OCTA poll: 80% of Filipinos want VP Sara to face impeachment trial
The July 2025 Tugon ng Masa (TNM) Survey, released on Sunday, showed that 80% of respondents answered in the affirmative when asked if they thought Duterte should face trial. There were 14% who disagreed, while the remaining 7% were undecided or refused to answer.
Majority support for the trial was seen across all regions: 87% in the National Capital Region, 77% in balance Luzon, 92% in the Visayas, and 69% in Mindanao.
This was also the case across socio-economic classes: 80% for Classes A, B, C, and D, and 78% for Class E.
For those who agreed that Duterte should face the impeachment trial, the most commonly cited reason, with 59% of respondents, was that she should address the charges, clear her name, and prove herself worthy of her position.
Other reasons include a belief in the charges with 21%, and the view that facing trial is necessary for her to remain eligible to run in the 2028 elections with 16%.
Among those who opposed a trial, 44% said the issue is a political conflict between the camps of Duterte and President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr., whom she ran alongside with in the 2022 national elections.
Other cited a belief in her integrity and disbelief in the allegations with 33%, while 19% said she should focus instead on serving the nation.
The survey fieldwork was conducted using face-to-face interviews from July 12 to July 17, 2025, a week before the Supreme Court released its decision declaring that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte as unconstitutional.
SC spokesperson Camille Ting noted, however, that the SC is not absolving Duterte from any of the charges against her, but any subsequent impeachment complaint may only be filed starting February 6, 2026.
The survey polled 1,200 male and female respondents aged 18 and above. It has a margin of error of ±3 % at a 95% confidence level. Subnational estimates carry a ±6% margin of error for Metro Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao.
Out of the respondents, 97% said they have heard, read, or watched anything about the impeachment complaint, while 2% said they were unaware.
The recent SC decision is in relation to the petition filed by Duterte and lawyer Israelito Torreon, among others, seeking to declare the Articles of Impeachment against her null and void
Lawyer and Constitutional law expert Domingo 'Egon' Cayosa on Saturday said the Senate may still opt to proceed with the trial, as it may assert its 'exclusive power' with regard to impeachment matters.
Three impeachment complaints were filed against Duterte in December 2024, all of which were connected with the alleged misuse of confidential funds.
The fourth impeachment complaint, endorsed by over one-third of lawmakers from the House of Representatives, was later on transmitted to the Senate.
Duterte, for her part, entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her, which she called merely a 'scrap of paper.' — BM, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
8 minutes ago
- GMA Network
SC asked to reconsider ruling on VP Sara impeachment, hold oral arguments
Various individuals on Tuesday filed a letter-petition asking the Supreme Court (SC) to reconsider its ruling that declared the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. The letter, addressed to Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo, has more than 100 signatories as they also called on the High Court to hold oral arguments about the matter. 'Sa bigat ng impact ng desisyon ng korte, nararapat na magpatawag ng mga sesyon ang korte para sa publikong oral argument hinggil sa nasabing kaso, upang higit na mapagusapan ang iba't ibang perspektiba hinggil dito,' the petitioners said in the letter. (Due to the impact of the court's decision, the court should call for sessions for public oral argument regarding the said case so that the different perspectives on the matter can be further discussed.) 'Umaasa kami na sa pamamagitan ng publikong oral arguments, makakakita ng sapat na liwanag at bagong insights ang korte para baliktarin ang desisyon at bigyaang-daan ang kagyat na pagsasabalikat ng Senado sa konstitusyonal nilang tungkulin na agarang isagawa ang impeachment trial ni Vice President Duterte,' they added. (We are hoping that through public oral arguments, the court will gain new insights to overturn the decision and allow the Senate to immediately carry out its constitutional duty to immediately conduct the impeachment trial of Vice President Duterte.) Concerned citizens file a letter-petition asking the Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling on the impeachment trial of VP Sara Duterte — Joahna Lei Casilao (@joahnacasilao) August 5, 2025 They also expressed support for the motion for reconsideration filed by the House of Representatives last week. The House argued that it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case. In its ruling, the SC declared that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. To recall, three impeachment complaints were filed against Duterte in December 2024, all of which were connected with the alleged misuse of confidential funds. It was the fourth impeachment complaint that was endorsed by over one-third of lawmakers from the House of Representatives and was later transmitted to the Senate as the Articles of Impeachment. 'Pagpapahirap' In their letter, the petitioners argued that the House has the sole authority to begin all cases of impeachment. They also argued that the SC's ruling imposed additional requirements on the process that are not under the Constitution. 'Bunsod ng dagdag kahingian na wala sa Saligang Batas ay magiging mas mahirap at mas mabagal na ang takbo ng anumang impeachment complaint,' the letter read. (Due to the added requirements not found in the Constitution, the progress of any impeachment complaint will become more difficult and slower.) 'Ang ganitong pagpapahirap sa proseso ng impeachment ay maaring maituring na isang kaso ng conflict of interest dahil ang mga justice ng Katas-taasang Hukuman ay impeachable na mga opisyal din,' it added. (This kind of making the impeachment process more difficult can be considered a case of conflict of interest because the justices of the Supreme Court are also impeachable officials.) Aside from this, the petitioners argued that the rights of the public should have more weight in the impeachment process. 'Sa proseso at mekanismo ng impeachment sa Pilipinas, laging mas matimbang at dapat katigan ng korte ang karapatan ng sambayanang Pilipino na agad maalis sa pwesto ang impeachable na opisyal kaysa sa anumang teknikalidad,' the letter read. (In the process and mechanism of impeachment in the Philippines, the right of the Filipino people to immediately remove an impeachable official from office should always carry more weight and be upheld by the court than any technicality.) —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
