
GM Q2 profit falls 35%: Tariff hit reaches $1.1 billion, automaker retains full-year forecast lowered in May
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
For the quarter ended June 30, GM posted a net profit of $1.89 billion, or $1.91 per share, compared to $2.93 billion, or $2.55 per share, in the same period last year. Stripping out certain items, adjusted earnings stood at $2.53 per share, comfortably beating analyst estimates of $2.34, according to FactSet.
Revenue also slipped marginally to $47.12 billion from $47.97 billion, but still came in higher than Wall Street's forecast of $45.84 billion.
GM shares were down over 3% in premarket trade on Tuesday, AP reported.
CEO Mary Barra, in a letter to shareholders, acknowledged the company's tariff challenges, noting a $1.1 billion net impact from tariffs in the second quarter. She warned that the third quarter could see a higher impact, citing indirect costs related to trade policy. GM expects total gross tariff exposure of $4 billion to $5 billion in 2025.
'Today's announcement underpins our belief in America's innovation in biopharmaceuticals,' Barra wrote, adding, 'We are positioning the business for a profitable, long-term future as we adapt to new trade and tax policies, and a rapidly evolving tech landscape.'
To mitigate the pressure, GM said it is making progress in offsetting at least 30% of its gross tariff exposure through targeted cost initiatives, manufacturing adjustments, and strategic pricing. The automaker had previously announced a $4 billion investment to shift production from Mexico to US plants—its largest domestic manufacturing commitment in recent years.
Barra said the move was aimed at 'greatly reducing our tariff exposure,' and that the company continues to leverage its domestic battery investments and flexible manufacturing footprint to maintain profitability.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
GM also reported electric vehicle (EV) sales of 46,300 units in Q2, up from 31,900 in Q1, even as overall EV market growth in the US shows signs of slowing. The $7,500 EV tax credit under the Inflation Reduction Act is set to expire for many models in September.
'Despite slower EV industry growth, we believe the long-term future is profitable electric vehicle production, and this continues to be our north star,' Barra said, reaffirming GM's EV strategy.
GM maintained its full-year earnings forecast of adjusted EBIT between $10 billion and $12.5 billion, a guidance range lowered in May in anticipation of steep tariff impacts.
The broader auto sector has been under strain due to President Donald Trump's trade policies, which initially imposed 25% tariffs on auto imports. While Trump relaxed some of these duties in April, his administration has ordered a review into further levies on foreign-made vehicles and parts.
According to the Center for Automotive Research, a uniform 25% tariff across all trading partners could cost the US auto industry an additional $107.7 billion, with Detroit's Big Three automakers—GM, Ford and Stellantis—bearing $41.9 billion of that burden.
The report came a day after Stellantis said it expects to post a €2.3 billion ($2.68 billion) net loss in H1 due to tariffs and other charges. Stellantis is scheduled to release its formal results on July 29.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Don't give China a pass': Nikki Haley backs India amid Trump tariff threat
Former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley has urged US President Donald Trump to not "burn a relationship" with a strong ally like India. Backing New Delhi, the Republican leader, who served as Trump's UN envoy during his first administration, alleged that the US president has given China "a pass" despite its close ties with Russia. Nikki Haley, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, has called on Trump to reconsider his warnings to India(AP) "India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India," she wrote on X. Haley's statement for India comes after Donald Trump said he would issue a fresh tariff rate for India in the next 24 hours due to its purchase of Russian oil. On Monday, the US president took to Truth Social and stated that he will "substantially increase" the tariffs against India due to its purchase of Russian oil amid the ongoing war in Ukraine. Also Read | 'India fuelling war machine': Trump 'may substantially raise' tariff in 24 hours "They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," said Trump. Following this statement, India accused the US and European Union for its 'unjustified and unreasonable" targeting of New Delhi. In a strong response, the Indian government flagged the US and EU's history of trade ties with Russia. Furthermore, Russia also came to India's defence on Tuesday and said any statements against Russian trading partners will be perceived as "threats". "We hear many statements that are in fact threats, attempts to force countries to cut trade relations with Russia. We do not consider such statements to be legal," Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters.

