accounts, the auditor wrote in the report, which was reviewed by Bloomberg.
Deloitte did sign off on the startup's accounts for the year as 'true and fair.' Bedi described the issues the auditor flagged as common 'process control' difficulties that the company was working through and said that Deloitte found no material misstatements.
The Deloitte opinion was previously reported by the Indian publication Mint. The newspaper also reported in April that VerSe's chief financial officer had resigned ahead of the startup's expected initial public offering. Bedi said the CFO, Sandip Basu, left for health reasons. He said the company currently has 'very little debt' and plans to break even by the second half of 2025. He said the company is speaking to potential advisers about an IPO, but doesn't have firm plans. Basu couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
Builder.ai founder Duggal and Bedi have cooperated publicly and Duggal has posted on social media with Bedi. In 2023, Duggal added a photo on his verified Instagram account showing him and Bedi standing together, sporting light colored blazers, in front of 10 Downing Street, the official residence and office of the British Prime Minister. 'With my main man @umang.bedi at @10downingstreet for #londontechweek,' Duggal wrote, tagging Bedi's verified account. In a later LinkedIn post, Duggal thanked Bedi for contributing to a Builder.ai gathering in Singapore as one of the 'incredible speakers from the extended Builder.ai family.'
Bedi said he participated in the event via Zoom and did not travel to Singapore. He said he invested about $10,000 in Duggal's company, which was previously known as Engineer.ai, around 2017. But Bedi said he has only met Duggal 'two or three' times, noting that the London meeting was part of a broader group of tech executives and entrepreneurs. 'I don't have a very close interpersonal relationship,' Bedi said. 'I have a professional business working relationship.'
--With assistance from Sankalp Phartiyal.
(Updates with additional comments from VerSe in third and 16th paragraphs)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
19 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump will be unhappy with this 200 number as India makes things easier for China, takes this big step to...
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has invited trouble without any effort. His move to put pressure on India seems to be backfiring. The whole game has suddenly changed with India and China coming closer in the tariff war. Now India has done something that can hurt Trump a lot. The government is making it easier for China to invest money in India. This is a big sign of improvement in the relations between the two countries. All this is happening at a time when Trump has imposed an additional tariff of 25% on India. This will increase the tariff on Indian goods in America to 50% from August 27. Trump has imposed this tariff due to buying Russian oil. What is the government doing to settle the Chinese FDI? The government is preparing to quickly settle the FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) proposals coming from Chinese companies. For this, the government has given instructions to simplify the approval process. According to sources, the Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) headed by the Home Secretary will now work on these proposals expeditiously. A meeting of the IMC was also held last week. A senior official said, 'We have clear instructions. Reduce the time taken to process applications.' According to sources, proposals from non-critical sectors like renewable energy, manufacturing and electronics are still being considered. Dixon Technologies' FDI proposal is also under review. It includes two Chinese partners. 200 FDI proposals are awaiting approval Under Press Note 3, about 200 FDI proposals from China are pending. According to this rule, approval has to be taken from the government before investing in countries sharing a land border with India. The government can dispose of them quickly after getting approval from the IMC and the Cabinet Secretariat. Many Chinese companies have been waiting for their proposals to be approved for a long time. However, officials have also made it clear that this move should not be seen as India's soft stance towards China. A source said, 'India's engagement with Chinese FDI should not be seen through the prism of its relations with the US.'


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Peter Navarro to India: Act like a US partner or pay the price
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro on Monday criticised India's crude oil imports from Russia, calling the move "opportunistic" and warning that if India "wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one". In an opinion piece in the Financial Times, Navarro alleged that India was "now cosying up to both Russia and China" and argued that New Delhi's Russian crude purchases must stop as they were financing Moscow's war in Ukraine. His comments come ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping later this month, even as Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi visits New Delhi for talks on the disputed border. "This two-pronged policy will hit India where it hurts-its access to US markets - even as it seeks to cut off the financial lifeline it has extended to Russia's war effort," Navarro wrote. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Crossout 2.0: Supercharged Crossout Play Now Undo He said India's reliance on Russian crude was "opportunistic and deeply corrosive of global efforts to isolate Putin's war economy". The remarks assume significance as US trade negotiators have postponed their planned August 25-29 visit for the sixth round of Bilateral Trade Agreement talks , the first tranche of which is targeted for conclusion by autumn. Live Events Trump has already imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, including a 25% penal levy for continued purchases of Russian oil, despite the external affairs ministry's assertion that India is being unfairly singled out while the US and EU continue to source energy from Moscow. While the 25% tariff on Indian goods entering the US took effect on August 7, the additional 25%, announced as penalty for crude and defence imports from Russia, will kick in on August 27. "India acts as a global clearing house for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro wrote, adding that it was risky to transfer cutting-edge US military capabilities to a country "cosying up to both Russia and China".