38 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Imee calls for immediate signing of Konektadong Pinoy Bill
Senator Imee Marcos on Tuesday called for the immediate signing of the proposed Konektadong Pinoy Act (KPA), urging the administration to deliver on its commitment of strengthening digital services for all Filipinos. In a press release, Imee cited the remarks of his brother, President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr., in his fourth State of the Nation Address, saying that "the government must fully embrace digitalization to provide better service to the people, through its vital frontline services and its back-end functions." "If the administration is serious about this commitment, there should be no reason to delay the full passage and implementation of the KPA," Imee said. Imee said the funding for the KPA could be included in the 2026 National Expenditure Program (NEP). "We are already a generation behind in digitalization. Delaying the implementation of the KPA further poses a serious threat to our nation's development. We must allocate funding for it without delay," she said. GMA News Online has asked the Presidential Communications Office for comment on the matter, but it has yet to respond as of posting time. Under the proposed measure, new data transmission players are no longer required to secure a legislative franchise or Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN). The measure, however, has faced criticisms from some groups, including the Philippine Chamber of Telecommunications Operators (PCTO), composed of the country's leading telcos, and the Philippine Association of Private Telecommunications Companies (PAPTELCO). The PCTO had called for a review of the ratified version of the measure, citing national security concerns and weakening of regulatory oversight among new entrants in the country's connectivity service sector. The Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT), for its part, defended the bill, saying that it would never allow deregulation at the expense of security or public interest. Further, the DICT assured that the measure would not weaken the role of the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC). Lawmakers have urged the DICT to begin drafting the measure's implementing rules and regulations. Meanwhile, Imee also agreed with Philtrust Bank Chairman Hermogenes Esperon's observation that the President had missed an opportunity in his last SONA to discuss plans for improving the digital economy. "Esperon is right. It was a missed opportunity to lay out concrete strategies for growing the digital economy, which has the potential to increase government revenue and help address the country's annual budget deficit," she said. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Risa, Kiko seek to remove presidential power to adjust rice tariff
Two senators have filed a joint resolution seeking to terminate the delegated authority of the President to modify tariff rates on rice in a bid to bring back its tariff to 'previous levels.' In filing Joint Senate Resolution No. 2, Senators Francis 'Kiko' Pangilinan and Risa Hontiveros asked both the House of Representatives and the Senate to strip the President of such powers, citing the negative impact of imposing lowered tariffs on imported rice. It also aims to revert the tariff rates on imported rice to the previous level of 35% from 15%, following the signing of Executive Order No. 62 in June 2024. '[T]his combination of lower tariffs and precipitous drops in global rice prices constitutes a 'perfect storm' that has severely devastated the Philippine agricultural sector,' the resolution read. While it acknowledged that Section 1608 of Republic Act No. 10863 or the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act (CMTA) of 2016, delegates authority to the President to adjust tariffs, the joint resolution emphasized that 'this is not an absolute power' and that Congress has the authority to withdraw or terminate it. The resolution also directed the appropriate committees of both the Senate and House to hold caucuses to review the current state of the rice industry and propose specific legislation for the welfare of local farmers. Pangilinan, chairman of the Senate committee on agriculture, food, and agrarian reform, urged immediate action on the matter for the sake of local farmers. 'Wag natin patayin nang paunti-unti ang ating mga magsasaka. Ipaglaban naman natin ang karapatan nila na kumita ng sapat at maayos, na mabuhay ng may dangal,' he said in a statement. (Let's not kill our farmers little by little. Let's fight for their right to earn enough and properly, and to live with dignity.) GMA News Online sought a comment from Malacañang and will update this story once it responds. In June, the Department of Agriculture (DA) recommended to the Tariff Commission that any future increase in the rice import duty—from the current 15% back to the previous 35%—be implemented gradually to minimize its effect on both local and global markets. Agriculture chief Francisco Tiu Laurel Jr. had warned that an abrupt 20-percentage-point hike could disrupt the rice market. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
