logo
Trump's Scotland holiday was a triumph – but trouble awaits back home

Trump's Scotland holiday was a triumph – but trouble awaits back home

Telegraph4 days ago
It has been the perfect working holiday.
On his four-day trip to Scotland, Donald Trump played golf with his family, jousted with journalists and cut a trillion-dollar trade deal with the EU.
But as he lined up his tee shot on the first hole of his new course near Aberdeen, there was just a hint that his mind had already drifted towards the domestic and international crises he faces when he returns to Washington on Tuesday evening.
'We'll play it very quickly, and then I go back to DC, and we put out fires all over the world,' he said.
The questions about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire paedophile, have not gone away and he must now make some tough decisions about the conflict in Gaza.
His own supporters still want to know why his officials went back on promises that they would reveal all the evidence from the Epstein case, amid suspicions that a powerful cabal of paedophiles was being protected.
But for a few days on this side of the Atlantic, he seemed alleviated of those stresses.
'Thank you everybody, and thank you to the media,' he said, his good mood spilling over towards one of his favourite punchbags.
'The media has been terrific, believe it or not! Fake news not one time today. Today, they're wonderful news.'
It was an unusual compliment from a politician who has based much of his career on deriding the reporters who cover him.
Even the bank of wind turbines, which he has criticised throughout his visit, went unmentioned.
It was the sign of a president in good cheer throughout his trip to Scotland, which was billed as a 'working visit' but was really a thinly-disguised chance to unwind.
He flew into Scotland on Friday evening and spent his first 24 hours in the country out of sight of the media, playing golf on his Turnberry course with Eric, his son, who manages his businesses.
He golfed again on Sunday morning but got to play the part of 'dealmaker in chief' in the afternoon, when Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, arrived for a hastily-arranged meeting to talk trade.
An hour later, the president announced that they had reached a deal. It would see the European Union buy $700 billion (£525 billion) of American energy and invest $600 billion on US soil, in return for a reduction in tariffs.
An elated Mr Trump called it 'the biggest of the all deals' but flashed irritation when Washington headlines intruded on his moment.
'Oh, you've got to be kidding me,' he said when asked if the deal had been rushed through to distract from the Epstein controversy at home. 'No, had nothing to do with it. Only you would think that.'
The next day, he hosted Sir Keir Starmer, treating the prime minister to a ride on Air Force One and Marine One, the presidential aeroplane and helicopter.
He praised Lady Starmer: 'I don't know what he's [Sir Keir] doing but she's very respected, as respected as him. I don't want to say more, I'll get myself in trouble. But she's very, she's a great woman and is very highly respected.'
Now he must return to Washington and the controversy over Epstein. His own supporters still want to know why his officials went back on promises that they would reveal all the evidence from the case, amid suspicions that a powerful cabal of paedophiles was being protected.
Mr Trump hinted at unfinished business just before he set off on his new course when he said: 'I go back to DC, and we put out fires all over the world.'
The war in Ukraine has proven stubbornly intractable, despite Mr Trump's promise to end it on the first day of his presidency. And he must decide just what to do about Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, and his new threat to introduce secondary sanction on Russia within ten to 12 days.
Growing revulsion at images of starving children emerging from Gaza means he is under increasing pressure to take a tougher stance on Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister.
'We are working together to try and get things straightened out for the world,' he said when asked what he would say to Mr Netanyahu.'
He is due to have lunch with JD Vance, the vice-president, where the pair can share notes about holidaying in the UK. Mr Vance is expected to visit London, the Cotswolds, and Scotland with his family next month.
Mr Trump will be back in September, when he will become the first world leader in modern times to undertake two state visits to Britain. The special relationship endures.
'I hate to say it, but nobody does it like you people in terms of the pomp and ceremony,' Mr Trump said. 'I'm a big fan of King Charles. I've known him for quite a while. Great guy, great person.'
Sir Keir added: 'This is going to be a historic occasion and we're all very much looking forward to it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Durham disclosures further undermine Gabbard's claims of plot against Trump
Durham disclosures further undermine Gabbard's claims of plot against Trump

The Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Durham disclosures further undermine Gabbard's claims of plot against Trump

