Starmer heads to Nato summit with 5% spending pledge
Sir Keir Starmer and other leaders of Nato countries will meet in The Hague this week, where they are expected to formally agree the target.
It includes spending 3.5% on 'core defence' and another 1.5% on 'resilience and security'.
It represents a significant jump from the current 2% Nato target, and from the UK Government's aim of spending 2.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence from 2027 and 3% at some point after the next election.
But the figure is in line with the demands of US President Donald Trump, who has called for Nato allies to shoulder more of the burden of European defence.
Ahead of his trip to the Netherlands, Sir Keir said the increased spending target was 'an opportunity to deepen our commitment to Nato and drive greater investment in the nation's wider security and resilience'.
He said: 'We must navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest to deliver security for working people and keep them safe.'
The Government expects to spend 1.5% of GDP on resilience and security by 2027.
The details of what counts towards that target are due to be set out during this week's summit, but it is likely to include spending on energy and border security as well as intelligence agencies.
But increasing core defence spending to 3.5% will not happen until 2035, with at least two elections likely to take place before then.
Nor would Downing Street say how the increase would be paid for, with a spokesman describing the figure as 'a projected target' that allies would review in 2029 when Nato carries out its next capability assessment.
The Royal United Services Institute has estimated that increasing core defence spending to 3.5% by 2035 would cost £40 billion a year more than keeping the figure at 2.5%.
Conservative shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the Tories welcomed the higher Nato target, but said the Government's commitment was 'both unfunded and a decade away, when the threat we face is real and imminent'.
He said: 'The Chancellor failed to set a path to 3% in the spending review, and this is another announcement without a plan.
'Instead of using smoke and mirrors to inflate defence spending, Labour must get to 3% this Parliament and back our country's defence with a fully funded plan.'
The Prime Minister prepared to fly to the Netherlands for the two-day Nato summit against the background of both the war in Ukraine and hostilities in the Middle East.
Late on Monday, Mr Trump claimed he had secured a ceasefire between Iran and Israel after Tehran retaliated against a US strike on its nuclear facilities.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said Sir Keir would continue to press for a diplomatic solution to the Israel-Iran crisis.
He will also urge allies to help secure a 'just and lasting peace' in Ukraine by showing strength and providing Kyiv with 'the support it needs to defend itself against continued Russian aggression'.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is also expected to attend the summit, but not take part in the main discussions of the North Atlantic Council.
Ahead of the summit, Nato secretary general Mark Rutte described the move to spend more on defence as a 'quantum leap' that would make the organisation 'a stronger, a fairer and a more lethal alliance'.
But it was reported on Sunday that Spain had reached a deal that would see it exempted from the 5% target.
Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said that Spain would be able to keep its commitments to the 32-nation military alliance by spending 2.1% of GDP on defence needs.
Tuesday will also see the publication of the UK's national security strategy, which is expected to call for the whole of society to become more resilient and recognise national security 'means more than it used to'.
The document will tie together a series of reviews commissioned by the Government, including the recent strategic defence review, a review of the Aukus alliance with the US and Australia and an audit of relations with China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
14 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: Trump claims a 'total ceasefire' has been agreed - but new missiles launched
Explosions have been heard in Tel Aviv overnight - plunging the US president's claims of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran into doubt. Iran's foreign minister has thanked "our brave Armed Forces who remain ready to defend our dear country until their last drop of blood".
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS NSW plunges $178BILLION into the red in latest budget - as it reveals its latest spending spree
Charting a path back to surplus, the treasurer compiling Australia's largest state budget has advised caution amid global uncertainty as he trumpets stability. NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey unveiled the $128billion 2025/26 state budget on Tuesday focused on housing, essential workers and protecting vulnerable communities. 'Investment in our essential services is up, debt is down, and NSW is back on the path toward surplus,' Mr Mookhey told reporters in the budget lock-up. 'This budget has been put together carefully, deliberately, at a time of great global uncertainty, and sends a big message that NSW is stable and NSW is open for business.' Finance Minister Courtney Houssos said the budget is about reform and accelerating growth. 'Our focus over three budgets has been on controlling what we can in the context of the budget. 'That has resulted in very low expenses growth ... at the same time as we are delivering these important reforms,' she said. Remaining below target to build 377,000 new homes by 2029 as part of a national housing agreement, the state will make an unprecedented intervention in the housing market. A $1billion revolving fund will provide pre-sale guarantees as developers seek financing to begin construction. The funds will go towards low-to-mid-rise developments, some of the most challenging projects to deliver under current market conditions and the kind of homes the state needs to tackle housing affordability constraints, Mr Mookhey said. The government will guarantee 5000 homes in the hope of supporting the construction of 15,000 more. It is a step to broaden its response to the housing crisis, moving into the mainstream market after previous budgets focused on supporting priced-out frontline essential workers and building more social housing. 