Elon Musk Vs Donald Trump: Why Epstein Files Are Back In Headlines
Last Updated:
Musk's Trump claim has put the spotlight back on Epstein files. A detailed look at what may still remain hidden in one of the world's most high-profile sex trafficking cases
Trump Vs Musk: The New Twist In The Epstein Scandal
The bitter feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump has taken a sensational turn. In a recent post on X, Musk alleged that Trump's name appears in the sealed Epstein files — the court documents linked to billionaire financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation.
Musk's claim comes amid their increasingly public spat, which began after Musk criticised Trump's controversial 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act." The two, once seemingly aligned on certain policies, are now openly attacking each other. By linking Trump to the Epstein case, Musk has escalated the feud into highly charged territory.
Following Musk's explosive statement, several Democratic lawmakers have urged the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI to clarify whether Trump's name appears in any of the still-sealed Epstein files and to explain the status of remaining redactions. While Trump has repeatedly denied any improper association with Epstein, Musk's claim has revived both public curiosity and political calls for transparency over what the Epstein files actually contain.
Who Was Jeffrey Epstein?
Why Was It Called A 'Sweetheart Deal'?
Under this 2008 non-prosecution agreement, Epstein pleaded guilty to minor state-level charges of soliciting prostitution. He served just 13 months in jail, much of it under work-release conditions allowing him to leave jail for up to 12 hours a day. The deal shielded Epstein from federal prosecution not only for his past crimes but also for any potential co-conspirators, whose identities remained sealed. Victims were not informed of the deal, violating federal victims' rights laws. Because of its unusually lenient terms — despite the serious nature of the charges — the agreement was widely criticised as a 'sweetheart deal", suggesting Epstein's wealth and powerful connections may have helped him avoid harsher punishment.
The controversy resurfaced in 2019, eventually leading to the resignation of Alexander Acosta, the US Attorney who approved the deal and later served in President Trump's cabinet.
Epstein died in prison in August 2019 while awaiting trial. His death was officially ruled a suicide, though many continue to suspect foul play given the powerful individuals potentially implicated.
What Are The Epstein Files?
The Epstein files refer to a massive collection of legal documents, investigative records, and court evidence related to American financier Jeffrey Epstein's global sex trafficking operation, a scandal that exposed a murky world of exploitation, money, and power involving some of the world's most influential people.
At the centre of Epstein's network was Ghislaine Maxwell, a British socialite and daughter of late media tycoon Robert Maxwell. Maxwell was one of Epstein's closest associates and, according to court findings, played a key role in helping him recruit, groom, and exploit underage girls for years. Victims testified that Maxwell would often approach young girls with promises of education, modelling or career opportunities, only to pull them into Epstein's abusive circle. In 2021, Maxwell was convicted on multiple charges of sex trafficking and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
The Epstein files contain material from multiple investigations, lawsuits, and trials involving both Epstein and Maxwell. These include:
Flight logs from Epstein's private jets, especially his Boeing 727 nicknamed the 'Lolita Express," which reportedly carried celebrities, politicians, royalty, and business tycoons to Epstein's various properties, including his private Caribbean island.
Deposition transcripts — sworn testimonies from Epstein, Maxwell, their victims, witnesses, employees, and other associates.
Financial and business records, exposing Epstein's complex network of offshore accounts, shell companies, and financial dealings that helped him accumulate vast wealth and influence.
Civil lawsuits filed by victims against Epstein, Maxwell, and unnamed individuals alleged to have been involved.
Grand jury materials and sealed court orders, some of which remain confidential even today, either to protect victims' identities or because investigations are ongoing.
In 2024 and 2025, fresh batches of documents were made public, renewing media and public interest worldwide.
Who Is Named In The Epstein Files?
Multiple high-profile names have surfaced in various parts of the Epstein files over the years. These include:
It's important to note that being named in the files does not automatically mean criminal wrongdoing. Many names appear because of business, social, or philanthropic associations with Epstein — without any direct allegations of criminal conduct.
Trump's name, for example, has previously appeared in social contexts — such as parties and Palm Beach events in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Trump has consistently denied any involvement in Epstein's criminal activities and has stated that he distanced himself from Epstein long before the scandal became public.
Why Were The Epstein Files Sealed?
Much of the Epstein files remained sealed for years due to:
Protection of victims' identities and privacy
Ongoing criminal investigations
Possible sensitive intelligence links (speculated but unproven)
Civil settlements with confidentiality agreements
As lawsuits continued, particularly in the US Virgin Islands where Epstein owned private property, more files have gradually been unsealed. However, some documents remain sealed due to legal complexities. The pace and scope of further releases depend largely on US federal court rulings, ongoing appeals, and requests from government agencies or victims' attorneys.
