logo
Without USAID's Food for Peace, Kansas grain elevators have no market for sorghum

Without USAID's Food for Peace, Kansas grain elevators have no market for sorghum

USA Today09-02-2025

Without USAID's Food for Peace, Kansas grain elevators have no market for sorghum
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Protest outside USAID offices after Elon Musk vows to shut agency down
Protesters gathered outside the USAID building in Washington, D.C., after Donald Trump and Elon Musk vowed to shut the agency down.
The U.S. Agency for International Development has been shut down by President Trump and Elon Musk.
Food for Peace, a program under USAID that used American agricultural surpluses for foreign aid, has been shuttered.
Kansas farmers, the leading producers of sorghum often purchased for the Food for Peace program, are left with a surplus and no buyer.
The shutdown has raised concerns about the potential loss of export markets and the impact on global food security.
Kansas farmers and grain elevators could be left without a market for last year's sorghum crop after President Donald Trump dismantled a federal foreign aid program.
Trump and billionaire Elon Musk have shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID. It housed Food for Peace, which used America's agricultural surpluses to fight world hunger, expand international trade and advance foreign diplomacy.
Shutting down the food aid program could adversely affect the Kansas agriculture industry, which has an overabundance of sorghum, also known as milo.
"Right now, there's no export market for it, and there's no domestic market," said Kim Barnes, the chief financial officer of the Pawnee County co-op in Larned.
Part of his job is purchasing and selling grain, like the sorghum taking up much of the space in the co-op's grain elevators. Sometimes, that has meant selling to Food for Peace when there are calls for contracts.
"We were hoping there'd be another one with as much milo as we have," Barnes said.
Food for Peace used to buy grain from Kansas
Food for Peace, also known as Public Law 480, is a 70-year-old foreign aid program with a Kansas legacy. It was inspired by a Kansas farmer, signed into law by President Dwight D. Eisenhower and later championed by U.S. Sen. Bob Dole.
Barnes said taxpayer dollars pay the American agriculture industry for the food that is used in foreign aid. The way the USAID program has worked is the government, through the U.S. Department of Agriculture, sends out a call for contract.
"I've gotten these contract proposals for many years," Barnes said. "They tell you what they're looking to buy and the destination and how much they're looking to buy."
Sometimes, they sell to brokers. Other times, directly to an export house, and they then make the contract with the government. From there, the grain is loaded on a ship and sent overseas.
If the government doesn't buy the sorghum to use as food aid, grain elevators and others in the industry could find themselves stuck with last year's harvest filling up space — and potentially costing them storage interest — heading into this year's growing season.
"It won't go bad — we know how to maintain grain — but storage space is going to get tight," Barnes said.
Sorghum grain stocks are higher than a year ago
Sorghum is a popular crop in western Kansas. Because it requires less water to produce, it has been championed as part of the response to the ongoing depletion of the Ogallala Aquifer.
While Kansas may be better known for wheat and sunflowers, it is the nation's leading producer of sorghum. The USDA reports that Kansas produces 57% of the country's sorghum. Meanwhile, the U.S. is the world leader with 14% of global sorghum production.
Being the nation's leading producer also means Kansas has more sorghum stocks than the rest of the country.
The latest USDA grain stock data shows that as of Dec. 1, Kansas had 151 million bushels of sorghum held at mills, elevators, warehouses, terminals and processors. The nationwide total was 210 million bushels.
The state figure is 26 million bushels — or 21% — higher than the same date a year before.
"The market is just not there to sell it," Barnes said. "We've been buying milo from our producers all along. We have a tremendous company-owned position at this point, just nobody on the other side to sell it to. And it's just not country elevators, it's terminals, it's everybody, because there's just no market in the world today for milo."
The Pawnee County co-op's grain elevator has a storage capacity of 6 million bushels, Barnes said. About 2.5 to 3 million of that is currently full, and the majority of that is sorghum. Compared to this time in past years, grain storage is typically around 2 to 2.5 million, with sorghum accounting for a smaller share.
"This is just a milo issue," he said. "Because corn, soybeans and wheat are finding homes domestically and export."
In the United States, sorghum is primarily used for ethanol or livestock feed. Human consumption is more common internationally. Top export destinations include China, Mexico and Africa.
"If we can't get a chance to move this milo, the basis on milo is just going to deteriorate farther as we get into the future months," Barnes said. "Because if there's no place to go with it, we can't buy something that we can't get fair value on the other side."
More: Will Kansas State lose $50 million in USAID funding for agriculture research?
Donald Trump and Elon Musk shut down USAID
Trump has alleged corruption at USAID, saying, "It's been run by a bunch of radical lunatics, and we're getting them out." The president reiterated his point in an all-caps post Friday morning on Truth Social.
"USAID IS DRIVING THE RADICAL LEFT CRAZY, AND THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO ABOUT IT BECAUSE THE WAY IN WHICH THE MONEY HAS BEEN SPENT, SO MUCH OF IT FRAUDULENTLY, IS TOTALLY UNEXPLAINABLE," Trump wrote. "THE CORRUPTION IS AT LEVELS RARELY SEEN BEFORE. CLOSE IT DOWN!"
Musk, who lead's Trump's informal Department of Government Efficiency, has said USAID is "beyond repair" and that it is "time for it to die." He called it "evil" and a "criminal organization." After shutting down the agency, he said, "We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper."