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of US national intelligence, hoped to uncover evidence that Barack Obama and his national security team conspired to undermine Donald Trump in a slow-motion coup. But if her crusade was aimed at proving that Obama embarked on a 'treasonous conspiracy' to falsely show that Russia intervened in the 2016 presidential election to help Trump, Gabbard made a mistake. A previously classified annexe to a report by another special counsel, John Durham – appointed towards the end of Trump's first presidency – has further undermined Gabbard's case. It was a quixotic enterprise from the start. After all, the 2019 report from Robert Mueller, the original special counsel appointed to investigate the Russia allegations, and a bipartisan five-volume report the following year from the Senate intelligence committee – then chaired by Marco Rubio, now Trump's secretary of state – both affirmed the offending January 2017 intelligence community assessment, which expressed 'high confidence' in Russian interference. Vladimir Putin, Russia's president, seemed to validate the intelligence's premise in 2018 when, standing beside Trump at a news conference in Helsinki, he admitted wanting him to win. The newly unclassified 29-page document from Durham, made public this week, contains a deflating conclusion for Gabbard. It confirms that Russian spies were behind the emails that were originally released as the result of a Russian cyber-hack of internal Democratic information channels and which Trump supporters believed showed the campaign of Hillary Clinton, his 2016 opponent, conspiring to accuse him of colluding with Moscow. 'The office's best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the US-based thinktanks,' Durham writes. He is referring to Leonard Benardo, of the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros, a philanthropist and bete noire of Trump's Maga base. One of the emails purportedly from Benardo proposes a plan 'to demonize Putin and Trump' and adds: 'Later the FBI will put more oil on the fire.' That message and others, including from a Clinton foreign policy aide, Julianne Smith, became part of the so-called 'Clinton Plan intelligence'. Benardo and Smith disputed ever writing such emails. In his 2023 report annexe, released on Thursday in heavily redacted form, Durham at least upholds Benardo's disavowal – concluding that it has been cobbled together from other individuals' emails to produce something more incriminating than the actuality. For Gabbard, who is feverishly trying to prove the existence of a 'deep state' determined to sabotage Trump, emails suspected to have been confected by Russia is hardly a brilliant look in her evidence package. Some former intelligence insiders find that unsurprising – dismissing the idea as a Trump-inspired fiction. 'Trump is lying when he speaks of a 'deep state',' said Fulton Armstrong, a retired CIA analyst who served under Democratic and Republican administrations. 'But if there were one, it would not be Democrat. The culture of that world is deeply Republican.' The national intelligence director – who has never served in the intelligence services or sat on its eponymous congressional committee when she was in the House of Representatives – is likely to see Durham's finding as immaterial to her quest to put Obama officials on trial for 'manufacturing' intelligence. But Gabbard's insistence – echoing her boss's view – on the existence of a plot to torpedo Trump was dismissed on Friday by John Brennan, the CIA director under Obama, who told the New Yorker that Obama issued instructions that intelligence showing Russian meddling to be kept hush-hush, at least until polling day, to ensure a fair election. 'He made very clear to us [that] he wanted us to try to uncover everything the Russians were doing, but also not to do anything that would in any way interfere in the election,' Brennan said. Gabbard has cited a 2020 House of Representatives intelligence committee report – endorsed only by its Republican members – challenging the assertion that Putin wanted to Trump to win. However, Michael Van Landingham, one of the CIA authors of the 2017 intelligence assessment now in her crosshairs, said credible intelligence cast the Russian leader's motives in an unambiguous light. 'The primary evidence to get to Putin's mindset was a clandestine source that said, essentially, when Putin realized that Clinton would win the election, he ordered an influence campaign against Hillary Clinton,' Van Landingham told PBS News Hour. 'Then we saw a series of events that happened with the hacked US materials by the Russian special services or intelligence services to leak those materials similar to the information a clandestine source had provided. At the same time, we saw lots of members of the Russian media portraying Donald Trump in a more positive light. 'There was other information … collected by the US intelligence community … over time, having a high-quality, clandestine source telling you that Putin was counting on Trump's victory, having members of the Russian state saying Trump would be better to work with because of his views on Russia that don't represent the US establishment, all of those things gave us high confidence that Putin wanted Trump to win.'

Trump to be nominated for Nobel peace prize after ending deadly war with a phone call
Trump to be nominated for Nobel peace prize after ending deadly war with a phone call

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump to be nominated for Nobel peace prize after ending deadly war with a phone call

President Donald Trump is being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Cambodia for helping to avert a deadly war in the region. Deputy Prime Minister Sun Chanthol announced the decision on Friday, citing Trump's role in halting the deadly war between the Southeast Asian country and Thailand. Clashed between the countries broke out late last week, with each accusing the other of firing first. At least 43 people were killed in the intense clashes, which lasted five days and displaced more than 300,000 people on both sides of the border. The conflict began to wind down after Trump called Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai on July 26, Reuters reported. A ceasefire was agreed to in Malaysia on Monday, ending the worst fighting between the two nations in the last decade. Speaking to reporters earlier in the Cambodian capital, Phnom Penh, Chanthol thanked Trump for bringing peace and said he deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. The prize is the highest-profile international award given to an individual or organization deemed to have done the most to 'advance fellowship between nations'. Most recently, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu nominated Trump for the prize for his work in 2020 negotiating the Abraham Accords between Israel and several other Arab nations. Netanyahu's letter, which he handed to the president at the White House, said Trump had 'created new opportunities to expand the circle of peace and normalization' in the Middle East. Trump has assisted Israel's war in Gaza and has also aided in its campaign against Iran, authorizing a mission in June to destroy Iran's nuclear enrichment sites. Pakistan also said in June that it would recommend Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in helping to resolve a conflict with India. The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded annually on December 10, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death. The ceremony is held in Oslo, Norway. After peace was declared between Cambodia and Thailand, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X that Trump made it happen. 'Give him the Nobel Peace Prize!,' she said.