The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Cadillac will add value as 11th F1 team, says McLaren's Zak Brown
Cadillac's arrival in Formula One next year as an 11th team will bring added financial value with new partners and more fan engagement rather than diluting resources, according to McLaren's American chief executive Zak Brown. The General Motors-backed team have taken staff already from rival outfits, their European headquarters at Silverstone being close to other factories, and are also competing for sponsorship. Brown, whose team are dominating this year's championship after winning the 2024 constructors' title, saw no reason to fear a dilution of resources, however. 'I think on employees they are definitely going to take a lot more than they give, which is fine,' he said at last weekend's Hungarian Grand Prix. 'My general view is if someone wants to go work for a rival team then shame on me. ALSO READ | McLaren boss says Formula 1 is healthier without Horner 'For sponsors, I think they'll bring more new to the table than take.' Brown expected Cadillac also to bring more competition eventually, although it faced a tough challenge as newcomers, and more fans to a series that now has three U.S. rounds and a growing audience in America. 'Will we get a better U.S. TV deal, more American presence? I think their sponsors and Cadillac will spend money in the sport, the teams get a percentage of that so I see them as a value add to the sport,' he added. 'I'm not worried about maybe some of the short term-ness of they are going to take an employee here or there or poach a sponsor here or there. I think the contribution will be bigger than that.' Cadillac secured approval of their bid in March, after a 764-day entry process and initial opposition from Formula One and the other 10 teams wary of a potential reduction in the share of revenues. The team are also backed by TWG Global, whose CEO Mark Walter has an estimated net worth of $12.5 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
India-US ties in the crosswires
India's blunt response to US President Donald Trump's repeated outbursts on New Delhi's trade and defence relations with Moscow highlighted the double standards of Western powers that have criticised India for purchasing discounted Russian commodities over the past three years. Trump, who follows a completely transactional and unpredictable approach to global trade and key geo-strategic relationships, has spoken more than once in recent days about levying an unspecified penalty on India for its purchases of energy and military hardware from Russia, over and above the 25% tariff that he has already imposed on exports to the US. India-US ties have evolved from the Cold War days, to achieve a relatively balanced relationship based on mutual respect, democratic values, and strategic interests. (AP) The external affairs ministry's response to Trump's latest fusillade against India has two key takeaways: One, New Delhi reserves the right to choose its trade partners and will exercise strategic autonomy to meet its security needs; and two, the West must end its hypocrisy of offering one set of principles for the rest of the world and following another set to meet its own energy imperatives. A year ago, US officials, albeit under a different administration, had assured the Indian side that Russian crude refined in a third country, such as India, is not a 'product of Russia' from a sanctions perspective. For India, Russian energy is a necessity to ensure predictable and affordable costs for Indian consumers amid volatile market conditions. At the same time, members of the EU and the US have retained their energy and other trade ties with Russia under carve-outs from sanctions packages. The EU's latest sanctions, for example, provide exemptions for Canada, Norway, Switzerland, the UK and the US from an import ban on refined products made from Russian oil. Such double standards do not sit well with Trump's sharp remarks about India. Sure, Trump's posturing may be aimed at pressuring India to conclude a trade deal that is to the advantage of the US, but this is no way to treat an important partner. While Washington has taken the moral high ground on Ukraine (one reason Trump has cited for targeting India), it appears unconcerned about Israel's war in Gaza that has claimed more than 60,000 Palestinian lives. Washington will be mistaken to take India for granted at a time when Trump is dining with the Pakistan army chief in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack. Such moves may even push New Delhi closer to Moscow, a longstanding and reliable ally. India-US ties have evolved from the Cold War days, when New Delhi was allied to Moscow and Washington patronised Islamabad, to achieve a relatively balanced relationship based on mutual respect, democratic values, and strategic interests. Trump's short-sighted and transactional approach to diplomacy threatens to disrupt that journey.