When asked about the future of Food for Peace, U.S. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, alleged waste, fraud and abuse at USAID.
"It's something that I want to be part of, but I want it to be efficient, and I don't want the thugs stealing the food and stealing the money as well," Marshall said in response to a question from The Capital-Journal while in Topeka on Feb. 3. "So I think there's a right way to do it; there's a wrong way to do it. I think it's very good to take a pause on all of our money that we're sending outside of this country."
Barnes, who is 70 years old and has worked at the Pawnee County co-op for 51 years, said he has not seen financial impropriety on the grain side of foreign aid.
"I know the discussion was that there was a lot of potential mismanagement of funds," he said. "I don't know that over the whole system, but I know when the award was made, I'm able to see what they get, price per metric ton. I can convert that back to bushel price. I know the freight between here and that foreign country. And I've not seen where a company selling that grain isn't getting above and beyond normal margin."
More: Are Trump and Musk ending a Kansas legacy by shuttering USAID's Food for Peace?
Could Food for Peace be kept alive?
Barnes said putting back in place Food for Peace would help the industry. But he doesn't know whether to expect future calls for contracts or if the program is permanently gone.
"It's unclear today what's going to happen," he said.
Nearly all USAID employees have been placed on administrative leave. There appears to be no way to contact what, if anything, remains of the agency.
Kansas Sorghum Producers CEO Adam York said in a statement to The Capital-Journal that sorghum is a critical crop for national and global food security.
"Throughout changes in administrations, U.S. sorghum farmers have worked to have a seat at the table in international food aid programs housed across many agencies, including over the past several years with officials at State Department," York said. "As the Administration sees reorganization, we absolutely urge the Administration and Congress to prioritize American agriculture going forward as a solution to challenges in both international and domestic policy."
Barnes said he has been in communication with U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran's office.
"U.S. food aid feeds the hungry, bolsters our national security & provides an important market for our farmers, especially when commodity prices are low," said Moran, R-Kansas, in a Friday afternoon post on X. "I've spoken to USDA & the White House about the importance of resuming the procurement, shipping & distribution of American-grown food."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio is now as acting administrator of USAID. The U.S. State Department didn't immediately respond to a request for comment Friday afternoon on if and when USAID's Food for Peace will resume buying Kansas sorghum.
Speaking to reporters in the past week while in Latin America, Rubio said he would have preferred an approach that identified which ones to keep and which ones to end. But he said that USAID staff were uncooperative, so the administration went a different route.
"The goal of our endeavor has always been to identify programs that work and continue them and to identify programs that are not aligned with our national interest and identify those and address them," Rubio told reporters in on Thursday in the Dominican Republic.
"We are going to do foreign aid," he added. "The United States will be providing foreign aid, but it is going to be foreign aid that makes sense and is aligned with our national interest."
More: Without USAID funding, Kansans who help children with disabilities lose jobs
Jerry Moran talks in Congress about foreign food aid
In a Wednesday hearing of the U.S. Senate's agriculture committee, Moran emphasized the importance of agricultural export markets, "because we produce more than we can consume."
Moran raised concerns that "what we believe to be true is that $560 million worth of food commodities is sitting in ports awaiting the ability to be moved to places where people are starving."
The senator said "while there is certainly a moral component to food aid," there is also "a value to farmers" and bettering their economics. He recalled, during the first Trump administration, visiting Kensington where sorghum "piled on the ground was as high as the elevator."
"Any food aid helps in that economic picture for farmers," said Zippy Duvall, a Georgia farmer who is president of the American Farm Bureau Federation. "It is important to realize that we support efficiencies. We want it done in an efficient way and not be wasteful. But we also got to think about the stability of our world."
National Farmers Union president Rob Larew, who is a West Virginia farmer, said that in addition to the humanitarian aspects of food aid, it can help bring market stability.
"And particularly now, with a lot of pressure on all of those commodities, some of those commodities are at risk — should there be major disruptions here — to falling even further," Larew said.
'The breadbasket of the world'
Barnes, with the co-op in Pawnee County, echoed the thoughts shared in Congress.
"My concern is these will be potential markets that we'll lose, and people will go hungry," Barnes said. "They'll look for other sources, and will those other sources not be what we need for safety? We also need to take care of those in need."
Barnes said that foreign food aid opens the opportunity for long-term benefit in exports.
"In other words," he said, "taking that development of that country, getting them on their feet, helping them to be better economics in their countries, with the idea that we help you today, get you back on your feet, and you could be a purchaser down the road."
"The farming community," he added, "believes in raising the crop and providing things for the world and for other people to be able to prosper themselves. We've been the breadbasket of the world for years, and that hasn't changed."
Jason Alatidd is a Statehouse reporter for The Topeka Capital-Journal. He can be reached by email at jalatidd@gannett.com. Follow him on X @Jason_Alatidd.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