Durham disclosures further undermine Gabbard's claims of plot against Trump
Durham disclosures further undermine Gabbard's claims of plot against Trump

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Durham disclosures further undermine Gabbard's claims of plot against Trump

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of US national intelligence, hoped to uncover evidence that Barack Obama and his national security team conspired to undermine Donald Trump in a slow-motion coup. But if her crusade was aimed at proving that Obama embarked on a 'treasonous conspiracy' to falsely show that Russia intervened in the 2016 presidential election to help Trump, Gabbard made a mistake. A previously classified annexe to a report by another special counsel, John Durham – appointed towards the end of Trump's first presidency – has further undermined Gabbard's case. It was a quixotic enterprise from the start. After all, the 2019 report from Robert Mueller, the original special counsel appointed to investigate the Russia allegations, and a bipartisan five-volume report the following year from the Senate intelligence committee – then chaired by Marco Rubio, now Trump's secretary of state – both affirmed the offending January 2017 intelligence community assessment, which expressed 'high confidence' in Russian interference. Vladimir Putin, Russia's president, seemed to validate the intelligence's premise in 2018 when, standing beside Trump at a news conference in Helsinki, he admitted wanting him to win. The newly unclassified 29-page document from Durham, made public this week, contains a deflating conclusion for Gabbard. It confirms that Russian spies were behind the emails that were originally released as the result of a Russian cyber-hack of internal Democratic information channels and which Trump supporters believed showed the campaign of Hillary Clinton, his 2016 opponent, conspiring to accuse him of colluding with Moscow. 'The office's best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the US-based thinktanks,' Durham writes. He is referring to Leonard Benardo, of the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros, a philanthropist and bete noire of Trump's Maga base. One of the emails purportedly from Benardo proposes a plan 'to demonize Putin and Trump' and adds: 'Later the FBI will put more oil on the fire.' That message and others, including from a Clinton foreign policy aide, Julianne Smith, became part of the so-called 'Clinton Plan intelligence'. Benardo and Smith disputed ever writing such emails. In his 2023 report annexe, released on Thursday in heavily redacted form, Durham at least upholds Benardo's disavowal – concluding that it has been cobbled together from other individuals' emails to produce something more incriminating than the actuality. For Gabbard, who is feverishly trying to prove the existence of a 'deep state' determined to sabotage Trump, emails suspected to have been confected by Russia is hardly a brilliant look in her evidence package. Some former intelligence insiders find that unsurprising – dismissing the idea as a Trump-inspired fiction. 'Trump is lying when he speaks of a 'deep state',' said Fulton Armstrong, a retired CIA analyst who served under Democratic and Republican administrations. 'But if there were one, it would not be Democrat. The culture of that world is deeply Republican.' The national intelligence director – who has never served in the intelligence services or sat on its eponymous congressional committee when she was in the House of Representatives – is likely to see Durham's finding as immaterial to her quest to put Obama officials on trial for 'manufacturing' intelligence. But Gabbard's insistence – echoing her boss's view – on the existence of a plot to torpedo Trump was dismissed on Friday by John Brennan, the CIA director under Obama, who told the New Yorker that Obama issued instructions that intelligence showing Russian meddling to be kept hush-hush, at least until polling day, to ensure a fair election. 'He made very clear to us [that] he wanted us to try to uncover everything the Russians were doing, but also not to do anything that would in any way interfere in the election,' Brennan said. Gabbard has cited a 2020 House of Representatives intelligence committee report – endorsed only by its Republican members – challenging the assertion that Putin wanted to Trump to win. However, Michael Van Landingham, one of the CIA authors of the 2017 intelligence assessment now in her crosshairs, said credible intelligence cast the Russian leader's motives in an unambiguous light. 'The primary evidence to get to Putin's mindset was a clandestine source that said, essentially, when Putin realized that Clinton would win the election, he ordered an influence campaign against Hillary Clinton,' Van Landingham told PBS News Hour. 'Then we saw a series of events that happened with the hacked US materials by the Russian special services or intelligence services to leak those materials similar to the information a clandestine source had provided. At the same time, we saw lots of members of the Russian media portraying Donald Trump in a more positive light. 'There was other information … collected by the US intelligence community … over time, having a high-quality, clandestine source telling you that Putin was counting on Trump's victory, having members of the Russian state saying Trump would be better to work with because of his views on Russia that don't represent the US establishment, all of those things gave us high confidence that Putin wanted Trump to win.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store