
‘Profound alarm': US veterans agency roiled by fight over anti-discrimination provisions
Last week, VA secretary Doug Collins tweeted that 'VA is now squarely focused on Veterans – not out-of-touch, woke causes such as DEI and gender dysphoria treatments.'
Collins' pronouncement comes as he faces tough questions from US Senate and House members in the wake of a Guardian report that the agency had quietly removed language from its hospital bylaws that explicitly barred discrimination based on patients' marital status or political views.
Seventy House members wrote to express 'profound alarm' that doctors and other VA medical providers 'will now be able to refuse treatment' based on veterans' political views or whether they are unmarried, widowed or part of a same-sex couple.
Collins and his agency have pushed back with a series of puzzling statements, saying the bylaw changes were merely a 'formality' and were required by a Trump anti-transgender executive order banning 'gender ideology extremism' – even though the Trump order says nothing about marital status or political affiliations.
Especially novel – given the VA and the Trump administration's adamant anti-DEI stance – was the agency's argument that the bylaw changes did not matter because unmarried or politically active patients would still be protected by a 2013 Obama administration DEI directive.
Kayla Williams, an Iraq war veteran who is a former VA assistant secretary for public and nongovernmental affairs and former director of the VA's Center for Women Veterans, said the agency's explanation 'doesn't make any sense'.
'If this change isn't going to lead to any of the things we're worried about, why would they make it?' she asked. 'They're talking out of both sides of their mouth. You know they don't like Obama policies.'
The VA told the Guardian the directive 'remains in effect' and that 'under no circumstances whatsoever would VA ever allow any employee to refuse to provide appropriate care to any eligible veteran'.
The VA declined requests to make Collins available for an interview. On Tuesday, the Guardian sent the agency a five-page email that included 19 questions and details of the issues examined in this story. The VA press secretary, Peter Kasperowicz, responded with a 126-word statement that ignored nearly all of the Guardian's questions. The statement said the Guardian and the story's author 'are purveyors of disinformation with a history of maliciously false reporting on Veterans issues. Nothing they say can be trusted.'
'Here is the truth: Under Secretary Collins, VA doesn't tolerate discrimination against Veterans or VA employees on any grounds, and multiple federal laws and VA policies prohibit discrimination,' the statement added. It cited federal code sections that address discrimination in employment and cover overall healthcare eligibility and enrollment practices at VA, but are silent on the subject of discrimination involving veterans who are patients.
The statement also cites the VA's Obama era anti-discrimination directive. The protections for veterans included in the directive include language that forbids discrimination based on 'gender identity and transgender status'. But advocates say the agency is actively discriminating against transgender veterans under Trump by denying them many healthcare services.
In the same document that ordered changes to the medical bylaws, VA leadership also required hospital directors to 'remove' education and outreach materials 'that provide information about gender identity, gender diversity or gender inclusivity'. Physical items like posters and brochures 'may be discarded', according to the document. Archived and inactive digital material 'may be automatically restricted', the document says, as part of efforts by the VA's technology unit to 'identify and hide documents'.
The Guardian asked the VA about the directive to remove and restrict records. The VA did not respond.
Doron Dorfman, a law professor at Seton Hall who specializes in healthcare discrimination, said the medical bylaw changes were especially concerning because – unlike protections for race, sex, age, national origin and disability, which are enumerated in federal law – the Trump administration can wipe away rights for equal medical treatment on the basis of marital status and politics by rescinding the 2013 directive.
The nearly 100 members of Congress who have signed letters complaining about the changes indicated they are not satisfied with the agency's assurances.
Senators led by Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, the ranking Democrat on the Senate veterans affairs committee, and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer of New York, called the revisions 'deeply dangerous and pernicious in practice and principle'.
Under questioning from Senator Patty Murray during a 24 June public hearing, Collins reiterated his position that the bylaw changes were meaningless.
'Nothing was changed that actually affected' protections for veterans, he said.
'When you take words out, people hear them,' Murray, a Democrat from Washington state, pressed. 'Therefore, I'm asking why don't you put them back in?'
Collins refused. 'No,' he said. 'I can't believe we're still talking about this … No one is being discriminated against at VA.'
After the hearing, they continued the argument over social media – with Collins accusing Murray of 'lying' and Murray replying: 'Did you or did you not explicitly REMOVE language requiring health care professionals to care for veterans regardless of their politics & marital status?'