The So-Called 'Client List': Myth Vs Reality
One of the most widely circulated conspiracy theories is about Epstein's alleged 'client list" — a definitive list of people who engaged in criminal acts through Epstein's trafficking network.
However, no such single, official 'client list" has ever been released. What exists are scattered names across depositions, civil filings, and witness statements. Many media outlets have clarified that most individuals named were simply acquaintances or passengers on Epstein's planes without evidence of criminal activity.
That said, there remain unanswered questions, particularly around certain redacted or still-sealed portions of the files.
What Next? The Unfinished Story
Even years after Jeffrey Epstein's death, the legal and political fallout from the scandal remains far from over, and may continue to generate headlines globally.
More files could still be unsealed: While large portions of Epstein-related documents have already been made public, some material remains sealed under court orders, particularly parts of civil suits, depositions, and grand jury evidence. Legal experts suggest that additional files may be released gradually depending on ongoing lawsuits, appeals, and victim privacy considerations. However, there is no official timeline for further disclosures.
Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team continues to fight her conviction: After being sentenced to 20 years in prison, Maxwell has filed appeals challenging both her conviction and sentence. While these appeals are pending, they could potentially bring more case documents into public view — though whether they will reveal new names or evidence remains uncertain. So far, these appeals have not resulted in any new public disclosures or release of sealed names.
Elon Musk's recent claim may increase political pressure for transparency: Following Musk's allegation that Trump is named in sealed Epstein files, some US lawmakers, particularly from the Democratic Party, have urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI to clarify what remains sealed and whether politically sensitive names are being protected. It remains unclear whether these demands will lead to further disclosures, but the political conversation around transparency has intensified.
top videos
View all
The Epstein Case: A Scandal Still Unfolding
The Epstein files remain one of the most sensational and disturbing legal sagas of modern times. The latest Musk vs Trump feud has once again pushed the Epstein files into global headlines, raising both lingering questions about accountability and fresh speculation about who knew what — and who may still have secrets to hide.
About the Author
Karishma Jain
Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at News18.com, writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @kar...Read More
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
donald trump elon musk Jeffrey Epstein
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 06, 2025, 12:05 IST
News world Elon Musk Vs Donald Trump: Why Epstein Files Are Back In Headlines
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Vance says Musk making a 'huge mistake' in going after Trump but also tries to downplay the attacks
BRIDGEWATER: Vice President JD Vance said Elon Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after President Donald Trump in a storm of bitter and inflammatory social media posts after a falling out between the two men. But the vice president, in an interview released Friday after the very public blow up between the world's richest man and arguably the world's most powerful, also tried to downplay Musk's blistering attacks as an 'emotional guy' who got frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Vance said. Vance's comments come as other Republicans in recent days have urged the two men, who months ago were close allies spending significant time together, to mend fences. Musk's torrent of social media posts attacking Trump came as the president portrayed him as disgruntled and 'CRAZY' and threatened to cut the government contracts held by his businesses. Musk, who runs electric vehicle maker Tesla, internet company Starlink and rocket company SpaceX, lambasted Trump's centerpiece tax cuts and spending bill but also suggested Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. 'Look, it happens to everybody," Vance said in the interview. 'I've flown off the handle way worse than Elon Musk did in the last 24 hours.' Vance made the comments in an interview with ' manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the U.S. Navy when he opened for Trump at a military base in Qatar. The vice president told Von that as Musk for days was calling on social media for Congress to kill Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' the president was 'getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon, but I think has been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk.' 'I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine," he added.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
What It Would Take To Convert Qatari Jet Into Air Force One To Safely Fly Trump
