US Military Spent Over $21 Million On Deportation Flights This Year
Between January 20 and April 8, US Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) flew 46 flights on military aircraft in support of migrant deportation efforts, the command told Senator Elizabeth Warren, who released replies to a series of questions she had posed.
"The flights total 802.5 hours at an average cost of $26,277 per flight hour," TRANSCOM said -- a total of more than $21 million.
Warren -- a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee -- said "every American should be outraged by Donald Trump wasting military resources to pay for his political stunts that do not make us safer."
"US service members did not sign up for this abuse of power," the Democratic lawmaker said in a statement.
The Trump administration has launched what it has cast as a major effort to curb illegal migration that has included immigration raids, arrests and deportations.
Trump has also deployed thousands of additional troops to the US border with Mexico, where they have been granted the power to detain migrants in certain areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
10 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump hails 'total victory' as US court quashes $464 mn civil penalty
Agencies US President Donald Trump A US court threw out Thursday a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum "excessive" but upholding the judgment against Arthur Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions that the Republican slammed as "lawfare.""It was a Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense, the likes of which no one has ever seen before," Trump said on his Truth Social platform Thursday, adding that "everything I did was absolutely CORRECT and, even, PERFECT."When Engoron originally ruled against Trump, he ordered the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr. were told to hand over more than $4 million judge found that Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favorable bank loans or insurance terms. Alongside the financial hit to Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the president repeatedly referred to as a "corporate death penalty."On Thursday, five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the verdict, but ruled that the size of the fine was "excessive" and that it "violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution."The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive or cruel punishments and penalties.- 'Massive win! - State Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the initial case, vowed to take Thursday's ruling to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. Thursday's appeals court ruling "affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud," James added. Following the initial verdict, Trump subsequently sought to challenge the civil ruling as well as the scale and terms of the penalty, which has continued to accrue interest while he repeatedly condemned the case and the penalty as politically son Don Jr. termed the appellate court ruling a "massive win!!!" "New York Appeals Court has just THROWN OUT President Trump's $500+ Million civil fraud penalty! It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice... and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!" he wrote on X. During hearings, conducted without a jury under state law, Trump accused then-president Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it "weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls."As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of economic advisor Peter Navarro said at the White House Thursday that "James is another one that belongs in jail," referring to the New York attorney general."The Democrats really overplayed their hand on this because they thought they could take Donald Trump out," he said.
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump demands release of ex-Colorado clerk Tina Peters jailed for election breach — warns of harsh measures
Donald Trump's Social Media Plea: 'Free Tina Peters' What Was Tina Peters Convicted For? Live Events Ongoing Legal Battles and Appeals Can Trump Pardon Tina Peters? FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel : US president Donald Trump has once again publicly called for the release of Tina Peters, a former Colorado election clerk sentenced to nine years in prison for her role in breaching election data, as per a wrote on his social media side Truth Social, saying, 'FREE TINA PETERS, a brave and innocent Patriot who has been tortured by Crooked Colorado politicians, including the big Mail-In Ballot supporting the governor of the State,' as quoted by The added that, 'Let Tina Peters out of jail, RIGHT NOW. She did nothing wrong, except catching the Democrats cheat in the Election. She is an old woman, and very sick. If she is not released, I am going to take harsh measures!!!' as quoted in the READ: Did a Russian missile strike hit a US-owned factory in Ukraine with hundreds inside? Here's what reports say Peters, was convicted in 2024 of multiple felony charges including misconduct, conspiracy, and impersonation after she allowed an outside election activist to access county voting equipment using false credentials, as per The Guardian. The materials and passwords were then published online on social media platform Telegram and on the rightwing outlet the Gateway Pundit, according to the was found guilty by a jury in Mesa county in 2024 of seven counts, out of which four were felony charges, and was then sentenced later that year to nine years in prison, as reported by The Guardian. While the ex-election clerk's attorneys had argued for probation instead of prison time, according to the her sentencing at that time, Judge Matthew Barrett pointed out that Peters had not shown remorse for her actions, saying, she was 'as defiant as a defendant that the court has ever seen' and that he was 'convinced you'd do it all over again if you could," as quoted in The Guardian READ: Shocking twist: Computer Science grads face one of the highest unemployment rates today Meanwhile, Peters' attorneys have filed an appeal of her conviction and are trying to get her out on bond, arguing in a federal habeas corpus petition that her bond denial comes from her exercise of first amendment rights, with her lawyer saying that she 'has been made to stay in prison because people are afraid of what she would say," as quoted in the this is not the first time Trump has called for Peters' release, even in May, he said in social media posts that she was an 'innocent Political Prisoner' who was part of a 'Communist persecution by the Radical Left Democrats to cover up their Election crimes and misdeeds in 2020," as quoted by The she is convicted of state-level crimes, the US president cannot pardon her, but the Colorado governor, Democrat Jared Polis, could pardon her, according to the report. Even Trump's justice department had submitted a court filing in March, that said it would be reviewing the case for potential 'abuses of the criminal justice process," as reported by The READ: Apple Watch SE 3 leaks spill major upgrades — and fans can't stop buzzing about what's coming Tina Peters is a former Colorado election clerk convicted of breaching election data, as per The Guardian was found guilty of felony charges related to allowing unauthorized access to county voting equipment, as per The Guardian report.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
13 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India's GDP growth likely at 6.3% in FY26, below RBI estimates: SBI report
A New York appeals court struck down a $464 million fraud fine against President Donald Trump and his company, handing him a victory over the state's attorney general. In a decision issued Thursday, the Manhattan appellate court still found that Trump broke the law by inflating the valuation of assets like Mar-a-Lago and his Trump Tower penthouse, but it said the massive penalty was unconstitutionally 'excessive.' The long-awaited ruling by an intermediate state appeals court wipes out one of Trump's biggest financial liabilities. It also puts fresh pressure on New York Attorney General Letitia James, who has become the focus of a federal probe into whether her lawsuit violated Trump's legal rights. The politically charged decision resulted in the five-judge panel issuing three separate opinions. The majority ultimately concluded that Trump violated the law by inflating his assets, but nevertheless threw out the massive fine. Most of Trump's legal woes melted away after his election victory. The Justice Department dropped two federal criminal cases against Trump, citing a longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president. While Trump was convicted in his hush money case in Manhattan, a judge sentenced him to no jail time at a hearing 10 days before his inauguration — following a US Supreme Court ruling that gave the president broad immunity. James filed the case against Trump and his sprawling real estate company in September 2022, more than two years before his successful bid to retake the White House. She won the case after an 11-week trial. The development raises questions about whether James, a Democrat and staunch critic of Trump, will seek to reinstate the penalty by appealing the decision to the state's highest court in Albany. Trump argued that his method of valuing his real estate was typical of the industry and that disclaimers on his financial statements advised banks they should do their own valuations anyway. One of his biggest defense arguments was that no banks lost money on his loans, and the state didn't dispute that. On Aug. 8, people familiar with the federal probe into James' civil lawsuit against Trump said Justice Department officials had convened a grand jury and sent subpoenas to James's office. The subpoena also seeks information on James's case against the National Rifle Association, said one of the people. The probe is being run out of Albany, New York. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer for James, said at the time that the investigation is a 'blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump has long criticized James as well as Justice Arthur Engoron, who oversaw the non-jury trial, calling both of them biased against him because he's a Republican. Trump has also appealed his conviction in the hush money case, seeking to erase his criminal record. He has also appealed two civil jury verdicts against him in lawsuits brought by E. Jean Carroll, who sued him for sex abuse and defamation and won nearly $90 million in total damages. Trump has maintained innocence throughout.
