Judge declines to block parts of Trump gender, DEI executive orders
U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly denied the advocacy groups' request for a preliminary injunction, which would have prohibited the Trump administration from implementing parts of three executive orders against the challengers.
The judge said they failed to establish standing for half of the challenged provisions, and on the other provisions, their constitutional claims 'falter for various reasons.'
'The motion before the Court is not about whether DEI policies, however defined in a given context, are good public policy. Nor is it about whether specific DEI initiatives comply with antidiscrimination law,' Kelly wrote in a 58-page order. 'Instead, it is about whether Plaintiffs have shown that they are entitled to a preliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of the executive orders at issue.
'Because they are not likely to prevail on the merits, the Court will deny the motion,' he said.
The three organizations — National Urban League, National Fair Housing Alliance and the AIDS Foundation of Chicago — sued earlier this year, contending that Trump's orders violate their First Amendment rights by censoring their views on DEI, accessibility and transgender rights. They also said the orders limit their ability to provide social and health services, like HIV treatment, fair housing and civil rights protections.
Donya Khadem, a lawyer for the groups, said during a hearing in March that the breadth of the orders has made it challenging to know how to comply. She pointed to the president's executive order titled 'Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.'
'Does that mean they can't say transgender people exist?' she asked, suggesting that 'even minimal loss' of First Amendment freedom amounts to irreparable harm.
But Kelly, the judge, pushed back and noted the challenge of creating a 'bright line' rule as to when conditions on government funding become unconstitutional.
'Why isn't the president permitted to have his or her policy priorities?' he asked.
Khadem said there are 'constitutional limits' to how a president can implement their policy agenda, calling Trump's perspective that DEI is 'un-American' amounts to viewpoint discrimination.
Kelly also questioned Justice Department lawyer Pardis Gheibi over the confusion caused by Trump's orders during the March hearing, where arguments for and against a preliminary injunction were made.
'Plaintiffs can't tell what's covered,' he said. 'What is DEI and what is not?'
Gheibi said any questions the organizations have about Trump's orders amount to 'legal advice,' not evidence of the orders' deficiencies. She said the orders don't 'rise or fall' on whether a legal memo explaining their scope was attached.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bondi names DC ‘emergency police commissioner'
Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday tapped the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) chief to serve as Washington's 'emergency police commissioner,' a move to wrest power from the district's current police chief amid the Trump administration's law enforcement takeover. DEA Administrator Terry Cole will now assume 'all of the powers and duties' of D.C. Police Chief Pamela Smith, Bondi said in a directive Thursday. The appointment quickly drew backlash from local officials, including D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, who told Smith in a letter that he believed Cole's appointment was unlawful. The attorney general's directive asserted that Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) leaders had to receive approval from Cole before issuing any directives to its officers. In his letter to Smith, however, Schwalb argued that the Home Rule Act — the law under which President Trump has temporarily assumed control of the district's police — did not allow for the federal government to directly alter the chain of command. 'It is my opinion that the Bondi Order is unlawful, and that you are not legally obligated to follow it,' he wrote. When the White House first announced its federalization of law enforcement in the nation's capital, Cole was named as the department's interim federal administrator. A career DEA agent who was stationed in Bogota, Colombia; Kabul, Afghanistan and Mexico City, he was confirmed to his position in the administration in July. MPD issued a statement following the decision, but did not offer an opinion on Cole's appointment. 'We understand there may be questions about recent decisions regarding the Metropolitan Police Department,' a department spokesperson told NewsNation, The Hill's sister network. 'What's most important for our community to know is that MPD remains committed to delivering high-quality police service and ensuring the safety of everyone in our city,' they added. Previously, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and Smith said MPD leaders would continue to make decisions. Bowser, who was out of town Thursday, called Trump's moves ' unsettling and unprecedented.' The president has signaled he plans to request an extension on the 30-day takeover from Congress. He also deployed National Guard soldiers to Washington earlier this week to patrol the streets amid the administration's efforts to fight crime, which has also sparked pushback and protests.
Fox News
18 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump-appointed judge strikes down anti-DEI measures from Education Department
A Trump-appointed judge struck down two actions from the Education Department aimed at rooting out diversity, equity and inclusion programs in American schools, arguing that the federal government cannot push their policies "at the expense of constitutional rights." In her ruling Thursday, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland found that the Education Department violated the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from educational institutions that continued with DEI initiatives. "The administration is entitled to express its viewpoints and to promulgate policies aligned with those viewpoints," Gallagher wrote, according to Politico. "But it must do so within the procedural bounds Congress has outlined. And it may not do so at the expense of constitutional rights." "The government did not merely remind educators that discrimination is illegal: it initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished," she added. The ruling followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, which challenged the government's actions in a February lawsuit. The case centered on two Education Department memos ordering schools and universities to end all "race-based decision-making" or face penalties up to a total loss of federal funding. The conflict started with a Feb. 14 memo declaring that any consideration of race in admissions, financial aid, hiring or other aspects of academic and student life would be considered a violation of federal civil rights law. A further memo in April asked state education agencies to certify they were not using "illegal DEI practices." Violators risked losing federal money and being prosecuted under the False Claims Act, it said. A statement from the Education Department on Thursday said it was disappointed in the ruling but that "judicial action enjoining or setting aside this guidance has not stopped our ability to enforce Title VI protections for students at an unprecedented level." In April, a federal judge in New Hampshire already blocked the Trump administration from cutting funding to public schools that maintain diversity programs. U.S. District Judge Landya McCafferty said at the time that the effort by Trump's Education Department to block federal funding to public schools that continue to promote DEI programs likely violates the First Amendment, presenting what she described as "textbook viewpoint discrimination."
Bloomberg
18 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump, Putin Gear Up for Alaska Meeting; US Mulls Stake in Intel
US equity futures are mixed after notching another record high, brushing off a hotter-than-expected PPI data while traders trim expectations for the Fed's rate cut. Presidents Trump and Putin prepare for their meeting in Alaska to discuss the war in Ukraine. The Trump administration is said to be in talks to take a stake in Intel. Chris Watling of Longview Economics expects a "summer turbulence" in equity markets. Kevin Gordon of Charles Schwab discusses the Fed's rate path. 'Bloomberg Brief' delivers the market news, data and analysis you need to set your agenda. (Source: Bloomberg)