'We are very careful about what projects we are going to guarantee,' Mr Mookhey told reporters. But it is not the 'plan B' promised following the failure of a plan to build 25,000 homes at Rosehill Racecourse. A record $1.2 billion child protection package will meanwhile increase support and protection for young people in the state's care. Allowances for foster carers will increase for the first time in decades. Almost $50 million will go to building or upgrading residential care homes for children with complex needs, and $191.5 million will support caseworker recruitment and retention. Mr Mookhey said the package was funded 'from the savings created by no longer having to pay labour hire firms to care for kids in motels'. A deficit of $3.4billion is forecast for the 2025/26 financial year, falling to $1.1billion in 2026/27. Modest surpluses of $1.1billion are projected in the following two years. Mr Mookhey acknowledged 'a lot needs to go right' in order to return to surplus but the state's finances were improving. Net debt is $120billion while gross debt, hitting $178.8 billion by next June, remains proportionally lower than other states outside resource-rich Western Australia. But the budget papers note increasing uncertainty from unpredictable global policy including US President Donald Trump's tariff regime. Other drags on the budget include workers compensation, which the government has been unable to reform before premiums increase on July 1, and natural disasters. Disaster relief spending has leapt tenfold since the 2019/20 Black Summer Bushfires, when compared to the six years prior, now costing $1.6 billion annually. WINNERS: * Indigenous Australians - The Minns Labor Government will allocate $246.8 million over the next 4 years through an additional $202.4 million in the 2025-26 Budget to Close the Gap to improve the lives of Aboriginal people in NSW * Workers - real wages forecast to grow 0.6 per cent a year after declining 0.1 per cent a year since 2020 * Foster carers - an immediate 20 per cent boost in allowances * Property developers - Australian-first pre-sale guarantee supporting $1 billion of projects plus $83.4m to speed up planning approvals * Apprentices - $40.2 million for up to 90,000 fee-free apprenticeships * School students - $10 billion more for public education over next decade, $9 billion for school infrastructure over four years * Justice - $856 million to better support victims, prosecute child abuse claims faster and boost domestic violence services LOSERS: * Sydney drivers - no extension of $60 weekly toll 'cap' while revenue from government-owned toll roads nearly doubles over four years once the Western Harbour Tunnel opens. * Feral animals - $9.3 million for pig and deer culling program that has killed 230,000 animals over two years * Service NSW - the shopfront for government services faces a $70.8 million budget cut including to capital works * Dodgy officials - corruption and police watchdogs' budgets boosted by nearly 20 per cent
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Apocalyptic Iranian 'messiah' theory 'proves the country CANNOT be allowed nuclear weapons': PETER VAN ONSELEN on the deranged belief system of Iran's ayatollahs
It is concerning when any country has nuclear weapons - but it's a threat the world has learned to manage. There's a basic assumption that most nuclear-armed countries refrain from using atomic bombs out of self-preservation. That is, if they fired nuclear warheads, their country would be destroyed. Defence experts call this 'Mutually Assured Destruction'. But what if a state doesn't fear destruction? What if it welcomes it, viewing it as a gateway to divine salvation? That's long been the concern with Iran. And it's not an exaggerated risk. Iran's nuclear ambitions don't exist in a vacuum. They sit within a broader ideological framework that includes what's known as millenarianism: the belief that the world is heading for a final, transformative clash between good and evil. Years ago, as a university academic, I supervised an honours student whose thesis examined millenarianism. It opened my eyes to its impact on politics in the Middle East. In Shia Islam, millenarianism is tied to the return of the Mahdi, or the Hidden Imam. He is a messianic figure who will emerge in an era of chaos to establish a just Islamic order. This isn't just background noise, by the way. Former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad openly embraced this worldview. During his presidency, he not only referred to the Mahdi in speeches, including at the United Nations no less, but his government poured funds into religious preparations for the Mahdi's return. Ahmadinejad believed the apocalypse wasn't to be avoided but welcomed - even hastened. Road upgrades to Jamkaran, home of the mosque linked to the Mahdi's reappearance, were budgeted as national infrastructure. The line between religion and state planning was deliberately blurred. While not every Iranian leader is a millenarian, enough are, and the political system gives them real influence. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which would almost certainly be in control of any Iranian nuclear arsenal were that to eventuate, has leaders who parrot similarly apocalyptic language. General Hossein Salami, the head of the IRGC - before he was recently killed by Israeli strikes - had repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map. He described Israel as a 'cancerous tumour' that must be 'destroyed'. There's not a lot of room to move with such rhetoric. It can't be treated as a metaphorical flourish. It is a statement of intent, rooted in a belief that conflict with Israel is religiously sacred. This is why Israel acts the way it does - from targeted assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists to cyber sabotage and the recent airstrikes in Iran. The moves by the US and Israel this past fortnight aren't just about national defence. They're about preventing the unimaginable: a nuclear-armed state run by people who don't fear a true Armageddon. The US under Trump hit three separate nuclear-linked sites, facilities buried deep underground, because no other country has the capability to strike those types of bunkers effectively. The message was clear: diplomacy has its limits when dealing with a state like Iran, which in many ways is a much more dangerous actor than somewhere like North Korea precisely because of its millenarian tendencies. While Iran has always claimed its nuclear program is civilian, about energy not weapons, that claim doesn't pass the sniff test. Places like Fordow, the nuclear fortress buried under mountains, were deliberately shielded from airstrikes precisely because it's not an energy enrichment site. It's designed for survivability in the event of war, which only makes sense if the goal is to build a weapon, not a civilian reactor. The US has now apparently taken care of that. Iran getting the bomb poses other risks. If it was armed with nuclear weapons, we would see nuclear proliferation across the Middle East. If Iran got the bomb, Saudi Arabia would want one (it has said as much), and potentially, so would Turkey. Egypt might seek to build one too. Some in the West forget, or wilfully ignore, that Iran is not the underdog in the Middle East. It is the regional bully. Far from being a besieged victim of aggression Iran is the primary source of destabilisation right across the region. As a Shia theocracy in a predominantly Sunni region Iran's rise is deeply feared by Sunni Arab states. Its nuclear ambitions are seen as part of its ideological mission to reshape the Middle East in its image. It's a revolutionary regime, where parts of the leadership believe global chaos isn't to be avoided, it's to be embraced, because it brings the end times closer. If that doesn't justify aggressive containment measures, what does?