Collins' social media comment about DEI being an 'out-of-touch, woke cause' came in a separate exchange with Representative Ilhan Omar, in response to the Minnesota Democrat's charge that the agency's plans to cut 30,000 staffers will 'devastate veterans who depend on timely care and benefits'. Collins touted the rollback of diversity, equity and inclusion programs as one of the 'commonsense reforms' that are allowing the agency to better serve veterans.
Collins has also pushed back against the Guardian – appearing on conservative outlets Fox News, Newsmax and Barstool Sports to denounce the news organization's reporting on the bylaw changes. He called the story 'fabricated', 'ridiculous' and 'false and unbelievable'.
Both the VA and White House demanded a retraction. The Guardian amended the story with additional context provided by the VA after publication, but did not retract it.
VA officials took a similar tack in March when the Advocate, a national LGBTQ+ publication, revealed the Trump administration had 'quietly reversed' an agency policy ensuring gender affirming care for transgender veterans. The agency's press secretary, Kasperowicz, demanded a retraction. 'No such policy change has been made,' he said.
Three days later, the VA publicly announced that it had reversed the policy and declared that it was ending gender-affirming medical care for transgender veterans.
'All eligible Veterans – including trans-identified Veterans – will always be welcome at VA and will always receive the benefits and services they've earned under the law,' Collins said. 'But if Veterans want to attempt to change their sex, they can do so on their own dime.'
The agency said the move was required by Trump's 20 January executive order titled 'Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government' – the same order that the agency is now citing to justify the hospital bylaw changes. Trump's executive order declares that there are 'two sexes, male and female' that are 'not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality'.
A lawsuit filed on 9 June by a transgender veteran with the backing of the Yale Law School's Veterans Legal Services Clinic alleged that her hormone treatments had been wrongly discontinued.
Four days after being sued, the VA reversed itself, and agreed to resume the veteran's hormone therapy. The veteran then dropped her suit before the court of appeals for veterans claims – leaving the underlying legal issues unresolved.
'It should not require a federal lawsuit for VA to fulfill its obligation to provide healthcare for veterans injured during service,' law clinic member Hillary Browning said. She said the VA 'should reassess any decisions terminating or denying gender-affirming care for other transgender veterans'.
Representative Maxine Dexter, a Democrat from Oregon, and a physician who worked for eight years at VA hospitals, said she saw the changes in the medical bylaws and the removal of protections for trans veterans as part of a larger plan to politicize the VA. 'As doctors we're supposed to treat the patient in front of us, whoever they are,' she said.
Legal experts say the recent changes to the VA's medical bylaws created a murky situation where individual medical officers and patients will be left to themselves to interpret what is legal and what is not.
Dr Ken Kizer, the former head of the VA healthcare system, said the changes open up the possibility that doctors could refuse to treat veterans based on their 'reason for seeking care – including allegations of rape and sexual assault – current or past political party affiliation or political activity, and personal behavior such as alcohol or marijuana use'.
The legal experts and veterans advocates said the impact of the revisions would probably fall hardest on female veterans, LGBTQ+ veterans and those who live in rural areas where there are fewer doctors.
After the bylaw changes were publicly reported, veterans in multiple states told the Guardian that they worried whether their own recent problems accessing care were linked to the rollback of explicit anti-discrimination protections.
Air force veteran Domonic Medley, 43, who is gay and lives in Dothan, Alabama, said he had to drive four hours roundtrip to Montgomery to receive routine injections of prophylactic HIV medication after staff at his local clinic said they were 'unable' to administer the jab. He suspects discrimination.
'I'm not asking to undergo open heart surgery in my small, community based clinic,' he said. 'I'm asking to receive a very simple injection, which just happens to be most commonly prescribed to gay men.'
After the Guardian's story was published in June, Medley complained to an infectious disease specialist at the VA in Montgomery. The doctor tried to set Medley at ease, saying the prescribed medication might be 'unfamiliar' to clinic staff, but added that he 'was never made aware of any reason why the dose could not be given'.
The doctor also told Medley she had since been notified that the 'medication could be given locally by the nursing staff at the Dothan clinic with some pre-planning'.