S.F. shouldn't forget where it came from: U.S. Army helped shape city
S.F. shouldn't forget where it came from: U.S. Army helped shape city

San Francisco Chronicle​

time21 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

S.F. shouldn't forget where it came from: U.S. Army helped shape city

Missiles are flying in the Mideast air, but I still can't get over the parade to celebrate the Army's 250th anniversary in Washington last weekend. It was Flag Day, as well as President Donald Trump's birthday. The president took the salute himself. Seven thousand troops marched, and the White House said 250,000 patriots watched. The big parade was overshadowed by events including the huge anti-Trump No Kings rallies across the country, political killings in Minnesota, a horrific air crash in India and the Israeli raids on Iran. It nearly rained on the Army's parade, the crowds were smaller than anticipated, the troops seemed dispirited, and the World War II armored vehicles looked like creaky relics. It was all 'a little underwhelming,' a reporter from the British Guardian newspaper wrote. The American social media was full of scorn. The soldiers didn't even march in step, some wrote. I read these statements with some sadness. Given the way things are going, it is possible that some of the soldiers on parade last week may soon be in a war, especially because a lot of them were from infantry units. They could be there tomorrow, or next week. So I watched the parade with a wary eye. Some of it is personal: I used to be a soldier myself, long ago. Like millions of men of my vintage, I was drafted into the Army during the Cold War. I did five years, counting some reserve duty. I disliked the Army — all of us did — but came to respect it. Then later, through one of those turns of fortune, I did two turns as a war correspondent for the Chronicle, both in the Mideast. I was with the Seventh Infantry Regiment during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and my unit was in combat. I saw what these Mideast adventures are like in real life. The city of San Francisco and the region around it has a long connection to armies — first to foreign militaries and then to our own. Soldiers of the Spanish Army were the first Europeans to see San Francisco Bay, and in 1776, a colonial expedition from Mexico led by a lieutenant colonel named Juan Bautista de Anza located the site of Mission San Francisco de Asis and what became the Presidio of San Francisco. The Presidio was a military post for the next 219 years — first Spanish, then Mexican and, finally, an American garrison in 1847. The Presidio was one of the places where this part of California began. As the city and the region grew up around it, the fort by the Golden Gate became the most important military post in the country. The was first created to defend the magnificent harbor from foreign invasion, with cannons ringing the entrance to the harbor at Fort Point and Alcatraz Island. Army troops at the Presidio rode off to the Indian wars, to the conquest of the Philippines. Massive guns in the Marin Headlands could defeat any naval attack. In World War II, the Presidio and Fort Mason were staging areas for the war in the Pacific. More than 2 million soldiers, sailors and Marines sailed out the Golden Gate during World War II, and thousands more in the Korean War. During the Cold War, dozens of Nike missile sites covered the hills around the Bay Area in the tense times when nuclear war with the Soviet Union seemed imminent. It was our last line of defense. The war never came; the Presidio and the other military bases around the bay never fired a shot in anger. The military performed one service that affects everyone in the region to this day. The Army was the steward of an immense tract of open space from the Marin coast down nearly to Santa Cruz County, including Alcatraz and Angel islands, with the Presidio of San Francisco as its crown jewel. Most of it became part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, a park nearly three times the size of San Francisco. It was created by citizen activists including Amy Meyer and Edgar Wayburn, plus political leaders such as Phillip Burton and Nancy Pelosi, but it would never have happened without the stewardship of the Army. The Army fired its last cannon salute at day's end on June 23, 1995 — 30 years ago Monday. It was the day the Army turned over the Presidio to the National Park Service. A bugler played 'To the Colors,' and soldiers lowered the flag, slowly, carefully. Then, with a band playing 'The Stars and Stripes Forever' and led by 11 generals, the last U.S. Army soldiers marched from the parade ground out to the Presidio gate at Lyon and Lombard streets. A man who identified himself as John marched on the street, alongside the soldiers. He limped a little. He said a piece of shrapnel from Vietnam still bothered him. Still, he kept up. 'You never forget how to march,' he said. As far as I know, that was the last Army parade in San Francisco.