Economic Times
27 minutes ago
- Economic Times
A chill is setting in that will take a long time to recover in the India-US relationship
Synopsis The India-US relationship has deteriorated, with disproportionate responses from the White House despite India's efforts to address trade concerns. Political imperatives in the US, rather than trade merits, seem to be driving the decisions, leading to a chill in relations and a hardening public mood in India. Over the past few weeks, as the India-US relationship has near-imploded, several opinions and assessments have emerged. Most analysts have been measured and thoughtful, and attempted to discern the long view. Others have been astonishingly uninformed, ranging from amateurs talking through their hats to (former) professionals opining through their golf caps. ADVERTISEMENT To be sure, any consequential policy episode must see a reckoning and self-appraisal within the government. This is to be expected in an accountable democracy. The external affairs ministry, commerce ministry and even the PMO would naturally undertake such an exercise. Were there diplomatic missteps? Could the trade negotiations have gone differently? Were gaps in Operation Sindoor's strategic comms deterministic? These are all good questions. Since there is always room for improvement, they must be asked and deliberated upon. However, this should not deflect from a fundamental and pivotal point: nothing India did, no act of commission or omission, merited the sort of response that has come from the White House and Trump regime. It's egregiously disproportionate. Inevitably, this warrants the conclusion that the issue is not about some minor sticking point that can be resolved with a 'high-level phone call' here, or more 'trade concessions' there. Advice that India should rethink its position on GM food, or making investment announcements even without resources to back them, is not particularly sensible those who should know better have advocated reckless and adventurist approaches that no Indian minister, civil servant or public official - past, present and future - can carry out. The legitimate restraints of the Indian system will always - and correctly - prevent also needs to be said India's diplomats recognised the importance of the trade and tariffs issue very early, and worked to a win-win plan. On their part, trade negotiators from the commerce ministry - again, often criticised - came up with the most ambitious market-access package in India's history. They were given the political space for it by the PM, and they delivered. ADVERTISEMENT Whatever else it is, the White House's rejection/non- acceptance of the trade offer - which would give the US an unprecedented market and strategic advantage in India - is not on merits. Even USTR insiders have that appreciation. So, what is driving the Trump regime's decision flow? How goalposts have shifted repeatedly in recent weeks would suggest that trade imperatives have long given way to political imperatives, perhaps even strategic and domestic calculations in the US president's inner council. If that is, indeed, the case, the basket of bilateral challenges could both deepen and expand in the near term. ADVERTISEMENT Either way, the relationship will take a long time to recover to the levels of political trust it has been used to over the past 20 years. A chill is setting in. The public mood is hardening, and the pressure on the Narendra Modi government - including on its ability to offer further trade concessions - is there for all to reckoning in New Delhi is that India is facing the most structured and coercive assault on its strategic autonomy - industrial and policy - in a long time. Inevitably, this perception will shape reactions. Consequences will not be limited to just the immediate future. ADVERTISEMENT No doubt there will be an economic cost. 50% tariffs are not going to be easy to manage, particularly for industries significantly dependent on US exports. Yet, this will also make other sectors wary of the geopolitical risks of excessive market exposure to the US. Rather than spur further engagement - as the trajectory of India-US relations has done in recent decades - it will induce caution and a desire to hedge and diversify. India's economic approaches towards China and Russia will become a self-fulfilling prophecy for Washington's tariff a slightly longer, but still not-too-distant, timeframe, India could conclude a trade deal with the EU. Once the EU recovers from its current 'He loves us, he loves us not' trans-Atlantic minuet, and assesses its position in the ballroom, it will note the opportunity of the moment. Next, India needs to find a non-China, non-RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) pathway to an economic and supply chains partnership with the Indo-Pacific. ADVERTISEMENT CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) lends itself as an idea. Admittedly, CPTPP standards are very stringent. Could there be a trade-off between political comfort - the absence of arm-twisting and/or supply chains surrender - and calibrating just how much an external trade agreement could be used to drive internal reform and regulatory change? The process will not be easy, or without pain. Even so, if it is achieved, it could give India a longer-term hedge and option vis-a-vis the US. The lessons of the Summer of 2025 will alter the baseline for a reset, whenever that happens. This is not a stare-down India wanted - or, more accurately, wants. But whatever happens, India cannot allow itself to be outstared. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2024 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. NEXT STORY