In April, Carrie Sutton, a 13-year Navy veteran, received a call from a wellness coach from the Department of Veterans Affairs' 'whole health' team. The coach asked her: 'What do you want your health for? What brings you joy and happiness?'
Sutton, a former cryptologist who served a tour combating pirates off the coast of Somalia, told the coach she wanted her family and community to feel safe, but she added that she was upset by the plans to lay off tens of thousands of VA workers. Sutton wanted 'to not have the VA gutted, to be able to have VA care and that VA employees feel safe', her medical record shows.
Soon after, Sutton's appointment with a neurologist near her hometown of Conesville, New York, was cancelled. She could still receive treatment for service-connected migraines and fibromyalgia, the agency said, but her permission to get treatment in her community had expired and would not be renewed. Sutton, a survivor of military sexual trauma, would now have to drive more than two hours roundtrip to a major VA medical center to see a doctor. Sutton believes she was punished for speaking out.
'I have to think it was what I said,' she said. 'I can see no other reason why.' She filed a complaint with the patient advocate at her VA medical center.
The VA declined to comment on Medley and Sutton's experiences, despite signed releases from both veterans. 'I'm not really surprised they didn't actually address the issue,' Sutton said. It 'seems to be the current trend in the country right now. There is no transparency.'
Lois Weithorn, a professor at the University of California San Francisco School of Law, said denials of care might ultimately have to be addressed through litigation, but that the changes to the medical bylaws 'could cause substantial delays in the provision of care to veterans, and create difficult obstacles for sick veterans who must challenge denials of care'.
The VA runs the nation's largest integrated healthcare system, serving 9 million veterans a year across 170 hospitals and more than 1,000 clinics.
Like any large hospital system, the VA has long struggled to ensure benefits are provided equitably. A 232-page report, published by the agency in 2022, found that Black and Native American veterans received significantly lower quality healthcare than non-Hispanic white veterans, while women veterans over 65 years old faced 'large gaps in quality' compared with male veterans in the same age group.
The report also found 'female veterans of reproductive age' reported far worse patient experiences than male veterans of the same age group, while Black, Asian and Hispanic veterans reported worse experiences than whites.
Disparities have also been endemic when it comes to the provision of benefits. A 2023 report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, found the VA was far more likely to deny disability claims filed by Black veterans than white veterans.
Under President Joe Biden, the VA worked to confront these problems, including deploying a team within the VA's Office of Equity Assurance to address the disability benefits issues for Black veterans.
In March, the VA 'liquidated' the office of equity assurance, placing staff on administrative leave, according to the investigative news outlet ProPublica.
The VA said the office was being liquidated because there is no longer discrimination at the VA.
Under Collins' leadership, press secretary Kasperowicz told ProPublica, the VA 'treats all veterans and beneficiaries fairly and equally, so the Office of Equity Assurance is no longer needed'.
Richard Brookshire, a former US army combat medic and co-founder of the Black Veterans Project, called that statement 'laughable'.
Brookshire, an Afghanistan war veteran, noted that during the first Trump administration, the VA produced an internal report that found just 43% of Black veterans' post traumatic stress disorder claims were approved compared to 57% for non-Hispanic white veterans. The report provided a detailed analysis of where disparities were greatest based on a long list of factors, accounting for the veterans' income, age, education, the state where the veteran lived and the war where the veteran served.
'They know this is happening,' Brookshire said. 'They just don't want to do anything about it.'
Veterans and VA employees said the Trump administration's clampdown on diversity efforts has created a chilling effect with far reaching consequences.
In Seattle, Iraq war veteran and former army intelligence sergeant Selena Coppa said she spent almost half of a recent therapy session talking to her therapist 'about their own fear of getting fired because they had participated in various forms of political activity'.
Staffers' concerns rose two days into Trump's second term, when then acting VA secretary Todd Hunter sent an all staff email that asked VA workers to report colleagues who are 'using coded or imprecise language' to 'disguise' diversity efforts.
'Failure to report this information within 10 days may have adverse consequences,' the email said.
In the months that followed, Coppa said, posters and pamphlets providing information on sexual health, disease transmission and suicide prevention disappeared from the women's clinic in Seattle. Rainbow flags have also been removed and some of the most caring clinicians have quit, Coppa said.
'What's going to be left and who's going to be left?' she said. 'It's like a grim horror movie' that also impacts the healthcare available to straight veterans.