Tesla releases new details about its next big deal
Tesla releases new details about its next big deal

Miami Herald

time24 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Tesla releases new details about its next big deal

Rumors have been swirling for weeks as Tesla nears the launch of its next big idea - robotaxi - in Austin, Texas. The robotaxi hype hasn't reached the fever pitch of the Cybertruck, Tesla's last big idea, but if it gets this right, robotaxi has the chance to transform not just Tesla, but driving itself. Related: Tesla robotaxi launch hits major speed bump Tesla is admittedly slow-walking the rollout with CEO Elon Musk telling CNBC, "It's prudent for us to start with a small number, confirm that things are going well, and then scale it up." Tesla says it will have just 10 robotaxis on the street at launch. The company has already been testing its system, however. Earlier this year, Tesla said that its FSD system has driven a cumulative total of 3.6 billion miles, nearly triple the 1.3 billion cumulative miles it reported a year ago. But the public may not trust the autonomous vehicles yet. "Consumers are skeptical of the full self-driving (FSD) technology that undergirds the robotaxi proposition, with 60% considering Tesla's full self-driving 'unsafe,' 77% unwilling to utilize full self-driving technology, and a substantial share (48%) believing full self-driving should be illegal," the May 2025 edition of the Electric Vehicle Intelligence Report (EVIR) said. Self-driving Teslas have already been spotted on city streets with a human riding shotgun ahead of the program's official launch. And now Tesla is confirming that humans will be a fixture as it goes forward. Image source: vanTesla won't be leaving passengers in their Austin robotaxis alone, as the company plans to have a "safety monitor" sitting in the front seat during drives. Musk has claimed in the past that once the robotaxi program is up and running, Tesla owners would be able to earn passive income by allowing their Teslas to operate autonomously as taxis, without human intervention. However, the "safety monitor" isn't an abnormal safety feature for an autonomous vehicle. Waymo tested its vehicles for six months with a driver and for six months without one in Austin before it launched its commercial service earlier this year, according to Electrek. Related: Tesla takes drastic measures to keep robotaxi plans secret A safety monitor is just one of the robotaxis' safety requirements. Riders must agree to a TOS agreement, must have a debit or credit card on file, and can only request rides via the app between 6 a.m. and 12 a.m. within the geofenced area where it's allowed to operate. That geofenced area limits where cars can travel and changes based on the time of day. Only invited users are allowed to download and use the Robotaxi app. While the Cybertruck has had a lot of hype, it has been a massive flop for Tesla. A backlog of reservations helped push Cybertruck out with a lot of momentum, but it can only be described as an epic failure regarding sales. Tesla sold just 7,100 Cybertrucks in the first three months of the year, according to the Wall Street Journal, nearly half of the 13,000 it sold in the fourth quarter of 2024. Tesla sold fewer than 40,000 Cybertrucks in 2024, making Elon Musk's far-fetched prediction of over half a million annual sales look farcical. Electrek reports that Tesla is sitting on $800 million of 10,000 Cybertrucks it can't sell. More on Tesla: Tesla claims rival startup is built on stolen trade secrets10,000 people join crazy Tesla class action lawsuitTesla execs question Elon Musk over controversial X post Mix that with the dismal quarter Tesla just reported, and Musk has a lot of work to do. It reported its worst quarter in years, with auto sales revenue dropping 20% amid falling demand in the U.S., Europe, and China. In the first quarter, deliveries fell 13% year over year to 36,681 vehicles from 386,810. Musk has been promising the robotaxi since at least 2016. Now that it is finally ready to debut, the company needs Musk's latest big swing to be a home run. Related: Tesla's robotaxi rollout is alarming the public, new report shows The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store