Washington: President Donald Trump really wants to fly on an upgraded Air Force One - but making that happen could depend on whether he's willing to cut corners with security. As government lawyers sort out the legal arrangement for accepting a luxury jet from the Qatari royal family, another crucial conversation is unfolding about modifying the plane so it's safe for the American president. Installing capabilities equivalent to the decades-old 747s now used as Air Force One would almost certainly consign the project to a similar fate as Boeing's replacement initiative, which has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers Thursday that those security modifications would cost less than $400 million but provided no details. Satisfying Trump's desire to use the new plane before the end of his term could require leaving out some of those precautions, however. A White House official said Trump wants the Qatari jet ready as soon as possible while adhering to security standards. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, did not provide details on equipment issues or the timeline. Trump has survived two assassination attempts, and Iran allegedly also plotted to kill him, so he's well aware of the danger he faces. However, he seems willing to take some chances with security, particularly when it comes to communications. For example, he likes to keep his personal phone handy despite the threat of hacks. He boasted this week that the government got the jet "for free," saying, "We need it as Air Force One until the other ones are done." Here's a look at what it would take to make the Qatari plane into a presidential transport: What Makes A Plane Worthy Of Being Air Force One? Air Force One is the call sign for any plane that's carrying the president. The first aircraft to get the designation was a propeller-powered C-54 Skymaster, which ferried Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Yalta Conference in 1945. It featured a conference room with a bulletproof window. Things are a lot more complicated these days. Boeing has spent years stripping down and rebuilding two 747s to replace the versions that have carried presidents for more than three decades. The project is slated to cost more than $5.3 billion and may not be finished before Trump leaves office. A 2021 report made public through the Freedom of Information Act outlines the unclassified requirements for the replacement 747s under construction. At the top of the list - survivability and communications. The government decided more than a decade ago that the new planes had to have four engines so they could remain airborne if one or two fail, said Deborah Lee James, who was Air Force secretary at the time. That creates a challenge because 747s are no longer manufactured, which could make spare parts harder to come by. Air Force One also has to have the highest level of classified communications, anti-jamming capabilities and external protections against foreign surveillance, so the president can securely command military forces and nuclear weapons during a national emergency. It's an extremely sensitive and complex system, including video, voice and data transmissions. James said there are anti-missile measures and shielding against radiation or an electromagnetic pulse that could be caused by a nuclear blast. "The point is, it remains in flight no matter what," she said. Will Trump Want All The Security Bells And Whistles? If the Qatari plane is retrofitted to presidential standards, it could cost $1.5 billion and take years, according to a U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide details that aren't publicly available. Testifying before Congress this week, Meink discounted such estimates, arguing that some of the costs associated with retrofitting the Qatari plane would have been spent anyway as the Air Force moves to build the long-delayed new presidential planes, including buying aircraft for training and to have spares available if needed. In response, Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., said that based on the contract costs for the planes that the Air Force is building, it would cost about $1 billion to strip down the Qatar plane, install encrypted communications, harden its defenses and make other required upgrades. James said simply redoing the wiring means "you'd have to break that whole thing wide open and almost start from scratch." Trump, as commander in chief, could waive some of these requirements. He could decide to skip shielding systems from an electromagnetic pulse, leaving his communications more vulnerable in case of a disaster but shaving time off the project. After all, Boeing has already scaled back its original plans for the new 747s. Their range was trimmed by 1,200 nautical miles, and the ability to refuel while airborne was scrapped. Paul Eckloff, a former leader of protection details at the Secret Service, expects the president would get the final say. "The Secret Service's job is to plan for and mitigate risk," he said. "It can never eliminate it." If Trump does waive some requirements, James said that should be kept under wraps because "you don't want to advertise to your potential adversaries what the vulnerabilities of this new aircraft might be." It's unlikely that Trump will want to skimp on the plane's appearance. He keeps a model of a new Air Force One in the Oval Office, complete with a darker color scheme that echoes his personal jet instead of the light blue design that's been used for decades. What Happens Next? Trump toured the Qatari plane in February when it was parked at an airport near Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort. Air Force chief of staff Gen. David Allvin was there, too. The U.S. official said the jet needs maintenance but not more than what would be expected of a four-engine plane of its complexity. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said it would be irresponsible to put the president and national security equipment aboard the Qatari plane "without knowing that the aircraft is fully capable of withstanding a nuclear attack." "It's a waste of taxpayer dollars," she said. Meanwhile, Boeing's project has been hampered by stress corrosion cracks on the planes and excessive noise in the cabins from the decompression system, among other issues that have delayed delivery, according to a Government Accountability Office report released last year. Boeing referred questions to the Air Force, which said in a statement that it's working with the aircraft manufacturer to find ways to accelerate the delivery of at least one of the 747s. Even so, the aircraft will have to be tested and flown in real-world conditions to ensure no other issues. James said it remains to be seen how Trump would handle any of those challenges. "The normal course of business would say there could be delays in certifications," she said. "But things seem to get waived these days when the president wants it." (This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