The women's health medical director at another VA hospital, in California, said basic information about women's healthcare – including posters and pamphlets – was also removed from her hospital. Half of the staff of the women's clinic have either resigned or are looking for work, she said. 'You can't erase the word 'gender' without impacting women,' she said, requesting anonymity to avoid being publicly attacked.
The Guardian asked the VA about reports of disappearing pamphlets, loss of staff and low morale at VA women's clinics. The agency did not answer.
Experts say the lack of gender affirming care will have a major impact on trans veterans' mental health, experts say. VA researchers have found elevated rates of suicide among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender veterans – with trans veterans dying by suicide at more than twice the rate of cisgender veterans.
The VA did not answer a question from the Guardian about the mental health impacts of ending gender affirming care.
In Pittsburgh, transgender Navy veteran Rayven Greer lost her therapist, when he resigned.
The therapist, a licensed clinical social worker, said he could not ethically continue to treat Greer because he had been instructed that, consistent with Trump's executive order, he had to refer to his patient by her birth name and gender in his clinical notes. The therapist spoke on condition of anonymity because he feared online attacks and unwanted political attention to his new employer.
Greer, a survivor of military sexual trauma who suffers from post traumatic stress disorder, said she is now struggling to create a relationship with a new therapist in an atmosphere where her identity as a trans woman is being held in question.
'I get 'sirred' all the time,' she said. 'It's very obvious that I look like Rayven. I use she/her pronouns, but they refuse to follow that.'
The VA's updated clinical practice guidelines for treating trans veterans direct staff to address veterans by their preferred name and pronoun, saying that doing so 'demonstrates respect', but Greer said that hasn't been her experience. VA clinicians regularly refer to her as a 'MALE' in her VA medical record.
The VA did not respond to questions about Greer's care, despite a signed release from the veteran.
Harold Kudler, a psychiatrist who served as a top VA mental health official under Obama and the first Trump administration, said the changes at the VA are not small matters.
'A psychotherapist who can neither be present nor genuine with patients is seriously compromised,' Kudler said. 'By creating an environment in which neither veteran nor clinician feels safe in speaking frankly and honestly, there can be no new understanding, no growth, and no healing.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Trump's tariffs could squeeze US factories and boost costs by up to 4.5%, new analysis finds
As Donald Trump prepares to announce new tariff increases, the costs of his policies are starting to come into focus for a domestic manufacturing sector that depends on global supply chains, with a new analysis suggesting factory costs could increase by roughly 2% to 4.5%. 'There's going to be a cash squeeze for a lot of these firms,' said Chris Bangert-Drowns, the researcher at the Washington Center for Equitable Growth who conducted the analysis. Those seemingly small changes at factories with slim profit margins, Bangert-Drowns said, 'could lead to stagnation of wages, if not layoffs and closures of plants' if the costs are untenable. The analysis, released Tuesday, points to the challenges Trump might face in trying to sell his tariffs to the public as a broader political and economic win and not just as evidence his negotiating style gets other nations to back down. The success of Trump's policies ultimately depends on whether everyday Americans become wealthier and factory towns experience revivals, a goal outside economists say his Republican administration is unlikely to meet with tariffs. Trump has announced new frameworks with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia and Britain that would each raise the import taxes charged by the United States. He's prepared to levy tariffs against goods from dozens of other countries starting on Friday in the stated range of 15% to 50%. The US stock market has shown relief the tariff rates aren't as high as Trump initially threatened in April and hope for a sense of stability going forward. Trump maintains the tariff revenues will whittle down the budget deficit and help whip up domestic factory jobs, all while playing down the risks of higher prices. 'We've wiped out inflation,' Trump said last Friday before boarding Marine One while on his way to Scotland. But there's the possibility of backlash in the form of higher prices and slower growth once tariffs flow more fully through the world economy. A June survey by the Atlanta Federal Reserve suggested companies would on average pass half of their tariff costs onto US consumers through higher prices. Labor department data shows America lost 14,000 manufacturing jobs after Trump rolled out his April tariffs, putting a lot of pressure as to whether a rebound starts in the June employment report coming out Friday. The Washington Center for Equitable Growth analysis shows how Trump's devotion to tariffs carries potential economic and political costs for his agenda. In the swing states of Michigan and Wisconsin, more than one in five jobs are in the critical sectors of manufacturing, construction, mining and oil drilling and maintenance that have high exposures to his import taxes. The artificial intelligence sector Trump last week touted as the future of the economy is dependent on imports. More than 20% of the inputs for computer and electronics manufacturing are imported, so the tariffs could ultimately magnify a hefty multitrillion-dollar price tag for building out the technology in the US. The White House argues American businesses will access new markets because of the trade frameworks, saying companies will ultimately benefit as a result. 