How The Vatican Manages Money And Where Pope Leo XIV Might Find More
Vatican City: The world's smallest country has a big budget problem. The Vatican doesn't tax its residents or issue bonds. It primarily finances the Catholic Church's central government through donations that have been plunging, ticket sales for the Vatican Museums, as well as income from investments and an underperforming real estate portfolio. The last year the Holy See published a consolidated budget, in 2022, it projected 770 million euros ($878 million), with the bulk paying for embassies around the world and Vatican media operations. In recent years, it hasn't been able to cover costs. That leaves Pope Leo XIV facing challenges to drum up the funds needed to pull his city-state out of the red. Withering Donations Anyone can donate money to the Vatican, but the regular sources come in two main forms. Canon law requires bishops around the world to pay an annual fee, with amounts varying and at bishops' discretion "according to the resources of their dioceses." U.S. bishops contributed over one-third of the $22 million (19.3 million euros) collected annually under the provision from 2021-2023, according to Vatican data. The other main source of annual donations is more well-known to ordinary Catholics: Peter's Pence, a special collection usually taken on the last Sunday of June. From 2021-2023, individual Catholics in the U.S. gave an average $27 million (23.7 million euros) to Peter's Pence, more than half the global total. American generosity hasn't prevented overall Peter's Pence contributions from cratering. After hitting a high of $101 million (88.6 million euros) in 2006, contributions hovered around $75 million (66.8 million euros) during the 2010's then tanked to $47 million (41.2 million euros) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, when many churches were closed. Donations remained low in the following years, amid revelations of the Vatican's bungled investment in a London property, a former Harrod's warehouse that it hoped to develop into luxury apartments. The scandal and ensuing trial confirmed that the vast majority of Peter's Pence contributions had funded the Holy See's budgetary shortfalls, not papal charity initiatives as many parishioners had been led to believe. Peter's Pence donations rose slightly in 2023 and Vatican officials expect more growth going forward, in part because there has traditionally been a bump immediately after papal elections. New Donors The Vatican bank and the city state's governorate, which controls the museums, also make annual contributions to the pope. As recently as a decade ago, the bank gave the pope around 55 million euros ($62.7 million) a year to help with the budget. But the amounts have dwindled; the bank gave nothing specifically to the pope in 2023, despite registering a net profit of 30 million euros ($34.2 million), according to its financial statements. The governorate's giving has likewise dropped off. Some Vatican officials ask how the Holy See can credibly ask donors to be more generous when its own institutions are holding back. Leo will need to attract donations from outside the U.S., no small task given the different culture of philanthropy, said the Rev. Robert Gahl, director of the Church Management Program at Catholic University of America's business school. He noted that in Europe there is much less of a tradition (and tax advantage) of individual philanthropy, with corporations and government entities doing most of the donating or allocating designated tax dollars. Even more important is leaving behind the "mendicant mentality" of fundraising to address a particular problem, and instead encouraging Catholics to invest in the church as a project, he said. Speaking right after Leo's installation ceremony in St. Peter's Square, which drew around 200,000 people, Gahl asked: "Don't you think there were a lot of people there that would have loved to contribute to that and to the pontificate?" In the U.S., donation baskets are passed around at every Sunday Mass. Not so at the Vatican. Untapped Real Estate The Vatican has 4,249 properties in Italy and 1,200 more in London, Paris, Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland. Only about one-fifth are rented at fair market value, according to the annual report from the APSA patrimony office, which manages them. Some 70% generate no income because they house Vatican or other church offices; the remaining 10% are rented at reduced rents to Vatican employees. In 2023, these properties only generated 35 million euros ($39.9 million) in profit. Financial analysts have long identified such undervalued real estate as a source of potential revenue. But Ward Fitzgerald, the president of the U.S.-based Papal Foundation, which finances papal charities, said the Vatican should also be willing to sell properties, especially those too expensive to maintain. Many bishops are wrestling with similar downsizing questions as the number of church-going Catholics in parts of the U.S. and Europe shrinks and once-full churches stand empty. Toward that end, the Vatican recently sold the property housing its embassy in Tokyo's high-end Sanbancho neighborhood, near the Imperial Palace, to a developer building a 13-story apartment complex, according to the Kensetsu News trade journal. Yet there has long been institutional reluctance to part with even money-losing properties. Witness the Vatican announcement in 2021 that the cash-strapped Fatebenefratelli Catholic hospital in Rome, run by a religious order, would not be sold. Pope Francis simultaneously created a Vatican fundraising foundation to keep it and other Catholic hospitals afloat. "They have to come to grips with the fact that they own so much real estate that is not serving the mission of the church," said Fitzgerald, who built a career in real estate private equity.