'The 'Made in USA' label is set to resume its global dominance under President Trump,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. There are limits to the analysis. Trump's tariff rates have been a moving target, and the analysis looks only at additional costs, not how those costs will be absorbed among foreign producers, domestic manufacturers and consumers. Also, the legal basis of the tariffs as an 'emergency' act goes before a US appeals court on Thursday. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview last week on Fox Business Network's Kudlow show countries were essentially accepting the tariffs to maintain access to the US market. 'Everyone is willing to pay a toll,' he said. But what Bessent didn't say is US manufacturers are also paying much of that toll. 'We're getting squeezed from all sides,'' said Justin Johnson, president of Jordan manufacturing company in Belding, Michigan, northeast of Grand Rapids. His grandfather founded the company in 1949. The company, which makes parts used by Amazon warehouses, auto companies and aerospace firms, has seen the price of a key raw material – steel coil – rise 5% to 10% this year. Trump has imposed 50% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum. Jordan manufacturing doesn't buy foreign steel. But by crippling foreign competition, Trump's tariffs have allowed domestic US steelmakers to hike prices. Johnson doesn't blame them. 'There's no red-blooded capitalist who isn't going to raise his prices'' under those circumstances, he said.


Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Donald Trump is right to stir up the hornets' nest on North Sea oil and gas
In spite of their relationship being one of the political world's strangest bromances, Donald Trump's claim that Keir Starmer was 'destroying' the North Sea's oil and gas found other targets in his Aberdeen stopover. As a result – and even in their own backyard – he was not averse to letting John Swinney, the First Minister, and Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, know that he didn't think much of their energy policies. That's assuming that any one of those who'll be called to vote in next May's Scottish Parliament elections really knows what Swinney's or Sarwar's definite policy on North Sea oil and gas will be. Both parties have been playing a version of dodgems, ducking and diving all over the place as they constantly seek to confuse the electorate about what the future holds for what the president rightly described as the North Sea's 'treasure chest'. The SNP have been all over the place in relation to energy, while at least with Nicola Sturgeon voters knew where they were. Then, in that ill-fated and completely nonsensical alliance with the sub-Marxist Scottish Greens, the Scottish Government had set its face firmly against more development of oil and gas fields and any still under way would presumably be abandoned. Everything was geared to renewable power – wind, solar and tidal. And definitely no nuclear generation, either – not ever. Swinney has managed to get the SNP off that ludicrous policy for keeping Scotland's lights on, if only by sitting on the fence and stating that they'd no longer ban all North Sea production and instead would consider new licences to drill on a case-by-case basis. I can just imagine the world's oil giants rushing to do business with the Scottish Government with that sort of 'maybe-aye-maybe-no' condition hanging over their development plans. The Scottish Tories are completely onside with the president in being ready to approve many new licences that would help preserve the current well-paid and highly skilled jobs in the North East of Scotland. And it should help them hang onto key constituencies. But it was Scottish Labour that, until fairly recently, looked to have a fair chance of challenging the SNP for the right to form a government next May. That hope, however, almost disappeared thanks to a whole series of own goals by the UK Labour Government over issues such as winter fuel payments and benefit cuts. It remains to be seen whether their Hamilton by-election victory has put new heart into Labour and also whether they now have a policy on North Sea oil and gas that will attract voters. The omens are not good, if the trades union leader Gary Smith is to be believed. The general secretary of the Labour-supporting GMB union has said that the UK Government's energy policy is 'bonkers' as it plans to cut off investment that would help create jobs. In that he was essentially echoing the president's comments. The UK Government is expected to grant permission for the giant new Rosebank and Jackdaw oil and gas fields in the North Sea to go ahead as they already have licences approved. But Ed Miliband, the UK Energy Secretary, has repeatedly said no future licences will be granted by Labour – meaning the North Sea sector is in danger of continuing to shed jobs over time. Labour aims to fight the nationalists on the record of Swinney's Government, which in spite of President Trump's nice words about him are nothing to boast about, and neither is his obsession with breaking up Britain. But there are lots of votes in the energy policies of the three main contenders, and currently only the Tories seem to agree with the Trump 'manifesto' on North oil and gas. He was right to stir up that hornets' nest. The electorate deserve clearer answers, especially from Labour.


Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Trump's Scotland holiday was a triumph – but trouble awaits back home
It has been the perfect working holiday. On his four-day trip to Scotland, Donald Trump played golf with his family, jousted with journalists and cut a trillion-dollar trade deal with the EU. But as he lined up his tee shot on the first hole of his new course near Aberdeen, there was just a hint that his mind had already drifted towards the domestic and international crises he faces when he returns to Washington on Tuesday evening. 'We'll play it very quickly, and then I go back to DC, and we put out fires all over the world,' he said. The questions about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire paedophile, have not gone away and he must now make some tough decisions about the conflict in Gaza. His own supporters still want to know why his officials went back on promises that they would reveal all the evidence from the Epstein case, amid suspicions that a powerful cabal of paedophiles was being protected. But for a few days on this side of the Atlantic, he seemed alleviated of those stresses. 'Thank you everybody, and thank you to the media,' he said, his good mood spilling over towards one of his favourite punchbags. 'The media has been terrific, believe it or not! Fake news not one time today. Today, they're wonderful news.' It was an unusual compliment from a politician who has based much of his career on deriding the reporters who cover him. Even the bank of wind turbines, which he has criticised throughout his visit, went unmentioned. It was the sign of a president in good cheer throughout his trip to Scotland, which was billed as a 'working visit' but was really a thinly-disguised chance to unwind. He flew into Scotland on Friday evening and spent his first 24 hours in the country out of sight of the media, playing golf on his Turnberry course with Eric, his son, who manages his businesses. He golfed again on Sunday morning but got to play the part of 'dealmaker in chief' in the afternoon, when Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, arrived for a hastily-arranged meeting to talk trade. An hour later, the president announced that they had reached a deal. It would see the European Union buy $700 billion (£525 billion) of American energy and invest $600 billion on US soil, in return for a reduction in tariffs. An elated Mr Trump called it 'the biggest of the all deals' but flashed irritation when Washington headlines intruded on his moment. 'Oh, you've got to be kidding me,' he said when asked if the deal had been rushed through to distract from the Epstein controversy at home. 'No, had nothing to do with it. Only you would think that.' The next day, he hosted Sir Keir Starmer, treating the prime minister to a ride on Air Force One and Marine One, the presidential aeroplane and helicopter. He praised Lady Starmer: 'I don't know what he's [Sir Keir] doing but she's very respected, as respected as him. I don't want to say more, I'll get myself in trouble. But she's very, she's a great woman and is very highly respected.' Now he must return to Washington and the controversy over Epstein. His own supporters still want to know why his officials went back on promises that they would reveal all the evidence from the case, amid suspicions that a powerful cabal of paedophiles was being protected. Mr Trump hinted at unfinished business just before he set off on his new course when he said: 'I go back to DC, and we put out fires all over the world.' The war in Ukraine has proven stubbornly intractable, despite Mr Trump's promise to end it on the first day of his presidency. And he must decide just what to do about Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, and his new threat to introduce secondary sanction on Russia within ten to 12 days. Growing revulsion at images of starving children emerging from Gaza means he is under increasing pressure to take a tougher stance on Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister. 'We are working together to try and get things straightened out for the world,' he said when asked what he would say to Mr Netanyahu.' He is due to have lunch with JD Vance, the vice-president, where the pair can share notes about holidaying in the UK. Mr Vance is expected to visit London, the Cotswolds, and Scotland with his family next month. Mr Trump will be back in September, when he will become the first world leader in modern times to undertake two state visits to Britain. The special relationship endures. 'I hate to say it, but nobody does it like you people in terms of the pomp and ceremony,' Mr Trump said. 'I'm a big fan of King Charles. I've known him for quite a while. Great guy, great person.' Sir Keir added: 'This is going to be a historic occasion and we're all very much looking forward to it.'